Author

admin

Browsing

 

(TheNewswire)

 

     
  Element79 Gold Corp. 
             

 

Vancouver, BC TheNewswire – August 1, 2025 Element79 Gold Corp. (CSE: ELEM,OTC:ELMGF) (OTC: ELMGF) (FSE: 7YS0) (‘Element79 Gold’, the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that it has executed a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement (the ‘Agreement’) dated July 31, 2025, with Donald James McDowell (the ‘Vendor’) for the acquisition of a 100% interest in the Gold Mountain Project located in Lander County, Nevada.

 

  The Gold Mountain Project consists of 34 unpatented mining claims covering highly prospective ground in the heart of Nevada’s Battle Mountain trend. Under the terms of the Agreement, Element79 Gold, through its wholly owned subsidiary ELEM Battle Mountain LLC, has agreed to acquire all rights, title, and interest in the Gold Mountain assets in exchange for the issuance of 100,000,000 common shares of the Company at a deemed price of C$0.02 per share, as well as a cash payment of US$137,485.85 payable following the closing of the Company’s next equity financing.  

 

  As part of the transaction, the Vendor will retain a 3% Net Smelter Return (NSR) royalty on all future mineral production from the project.   This arm’s length transaction is not considered a fundamental change for the Company.  No finder’s fees will be paid in conjunction with the transaction. The Company Will ensere that all required regulatory Filings are made in regards to this transaction.  

 

  Full details of the acquisition are available in the Asset Purchase Agreement filed on SEDAR+.  

 

  James Tworek, CEO of Element79 Gold, commented   :  

 

  ‘This acquisition marks a significant step in advancing our strategic focus in Nevada. The Gold Mountain Project provides a drill-ready opportunity with strong geological fundamentals in one of the most prolific gold regions in the world. Our technical team is preparing an exploration program for later this year to begin unlocking the value of this asset.’  

 

  About Element79 Gold Corp  

 

  Element79 Gold Corp is a mining company focused on gold and silver exploration, with a portfolio of assets in Nevada and Peru. The Company is actively advancing its Elephant project in the Battle Mountain trend of Nevada, as well as the drill-ready Gold Mountain project in Battle Mountain, Nevada. The Company also holds an option to purchase the high-grade Lucero mine in southern Peru.   Element79 Gold has completed the transfer of its Dale Property in Ontario to its wholly owned subsidiary, Synergy Metals Corp., and is progressing through the Plan of Arrangement spin-out process.   Element79 Gold is listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE: ELEM,OTC:ELMGF), the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (FSE: 7YS0), and the OTC Markets (OTC: ELMGF).  

 

  Investor Relations Contact:  

 

  Investor Relations Department  

 

  Email:     investors@element79.gold     
Phone: +1.604.319.6953
 

 

  Corporate Contact:  

 

  James C. Tworek, Chief Executive Officer and Director  

 

  Email:     jt@element79.gold    

 

  Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements  

 

  This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words ‘anticipate,’ ‘plan,’ ‘continue,’ ‘expect,’ ‘estimate,’ ‘objective,’ ‘may,’ ‘will,’ ‘project,’ ‘should,’ ‘predict,’ ‘potential’ and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this press release contains forward-looking statements concerning the Company’s exploration plans, development plans and the Force Majeure Event. Although the Company believes that the expectations and   assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on these statements because the Company cannot provide assurance that they will prove correct. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include conditions in the duration of the Force Majeure Event, and receipt of regulatory and shareholder approvals. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and, except as required by law, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements.  

 

  Neither the Canadian Securities Exchange nor the Market Regulator (as that term is defined in the policies of the Canadian Securities Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.  

 

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

 

 

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

 

Silver47 Exploration Corp. (TSXV: AGA,OTC:AAGAF) (OTCQB: AAGAF) (‘Silver47’) and Summa Silver Corp. (TSXV: SSVR) (OTCQX: SSVRF) (‘Summa’) (together, the ‘Companies’) are pleased to announce the completion of their previously announced at-market merger (the ‘Transaction’) by way of a court-approved plan of arrangement (the ‘Arrangement’). The combined company (the ‘Combined Company’) will continue under the name ‘Silver47 Exploration Corp.’.

 

Gary R. Thompson, Executive Chairman of Silver47, stated: ‘We are excited to have reached this transformative milestone which begins our rapid growth phase to become a large high-grade USA-focused silver company. I’m looking forward to unlocking the value of these assets.’

 

Galen McNamara, Chief Executive Officer of Silver47, stated: ‘Silver47 now emerges as a premier United States-focused high-grade silver explorer and developer. Uniting projects in Alaska, Nevada, and New Mexico cumulatively hosting well over 200 million silver equivalent ounces with clear upside potential, we’re poised to benefit from a renewed interest in United States mineral development at a time when the importance of domestic production has returned to the national spotlight. With a talented team, strong cash position, and support from our shareholders, we plan to aggressively drive exploration, growth, and development. This combination enhances our scale and visibility in an emerging silver and critical metals market, positioning us to advance our vision and deliver ongoing value to shareholders.’

 

Following the Transaction, the Combined Company is a premier high-grade silver focused explorer and developer with a portfolio of silver-rich mineral resource staged projects in the United States (Alaska, Nevada and New Mexico). Collectively, the Companies’ mineral resources equal approximately 10 Moz AgEq at 333 g/t AgEq of indicated mineral resources and 236 Moz AgEq at 334 g/t AgEq inferred mineral resources (see mineral resource table below for full details) with substantial upside and a shared vision for significant additional silver discovery and consolidation.

 

Under the terms of the Transaction, Summa shareholders received 0.452 common shares of Silver47 (each whole share, a ‘Silver47 Share‘) in exchange for each Summa common share (each a ‘Summa Share) held (the ‘Exchange Ratio‘).

 

As a result of the Transaction, Summa has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Silver47 and the Summa Shares are anticipated to be delisted from the TSX Venture Exchange at market close on or about August 5, 2025. Following the delisting, Summa intends to apply to cease to be a reporting issuer under applicable Canadian securities laws.

 

Strategic Rationale for Transaction

 

  •  Creation of a Leading High-Grade US-Focused Silver Explorer and Developer: The combination of Silver47’s Red Mountain project in Alaska with Summa’s Hughes project in Nevada and Mogollon project in New Mexico establishes a premier portfolio of high-grade silver-focused assets in the United States enhancing the Combined Company’s scale, leverage to silver and appeal to investors.
  •  Expanded Resource Base for Accelerated Growth: The Transaction consolidates significant mineral resources of approximately 10 Moz AgEq at 333 g/t AgEq of indicated mineral resources and 236 Moz AgEq at 334 g/t AgEq inferred mineral resources (see mineral resource table below for full details) with significant growth potential between the three United States-based projects positioning the combined company to accelerate exploration and development towards production.
  •  Significant Re-Rate Potential Based on Valuation of Peers: The Combined Company is currently undervalued on an EV/oz metric of US$0.33/oz AgEq for their pro forma current total MI&I resource endowment. The Combined Company has significant growth potential through re-rating relative to peers, through systematic exploration, resource growth, and strategic acquisitions.
  •  Enhanced Capital Markets Profile and Liquidity: By consolidating projects and increasing market capitalization, the Combined Company can be expected to benefit from improved visibility and access to capital, appealing to institutional investors seeking exposure to high grade U.S.-based silver projects, supported by a tight share structure with strong backing from investors including Eric Sprott.
  •  Continued Growth and Value Creation: The Combined Company will pursue organic and acquisitive growth to consolidate and create a high-quality silver portfolio in the U.S. The Combined Company will plan to (i) advance the current portfolio, creating strong silver development projects by expanding on resources and grade; and (ii) continue to consolidate the silver market, acquiring high-quality silver projects in tier 1 jurisdictions at accretive valuations.
  •  Exceptional Technical & Capital Markets Team, and Commitment to Shareholder Value Creation: The board of directors and management team of the Combined Company includes members with deep experience in the capital markets as well as proven mine finding and mine development histories.

