Author

admin

Browsing

KEY HIGHLIGHTS:

  • With this transaction, together with previous CBPM mineral lease acquisitions and long-term supply and surface rights agreements, Homerun has completed the District Control Strategy initiated in Q1 2023 and secures long-life economic interests and control over the SME Silica Sand District, providing security of supply, scale and the location for the Company’s planned high purity silica sand industrial complex.

Homerun Resources Inc. (TSXV: HMR,OTC:HMRFF) (OTCQB: HMRFF) (‘Homerun’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that the Company has signed a purchasing agreement (the ‘Agreement’) over the FAZENDA CONJUNTO SÃO JOSÉ E NOVA ESPERANÇA, located in the Municipality of Belmonte, Bahia, Brazil, in the district of Santa Maria Eterna (‘SME’). The Agreement covers a total area of 582 hectares and represents the final component of the District Control Strategy initiated in Q1 2023 and secures long-life economic interests and control over the SME Silica Sand District, providing security of supply, scale and the location for the Company’s planned high purity silica sand industrial complex.

Completing the SME District Control Strategy

Over the past three years, Homerun has executed a staged consolidation strategy over the SME Silica Sand District, starting with a stated plan but no initial position in the SME District, the Company has now secured mineral leases, supply agreements, surface rights and now direct land ownership within the SME District. This strategy has now delivered the competitive advantage of effective district-scale control of this unique high-purity silica resource which can provide decades of substantial silica sand supply for downstream industrial use.

The land being acquired under the Agreement for Fazenda Conjunto São José e Nova Esperança is directly contiguous with Homerun’s 99-year, renewable surface rights over Fazenda São José, which were secured in December 2025 specifically for the installation of the Company’s silica sand industrial complex, including processed silica and solar glass manufacturing. Together with Homerun’s three CBPM mineral lease acquisitions and its long-term Material Supply Agreements, this land position completes the SME District Control Strategy.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4082/282364_ac8fc2f434b8891e_001.jpg

Figure 1 – Map of Fazenda Conjunto São José e Nova Esperança, Fazenda São José and related rights

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4082/282364_ac8fc2f434b8891e_001full.jpg

Brian Leeners, CEO of Homerun stated, ‘Just over three years ago we were the only party to identify the globally unique value of the SME Silica Sand District as a critical material supply for the global solar and energy storage sectors. At that time, we set about on an ambitious plan to commercially control the SME Silica Sand District. An ambitious plan considering Homerun had no position in the district and minimal financial resources, at that time. That original plan has manifested today into Homerun obtaining that desired control of the SME Silica Sand District through direct resource ownership, resource partnership and direct land ownership. Homerun’s SME control is a key requirement for the execution of the next phases of the Company’s strategic plan – developing and capitalizing Homerun’s high-margin silica processing and antimony-free solar glass manufacturing in the SME Silica Sand District on the industrial site now controlled by Homerun.’

The US$ 1,100,000 purchase price under the Agreement is, to be paid as follows:

  • US$ 500,000 via wire transfer, in 5 equal and successive monthly installments, the first installment being due on June 25, 2026.
  • US$ 600,000 in Homerun common shares, priced at market value at the time of the Agreement which is CA$1.00, subject to TSX Venture Exchange approvals and the four-month statutory hold period and to re-purchase and anti-dumping clauses.

The Agreement also transfers the standard Brazilian Mineral Lease/Royalty Rights for mineral exploration with Third Parties from resources within land/surface rights areas.

About Homerun

Homerun is building the silica-powered backbone of the energy transition across four focused verticals: Silica, Solar, Energy Storage, and Energy Solutions. Anchored by a unique high-purity low-iron silica resource in Bahia, Brazil, Homerun transforms raw silica into essential products and technologies that accelerate clean power adoption and deliver durable shareholder value.

  • Silica: Secure supply and processing of high-purity low-iron silica for mission-critical applications, enabling premium solar glass and advanced energy materials.
  • Solar: Development of Latin America’s first dedicated 1,000 tonne per day high-efficiency solar glass plant and the commercialization of antimony-free solar glass designed for next-generation photovoltaic performance.
  • Energy Storage: Advancement of long-duration, silica-based thermal storage systems and related technologies to decarbonize industrial heat and unlock grid flexibility.
  • ⁠Energy Solutions: AI-enabled energy management, control systems, and turnkey electrification solutions that reduce costs and optimize renewable generation for commercial and industrial customers.

With disciplined execution, strategic partnerships, and an unwavering commitment to best-in-class ESG practices, Homerun is focused on converting milestones into markets—creating a scalable, vertically integrated platform for clean energy manufacturing in the Americas.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of
Homerun Resources Inc.

‘Brian Leeners’

Brian Leeners, CEO & Director
brianleeners@gmail.com / +1 604-862-4184 (WhatsApp)

Tyler Muir, Investor Relations
info@homerunresources.com / +1 306-690-8886 (WhatsApp)

FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE

The information contained herein contains ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements relate to information that is based on assumptions of management, forecasts of future results, and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. Any statements that express predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be ‘forward-looking statements’.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/282364

News Provided by TMX Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

A new report from a Senate Republican showed that in the last year, the federal government wasted millions on transgender animal tests, lab testing beagles in China and aborted fetal tissue research. 

In his 9th annual edition of ‘Federal Fumbles,’ Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., found several instances of waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government, and he laid out a game plan to address some of the shortcomings of the past year. 

Lankford noted that after the first year of President Donald Trump’s second term, the Republican-controlled Congress was able to improve efficiency, save billions in taxpayer dollars and redefine spending in Washington, D.C. 

‘However, the work is far from over,’ Lankford wrote in the report.

‘Too often, the federal government is gridlocked, unresponsive and inefficient,’ he continued. ‘We must continue pushing through bureaucratic red tape to make the government work better for you, the taxpayer. We have so much still to do.’

Some of the more egregious examples of federal waste laid out in the report included a handful of grant programs from the National Institute of Health (NIH) held over from the Biden administration.

Among those were a roughly $240 million study on transgender ‘animal experiments involving mice, rats and monkeys.’ That grant program was eventually terminated by Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

‘These NIH-funded studies attempted to model transgender adults and children by subjecting animals to hormone regimens and surgical procedures,’ Lankford wrote. 