Benefits to Silver47 and Summa Shareholders

 

  • Shareholders of the Combined Company will have exposure to a diversified portfolio of high-grade United States silver projects, reducing risk while positioning for upside in a rising silver market.
  • The Combined Company’s enhanced scale will strengthen its ability to attract strategic partnerships, unlocking capital for exploration and development to drive share price appreciation.
  • Shareholders of the Combined Company will benefit from a unified management team with complementary expertise, optimizing project execution at Red Mountain, Hughes, and Mogollon for efficient resource growth and development.
  • The Transaction’s all-share structure aligns long-term shareholder interests, ensuring shared commitment to advancing projects and pursuing value-accretive opportunities.
  • An expected increase in market exposure from high-profile United States assets should enhance the Combined Company’s appeal to global investors, supporting potential inclusion in silver-focused indices and ETFs.
  • Shareholders of the Combined Company are expected to benefit from reduced G&A, cost savings, and prioritized work programs and asset catalysts to drive a potential re-rating for the Combined Company.

Combined Silver Mineral Resource Summary

 

                                                                                                                                            
Classification Company Project Tonnes Ag Au Zn Pb Cu AgEq Ag Au Zn Pb Cu AgEq
(Mt) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) (Moz) (koz) (kt) (kt) (kt) (Moz)
Inferred Silver47 Red Mountain 15.6 71 0.4 3.4 1.4 0.2 336 36.0 214 532 216 26 168.6
Indicated Summa Hughes 1.0 188 1.6 333 5.8 49 10.3
Inferred Summa Hughes (In Situ) 2.4 204 2.4 421 15.9 188 32.9
Inferred Summa Hughes (Tailings) 1.3 44 0.3 68 1.8 11 2.7
Inferred Summa Mogollon 2.7 139 2.7 367 12.1 238 32.1
Total Indicated Mineral Resources 1.0 188 1.6 333 5.8 49 10.3
Total Inferred Mineral Resources 22.0 92 0.9 2.4 1.0 0.1 334 65.8 651 532 216 26 236.3

 

 

 

Notes to Silver47 Mineral Resources:

 

1. The 2024 Red Mountain mineral resource estimate (‘MRE‘) was estimated and classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (‘CIM’) ‘Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines’ dated November 29, 2019, and the CIM ‘Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves’ dated May 10, 2014.
2. Mr. Warren Black, M.Sc., P.Geo. of APEX Geoscience Ltd., a ‘qualified person’ (‘QP‘) as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (‘NI 43-101‘), is responsible for completing the MRE, effective January 12, 2024.
3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have no demonstrated economic viability. No mineral reserves have been calculated for Red Mountain. There is no guarantee that any part of the mineral resources discussed herein will be converted to a mineral reserve in the future.
4. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, market, or other relevant factors.
5. The quantity and grade of reported inferred mineral resources is uncertain, and there has not been sufficient work to define the inferred mineral resource as an indicated or measured mineral resource.
6. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Reported grades are undiluted.
7. A standard density of 2.94 g/cm³ is assumed for mineralized material and waste rock. Overburden density is set at 1.8 g/cm³. For mineralized material blocks with iron assays close enough to estimate an iron value for the block, density is calculated using the formula: density (g/cm³) = 0.0553 * Fe (%) + 2.5426.
8. Metal prices are US$2,750/tonne Zn, US$2,100/tonne Pb, US$8,880/tonne Cu, US$1,850/oz Au, and US$23/oz Ag.
9. Recoveries are 90% Zn, 75% Pb, 70% Cu, 70% Ag, and 80% Au.
10. ZnEQ (%) = [Zn (%) x 1] + [Pb (%) x 0.6364] + [Cu (%) x 2.4889] + [Ag (ppm) x 0.0209] + [Au (ppm) x 1.923]
11. AgEQ (ppm) = [Zn (%) x 47.81] + [Pb (%) x 30.43] + [Cu (%) x 119] + [Ag (ppm) x 1] + [Au (ppm) x 91.93]
12. Open-pit resource economic assumptions are US$3/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material, US$19/tonne for processing, and 48° pit slopes.
13. Underground resource economic assumptions are US$50/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material and US$19/tonne for processing.
14. Open-pit resources comprise blocks constrained by the pit shell resulting from the pseudoflow optimization using the open-pit economic assumptions.
15. Underground resources comprise blocks below the open-pit shell that form minable shapes. They must be contained in domains of a minimum width of 1.5 m at Dry Creek or 3 m height at West Tundra Flats. Resources not meeting these size criteria are included if, once diluted to the required size, maintain a grade above the cutoff.

 

Notes to Summa Mineral Resources:

 

1. Silver Equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grade for the Hughes Project in situ Mineral Resources is based on a silver price of $25/oz, recovery of 90% Ag, and cost assumptions including: USD$88.2/t average mining cost for approximately 70% longhole stoping and 30% cut and fill mining, USD$36.3/t processing cost, USD$9.7/t G&A cost, USD$0.20/oz Ag refining cost for a total mining, processing and G&A cost of USD$134.2/tonne. A 3% royalty has also been applied to the cut-off grade determination.
2. Silver Equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grade for the Hughes Project tailings Mineral Resources is contained within an optimized pit and based on a silver price of $25/oz, recovery of 90% Ag, and cost assumptions including: USD$2.25/t mining cost, USD$21.0/t processing cost, USD$9/t G&A cost, USD$0.50/oz Ag refining cost for a total mining, processing and G&A cost of USD$33.34/tonne. A 3% royalty has also been applied to the cut-off grade determination.
3. Silver Equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grade for the Mogollon Project Mineral Resources is based on a silver price of $25/oz, recovery of 97% Ag, and cost assumptions including: USD$83/t mining cost for longhole stoping, USD$36.3/t processing cost, USD$9.7/t G&A cost, USD$0.20/oz Ag refining cost for a total mining, processing and G&A cost of USD$129/tonne A 3% royalty has also been applied to the cut-off grade determination.
4. AgEq is based on silver and gold prices of $25/oz and $2100/oz respectively, and recoveries for silver and gold of 90% and 97%, respectively for the Hughes Project, and 97% and 97%, respectively, for the Mogollon Project. AgEq Factor= (Ag Price / Au Price) x (Ag Rec / Au Rec); g AgEq/t = g Ag/t + (g Au/t / AgEq Factor).
5. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent discrepancies between tonnes, grade, and contained metal content.
6. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources estimated will be converted into mineral reserves. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred mineral resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred mineral resources as Indicated mineral resources. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to the Indicated mineral resources category.
7. The Mineral Resources were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019) prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council.
8. There are no known environmental, permitting, legal, or other factors which could materially affect the MREs.