In 2024, the Biden-led NIH funded $53 million worth of grants that allowed for ‘research using human fetal tissue obtained from elective abortions.’ And last year it was found that 17 of those grants were still active. 

Lankford noted that the NIH canceled the grants when the money flow became public after watchdog the White Coat Waste Project found that the agency was still funding them, and that the Trump administration went a step further to cancel all research involving aborted fetal tissue. 

Still, Lankford argued that unless Congress passed a law regarding the issue, ‘another pro-abortion Administration could resume or expand such projects at any time, forcing taxpayers to fund research that is both immoral and scientifically obsolete.’

Though the sums were not as eye-popping, Lankford also found that $124,000 in taxpayer money was sent to China to conduct drug research and experiments on ‘up to 300 beagles per week.’ 

Lankford said NIH announced it would not renew the contract after national scrutiny, but that there are still ’18 Chinese animal research laboratories, including several with troubling ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army, [that] still hold NIH approval to receive U.S. funding.’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A Russian cargo plane typically used to transfer military equipment landed at a military airfield in Havana Sunday night, echoing flight patterns seen ahead of the capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela.

The U.S.-sanctioned Ilyushin Il-76, operated by Russian state-linked airline Aviacon Zitotrans, was tracked landing at San Antonio de los Baños Airfield, a Cuban military installation roughly 30 miles south of Havana, according to public flight data.

Flight-tracking records show the aircraft stopped in St. Petersburg and Sochi in Russia; Mauritania, Africa; and the Dominican Republic. Each landing would have required approval from host governments, offering a window into which countries are continuing to permit Russian military-linked aviation activity despite Western sanctions.

The same aircraft conducted flights to Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cuba in late October 2025, as tensions between Washington and Caracas escalated. That movement preceded U.S. military action in Venezuela that ultimately ended Maduro’s rule — a sequence U.S. officials and analysts have since pointed to as a warning indicator when evaluating similar Russian aviation activity in the region.

Now, Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel finds himself under mounting pressure from President Donald Trump, who has sharply intensified U.S. policy toward Havana in recent weeks.

On Thursday, Trump declared a national emergency related to Cuba, asserting that the Cuban government poses an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat’ to U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. The administration also said it would impose penalties on any country that sells or supplies oil to Cuba without U.S. authorization.

Trump confirmed Sunday that the U.S. is engaged in direct talks with Cuban officials.

‘Cuba is a failing nation. It has been for a long time, but now it doesn’t have Venezuela to prop it up,’ Trump told reporters at Mar-a-Lago, Florida. ‘So we’re talking to the people from Cuba, the highest people in Cuba, to see what happens. I think we’re going to make a deal with Cuba.’

Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio both have indicated support for political change in Havana, though the administration has not said whether it would pursue that objective through military action.

Russian military ties to Cuba have repeatedly triggered concern in Washington. While the Soviet Union’s footprint on the island receded after the Cold War, Moscow has steadily rebuilt defense and intelligence cooperation with Havana over the past decade. U.S. officials have warned that renewed Russian activity in Cuba could pose security risks close to the U.S. mainland.

The Il-76 is a heavy transport aircraft capable of carrying roughly 50 tons of cargo or up to 200 personnel, a capability that has drawn scrutiny given the operator’s history. Aviacon Zitotrans has been sanctioned by the United States, Canada and Ukraine for supporting Russia’s defense sector.

‘Aviacon Zitotrans has shipped military equipment such as rockets, warheads, and helicopter parts all over the world,’ the U.S. Treasury Department said in January 2023, when it added the airline to its sanctions list.

It remains unclear what cargo the aircraft carried on its most recent flight. During earlier operations in Venezuela, Russian state media and a Russian lawmaker said the same aircraft delivered Pantsir-S1 short-range and Buk-M2E medium-range air defense systems to Caracas. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

New Found Gold Corp. (TSXV: NFG) (NYSE American: NFGC) (‘New Found Gold’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce additional results from grade control drilling at the Keats zone (‘Keats’) excavation in the AFZ Core (‘AFZC’), completed as part of the Company’s 2025 drill program on its 100%-owned Queensway Gold Project (‘Queensway’ or the ‘Project’) in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

Keats excavation grade control drill program highlights include:

  • 508 g/t Au1 over 2.20 m2 from 16.80 m (NFGC-25-GC-024)
  • 113 g/t Au over 3.75 m from 11.90 m (NFGC-25-GC-025)
  • 9.29 g/t Au over 37.60 m from 12.00 m (NFGC-25-GC-027)
  • 27.0 g/t Au over 10.00 m from 0.00 m (NFGC-25-GC-033)
  • 31.5 g/t Au over 6.10 m from 0.60 m (NFGC-25-GC-021)
  • 17.2 g/t Au over 9.05 m from 2.70 m (NFGC-25-GC-042)
  • 24.5 g/t Au over 6.35 m from 24.65 m (NFGC-25-GC-031)
  • 7.33 g/t Au over 19.80 m from 4.70 m (NFGC-25-GC-026)
  • 3.75 g/t Au over 21.40 m from 0.10 m (NFGC-25-GC-035)

Melissa Render, President of New Found Gold, stated: ‘Building on the initial Keats zone grade control drill results released in late 2025, these new results continue to demonstrate the high-grade tenor of this zone. The 5 by 5 metre spaced drilling is confirming strong continuity of gold mineralization occurring at or within a few metres of surface. We look forward to updating the market with the results of the remaining 2025 grade control drilling from both Keats and the Iceberg zone when available.’

Work Summary

The results presented in this release include 1,230 m of drilling in 36 diamond drill holes (‘DDH‘) from the 2025 Keats excavation grade control drill program (‘KEGCDP‘; Figures 1 to 3). The KEGCDP was designed to improve confidence in the distribution of high-grade, near-surface gold mineralization and support mine planning as outlined in the Preliminary Economic Assessment (‘PEA‘) Phase 1 open pits (see the New Found Gold press release dated July 21 2025). Drill highlights, along with detailed results for these 36 DDH, are provided in Tables 1 to 3 below.

The full KEGCDP comprises 84 DDH totalling 2,773 m; a total of 1,866 m in 52 DDH, or 62% of results have been reported to date, including 36 DDH in this release and an initial 16 DDH in the Company’s press release dated December 1, 2025. Remaining results will be reported as they become available.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7337/282330_77041155f49168ec_001.jpg

Figure 1: Plan view map of the AFZC with location of Keats and Iceberg excavation
grade control drill programs.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7337/282330_77041155f49168ec_001full.jpg

  • Keats excavation grade control drill program highlights (this press release):
    • 508 g/t Au over 2.20 m from 16.80 m (NFGC-25-GC-024)
    • 113 g/t Au over 3.75 m from 11.90 m (NFGC-25-GC-025)
    • 9.29 g/t Au over 37.60 m from 12.00 m (NFGC-25-GC-027)
    • 27.0 g/t Au over 10.00 m from 0.00 m (NFGC-25-GC-033)
    • 31.5 g/t Au over 6.10 m from 0.60 m (NFGC-25-GC-021)
    • 17.2 g/t Au over 9.05 m from 2.70 m (NFGC-25-GC-042)
    • 24.5 g/t Au over 6.35 m from 24.65 m (NFGC-25-GC-031)
    • 7.33 g/t Au over 19.80 m from 4.70 m (NFGC-25-GC-026)
    • 3.75 g/t Au over 21.40 m from 0.10 m (NFGC-25-GC-035)
    • 10.6 g/t Au over 6.60 m from 0.10 m (NFGC-25-GC-022)
    • 9.94 g/t Au over 6.95 m from 0.70 m (NFGC-25-GC-030)
    • 4.87 g/t Au over 10.55 m from 22.45 m (NFGC-25-GC-039)
    • 3.37 g/t Au over 12.20 m from 0.55 m (NFGC-25-GC-017)
    • 2.27 g/t Au over 16.35 m from 21.85 m (NFGC-25-GC-057)
    • 1.45 g/t Au over 23.55 m from 8.05 m (NFGC-25-GC-032)
    • 2.12 g/t Au over 13.75 m from 7.20 m (NFGC-25-GC-028)
    • 1.52 g/t Au over 14.05 m from 3.50 m (NFGC-25-GC-045)
    • 1.64 g/t Au over 12.65 m from 33.25 m (NFGC-25-GC-029)
    • 1.78 g/t Au over 11.30 m from 4.70 m (NFGC-25-GC-034)
    • 1.55 g/t Au over 12.50 m from 0.00 m (NFGC-25-GC-024)

    Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7337/282330_77041155f49168ec_002.jpg

    Figure 2: Keats and Iceberg excavations with proposed grade control drill holes and location of results received.

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
    https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7337/282330_77041155f49168ec_002full.jpg

    The KEGCDP is testing a volume that is approximately 65 m long by 30 m deep by 40 m wide with a drill spacing of 5 m by 5 m and includes a near-surface high-grade region that was uncovered as part of the Company’s ongoing excavation program (see the New Found Gold press releases dated September 23, 2024, December 2, 2024, September 25, 2025, and December 1, 2025).

    Results released to date correlate well with the initial mineral resource estimate (‘MRE‘) block model and indicate strong continuity of high-grade mineralized shoots at Keats, providing improved definition of their geometry, with most intervals occurring at or within a few meters of surface. The detailed geostatistical data from this phase of work will further validate our resource models, specifically by increasing confidence in grade-capping and influence-limiting parameters applied to high-grade intersections in advance of a MRE update and subsequent mine planning.

    The Keats and Iceberg zones are hosted within the Keats-Baseline Fault Zone (‘KBFZ‘), a high-grade gold-bearing structure that has been defined over a current strike length of 1.9 kilometres (‘km‘). This corridor consists of a broad mineralized fault zone with limited deep drill testing to date. Drilling completed in 2024 confirms that the system extends to vertical depths of up to 1.1 km (see the New Found Gold press releases dated July 11, 2024, October 31, 2024, and April 29, 2025).

    Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7337/282330_77041155f49168ec_003.jpg

    Figure 3: Keats longitudinal section view of grade control grid location (looking northwest, +/- 12.5 m).

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
    https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7337/282330_77041155f49168ec_003full.jpg

    Looking Ahead

    The 2025 Queensway drill program included 74,377 m of drilling in 614 diamond DDH, with approximately 75% of the drilling focused on the AFZC area to support advancement of the Phase 1 mine plan as outlined in the Company’s PEA and 25% focused on exploration targets such as the Dropkick zone (‘Dropkick‘). To date, approximately 50% of the results from 2025 drilling remain outstanding, as well as channel sampling results from the Lotto excavation. These results will be reported once available.

    The 2026 Queensway drill program is underway, with four drill rigs currently active (see the New Found Gold press release dated January 21, 2026). Initial 2026 infill drilling is planned to first target PEA Phase 2 open pit resource conversion, transitioning later in the year to PEA Phase 3 underground resource conversion.

    The Company plans to expand its grade control drilling beginning in Q2/26. The next phase of work will leverage results from the 2025 program to optimize drill hole spacing and program scope. This will include completing the initial grade-control drilling at the Iceberg excavation, commencing grade-control drilling at the Lotto excavation and potentially expanding the grade-control drilling at the Keats and Iceberg excavations. The objective of this work is to improve confidence in the distribution of gold mineralization and support mine planning as outlined for the PEA Phase 1 open pits.

    Exploration drilling will focus on AFZC resource expansion including an initial grid-based program targeting the prospective corridor adjacent to the AFZ at Bullseye, continued step-outs at Dropkick, located 11 km north of the AFZC, and targeted segments of the AFZ at AFZ Peripheral. A regional drilling program testing advanced targets at Queensway South is in the planning phase and expected to commence in H2/26.

    The Company plans to file an updated Technical Report for Queensway, which will include an updated mineral resource estimate, in mid-2026

    Table 1: Drill Result Highlights.