 

Management Team and Board of Directors

 

Silver47 will be led by Gary R. Thompson as Executive Chairman, Galen McNamara as Chief Executive Officer and Martin Bajic as Chief Financial Officer. Galen McNamara and Thomas O’Neill have been appointed to Silver47’s board of directors, joining Gary R. Thompson and Ryan Goodman.

 

Subscription Receipt Financing

 

Prior to the completion of the Transaction, the 27,600,000 Subscription Receipts issued by Summa pursuant to its previously announced subscription receipt financing (the ‘Subscription Receipt Financing‘) automatically converted into units of Summa, which units have been exchanged, adjusted, or converted into securities of Silver47 at the Exchange Ratio, resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 12,475,400 Silver47 Shares, and warrants entitling the holders to acquire an additional 6,237,600 Silver47 Shares at an exercise price of $0.796 per Silver47 Share.

 

The Subscription Receipt Financing was led by Research Capital Corporation, as co-lead agent and sole bookrunner, and together with Haywood Securities Inc., as co-lead agent, on behalf of a syndicate of agents, including Eventus Capital Corp.

 

Additional Issuances

 

Upon the closing of the Transaction, Haywood Securities Inc. and Eventus Capital Corp. were each issued 723,325 units of Silver47 (the ‘Advisory Units‘) in consideration of financial advisory services provided to Silver47 and Summa, respectively, in connection with the Transaction. The Advisory Units were issued at a deemed price of $0.553 per unit.

 

Each Advisory Unit is comprised of one Silver47 Share and one-half of one Silver47 share purchase warrant with each whole warrant exercisable to acquire one Silver47 Share at an exercise price of $0.796 for a period of 24 months from issuance.

 

Information for Registered Summa Shareholders

 

In order to receive Silver47 Shares in exchange for Summa Shares, registered shareholders of Summa must complete, sign, date and return the letter of transmittal that was mailed to each Summa shareholder prior to closing. The letter of transmittal is also available under Summa’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. For those shareholders of Summa whose Summa Shares are registered in the name of a broker, investment dealer, bank, trust company, trust or other intermediary or nominee, they should contact such nominee for assistance in depositing their Summa Shares and should follow the instructions of such intermediary or nominee.

 

Convertible Securities

 

Summa Options

 

Pursuant to the Arrangement, each Summa option (a ‘Summa Option‘), whether vested or unvested, has been transferred to Silver47, with the holder thereof receiving as consideration an option to purchase from Silver47 such number of Silver47 Shares equal to the Exchange Ratio multiplied by the number of Summa Shares subject to the Summa Option, at an exercise price per Silver47 Share equal to the current Summa Option exercise price divided by the Exchange Ratio, exercisable until the original expiry date of such Summa Option and otherwise governed by the terms of the Summa stock option plan.

 

Summa Warrants

 

Pursuant to the Arrangement, each Summa warrant to purchase common shares (a ‘Summa Warrant‘) will, upon the exercise of such rights, entitle the holder thereof to be issued and receive for the same aggregate consideration, upon such exercise, in lieu of the number of Summa Shares to which such holder was theretofore entitled upon exercise of such Summa Warrants, the kind and aggregate number of Silver47 Shares that such holder would have been entitled to be issued and receive if, immediately prior to the effective time of the Arrangement, such holder had been the registered holder of the number of Summa Shares to which such holder was theretofore entitled upon exercise of such Summa Warrants. All other terms governing the warrants, including, but not limited to, the expiry date, exercise price and the conditions to and the manner of exercise, will be the same as the terms that were in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the Arrangement, and shall be governed by the terms of the applicable warrant instruments.

 

Further information about the Transaction is set forth in the materials prepared by Summa in respect of the special meeting of the shareholders of Summa which were mailed to Summa shareholders and filed under Summa’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

 

Early Warning Disclosure

 

Prior to the Transaction, Silver47 held nil Summa Shares. Following the completion of the Transaction, Silver47 holds all of the issued and outstanding Summa Shares. An early warning report will be filed by Silver47 under Summa’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca in accordance with applicable securities laws. To obtain a copy of the early warning report, please contact Martin Bajic at mbajic@silver47.ca.

 

Advisors and Counsel

 

Haywood Securities Inc. acted as exclusive financial advisor to Silver47. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP acted as Canadian legal advisor to Silver47.

 

Eventus Capital Corp. acted as exclusive financial advisor to Summa. Forooghian + Company Law Corporation acted as Canadian legal advisor to Summa.

 

Technical Disclosure and Qualified Persons

 

The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Galen McNamara, P. Geo., Chief Executive Officer of Silver47, a QP as defined by NI 43-101.

 

About Silver47

 

Silver47 Exploration Corp. is a Canadian-based exploration company that wholly-owns six silver and critical metals (polymetallic) exploration projects in Canada and the US. These projects include the Red Mountain Project in southcentral Alaska, a silver-gold-zinc-copper-lead-antimony-gallium VMS-SEDEX project. The Red Mountain Project hosts an inferred mineral resource estimate of 15.6 million tonnes at 7% ZnEq or 335.7 g/t AgEq, totaling 168.6 million ounces of silver equivalent, as reported in the NI 43-101 Technical Report dated January 12, 2024. Silver47 also owns a 100% interest in the Hughes Project located in central Nevada and the Mogollon Project located in southwestern New Mexico. The high-grade past-producing Belmont Mine, one of the most prolific silver producers in the United States between 1903 and 1929, is located on the Hughes Project. The Mogollon Project is the largest historic silver producer in New Mexico. Both projects have remained inactive since commercial production ceased and neither have seen modern exploration prior to Summa’s involvement.

 

 

Silver47 Contact Information
Gary R. Thompson
Executive Chairman
gthompson@silver47.ca

 

Galen McNamara
Chief Executive Officer
gmcnamara@silver47.ca

 

Silver47 Investor Relations Contact:
Giordy Belfiore
gbelfiore@silver47.ca

 

 

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

 

Forward looking and other cautionary statements

 

Certain information set forth in this news release contains ‘forward‐looking statements’ and ‘forward‐looking information’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and applicable United States securities laws (referred to herein as forward‐looking statements). Except for statements of historical fact, certain information contained herein constitutes forward‐looking statements which includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to: the potential benefits to be derived from the Transaction; the future financial or operating performance of Silver47 and Silver47’s mineral properties and project portfolios; Silver47’s intended use of the net proceeds from the sale of Subscription Receipts; the results from work performed to date; the estimation of mineral resources and reserves; the realization of mineral resource and reserve estimates; the development, operational and economic results of technical reports on mineral properties referenced herein; magnitude or quality of mineral deposits; the anticipated advancement of Silver47’s mineral properties and project portfolios; exploration expenditures, costs and timing of the development of new deposits; underground exploration potential; costs and timing of future exploration; the completion and timing of future development studies; estimates of metallurgical recovery rates; exploration prospects of mineral properties; requirements for additional capital; the future price of metals; government regulation of mining operations; environmental risks; the timing and possible outcome of pending regulatory matters; the realization of the expected economics of mineral properties; future growth potential of mineral properties; and future development plans.