    Hole No. From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (g/t) True Width (%) Zone
    NFGC-25-GC-017 0.55 12.75 12.20 3.37 60-90 Keats Excavation
    Including 2.15 2.60 0.45 63.65 55-85
    NFGC-25-GC-021 0.60 6.70 6.10 31.47 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 1.65 3.40 1.75 98.64 70-95
    Including 6.25 6.70 0.45 35.73 70-95
    And 21.65 33.45 11.80 2.96 70-95
    Including 21.65 22.10 0.45 20.78 70-95
    Including 27.60 28.10 0.50 10.83 70-95
    Including 31.00 31.30 0.30 25.62 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-022 0.10 6.70 6.60 10.57 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 3.20 3.70 0.50 99.59 70-95
    Including 6.05 6.70 0.65 21.90 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-024 0.00 12.50 12.50 1.55 70-95 Keats Excavation
    And 16.80 19.00 2.20 507.70 70-95
    Including 18.60 19.00 0.40 2788.50 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-025 11.90 15.65 3.75 113.27 50-80 Keats Excavation
    Including 12.40 14.35 1.95 216.75 50-80
    NFGC-25-GC-026 4.70 24.50 19.80 7.33 65-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 4.70 6.00 1.30 90.49 65-95
    NFGC-25-GC-027 12.00 49.60 37.60 9.29 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 15.30 16.35 1.05 184.38 70-95
    Including 16.90 17.90 1.00 23.39 70-95
    Including 33.85 34.45 0.60 125.27 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-028 7.20 20.95 13.75 2.12 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 7.70 8.10 0.40 32.55 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-029 33.25 45.90 12.65 1.64 70-95 Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-030 0.70 7.65 6.95 9.94 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 1.60 2.20 0.60 17.42 70-95
    Including 4.45 5.00 0.55 16.08 70-95
    Including 5.95 6.45 0.50 87.48 70-95
    And 17.60 39.20 21.60 14.62 70-95
    Including 21.45 22.20 0.75 61.99 70-95
    Including 29.90 31.20 1.30 186.52 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-031 24.65 31.00 6.35 24.48 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 29.05 30.15 1.10 132.61 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-032 8.05 31.60 23.55 1.45 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 10.85 11.60 0.75 13.88 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-033 0.00 10.00 10.00 27.01 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 1.10 2.60 1.50 168.65 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-034 4.70 16.00 11.30 1.78 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 7.45 8.45 1.00 11.14 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-035 0.10 21.50 21.40 3.75 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 0.85 1.80 0.95 40.74 70-95
    Including 12.95 13.30 0.35 15.04 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-039 22.45 33.00 10.55 4.87 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 28.40 29.50 1.10 16.24 70-95
    Including 30.50 31.45 0.95 22.82 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-042 2.70 11.75 9.05 17.24 40-70 Keats Excavation
    Including 7.20 8.95 1.75 53.22 40-70
    Including 10.20 10.50 0.30 130.40 40-70
    NFGC-25-GC-045 3.50 17.55 14.05 1.52 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 8.75 9.20 0.45 10.12 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-057 21.85 38.20 16.35 2.27 65-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 21.85 22.70 0.85 23.67 65-95

     

    Note that the host structures are interpreted to be moderately to steeply dipping. Infill veining in secondary structures with multiple orientations crosscutting the primary host structures are commonly observed in drill core which could result in additional uncertainty in true width. Composite intervals reported carry a minimum weighted average of 1 g/t Au diluted over a minimum core length of 2 m with a maximum of 4 m consecutive dilution when above 200 m vertical depth and 2 m consecutive dilution when below 200 m vertical depth. Included high-grade intercepts are reported as any consecutive interval with grades greater than 10 g/t Au. Grades have not been capped in the averaging and intervals are reported as drill thickness. Details of all drill holes reported in this press release are included in Table 2 and Table 3 below.

    Table 2: Summary of composite drill hole results reported in this press release for Keats.