 

Forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of words such as ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘potential’, ‘estimate’, ‘budget’, ‘scheduled’, ‘plans’, ‘planned’, ‘forecasts’, ‘goals’ and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on a number of factors and assumptions made by management and considered reasonable at the time such information is provided. Assumptions and factors include: the integration of the Companies, and realization of benefits therefrom; Silver47’s ability to complete its planned exploration programs; the absence of adverse conditions at mineral properties; no unforeseen operational delays; no material delays in obtaining necessary permits; the price of gold remaining at levels that render mineral properties economic; Silver47’s ability to continue raising necessary capital to finance operations; and the ability to realize on the mineral resource and reserve estimates. Forward‐looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or result expressed or implied by such forward‐looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: risks related to the Transaction, including, but not limited to, integration risks; general business, economic and competitive uncertainties; the actual results of current and future exploration activities; conclusions of economic evaluations; meeting various expected cost estimates; benefits of certain technology usage; changes in project parameters and/or economic assessments as plans continue to be refined; future prices of metals; possible variations of mineral grade or recovery rates; the risk that actual costs may exceed estimated costs; geological, mining and exploration technical problems; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development (including the risks of obtaining necessary licenses, permits and approvals from government authorities); title to properties and management’s ability to anticipate and manage the foregoing factors and risks. Although Silver47 has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Readers are advised to study and consider risk factors disclosed in Silver47’s management’s discussion and analysis for the three and six months ended April 30, 2025 and 2024, and Summa’s annual information form dated December 20, 2024 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2024.

 

There can be no assurance that forward‐looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Silver47 undertakes no obligation to update forward‐looking statements if circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions should change except as required by applicable securities laws. The forward-looking statements contained herein are presented for the purposes of assisting investors in understanding Silver47’s plans, objectives and goals and may not be appropriate for other purposes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward‐looking statements. This news release also contains or references certain market, industry and peer group data, which is based upon information from independent industry publications, market research, analyst reports, surveys, continuous disclosure filings and other publicly available sources. Although Silver47 believes these sources to be generally reliable, such information is subject to interpretation and cannot be verified with complete certainty due to limits on the availability and reliability of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other inherent limitations and uncertainties. Silver47 has not independently verified any of the data from third party sources referred to in this news release and accordingly, the accuracy and completeness of such data is not guaranteed.

 

THIS NEWS RELEASE IS INTENDED FOR DISTRIBUTION IN CANADA ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

 

Corporate Logo

 

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/260955

 

 

 

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Salvadorian President Nayib Bukele’s New Ideas Party has paved the way for him to potentially retain power in the Central American nation by overhauling the country’s electoral system.

The new bill extends presidential terms to six years and allows for indefinite presidential re-election.

The country’s presidential terms were initially five years long and immediate re-election was prohibited. However, in 2021, the country’s Supreme Court — packed with justices picked by Bukele’s party — ruled that the president could seek a second term, The Associated Press reported. 

Critics said Bukele’s re-election in 2024 was unconstitutional.

Members of New Ideas and their allies in the Legislative Assembly used their supermajority to pass changes to five articles of the country’s constitution and passed the measure in a 57–3 vote on July 31. According to The Associated Press, New Ideas lawmaker Ana Figueroa’s proposal also included a provision to eliminate the second round of elections in which the top two candidates go head-to-head.

‘This is quite simple, El Salvador: only you will have the power to decide how long you wish to support the work of any public official, including your president,’ Figueroa said, according to Reuters. ‘You have the power to decide how long you support your president and all elected officials.’

Meanwhile, other lawmakers expressed their frustration with the bill, with one lamenting the death of democracy.

Nationalist Republican Alliance legislator Marcela Villatoro declared to her fellow lawmakers that ‘Democracy in El Salvador has died!’

‘You don’t realize what indefinite reelection brings: It brings an accumulation of power and weakens democracy … there’s corruption and clientelism because nepotism grows and halts democracy and political participation,’ Villatoro said, according to The Associated Press.

Bukele, who was first elected in 2019, has become somewhat of a polarizing figure as his crackdown on crime has made him popular with voters, while critics worry that he is trying to consolidate power. While Bukele’s tough-on-crime policies have caused homicides to plummet, human rights groups say that innocent people were caught up in mass arrests.

Human Rights Watch issued a report in July 2024 in which it found that approximately 3,000 children had become victims of the crackdown, which began in 2022. In the report summary, the group tells the story of a 17-year-old girl who was arrested without a warrant and eventually forced to plead guilty to collaborating with the notorious MS-13 gang, something she denied.

Last year, Bukele told Time magazine that he would not seek a third term, though he could change his tune following the constitutional reforms.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

 

(TheNewswire)

 

  
 Harvest Gold Corporation
 

 

Vancouver, British Columbia TheNewswire – August 1, 2025 ‑ Harvest Gold Corporation (TSXV: HVG,OTC:HVGDF) (‘ Harvest Gold ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) announces that, subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange (the ‘ Exchange ‘) and further to its news release of July 3, 2025, it has closed its non-brokered private placement raising gross proceeds of $2,295,549.86 (the ‘ Offering ‘).

 

The Offering consisted of 11,660,199 units (the ‘ Units ‘) at a price of $0.075 per Unit for proceeds of $874,514.93 and 13,533,666 charity flow-through units (the ‘ CFT Units ‘) at a price of $0.105 per CFT Unit for proceeds of $1,421,034.93.

 

Crescat Capital LLC (‘ Crescat ‘), as the lead investor in the Offering, purchased 5,866,666 Units, bringing its non-diluted ownership of Harvest Gold common shares to approximately 19.73%.  Crescat’s participation constitutes a ‘related party transaction’ as defined under Multilateral Instrument 61-101   Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions   (‘   MI 61-10   1′). Such participation is exempt from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements of MI 61-101 based on the exemptions provided in Section 5.5(c)   Distribution of Securities for Cash   and Section 5.7(b)   Fair Market Value Not More than $2,500,   000, respectively.  

 

  Quinton Hennigh, Geologic and Technical Advisor at Crescat Capital LLC states: ‘Harvest Gold has, in my view, a very attractive land position over a highly prospective greenstone belt that hosts the nearby Windfall deposit. Although in the early stage, Harvest Gold’s team collected solid geophysical and geochemical data that define some compelling green field targets. They are now set to conduct their first drill program to test these targets. I find it refreshing to see a company tackle something bold and new like this and look forward to seeing what they encounter.’  