    Hole No. From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Au (g/t) True Width (%) Zone
    NFGC-25-GC-017 0.55 12.75 12.20 3.37 60-90 Keats Excavation
    Including 2.15 2.60 0.45 63.65 55-85
    NFGC-25-GC-018 0.35 7.10 6.75 3.03 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 1.40 1.85 0.45 29.82 70-95
    And 15.50 18.00 2.50 1.36 Unknown
    NFGC-25-GC-019 No Significant Values Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-020 2.15 9.00 6.85 7.29 65-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 2.15 2.80 0.65 13.63 65-95
    Including 6.80 7.60 0.80 46.46 65-95
    And 14.45 16.95 2.50 2.06 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-021 0.60 6.70 6.10 31.47 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 1.65 3.40 1.75 98.64 70-95
    Including 6.25 6.70 0.45 35.73 70-95
    And 21.65 33.45 11.80 2.96 70-95
    Including 21.65 22.10 0.45 20.78 70-95
    Including 27.60 28.10 0.50 10.83 70-95
    Including 31.00 31.30 0.30 25.62 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-022 0.10 6.70 6.60 10.57 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 3.20 3.70 0.50 99.59 70-95
    Including 6.05 6.70 0.65 21.90 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-023 0.00 7.00 7.00 2.98 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 3.50 3.80 0.30 32.45 70-95
    And 24.00 32.90 8.90 3.39 70-95
    Including 25.90 26.50 0.60 27.63 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-024 0.00 12.50 12.50 1.55 70-95 Keats Excavation
    And 16.80 19.00 2.20 507.70 70-95
    Including 18.60 19.00 0.40 2788.50 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-025 11.90 15.65 3.75 113.27 50-80 Keats Excavation
    Including 12.40 14.35 1.95 216.75 50-80
    And 20.60 28.65 8.05 1.90 70-95
    Including 25.65 26.55 0.90 10.17 70-95
    And 37.70 46.40 8.70 5.94 70-95
    Including 38.90 39.50 0.60 75.27 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-026 4.70 24.50 19.80 7.33 65-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 4.70 6.00 1.30 90.49 65-95
    NFGC-25-GC-027 12.00 49.60 37.60 9.29 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 15.30 16.35 1.05 184.38 70-95
    Including 16.90 17.90 1.00 23.39 70-95
    Including 33.85 34.45 0.60 125.27 70-95
    And 52.90 55.00 2.10 1.90 70-95
    Including 53.65 54.00 0.35 10.00 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-028 7.20 20.95 13.75 2.12 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 7.70 8.10 0.40 32.55 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-029 16.50 22.00 5.50 6.11 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 21.40 22.00 0.60 14.55 70-95
    And 33.25 45.90 12.65 1.64 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-030 0.70 7.65 6.95 9.94 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 1.60 2.20 0.60 17.42 70-95
    Including 4.45 5.00 0.55 16.08 70-95
    Including 5.95 6.45 0.50 87.48 70-95
    And 17.60 39.20 21.60 14.62 70-95
    Including 21.45 22.20 0.75 61.99 70-95
    Including 29.90 31.20 1.30 186.52 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-031 24.65 31.00 6.35 24.48 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 29.05 30.15 1.10 132.61 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-032 8.05 31.60 23.55 1.45 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 10.85 11.60 0.75 13.88 70-95
    And 35.70 41.65 5.95 1.19 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-033 0.00 10.00 10.00 27.01 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 1.10 2.60 1.50 168.65 70-95
    And 16.95 23.60 6.65 2.24 70-95
    Including 17.60 18.25 0.65 10.60 70-95
    And 34.75 37.70 2.95 1.65 45-75
    NFGC-25-GC-034 4.70 16.00 11.30 1.78 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 7.45 8.45 1.00 11.14 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-035 0.10 21.50 21.40 3.75 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 0.85 1.80 0.95 40.74 70-95
    Including 12.95 13.30 0.35 15.04 70-95
    And 28.00 31.00 3.00 1.09 55-85
    NFGC-25-GC-036 No Significant Values Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-037 28.60 33.40 4.80 1.61 70-95 Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-038 4.35 11.50 7.15 1.93 55-85 Keats Excavation
    And 21.25 23.40 2.15 1.10 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-039 10.15 12.60 2.45 1.01 60-90 Keats Excavation
    And 22.45 33.00 10.55 4.87 70-95
    Including 28.40 29.50 1.10 16.24 70-95
    Including 30.50 31.45 0.95 22.82 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-040 No Significant Values Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-041 3.50 7.30 3.80 2.77 45-75 Keats Excavation
    Including 6.80 7.30 0.50 10.64 45-75
    And 16.55 26.20 9.65 2.56 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-042 2.70 11.75 9.05 17.24 40-70 Keats Excavation
    Including 7.20 8.95 1.75 53.22 40-70
    Including 10.20 10.50 0.30 130.40 40-70
    And 17.55 24.35 6.80 1.19 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-044 8.75 11.25 2.50 1.03 40-70 Keats Excavation
    And 15.25 17.40 2.15 1.05 40-70
    And 21.40 29.45 8.05 1.21 40-70
    NFGC-25-GC-045 3.50 17.55 14.05 1.52 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 8.75 9.20 0.45 10.12 70-95
    And 22.00 24.50 2.50 1.21 45-75
    NFGC-25-GC-047 24.45 27.10 2.65 1.00 70-95 Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-049 4.40 11.40 7.00 1.65 70-95 Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-051 24.80 31.05 6.25 1.32 70-95 Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-053 10.50 13.60 3.10 1.37 40-70 Keats Excavation
    And 22.40 29.10 6.70 1.14 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-054 20.70 29.15 8.45 2.36 70-95 Keats Excavation
    Including 20.70 21.70 1.00 10.30 70-95
    NFGC-25-GC-057 0.60 2.90 2.30 1.07 65-95 Keats Excavation
    And 11.15 15.35 4.20 6.21 65-95
    Including 11.15 12.10 0.95 14.02 65-95
    And 21.85 38.20 16.35 2.27 65-95
    Including 21.85 22.70 0.85 23.67 65-95
    NFGC-25-GC-077 No Significant Values Keats Excavation
    NFGC-25-GC-114 No Significant Values Keats Excavation

     

    Note that the host structures are interpreted to be moderately to steeply dipping. Infill veining in secondary structures with multiple orientations crosscutting the primary host structures are commonly observed in drill core which could result in additional uncertainty in true width. Composite intervals reported carry a minimum weighted average of 1 g/t Au diluted over a minimum core length of 2 m with a maximum of 4 m consecutive dilution when above 200 m vertical depth and 2 m consecutive dilution when below 200 m vertical depth. Included high-grade intercepts are reported as any consecutive interval with grades greater than 10 g/t Au. Grades have not been capped in the averaging and intervals are reported as drill thickness.

    Table 3: Details of drill holes reported in this press release.

    Hole Number Azimuth (°) Dip (°) Length (m) UTM E UTM N Prospect
    NFGC-25-GC-017 300 -45 30 658204 5427542 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-018 300 -45 21 658196 5427547 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-019 299 -45 15 658192 5427544 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-020 299 -45 34 658209 5427540 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-021 299 -45 39 658220 5427533 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-022 299 -45 12 658187 5427541 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-023 299 -45 39 658215 5427530 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-024 299 -45 22 658193 5427538 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-025 299 -45 46 658225 5427513 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-026 299 -45 30 658204 5427538 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-027 299 -45 61 658217 5427512 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-028 299 -45 32 658198 5427534 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-029 298 -45 53 658210 5427516 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-030 298 -45.3 52 658216 5427525 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-031 298 -45 47 658211 5427509 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-032 300 -45 54 658212 5427520 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-033 300 -45 43 658210 5427533 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-034 300 -45 24 658199 5427540 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-035 300 -45 37 658204 5427531 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-036 300 -45 21 658207 5427553 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-037 300 -45 40 658205 5427513 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-038 300 -45 40 658203 5427525 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-039 300 -45 40 658229 5427540 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-040 300 -45 25 658212 5427549 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-041 300 -45 33 658223 5427543 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-042 298 -45 36 658199 5427523 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-044 298 -45 37 658194 5427514 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-045 298 -45 28 658192 5427526 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-047 300 -45 42 658191 5427510 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-049 298 -45 21 658187 5427529 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-051 300 -45 39 658189 5427506 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-053 300 -45 33 658194 5427520 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-054 300 -45 33 658182 5427507 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-057 300 -45 45 658204 5427519 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-077 300 -45 12 658168 5427524 Keats
    NFGC-25-GC-114 300 -45 14 658253 5427538 Keats

     

    Sampling, Sub-sampling, and Laboratory

    All drilling recovers HQ core. For deep holes, the core size may be reduced to NQ at depth. The drill core is split in half using a diamond saw or a hydraulic splitter for rare intersections with incompetent core.