 

  Rick Mark, President and CEO of Harvest Gold states: ‘We are grateful to Crescat and the outstanding group of investors who have supported us in this round and over the past two year as we established ourselves in Quebec. I am very pleased to say that the drilling at Mosseau will begin shortly and that, concurrently, we will be exploring Urban Barry and Labelle for the first time.’  

 

Each CFT Unit is comprised of one common share of the Company (each, a ‘ Common   Share ‘) and one common share purchase warrant of the Company (each, a ‘ Warrant ‘), each of which qualifies as a ‘flow-through share’ (within the meaning of subsection 66(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada)). Each Unit consists of one Common Share and one Warrant. Each Warrant entitles the holder thereof to acquire one Common Share (each, a ‘ Warrant Share ‘) at a price of $0.12 per Warrant Share for a period of two years following the closing date of the Offering (the ‘ Expiry Date ‘).

 

  The Company anticipates using the proceeds from the issue and sale of the Units for the 2025 drilling campaign, various other exploration expenses and general working capital.  

 

  The gross proceeds raised from the CFT Units will be used by the Company to incur eligible ‘Canadian exploration expenses’ that qualify as ‘flow-through mining expenditures’ (as both terms are defined in the Income Tax Act (Canada)) (the ‘ Qualifying Expenditures ‘) related to the Company’s projects in Québec. The Company will renounce Qualifying Expenditures with an effective date of no later than December 31, 2025, in an amount of not less than the total amount of the gross proceeds raised from the issuance of the CFT Units, and incur such expenses by December 31, 2026.

 

All securities issued will be subject to a four-month hold period pursuant to securities laws in Canada, expiring on December 1, 2025.  

 

  In connection with the Offering, the Company paid finder’s fees consisting of $19,790 cash and 263,867 non-transferable finder’s warrants (the ‘   Finder’s   Warrants   ‘) to arm’s length finders.  Each Finder’s Warrant is exercisable at $0.12 until the Expiry Date.  

 

  About Harvest Gold Corporation  

 

  Harvest Gold has three active gold projects focused in the Urban Barry area, totalling 329 claims covering 17,539.25 ha , located approximately 45-70 km east of the Gold Fields Windfall Deposit.  

 

The Company’s board of directors, management team and technical advisors have collective geological and financing experience exceeding 400 years.

 

  Harvest Gold acknowledges that the Mosseau Gold Project straddles the Eeyou Istchee-James Bay and Abitibi territories.  Harvest Gold is committed to developing positive and mutually beneficial relationships based on respect and transparency with local Indigenous communities.  

 

  ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS  

 

Rick Mark
President and CEO
Harvest Gold Corporation

 

  For more information please contact:  

 

  Rick Mark or Jan Urata
@ 604.737.2303 or
    info@harvestgoldcorp.com    

 

  Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.  

 

  Forward Looking Information  

 

  This news release includes certain statements that may be deemed ‘forward looking statements’. All statements in this news release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that Harvest Gold expects to occur, are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words ‘expects’, ‘plans’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘projects’, ‘potential’ and similar expressions, or that events or conditions ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘may’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ occur.  

 

  Forward-looking statements in this news release include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: the final approval of the Offering by the Exchange; the anticipated commencement of drilling at Mosseau and initial exploration at Urban Barry and Labelle; the Company’s exploration plans and strategy; the expected use of proceeds from the Offering; and the Company’s intention to incur and renounce Qualifying Expenditures under the   Income Tax Act   (Canada) within the prescribed timelines.  

 

  Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, and continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any   such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.  

 

  The securities referred to in this news release have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘U.S. Securities Act’), or any applicable securities laws of any state of the United States, and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons (as such term is defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act) or persons in the United States unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and any other applicable securities laws of the United States or an exemption from such registration requirements is available.  

 

  This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of these securities within any jurisdiction, including the United States.  Any public offering of securities in the United States must be made by means of a prospectus containing detailed information about the company and management, as well as financial statements.  

 

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

 

 

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

President Donald Trump targeted Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, in a Thursday night Truth Social post, urging Republicans to vote in the opposite of the way that she does.

‘Republicans, when in doubt, vote the exact opposite of Senator Susan Collins. Generally speaking, you can’t go wrong. Thank you for your attention to this matter and, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!’ the president declared in the post.

Fox News Digital reached out to Collins’ office early on Friday morning to request a comment from the senator.

Last month Collins voted against passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and against passage of a rescissions measure, both of which Trump ultimately signed.

Earlier this year she voted against confirming Pete Hegseth to serve as secretary of defense and against confirming Kash Patel to serve as FBI director.

In February 2021, she voted to convict Trump after the House impeached him in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot, but that Senate vote, which occurred after Trump had already departed from office, did not reach the threshold necessary for conviction.

Collins has served in the Senate since 1997.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Trump’s tariffs appear to be pushing prices higher. Inflation picked up in June, according to new data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCEPI), which is the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation, grew at an annualized rate of 3.4 percent last month, up from 2.0 percent in May. It has averaged 2.5 percent over the last three months and 2.6 percent over the last year.

Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices but also places more weight on housing services prices, was a bit lower. According to the BEA, core PCEPI grew 3.1 percent in June, up from 2.6 percent in the preceding month. It has averaged 2.6 percent over the last three months and 2.8 percent over the last year.

Figure 1. Headline and core PCEPI inflation, June 2015 to June 2025

The uptick in inflation observed in June is largely due to newly-imposed tariffs by the Trump administration. Tariffs on foreign-produced goods get passed through to consumers, and enable domestic producers to charge higher prices for close substitutes. Consistent with this view, the BEA reports that the recent rise in prices was especially pronounced for goods. 

Goods prices grew at an annualized rate of 4.8 percent in June, compared with 0.9 percent in the prior month. Durable goods prices, including prices for motor vehicles and parts, furnishings and durable household equipment, recreational goods and vehicles, as well as other durable goods, grew at an annualized rate of 5.7 percent (up from 0.3 percent in the prior month). Non-durable goods prices, including prices for food and beverages purchased for off-premises consumption, clothing and footwear, gasoline and other energy goods, as well as other non-durable goods, grew 4.3 percent (up from 1.2 percent).

Services prices, in contrast, grew just 2.8 percent (annualized) in June — only slightly higher than the 2.5 percent rise observed in May.

All else equal, higher tariffs cause a one-time rise in the level of prices and, hence, a temporary increase in the rate of inflation. Once tariffs have passed through, the rate of inflation will return to its longer run trend — though the level of prices will remain permanently elevated.

As my colleague Bryan Cutsinger has recently argued, the Federal Reserve should look through tariff-induced price hikes when setting monetary policy. That doesn’t mean, however, the Fed should leave its federal funds rate target unchanged:

[…] when productivity prospects dim — as they often do in the face of trade uncertainty: higher input costs, reduced access to more efficient foreign suppliers, and resource misallocation driven by protectionist policies — investment demand falls, dragging the neutral rate down with it.