    A geologist examines the drill core and marks out the intervals to be sampled and the cutting line. Sample lengths are mostly 1.0 meter and adjusted to respect lithological and/or mineralogical contacts and isolate narrow (<1.0m) veins or other structures that may yield higher grades.

    Technicians saw the core along the defined cutting line. One half of the core is kept as a witness sample and the other half is submitted for analysis. Individual sample bags are sealed and placed into totes, which are then sealed and marked with the contents.

    New Found Gold has submitted samples for gold determination by PhotonAssay™ to ALS Canada Ltd. (‘ALS‘) since February 2024. ALS operates under a commercial contract with New Found Gold.

    Drill core samples are shipped to ALS for sample preparation in Thunder Bay, Ontario. ALS does not currently have accreditation for the PhotonAssay™ method at their Thunder Bay, ON laboratory. They do however have ISO/IEC 17025 (2017) accreditation for gamma ray analysis of samples for gold at their Australian labs with this method, including the Canning Vale lab in Perth, WA.

    Samples submitted to ALS beginning in February 2024 received gold analysis by photon assay whereby the entire sample is crushed to approximately 70% passing 2 mm mesh. The sample is then riffle split and transferred into jars. For ‘routine’ samples that do not have VG identified and are not within a mineralized zone, one (300-500g) jar is analyzed by photon assay. If the jar assays greater than 0.8 g/t, the remaining crushed material is weighed into multiple jars and submitted for photon assay.

    For samples that have VG identified, the entire crushed sample is riffle split and weighed into multiple jars that are submitted for photon assay. The assays from all jars are combined on a weight-averaged basis.

    Select samples prepared at ALS are also analyzed for a multi-element ICP package (ALS method code ME-ICP61) at ALS Vancouver.

    Drill program design, Quality Assurance/Quality Control, and interpretation of results are performed by qualified persons employing a rigorous Quality Assurance/Quality Control program consistent with industry best practices. Standards and blanks account for a minimum of 10% of the samples in addition to the laboratory’s internal quality assurance programs.

    Quality Control data are evaluated on receipt from the laboratories for failures. Appropriate action is taken if assay results for standards and blanks fall outside allowed tolerances. All results stated have passed New Found Gold’s quality control protocols.

    New Found Gold’s quality control program also includes submission of the second half of the core for approximately 2% of the drilled intervals. In addition, approximately 1% of sample pulps for mineralized samples are submitted for re-analysis to a second ISO-accredited laboratory for check assays.

    The Company does not recognize any factors of drilling, sampling, or recovery that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the assay data disclosed.

    The assay data disclosed in this press release have been verified by the Company’s Qualified Person against the original assay certificates.

    Qualified Person

    The scientific and technical information disclosed in this press release was reviewed and approved by Melissa Render, P. Geo., President, and a Qualified Person as defined under National Instrument 43-101. Ms. Render consents to the publication of this press release by New Found Gold. Ms. Render certifies that this press release fairly and accurately represents the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this press release.

    About New Found Gold Corp.

    New Found Gold is an emerging Canadian gold producer with assets in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The Company holds a 100% interest in Queensway and owns the Hammerdown Operation, Pine Cove Operation and Nugget Pond Hydrometallurgical Gold Plant. The Company is currently focused on advancing Queensway to production and bringing the Hammerdown Operation into steady-state gold production.

    In July 2025, the Company completed a PEA at Queensway (see New Found Gold press release dated July 21, 2025). Recent drilling continues to yield new discoveries along strike and down dip of known gold zones, pointing to the district-scale potential that covers a +110 km strike extent along two prospective fault zones at Queensway.

    New Found Gold has a new board of directors and management team and a solid shareholder base which includes cornerstone investor Eric Sprott. The Company is focused on growth and value creation.

    Keith Boyle, P.Eng.
    Chief Executive Officer
    New Found Gold Corp.

    Contact

    For further information on New Found Gold, please visit the Company’s website at www.newfoundgold.ca, contact us through our investor inquiry form at https://newfoundgold.ca/contact/contact-us/ or contact:

    Fiona Childe, Ph.D., P.Geo.
    Vice President, Communications and Corporate Development
    Phone: +1 (416) 910-4653
    Email: contact@newfoundgold.ca

    Follow us on social media at
    https://www.linkedin.com/company/newfound-gold-corp
    https://x.com/newfoundgold

    Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. 

    Forward-Looking Statement Cautions

    This press release contains certain ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation, including relating to the current drill program on its Queensway Gold Project in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, and the timing, results and interpretation and use of the drill results; future drill programs and the timing and focus thereof; the excavation program and the timing and results thereof; future exploration and the objectives and timing thereof, including future drilling and excavation; exploration, drilling and mineralization at Queensway; the extent of mineralization and the continuity of high-grade gold mineralization; the potential conversion of mineral resources; potential resource expansion; a mineral resource update and the timing thereof; focus on growth and value creation; and the merits of Queensway. Although the Company believes that such statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts; they are generally, but not always, identified by the words ‘expects’, ‘plans’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘interpreted’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘projects’, ‘aims’, ‘suggests’, ‘indicate’, ‘often’, ‘target’, ‘future’, ‘likely’, ‘pending’, ‘potential’, ‘encouraging’, ‘goal’, ‘objective’, ‘prospective’, ‘possibly’, ‘preliminary’, and similar expressions, or that events or conditions ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘may’, ‘can’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ occur, or are those statements, which, by their nature, refer to future events. The Company cautions that forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made, and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except to the extent required by applicable securities laws and the policies of the TSXV, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. Factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements include risks associated with the Company’s ability to complete exploration and drilling programs as expected, possible accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, risks associated with the interpretation of exploration results and the results of the metallurgical testing program, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration plans, the risk that the Company will not be able to raise sufficient funds to carry out its business plans, and the risk of political uncertainties and regulatory or legal changes that might interfere with the Company’s business and prospects. The reader is urged to refer to the Company’s Annual Information Form and Management’s Discussion and Analysis, publicly available through the Canadian Securities Administrators’ System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR+) at www.sedarplus.ca for a more complete discussion of such risk factors and their potential effects.

    1 g/t Au= grams of gold per tonne
    2 m = metres

    Corporate Logo

    To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/282330

    News Provided by TMX Newsfile via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    The House of Representatives is expected to vote this week on whether to refer former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for criminal charges.

    The House Rules Committee, the final gatekeeper before most legislation gets a chamber-wide vote, is slated to consider a pair of contempt of Congress resolutions targeting the Clintons at 4 p.m. ET on Monday.

    Those resolutions are expected to pass through the committee along party lines, teeing them up for final passage as early as Tuesday or Wednesday.

    Both Clintons were subpoenaed to appear before the House Oversight Committee to testify for Congress’ probe into Jeffrey Epstein.

    Despite months of back-and-forth between the former first couple’s lawyers and Oversight staff, they never appeared on terms dictated by Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., pushing him to initiate contempt proceedings.

    ‘This shows that no one is above the law,’ Comer told reporters after his panel advanced the resolutions last month. ‘I’m just real proud of the committee and look forward to hopefully getting the Epstein documents in very quickly and trying to get answers for the American people.’

    The committee voted along bipartisan lines to move forward with contempt resolutions against the Clintons. Nine Democrats joined the Republicans to advance the resolution against Bill Clinton, while three voted to advance Hillary Clinton’s.

    The majority of Democrats, however, have accused Comer of partisan motivations behind his Clinton contempt efforts.

    The Clintons were two of 10 people subpoenaed by Comer as part of the panel’s investigation into Epstein. The subpoenas were issued following a bipartisan vote by an Oversight subcommittee panel during an unrelated hearing on illegal immigration.

    Democrats on the committee have pointed out that Comer has not pushed to hold others who did not appear in contempt, nor has he made any threats against the DOJ for failing to produce all of its documents on Epstein by a deadline agreed to by Congress late last year. The department has produced a fraction of the documents expected so far.

    Comer has said he is in contact with the DOJ about its document production.

    If the vote this week is successful, the House will have recommended both the Clintons for prosecution by the DOJ.

    A contempt of Congress charge is a felony misdemeanor that carries a maximum fine of $100,000 and up to a year in jail.


    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

    Donald Trump wants lower interest rates. He has said so openly and has pressured the Federal Reserve accordingly. The political logic seems obvious: easier money boosts asset prices, juices consumer spending, and appears to support headline growth. With midterms approaching, that sugar high is tempting.

    But it’s also a mistake — economically, politically, and strategically.

    Lower rates at this point in the cycle would almost certainly reignite inflation. And except in the very short run, they would not make capital more affordable in real terms. Instead, they would worsen the affordability crisis (which voters are already upset about) and undermine the GOP’s reputation as the party of economic responsibility.

    Inflation is still a major concern. After peaking above 9 percent in 2022, it has come down meaningfully. But core inflation remains sticky, especially in services and housing. Shelter costs are still rising around 3 percent annually. Since shelter comprises a large share of price indices, it is a major contributor to average price growth exceeding the Fed’s two percent target. Insurance, medical services, childcare, and rents continue to climb faster than incomes. The last thing this economy needs is a renewed inflationary surge driven by easier monetary conditions.

    Trump’s implicit bet is that lower rates will bring down borrowing costs and make life more affordable. That misunderstands how inflation and interest rates interact.

    Nominal rates are not the same as real affordability. If the Fed cuts prematurely and inflation expectations rise, long-term yields will rise with them. That is exactly what happened in 2021–22: loose financial conditions and fiscal excess pushed inflation higher, and mortgage rates ultimately doubled anyway. The average 30-year mortgage rate went from under 3 percent in 2021 to over 7 percent in 2023 — even as the Fed initially insisted inflation was “transitory.” Once inflation expectations shift, credit does not stay cheap.

    Inflation makes affordability worse, not better. It raises rents. It pushes up home prices. It increases insurance premiums, service costs, and replacement costs for everything from cars to appliances. Any short-term relief from lower nominal rates is quickly eaten by a higher price level, and since wages tend to lag, American workers pay with reduced purchasing power.

    In macro terms, this is the Fisher effect in action: expected inflation gets embedded into nominal interest rates. You don’t get sustainably cheaper capital by eroding the purchasing power of money.

    The political consequences are just as bad as the economic ones.

    Voters are not angry about GDP growth rates or S&P multiples. They are angry about grocery prices, rent, childcare costs, and insurance premiums. Affordability is the dominant economic issue in polling. A policy that visibly worsens price stability in exchange for a few quarters of rosy headlines will look reckless to a public that already feels economically insecure.

    A cheap-money policy would erode Republicans’ hard-earned reputation for supporting sound economic policy. For decades, the GOP has championed lower inflation, fiscal restraint, and respect for market price signals. If Republicans start openly pressuring the Fed to run the economy hot for electoral reasons, they surrender that brand. They blur the distinction between themselves and the inflationary populism that voters have traditionally associated with progressive Democrats.

    Excessive pandemic-era spending, burdensome tax policy, regulatory overreach, and energy policy malpractice have done enough damage to long-term price stability already. The Congressional Budget Office now projects persistent trillion-dollar deficits as far as the eye can see. Federal debt held by the public is on track to exceed 100 percent of GDP this decade. That is a textbook setup for fiscal dominance, whereby monetary policy becomes subordinate to the government’s financing needs.

    If Republicans now join the inflationary chorus, voters will be left with no serious economic option at all.

    A genuine affordability agenda would seek to restore price stability on the demand side while easing regulations and restrictions on the supply side. We need housing abundance, energy production, and infrastructure renewal. Ultimately, affordability comes from productivity growth, not monetary theatrics.