In order for monetary policy to remain on track, the Fed must adjust its policy rate when the neutral rate changes. For example, if tariffs are pulling the neutral rate lower, then the appropriate course of action is for the Fed to cut its policy rate. 

If the Fed leaves its federal funds rate target unchanged as tariffs pull the neutral rate down, monetary policy will passively tighten.

And yet, that is precisely what the Fed did at this week’s meeting. The Federal Open Market Committee voted 9-2 to hold the federal funds rate target in the 4.25 to 4.5 percent range.

Back in June, the median FOMC member projected the longer run federal funds rate at 3.0 percent. That suggests monetary policy was already quite restrictive. Hence, the Fed has not merely allowed monetary policy to tighten passively. It has done so from a position where monetary policy was already tight.

Prior to the meeting, Fed Governor Christopher Waller — one of two FOMC members to dissent from Wednesday’s decision — explained why he thought the FOMC should begin cutting rates. “While I sometimes hear the view that policy is only modestly restrictive,” he said, “this is not my definition of ‘modestly.’”

In fact, the distance that must be traveled to reach a neutral policy setting weighs heavily on my judgment that the time has come to resume moving in that direction. In June, a majority of FOMC participants believed it would be appropriate to reduce our policy rate at least two times in 2025, and there are four meetings left. I also believe — and I hope the case I have made is convincing — that the risks to the economy are weighted toward cutting sooner rather than later. If the slowing of economic and employment growth were to accelerate and warrant moving toward a more neutral setting more quickly, then waiting until September or even later in the year would risk us falling behind the curve of appropriate policy. However, if we cut our target range in July and subsequent employment and inflation data point toward fewer cuts, we would have the option of holding policy steady for one or more meetings.

Alas, a majority of voting FOMC members ignored Waller’s warning. 

With the decision made, we must now hope the Committee comes around to Waller’s view by September — and that their decision in September is not too little, too late.

Any practicing Catholic will tell you that Pope Leo XIV answers to a higher power, but none would say that higher power is the Internal Revenue Service. Yet, as Tax Notes’ Robert Goulder notes, the Holy Father will likely still need to file income taxes. 

This debate highlights the importance of tax simplicity. If a government must levy taxes, the system should be straightforward enough for the average citizen to understand. If a government taxes income, it must be a simple flat rate. Even better would be to eliminate income taxes altogether. 

As reported by The Washington Post back in May, the US requires all citizens (including those living abroad like Pope Leo XIV) to file an annual tax return. Most Americans residing overseas can exclude up to $130,000 in foreign-earned income from US income taxes. This doesn’t apply, however, to Pope Leo, because that income is earned working for a foreign government: the Vatican. 

Although the pope does not have an official salary, the Vatican covers his housing, food, travel, and health care; it also provides a monthly stipend for personal expenses. 

Figuring out what he must report will be the daunting task of his accountants. Fortunately, the Holy Father is not on the hook for Illinois personal income taxes because he has not earned income in the state since 2014 (the last year he resided there). 

If he pays income taxes to a foreign government, however, it can be used to subtract his federal income tax bill by claiming the foreign tax credit. The pope likely utilized this credit during his time in Peru, where he became a naturalized citizen in 2015. Questions also arise about the specific tax forms he must file. 

Declining a salary and giving the earnings to charity, however, does not mean Pope Leo escapes the IRS. Goulder explains, “For US tax purposes, a decision to decline salary may not be sufficient to prevent the earnings from being treated as gross income.” 

The Holy Father is hardly alone in facing the headache of tax compliance. In 2024, 66 percent of Americans said that they believed the US Tax Code was “Overly Complex,” and for good reason. The Tax Code is 6,871 pages long. When adding on the federal tax regulations and official tax guidance, the total exceeds 75,000 pages. In 2024, Americans collectively spent 6.5 billion hours preparing and filing their taxes. This came at the cost of losing over $280 billion in foregone income and $133 billion in out-of-pocket costs.

Still, these complications are not likely to cause the Church to call for a crusade against the IRS. The Catholic Church acknowledges the legitimacy of civil authority while recognizing God as the ultimate authority. When questioned by the Pharisees about taxes, Jesus responded, “Then repay to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God” (appearing in Matthew 22:21, Mark 12:17, and Luke 20:25; also referenced in Romans 13:7). 

That said, “Caesar” is not above criticism. The Tax Code needs to be simplified. In 2025, one in four Americans feared they would make a mistake filing their income taxes, which would likely result in an audit. These fears are valid. Research shows that low-income taxpayers claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit are disproportionately audited compared to the average taxpayer. 

Enacting a flat income tax rate and eliminating loopholes would help ease those concerns. A flat tax rate is easier for taxpayers to understand and keeps government accountable. Carving out exceptions for specific cases (such as Pope Leo XIV’s) within the current framework is likely to invite fraud and manipulation.

Moreover, no income tax is better than a flat income tax rate. Taxing income (when money is earned) penalizes work, investment, savings, and hiring, which harms economic opportunity and overall quality of life. 

Alternatively, taxing consumption (taxing when money is spent) is less distortionary. Doing so shifts when people spend without discouraging them from earning and investing. 

In 2024, the federal government took 84 percent of all 2024 revenue directly from individual income taxes and payroll taxes (in other words, directly from the paychecks of hardworking Americans) — yet still ran a $1.83 trillion deficit. Calls for higher taxes belie the fact that the government’s budget problems stem from spending and overregulation, not a lack of revenue. 

“Caesar” cannot manage and fund everything. 

Simplifying the Tax Code will make life for Pope Leo and millions of Americans much easier going forward. The petty Caesars at the IRS should take note.

The idea that people have an unalienable right to pursue their own happiness is a very radical idea. Prior to the eighteenth century, almost no one in the world believed it. Even today, only a small sliver of humankind agrees with it. 

Equally radical is the idea that the only purpose of government is to protect that right. We can quibble about some of the details, but the central idea is unequivocal. If you and I both have the right to pursue our own happiness, it would be wrong for a government to impose burdens on you just to make me happier. 

Critics of this political philosophy invariably note that some of the authors of the Declaration of Independence owned slaves. But remember, just about everyone else in the world at the time thought that there was no such thing as an individual right. In recognizing that some people had rights, the founders opened a door that would inevitably extend to everyone else.

Their declaration of the right to representation and self-governance initially applied to the free, property-owning men of thirteen North American colonies. Thanks to their foresight, we’ve been extending the right to pursue happiness to more Americans ever since. 

A Radical Declaration: All Men Are Created Equal

The Declaration of Independence was written at a time when the world was undergoing two major changes — both of which made the Declaration possible. 

One major change was intellectual: a radical shift in thinking about the relationship of human beings to one another. Today it is called The Enlightenment or the Age of Reason. In place of domination by the Church or the State (empire or monarchy), Enlightenment thinking held that human beings were independent moral entities who should deal with each other on the basis of reason, persuasion, and voluntary exchange. 

Stephen Pinker has devoted an entire book to the idea that The Enlightenment is the reason why we are not living at the subsistence level today — grubbing around in the forest for roots and berries, as our ancestors lived for several hundred thousand years. 