    Trump’s preferred monetary policy, by contrast, pursues uncertain short-term political gains at the expense of certain long-term political damage. It risks discrediting the GOP as the party voters trust with the economy at a time when public trust is already fragile.

    If Republicans want to be taken seriously as an economic alternative, they should be defending price stability, not flirting with inflationary populism. First and foremost, they should be offering a supply-side reform agenda. There’s nothing wrong with holding misbehaving central bankers accountable. But that shouldn’t translate into reckless inflationism.

    There is no durable prosperity built on cheap money and political shortcuts. And there is no political upside, either, to unleashing the next inflation spike. Trump should rethink his rate gambit. If he doesn’t, his legacy will be the first casualty.

    Andy Schectman, president of Miles Franklin, weighs in on the factors moving gold and silver, emphasizing that their long-term drivers remain in place.

    ‘Nothing goes straight up without taking a breather, but you can still coexist. That can coexist with long-term bullishness, and I am hugely long-term bullish,’ he said.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Apollo Silver Corp. (‘Apollo Silver’ or the ‘Company’) (TSX.V:APGO, OTCQB:APGOF, Frankfurt:6ZF) is pleased to announce that it has received acceptance into the U.S. Defense Industrial Base Consortium (‘DIBC’), a U.S. Department of Defense-supported initiative designed to support collaboration across industry, academia, and government in advancing solutions relevant to U.S. defense and national security priorities.

    The DIBC focuses on strategic and critical materials and technologies essential to U.S. national security, including initiatives to improve the resilience and security of domestic critical mineral supply chains that support defense and industrial applications1.

    Apollo Silver’s U.S.-based Calico Project hosts significant silver mineralization alongside barite and zinc, which are classified as critical minerals on the USGS List of Critical Minerals and play important roles in industrial, infrastructure, and defense-related applications.

    As a member of the DIBC, Apollo Silver joins a network of traditional and non-traditional defense contractors, research institutions, and federal agencies working to advance innovation at speed. Membership provides the Company with opportunities to engage in federally sponsored initiatives related to critical materials supply chains, including the mining and processing of silver, zinc, and barite.

    ‘Apollo Silver’s acceptance into the DIBC reflects the growing strategic importance of U.S.-based critical mineral assets, including silver, following its inclusion on the USGS List of Critical Minerals in November 2025,’ said Ross McElroy, President and CEO of Apollo Silver. ‘With one of the largest undeveloped primary silver assets in the United States and meaningful exposure to industrial critical minerals such as barite and zinc, we believe Apollo Silver is well positioned to align with U.S. priorities focused on supply-chain security, industrial resilience, and national defense.’

    ABOUT Apollo Silver Corp.

    Apollo Silver is advancing the second largest undeveloped primary silver projects in the US. The Calico Project hosts a large, bulk minable silver deposit with significant barite and zinc credits – recognized as critical minerals essential to the U.S. energy, industrial and medical sectors. The Company also holds an option on the Cinco de Mayo Project in Chihuahua, Mexico, which is host to a major carbonate replacement (CRD) deposit that is both high-grade and large tonnage. Led by an experienced and award-winning management team, Apollo is well positioned to advance the assets and deliver value through exploration and development.

    Please visit www.apollosilver.com for further information.

    ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

    Ross McElroy
    President and CEO

    For further information, please contact:

    Email: info@apollosilver.com

    Telephone: +1 (604) 428-6128

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding ‘Forward-Looking’ Information

    This news release includes ‘forward-looking statements’ and ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. All statements included in this news release, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements with respect to the expected benefits of the Company’s acceptance into the U.S. Defense Industrial Base Consortium (‘DIBC’), the Company’s ability to maintain its membership in the DIBC and pursue opportunities arising therefrom, and the advancement and development potential of the Company’s projects, including the Calico Project and the Cinco de Mayo Project. Forward-looking statements include predictions, projections and forecasts and are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘plan’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘potential’, ‘target’, ‘budget’ and ‘intend’ and statements that an event or result ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘could’ or ‘might’ occur or be achieved and other similar expressions and includes the negatives thereof.

    Forward-looking statements are based on the reasonable assumptions, estimates, analysis, and opinions of the management of the Company made in light of its experience and its perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, as well as other factors that management of the Company believes to be relevant and reasonable in the circumstances at the date that such statements are made. Forward-looking information is based on reasonable assumptions that have been made by the Company as at the date of such information and is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may have caused actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to: risks associated with the Company’s ability to maintain DIBC membership and realize anticipated benefits therefrom; changes in government priorities, programs, funding or procurement processes; the risk that membership in the DIBC does not result in any specific contracts, funding, or other opportunities; risks associated with mineral exploration and development; metal and mineral prices; availability of capital; accuracy of the Company’s projections and estimates; realization of mineral resource estimates, interest and exchange rates; competition; stock price fluctuations; availability of drilling equipment and access; actual results of current exploration activities; government regulation; political or economic developments; environmental risks; insurance risks; capital expenditures; operating or technical difficulties in connection with development activities; personnel relations; and changes in Project parameters as plans continue to be refined. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions management believes to be reasonable, including but not limited to the price of silver, gold and barite; the demand for silver, gold and barite; the ability to carry on exploration and development activities; the timely receipt of any required approvals; the ability to obtain qualified personnel, equipment and services in a timely and cost-efficient manner; the ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective matter; and the regulatory framework regarding environmental matters, and such other assumptions and factors as set out herein. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate and actual results, and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking information contained herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information contained herein is presented for the purpose of assisting investors in understanding the Company’s expected financial and operational performance and the Company’s plans and objectives and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

    __________________________________
    1
    https://www.dibconsortium.org/

    Primary Logo

    News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Matthew Piepenburg, partner at Von Greyerz, breaks down what’s really driving the gold price, going beyond headlines to the ongoing debasement of the US dollar.

    He also discusses silver market dynamics.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Jeff Clark, founder of Paydirt Prospector, remains bullish on the outlook for gold and silver, emphasizing that cash is key when prices correct.

    ‘Even though I’m very long, and even though I haven’t taken profits on a lot of things, the number one antidote to a crash or a correction is your cash level,’ he said.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com