The other major change was economic. 

Prior to the eighteenth century, most people in most places could probably not have survived under the political arrangement envisioned by the Declaration of Independence. 

Our distant ancestors were hunter-gatherers who lived in small groups. They existed at the subsistence level, and they were continually at war with other tribes. In hunting and gathering and in making war, they relied on cooperative action, in which individuals subordinated their short-term self-interest to the long-term welfare of the group.

Think about a troop of soldiers on a military mission. If each one pursued his own happiness, the mission would never be achieved.

Our distant ancestors, like that military troop, were at war with other tribes and at war with nature. Since they had no markets and no government (at least as we know those institutions today) they relied very heavily on cultural norms to enforce cooperative activities. 

Cultural rites and rituals celebrated self-sacrifice — heroism in battle, risk-taking in the pursuit of large game, diligence in gathering food and other cooperative duties. People were encouraged to think of the entire tribe as extended kin. Other tribal inhabitants were seen as family, not parties to exchange. Outsiders were enemies. 

In time, the tribal life that dominated human existence for over 200,000 years began to give way to the marketplace. 

People began to view strangers in other communities as trading partners rather than military adversaries. Specialization and trade began to link people who lived in distant places. Tribes grew into cities, and specialization and trade replaced kinship relations in local communities as well. 

One recent paper, though writing of more recent market developments, summarizes trade’s pro-social benefits by noting that: “increased market access fostered universalism, tolerance, and generalized trust.” When we are supported in predictable patterns of cooperating with strangers, we extend trust and willingness to transact beyond our tribal and kin-based ties.

In the communities populated by our distant ancestors, an individual could do the most good for others around him by sacrificing his own self-interest to the whole group. In an interconnected marketplace, an individual could do the most good for the most others by pursuing his own self-interest, providing something others wanted to buy.

It may be no coincidence that the Declaration of Independence was published in the same year as Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations. By 1776, the best minds in the western world believed individuals had a right to pursue their own happiness and government should ensure they respected the rights of others. The two big changes — a change in how people thought and a change in how they made a living — fused into a political arrangement that had never existed before: classical liberalism.

The Pursuit of the Pursuit of Happiness: 

The Constitution that embodied the spirit of the Declaration of Independence placed restrictions on the federal government, but placed no such constraints on state and local governments. Rights guaranteed under federal law were increasingly seen as appropriate under state and local governments as well, after the Civil War. The Supreme Court and evolving popular opinion rapidly expanded the ideals of the Declaration to more residents of the nation. The rights of Black men to vote, and later of all women to vote, were eventually recognized.

Even so, as we approach the Declaration’s 250th birthday, it is helpful to think about which subsequent policy shifts were consistent with its underlying vision, and which were not. 

Where have we lived up to its ideals, and where have we failed? 

When Government Blocks Your Pursuit of Happiness

When it comes to the role of government in protecting our pursuit of happiness, history is a public policy roller coaster. 

In 1905, the Supreme Court struck down a state law that prohibited bakery workers from working more than 60 hours a week. The law protected established bakers by suppressing competition from bakers who were willing to work longer hours, mostly ethnic immigrants, including Italians, Jews, and German immigrant Joseph Lochner, the plaintiff. Incumbent businesses were using the state government to block people’s productive pursuits, operating like a medieval guild. 

​Between 1897 and 1937, in what is known as the Lochner era, the Supreme Court struck down 184 laws. For the most part, these were laws that limited people’s freedom of contract — usually for some obvious special interest reason. Clearly, the Lochner era rulings were consistent with the classical liberal concept of the proper role of government. They reversed special-interest public policies that trace their roots all the way back to the early settlements in this country.  

The political pressures of the Great Depression ended the Lochner era, and special interests regained their power. Today, even if the backers of a public policy admit that it has no defensible public purpose, that it robs the many for the benefit of the few, and that it makes almost everyone worse off — the courts will not step in to stop it. 

During the twentieth century, economic studies show that the Interstate Commerce Commission largely served as a cartel agent for the railroads and then for the trucking industry. The Civil Aeronautics Board served as a cartel agent for the airlines. The Federal Communications Commission served the interests of the broadcasters. Through price supports, quotas and other devices, the federal government helped farmers restrict output and sell at higher prices. All of these interventions were to the detriment of consumers. 

Beginning in the Jimmy Carter era, deregulation helped undo some of the special-interest harm — much of it stemming from the administration of Franklin Roosevelt. And we are lucky that the Roosevelt era wasn’t even worse. 

Had he not been stopped by the Supreme Court, Roosevelt was willing to allow every industry in the country to limit output and fix prices through the National Industrial Recovery Act — mercantilism on steroids. 

Today, nearly 30 percent  of all jobs require a government license, and economists across the political spectrum often agree that these requirements serve as barriers to entry. City after city has regulated low-income housing out of existence. Teachers’ unions are successfully blocking escape routes for disadvantaged children almost everywhere. Government continues to select who may pursue happiness.

Reclaiming the Promise of the Declaration 

Political change is hard. But acknowledging the meaning of the Declaration and honoring its creators should not be hard. 

In 1776, few people anywhere in the world believed anyone had an essential right to life, liberty or the pursuit of happiness, that his government was bound to honor. Fewer still were ready to die for that belief. 

When the founders first asserted the existence of individual rights — while it’s true they didn’t include everyone they should have — they were challenging what everyone else thought, and at great cost. For this, even as we acknowledge their failings, we owe them a great deal of gratitude. In opening the door for themselves, the founding fathers ultimately opened it for everyone else. 

To honor the real spirit of the Declaration, a public policy inventory is long overdue. So much of our government actions neither protect individual rights nor promote the general welfare. We could honor the Declaration by scuttling them. 

 

(TheNewswire)

 

   
  Silver Crown Royalties 
     

 

TORONTO, ON TheNewswire – August 1, 2025 Silver Crown Royalties Inc. ( Cboe: SCRI,OTC:SLCRF; OTCQX: SLCRF; FRA: QS0) ( ‘Silver Crown’ ‘SCRi’ or the ‘Company’ ) is pleased to announce it has executed an amendment (the ‘ Amendment ‘) to its silver royalty agreement originally dated December 13, 2024 (the ‘Agreement’ ) with PPX Mining Corp. ( TSXV: PPX; BVL: PPX) ( ‘PPX’ ) with respect to a silver royalty (‘ Silver Royalty ‘) on the Igor Project. The Amendment changes the capital deployment structure of the second tranche of the purchase price for the Silver Royalty (the ‘ Second Tranche Payment ‘) and the commencement date of the quarterly minimum Silver Royalty payments under the Agreement (the ‘ Minimum Royalty Payments ‘).

 

  The Second Tranche Payment, originally set at US$1,470,000 and payable on or before August 6, 2025, has now been divided into two payments, with Silver Crown paying US$833,000 of the Second Tranche Payment to PPX today and with the remaining US$637,000 of the Second Tranche Payment now being due on or before December 31, 2025. Additionally, the commencement date for the Minimum Royalty Payments has been deferred from October 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026, subject to earlier commencement upon the startup of metallurgical operations at the Beneficiation Plant.  

 

  In accordance with the terms of the Agreement as amended by the Amendment, the payment of the first US$833,000 of the Second Tranche Payment today increased Silver Royalty payable to SCRi to the cash equivalent of 5.1% of the silver produced at the Igor Project (to an aggregate 11.1%), and the total payable silver ounces under the Silver Royalty increased by 76,500 ounces (to an aggregate total of 166,500 ounces). Upon payment of the remaining US$637,000 of the Second Tranche Payment on or before December 31, 2025, the Silver Royalty will further increase by 3.9% of the cash equivalent of the silver produced at the Igor Project (to a total of 15%), and the total payable silver ounces under the Silver Royalty will increase by an additional 58,500 ounces (to an aggregate total of 225,000 ounces) as contemplated by the Agreement.  

 

  Peter Bures, Silver Crown’s CEO, stated, ‘Increasing our royalty to 11.1% of the cash equivalent of the silver produced at Igor 4 (up from 6% in the first half of the year) is expected to be instrumental to our revenue growth in the immediate term. Amending the Second Tranche Payment offers flexibility to our partners as they continue to develop their infrastructure and presents an opportunity for SCRI to deploy capital in a more advantageous manner for shareholders. Furthermore, adjusting the Minimum Royalty Payments to a more advantageous timeline enables for any fine tuning during the initial phase of the Beneficiation Plant’s operation. We emphasize that the overall transaction terms remain unchanged per the Agreement: SCRI is still expected to receive the cash equivalent of 225,000 silver ounces over the next four years, of which approximately the cash equivalent of 1,600 silver ounces have already been delivered and will now be delivered at an increased rate.  

 

  ABOUT Silver Crown Royalties INC.  

 

  Founded by industry veterans, Silver Crown Royalties (   Cboe:   SCRI |   OTCQX:   SLCRF |   BF:   QS0   ) is a publicly traded, silver royalty company. Silver Crown (SCRi) currently has four silver royalties of which three are revenue-generating. Its business model presents investors with precious metals exposure that allows for a natural hedge against currency devaluation while minimizing the negative impact of cost inflation associated with production. SCRi endeavors to minimize the economic impact on mining projects while maximizing returns for shareholders.   For further information, please contact:  

 

  Silver Crown Royalties Inc.  

 

  Peter Bures, Chairman and CEO  

 

  Telephone: (416) 481-1744  

 

  Email:   pbures@silvercrownroyalties.com  

 

  FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS  

 

  This release contains certain ‘forward looking statements’ and certain ‘forward-looking information’ as defined under applicable   Canadian and U.S. securities laws. Forward-looking statements and information can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘estimate’, ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘continue’, ‘plans’ or similar terminology. The forward-looking information contained herein is provided for the purpose of assisting readers in understanding management’s current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Forward-looking statements and information include, but are not limited to, SCRi anticipates that Elk Gold will pay this residual amount owing on or before March 31, 2025. Forward-looking statements and information are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions that, while believed by management to be reasonable, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual actions, events or results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to: the impact of general business and economic conditions; the absence of control over mining operations from which SCRi will purchase gold and other metals or from which it will receive royalty payments and risks related to those mining operations, including risks related to international operations, government and environmental regulation, delays in mine construction and operations, actual results of mining and current exploration activities, conclusions of economic evaluations and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents, equipment breakdowns, title matters, labor disputes or other unanticipated difficulties or interruptions in operations; SCRi’s ability to enter into definitive agreements and close proposed royalty transactions; the inherent uncertainties related to the valuations ascribed by SCRi to its royalty interests; problems inherent to the marketability of gold and other metals; the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses; industry conditions, including fluctuations in the price of the primary commodities mined at such operations, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and fluctuations in interest rates; government entities interpreting existing tax legislation or enacting new tax legislation in a way which adversely affects SCRi; stock market volatility; regulatory restrictions; liability, competition, the potential impact of epidemics, pandemics or other public health crises on SCRi’s business, operations and financial condition, loss of key employees. SCRi has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. SCRi undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information except as required by applicable law. Such forward-looking information represents management’s best judgment based on information currently available.  

 

  This document does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, securities of the Company in Canada, the United States or any other jurisdiction. Any such offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy the securities described herein will be made only pursuant to subscription documentation between the Company and prospective purchasers. Any such offering will be made in reliance upon exemptions from the prospectus and registration requirements under applicable securities laws, pursuant to a subscription agreement to be entered into by the Company and prospective investors. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.  

 

  CBOE CANADA DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS NEWS RELEASE.  

 

   

 

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

 

 

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

President Donald Trump clashed with a reporter Thursday over questions about a newly signed tariff, telling him that he had spent his first term ‘fighting lunatics like you.’ The intense exchange follows a White House signing ceremony for a series of executive actions aimed at expanding reciprocal tariffs and strengthening U.S. trade policy.

While speaking with reporters at the White House after the signing, a reporter confronted Trump on why he is emphasizing tariffs more in his second term. 

‘You’re weighing your decision to do that, your authority to do that based on a 1977 law. It’s never been invoked before,’ said the reporter. ‘Why didn’t you invoke this law in your first term? You could have taken in billions upon billions of dollars in your first term, but you waited until your second term?’

Without missing a beat, the president shot back: ‘Yeah, because in my first term, I was fighting lunatics like you who were trying to do things incorrectly and inappropriately to a president that was duly elected.’ 

‘And we did do certain tariffs in the first term,’ he continued. ‘If you look at China, China, we took in hundreds of billions of dollars from China.’ 

He also said that the COVID-19 pandemic also played a factor in his decision to not emphasize tariffs as much in his first term.

‘When Covid came the last thing I was going to do is tell France and Italy and Spain and a couple of other countries that we’re going to hit you with tariffs,’ he explained. ‘We had to fight the Covid situation when that came.’ 

‘But if you look at my first term,’ he went on, ‘We took in hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of tariffs, but you people didn’t cover it very well.’ 

A statement by the White House said that Trump’s executive actions taken on Thursday ‘reflects the President’s continued efforts to protect the United States against foreign threats to the national security and economy of the United States by securing fair, balanced, and reciprocal trade relationships to benefit American workers, farmers, and manufacturers and to strengthen the United States’ defense industrial base.’ 

This comes shortly after Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a trade deal between the U.S. and E.U. on Sunday.

‘We are agreeing that the tariff straight across for automobiles and everything else will be a straight-across tariff of 15%,’ Trump said.

‘So, we have a tariff of 15%. We have the opening up of all of the European countries, which I think I could say were essentially closed. I mean, you weren’t exactly taking our orders. You weren’t exactly taking our agriculture,’ he added, addressing von der Leyen.

Von der Leyen said Europe will also purchase $150 billion worth of U.S. energy as part of the deal, in addition to making $600 billion in other investments into the U.S.

Fox News Digital’s Anders Hagstrom and Stephen Sorace contributed to this report.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS