Author

admin

Browsing

 
 

 FPX Nickel Corp. (TSXV: FPX) (OTCQB: FPOCF) (‘ FPX ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) is pleased to provide an update on its Normal Course Issuer Bid (‘ NCIB ‘) that was announced on December 2, 2024 . Since December 5, 2024 the Company has repurchased a total of 720,000 common shares (‘ Common Shares ‘) of the Company at an average price of $0.24 per share under the NCIB.

 

 

  FPX Nickel logo (CNW Group/FPX Nickel Corp.) 

 

 

The repurchased shares represent progress toward the Company’s ability to acquire up to an aggregate of 5,000,000 Common Shares, representing approximately 2% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares, over the 12-month period ending December 5, 2025 . All shares repurchased under the NCIB have been cancelled.

 

Purchases under the NCIB continue to be executed through open market transactions on the TSX Venture Exchange, with the acquisition price determined by the prevailing market conditions at the time of each transaction. Cormark Securities Inc. is managing the NCIB on behalf of FPX.

 

  About FPX Nickel Corp.  

 

 FPX Nickel Corp.  is focused on the exploration and development of the Decar Nickel District, located in central British Columbia , and other occurrences of the same unique style of naturally occurring nickel-iron alloy mineralization known as awaruite.  For more information, please view the Company’s website at   https://fpxnickel.com/.   

 

On behalf of FPX Nickel Corp.

 

‘Martin Turenne’
Martin Turenne , President, CEO and Director

 

   Forward-Looking Statements   

 

  Certain of the statements made and information contained herein is considered ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. These statements address future events and conditions and so involve inherent risks and uncertainties, as disclosed in the Company’s periodic filings with Canadian securities regulators. Actual results could differ from those currently projected. The Company does not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking statement.  

 

  Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.  

 

SOURCE FPX Nickel Corp.

 

 

 

 Cision View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2025/24/c8569.html  

 

 

 

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Maritime Resources Corp. (TSXV: MAE,OTC:MRTMD) (‘Maritime’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to provide an update for the Hammerdown Gold Project, located in the Baie Verte mining district of Newfoundland and Labrador (‘Hammerdown’), near the towns of King’s Point and Springdale, including its Pine Cove milling facility located near the towns of Baie Verte and Ming’s Bight.

Highlights:

  • Start of civil construction and earthworks at the Hammerdown Gold Project

  • Excavation and transportation of the historic ore pad to the Pine Cove mill

  • Strengthening of the technical and project management team

  • Funding received from provincial government for reagent technology pilot project

‘Activity at Hammerdown is ramping up with work crews focused on the civil earthworks to prepare the site for mine development, including overburden removal, site road and stockpile pad construction along with the water management systems. Through this work our site team was able to locate and excavate the original Richmont Mines ore pad which has been transported to our Pine Cove mill for processing,’ comments Garett Macdonald, President and Chief Executive Officer. ‘We have also made several key project management appointments and have established the procurement and hiring systems needed to execute the project and maximize benefits for the local communities. We would also like to recognize the funding received from the province to study an innovative technology that could help optimize reagent consumption in our process plant.’

Construction Early Works
Maritime has received the Certificate of Approval from the Pollution Prevention Division of the provincial Department of Environment and Climate Change for full mine construction and operation. Over the next few months civil construction will establish key infrastructure for mine development including access roads, water management features, the power line right of way and rock filled pads for the crushing plant, maintenance and administration facilities. As a brownfields mine site, Hammerdown benefits from existing road access and a large volume of blasted waste rock left over from the original mine development in 2000. The site contains no major watercourses or fish habitat, and is generally dry, with minimal overburden over the deposit, averaging 2-3 metres of glacial till.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4548/259859_7ed1efe654102995_001.jpg

Figure 1. Hammerdown Project Site – Looking Southwest

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4548/259859_7ed1efe654102995_001full.jpg

Technical Team Appointments
The appointment of several key technical and project management personnel marks a positive step forward for the Company and Hammerdown. Recent additions to the Maritime team include:

  • Collin Ellison, Project Director. Collin has over 50 years experience in the mining industry, focusing on project development and operations. Former CEO, President and Director with Goldbelt Resources, Asian Mineral Resources and PMI Gold.

  • Billy Grace, Chief Mine Engineer. Former Manager of Technical Services with Newmont at the Musslewhite Mine in Ontario and General Manager with Aureus Gold in Nova Scotia.

  • Gregg Vickell, Senior Metallurgical Advisor. Gregg has more than 40 years experience in gold and base metals management and metallurgy including Mill Manager, Mill Superintendent, Chief Metallurgist and Operations Technical Services roles with a host of companies both in Canada and abroad. He has in depth experience with plant design, operations readiness, commissioning and process optimization.

  • Paolo Toscano, Technical Advisor – construction and engineering. Paolo recently served at Sr. Vice President Engineering and Construction for Calibre Mining at the Valentine Gold Project in Newfoundland and Labrador and has over 30 years of experience. Former Director of Projects for Alamos Gold.

Richmont Mines Historic Ore Pad
The Company’s mine geology team identified a volume of material left over from Richmont Mines when the mine closed in 2004. This material consists of broken rock from the former underground mining operation that was stockpiled on surface and transferred to highway trucks for delivery to the Nugget Pond mill. Crews have transported a portion of the existing stockpile material to the Company’s Pine Cove mill for mineral processing, providing an opportunity to test the material ahead of mine development. The remaining material is being used for construction of access roads and laydown on the Hammerdown site.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4548/259859_7ed1efe654102995_002.jpg

Figure 1. Excavating the historic Richmont Mines ore pad

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4548/259859_7ed1efe654102995_002full.jpg

Government Funding for Reagent Technology
Maritime is pleased to announce the receipt of funding in the amount of $154,000 from the provincial Department of Industry, Energy and Technology under its Green Transition Fund to study a new reagent technology for its Pine Cove gold mill. GlyCat™ is a glycine based technology developed by Draslovk that fosters a green approach to responsible resource development by greatly reducing the amount of sodium cyanide required in gold production. GlyCat™ also offers the potential for greatly reduced cyanide detoxification costs, effluent treatment and increased gold recoveries. Test work is scheduled during the third quarter of 2025.

Qualified Person
Exploration activities at the Hammerdown Gold Project are administered on site by the Company’s Exploration Manager, Larry Pilgrim, P.Geo. In accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, Larry Pilgrim, P.Geo. Exploration Manager, is the Qualified Person for the Company and has prepared, validated and approved the technical and scientific content of this press release. The Company strictly adheres to CIM Best Practices Guidelines in conducting, documenting, and reporting its exploration activities on its exploration projects.

Analytical Procedures
All samples assayed and pertaining to this press release were completed by Eastern Analytical Limited (EAL) located at Springdale, Newfoundland and Labrador. EAL is an ISO 17025:2005 accredited laboratory for a defined scope of procedures. EAL has no relationship to Maritime. Drill core samples are collected from NQ sized diamond drill core and sawn in half. The half core samples are delivered in sealed plastic bags to EAL by Maritime field crews where they are dried, crushed, and pulped. Samples are crushed to approximately 80% passing a minus 10 mesh and split using a riffle splitter to approximately 250 grams. A ring mill is used to pulverize the sample split to 95% passing a minus 150 mesh. Sample rejects are securely stored at the EAL site for future reference. A 30-gram representative sample is selected for analysis from the 250 grams after which EAL applies a fire assay fusion followed by acid digestion and analysis by atomic absorption for gold analysis. Other metals were analyzed by applying an acid digestion and 34 element ICP analysis finish. EAL runs a comprehensive QA/QC program of standards, duplicates and blanks within each sample stream.

About Maritime Resources Corp.
Maritime (TSXV: MAE,OTC:MRTMD) (OTC Pink: MRTMF) is a gold exploration and development company focused on advancing the Hammerdown Gold Project in the Baie Verte District of Newfoundland and Labrador, a top tier global mining jurisdiction. Maritime holds a 100% interest directly and subject to option agreements entitling it to earn 100% ownership in the Green Bay Property which includes the former Hammerdown gold mine and the Orion gold project. Maritime controls over 439 km2 of exploration land including the Green Bay, Whisker Valley, Gull Ridge and Point Rousse projects. Mineral processing assets owned by Maritime in the Baie Verte mining district include the Pine Cove mill and the Nugget Pond gold circuit.

On Behalf of the Board:

Maritime Resources Corp.

Garett Macdonald, MBA, P.Eng.
President and Chief Executive Officer
info@maritimegold.com
www.maritimeresourcescorp.com

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
YouTube

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements: 

Certain of the statements made and information contained herein is ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations. Forward-looking statements are often identified by terms such as ‘will’, ‘may’, ‘should’, ‘anticipate’, ‘expects’, ‘intends’, ‘indicates’ ‘plans’ and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the Hammerdown mineralization, its’ metallurgical response, precious metal extraction based on the ongoing metallurgical testwork, sampling programs, the grade control drilling program, location and grade of underground workings and backfill material, construction elements planned for Hammerdown, production ramp up at Hammerdown, preparation of an updated technical report for Hammerdown, investments to be made to and plans for the Pine Cove mill, growth of the Company and the creation of long-term value for shareholders, exploration plans at the Company’s properties, amongst other things, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. All forward-looking statements and forward-looking information are based on reasonable assumptions that have been made by the Company in good faith as at the date of such information. Such assumptions include, without limitation, the price of and anticipated costs of recovery of, base metal concentrates, gold and silver, the presence of and continuity of such minerals at modeled grades and values, the capacities of various machinery and equipment, the use of ore sorting technology will produce positive results, the availability of personnel, machinery and equipment at estimated prices, mineral recovery rates, and others. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking information, including, without limitation, the ability of the Company to continue to be able to access the capital markets for the funding necessary to acquire, maintain and advance exploration properties or business opportunities; global financial conditions, including competition within the industry to acquire properties of merit or new business opportunities, and competition from other companies possessing greater technical and financial resources; difficulties in advancing towards a development decision and executing exploration programs on the Company’s proposed schedules and within its cost estimates, whether due to weather conditions, availability or interruption of power supply, mechanical equipment performance problems, natural disasters or pandemics in the areas where it operates; increasingly stringent environmental regulations and other permitting restrictions or maintaining title or other factors related to exploring of its properties, such as the availability of essential supplies and services; factors beyond the capacity of the Company to anticipate and control, such as the marketability of mineral products produced from the Company’s properties; uncertainty as to whether mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves once economic considerations are applied; uncertainty as to whether inferred mineral resources will be converted to the measured and indicated categories through further drilling, or into mineral reserves, once economic considerations are applied; government regulations relating to health, safety and the environment, and the scale and scope of royalties and taxes on production; and the availability of experienced contractors and professional staff to perform work in a competitive environment and the resulting adverse impact on costs and performance and other risks and uncertainties, including those described in each MD&A of financial condition and results of operations. In addition, forward-looking information is based on various assumptions including, without limitation, assumptions associated with exploration results and costs and the availability of materials and skilled labour. Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Except as required under applicable securities legislation, Maritime undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange (‘TSX-V‘) nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX-V) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. 

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/259859

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

 

(TheNewswire)

 

  
 Harvest Gold Corporation
 

 

Vancouver, British Columbia TheNewswire – July 24, 2025 ‑ Harvest Gold Corporation (TSXV: HVG,OTC:HVGDF) (‘ Harvest Gold ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) is pleased to announce that it has completed all aspects of preparation for a diamond drilling program slated to begin in early August 2025 at its 100%-owned Mosseau Gold Project in the Abitibi Greenstone Belt, Quebec (Figure 1). This follows an extensive regional data compilation, high-resolution magnetic survey, and encouraging results from recent fieldwork, including reconnaissance mapping, prospecting, soil sampling.

 

  The present financing announced July 3, 2025 is expected to close on or about July 31, 2025 and, once closed, the funds will be released immediately to the related exploration contractors.  

 

Rick Mark, President and CEO of Harvest Gold states: ‘I want to thank Louis Martin and the entire geological team for their excellent and extensive work in preparing for drilling at Mosseau. The quality and scale of the targets identified across this large property provide a strong foundation for what we believe is a significant discovery opportunity. We will also fly a magnetic survey on Labelle and execute a regional till sampling program on Urban Barry, both largely unexplored until now.’

 

  Phase I of the diamond drill program is expected to consist of approximately 5,000 metres of drilling and will test the highest-priority targets in both the Northern and Central portions of the property to evaluate their gold potential (Figure 2).  

 

  The Company has now identified approximately 23 priority drill targets, located in the Northern and Central parts of the Mosseau property (Figure 3), as a result of its integrated exploration efforts. These targets exhibit strong geological, geochemical, and geophysical signatures consistent with orogenic gold mineralization (Figure 4).  

 

  In addition to the Mosseau drill program, Harvest Gold will be launching two key regional exploration initiatives this summer:  

 

  •  

      A high-resolution magnetic survey over the LaBelle property, and  

     

  •  

  •  

      A property-wide till sampling survey over its Urban Barry properties.  

     

  •  

  These programs are designed to expand the Company’s exploration pipeline and support future drill targeting across its Quebec project portfolio.  

 

    
Click Image To View Full Size
 

 

  Figure 1: Project Location: Urban-Barry Greenstone Belt  

 

    
Click Image To View Full Size
 

 

  Figure 2: Magnetic Domains across the Northern and Central Target Areas of Mosseau  

 

    
Click Image To View Full Size
 

 

  Figure 3: Drill targets on the Mosseau property (magnetics)  

 

    
Click Image To View Full Size
 

 

  Figure 4: Compilation and Drill targets in the Central Part – Mosseau (magnetics)  

 

  Qualified Person Statement  

 

  All scientific and technical information in this news release has been prepared and approved by Louis Martin, P.Geo., Technical Advisor to the Company and considered a Qualified Person for the purposes of NI 43-101.  

 

  About Harvest Gold Corporation  

 

 Harvest Gold is focused on exploring for near surface gold deposits and copper-gold porphyry deposits in politically stable mining jurisdictions. Harvest Gold’s board of directors, management team and technical advisors have collective geological and financing experience exceeding 400 years.

 

  Harvest Gold has three active gold projects focused in the Urban Barry area, totalling 377 claims covering 20,016.87 ha , located approximately 45-70 km west of Gold Fields – Windfall Deposit (Figure 1).  

 

  Harvest Gold acknowledges that the Mosseau Gold Project straddles the Eeyou Istchee-James Bay and Abitibi territories.  Harvest Gold is committed to developing positive and mutually beneficial relationships based on respect and transparency with local Indigenous communities.  

 

Harvest Gold’s three properties, Mosseau, Urban-Barry and LaBelle, together cover over 50 km of favorable strike along mineralized shear zones.

 

  ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS  

 

Rick Mark
President and CEO
Harvest Gold Corporation

 

  For more information please contact:  

 

  Rick Mark or Jan Urata
@ 604.737.2303 or
    info@harvestgoldcorp.com    

 

  Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.  

 

  Forward Looking Information  

 

  This news release includes certain statements that may be deemed ‘forward looking statements’. All statements in this news release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that Harvest Gold expects to occur, are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words ‘expects’, ‘plans’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘projects’, ‘potential’ and similar expressions, or that events or conditions ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘may’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ occur.  

 

  Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and   actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, and continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.  

 

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

 

 

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

 
 
  •   2024’s drill program was highly successful at converting Inferred resources, upgrading and expanding Indicated resources – meeting the key objectives and providing a foundation for Pre-Feasibility activities.  
  •  

  •   Indicated Primary Mineral Resource: 17.2 Moz at 1.24 g/t Au, a 42% increase in ounces and 15% grade increase from our Sept/24 resource estimate.
  •  

  •   Inferred Primary Mineral Resource: 11.9 Moz at 1.04 g/t Au, a 11 % increase in ounces, at the same grade
  •  

  • Cut-off grades are unchanged at 0.50 g/t Au.
  •  

  •   The 2025 Program will consist of infill and expansion drilling. Infilling is expected to continue the trend of enhancing grade and ounces, while converting Inferred Resources to Indicated Resources.
  •  

  •   Ongoing Metallurgical Work has demonstrated >90% recoveries with sulphide-oxidizing methods such as BIOX®, POX, and the Albion Process™. Additional test work is ongoing for these and conventional processing methods.
  •  

 
 
 

   2025 PROGRAM   

 

  •   Drilling in progress with four rigs, 30,000m planned.

       Conversion of inferred resources into indicated & further exploration drilling.

     

     
  •  

  •   Ongoing metallurgical work, focusing on flowsheet optionality with sulphide oxidation is a key part of our strategy to maximize the potential of the resource
    .
     
  •   

 

 

 Freegold Ventures Limited (TSX: FVL,OTC:FGOVF) (OTCQX: FGOVF) (‘Freegold’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce an updated mineral resource estimate (‘MRE’) for its Golden Summit Project, located near Fairbanks, Alaska . In line with the results from our 2023 drill program, the 2024 program has significantly increased the number of ounces and improved Indicated grades, all while maintaining finding costs below US$4 per ounce. This new estimate incorporates data from drilling conducted in 2024 and includes metallurgical recoveries from our extensive metallurgical program. This represents another critical milestone in our ongoing exploration and development efforts.

 

 

  Freegold Logo (CNW Group/Freegold Ventures Limited) 

 

 

  Comparison of July 2025 , September 2024 and March 2023 Resource Estimates  

 

 
                                                                                     
 

   July 2025 Resource Update   

 

   

   September 2024 Resource Update   

 

   

   March 2023 Resource Update   

 

 

   Primary Open Pit Resource   

 

   

   Primary Open Pit Resource   

 

   

   Primary Open Pit Resource   

 

   

   Moz   

 

 

   gpT   

 

 

   Cut
off
Grade
 
 

 

     

   Moz   

 

 

   gpT   

 

 

   Cut
off
Grade
 
 

 

     

   Moz   

 

 

   gpT   

 

 

   Cut
off
Grade
 
 

 

 

  Indicated  

 

 

   17.2   

 

 

   1.24   

 

 

  0.5  

 

   

  Indicated  

 

 

  12.1  

 

 

  1.08  

 

 

  0.5  

 

   

  Indicated  

 

 

  12.0  

 

 

  0.92  

 

 

  0.45  

 

 

   Change from
2024
 
 

 

 

  42 %  

 

 

  15 %  

 

     

   Change from
2023
 
 

 

 

  0 %  

 

 

  18 %  

 

           
 

  Inferred  

 

 

   11.9   

 

 

   1.04   

 

 

  0.5  

 

   

  Inferred  

 

 

  10.3  

 

 

  1.04  

 

 

  0.5  

 

   

  Inferred  

 

 

  7.7  

 

 

  0.85  

 

 

  0.45  

 

 

   Change from
2024
 
 

 

 

  16 %  

 

 

  0 %  

 

     

   Change from
2023
 
 

 

 

  33 %  

 

 

  22 %  

 

           
 

   Cut off gpt 0.50 (GP$2,490)   

 

   

   Cut off gpt 0.50 (GP$1,973)   

 

   

   Cut off gpt 0.45 (GP$1792)   

 

 

 

    July 2025 Updated Mineral Resource Estimate   

 

 
                                                  
 

   Cut-off Grade   

 

   gpT   

 

 

   Classification   

 

 

   Au   

 

   gpt   

 

 

   Tonnes   

 

 

   Ounces   

 

 

   OXIDE   

 

       
 

  0.15  

 

 

  Indicated  

 

 

  0.45  

 

 

  63,706,000  

 

 

  920,000  

 

 

  0.15  

 

 

  Inferred  

 

 

  0.47  

 

 

  18,837,000  

 

 

  287,000  

 

 

   PRIMARY   

 

       
 

  0.50  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

   1.24   

 

 

   431,949,000   

 

 

   17,236,000   

 

 

  0.50  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

   1.04   

 

 

   357,614,000   

 

 

   11,964,000   

 

 

   UNDER PIT   

 

       
 

  0.75  

 

 

  Indicated  

 

 

  1.12  

 

 

  2,205,000  

 

 

  79,000  

 

 

  0.75  

 

 

  Inferred  

 

 

  1.35  

 

 

  18,014,000  

 

 

  782,000  

 

 

 

 
 
 

    Mineral Resources for the primary resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.50 g/t gold and constrained within an open pit shell using a gold price of US$2,490 /ounce, US$2.50/t mining cost, US$25 processing cost, US$2.00/t G+A, 92% gold recovery, and a 45° pit slope. Tonnes and ounces rounded to the nearest thousand.    

 

 

 

The July 2025 resource estimate utilises a recovery rate of 92%, which is the average of the three sulfide oxidation methods assessed to date, along with a 3-year trailing gold price of $2,490 . Processing costs have increased from   US$14 per tonne ( 72% recovery)   to US$25 per tonne   (92% recovery) to account for the additional processing needed to achieve these higher recoveries. Ongoing metallurgical work aims to identify the most effective oxidation method for the deposit and to further optimize the use of gravity, flotation, and CIL techniques, determining if a simpler flowsheet is preferable.

 

Since 2020, Golden Summit has become one of North America’s largest undeveloped gold resources. The significant increase in resource ounces and grade is due to several targeted drilling campaigns conducted between 2020 and 2024, continuous upgrades to geological models, and a deeper understanding of the site. Additionally, strong metallurgical results have contributed to these advancements. The project presents an exceptional development opportunity, further enhanced by its strategic proximity to essential infrastructure, including roads, supply centres, and a readily available labour force.

 

The drilling programs have discovered significantly higher-grade material and have converted previously classified waste areas into mineralized zones deemed potentially economically viable. The expansion of mineralisation to the west has also provided new data on the higher-grade portions of Golden Summit. Consequently, there has been an increase in both the total indicated gold ounces and their grades within an open-pit context.

 

While the increase in resource size has been our most notable success, the improvement in grade has been particularly rewarding for Freegold. The expanded database of drill holes has enabled us to refine the geological model and deepen our understanding of how higher-grade mineralisation is distributed within a broader lower-grade halo. Over the last year, the focus has been on strengthening fault control boundaries to identify a higher-grade corridor, which has contributed to our success in increasing the overall grade of the indicated resource.

 

We anticipate that further infill drilling will help convert inferred resources into the indicated category and may continue the trend of increasing grade as we reduce drill spacing. This will contribute to greater confidence in the higher-grade zones identified in our model. The most recent resource estimate indicates growth in both overall resources and grades, while also maintaining Freegold’s remarkably low discovery cost of less than $4.00 per ounce.

 

In 2025, Freegold will focus on upgrading inferred resources to indicated resources to support further the planned pre-feasibility study (PFS), scheduled to commence later this year. Since inferred resources cannot be included in a PFS, drilling activities will focus on improving grade and increasing drill density to move inferred resources into the indicated category. Additionally, further drilling will aim to enhance the resource and define a smaller, higher-grade starter pit as the project progresses through the pre-feasibility phase. The goal is to reduce both operating and initial capital costs. This strategic approach is designed to optimize value by minimizing expenditures while maximizing resource grade and growth, thereby increasing overall effectiveness.

 

Supplementary metallurgical test holes will be drilled to obtain additional material for comprehensive testing. This will help optimize recovery rates and identify the most suitable processing methods. In addition, geotechnical drilling is being conducted to assess groundwater conditions. Ongoing archaeological, paleontological, and cultural resources studies are also part of the process.

 

Trade-off studies will be conducted to enhance the project’s economics, weighing improved recovery rates against capital and operating expenses as development proceeds. These studies will also assess various cut-off grades and strip ratios. The table below presents specific cut-off grades applicable within and beneath the current pit.

 

  OXIDE  

 

 
                                                                      
 

   Cut-Off Grade   

 

   gpt   

 

 

   Classification   

 

 

   Au   

 

   gpt   

 

 

   Tonnes   

 

 

   Ounces   

 

 

  1.00  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  1.98  

 

 

  4,154,000  

 

 

  264,000  

 

 

  0.75  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  1.45  

 

 

  7,954,000  

 

 

  370,000  

 

 

  0.50  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  1.08  

 

 

  14,153,000  

 

 

  490,000  

 

 

  0.40  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.89  

 

 

  20,007,000  

 

 

  574,000  

 

 

  0.30  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.70  

 

 

  30,918,000  

 

 

  695,000  

 

 

  0.15  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.45  

 

 

  63,706,000  

 

 

  920,000  

 

         
 

  1.00  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  1.47  

 

 

  1,598,000  

 

 

  76,000  

 

 

  0.75  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  1.08  

 

 

  4,628,000  

 

 

  160,000  

 

 

  0.50  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  1.02  

 

 

  5,225,000  

 

 

  172,000  

 

 

  0.40  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.90  

 

 

  6,613,000  

 

 

  191,000  

 

 

  0.30  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.74  

 

 

  9,242,000  

 

 

  221,000  

 

 

  0.15  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.47  

 

 

  18,837,000  

 

 

  287,000  

 

 

 

  PRIMARY  

 

 
                                                                      
 

   Cut-Off
Grade
 
 

 

   gpt   

 

 

   Classification   

 

 

   Au   

 

   gpT   

 

 

   Tonnes   

 

 

   Ounces   

 

 

  1.00  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  2.51  

 

 

  131,992,000  

 

 

  10,666,000  

 

 

  0.75  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  1.85  

 

 

  220,694,000  

 

 

  13,115,000  

 

 

  0.50  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  1.24  

 

 

  431,949,000  

 

 

  17,236,000  

 

 

  0.40  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  1.04  

 

 

  579,279,000  

 

 

  19,358,000  

 

 

  0.30  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.87  

 

 

  774,281,000  

 

 

  21,541,000  

 

 

  0.15  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.68  

 

 

  1,094,031,000  

 

 

  23,862,000  

 

         
 

  1.00  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  2.08  

 

 

  96,158,000  

 

 

  6,427,000  

 

 

  0.75  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  1.60  

 

 

  157,927,000  

 

 

  8,125,000  

 

 

  0.50  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  1.04  

 

 

  357,614,000  

 

 

  11,964,000  

 

 

  0.40  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.87  

 

 

  499,019,000  

 

 

  14,006,000  

 

 

  0.30  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.74  

 

 

  676,275,000  

 

 

  15,987,000  

 

 

  0.15  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.56  

 

 

  1,018,956,000  

 

 

  18,473,000  

 

 

 

  UNDER PIT  

 

 
                                                                      
 

   Cut-Off
Grade
 
 

 

   gpt   

 

 

   Classification   

 

 

   Au   

 

   gpT   

 

 

   Tonnes   

 

 

   Ounces   

 

 

  1.00  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  1.38  

 

 

  1,106,000  

 

 

  49,000  

 

 

  0.75  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  1.12  

 

 

  2,205,000  

 

 

  79,000  

 

 

  0.50  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.76  

 

 

  6,741,000  

 

 

  165,000  

 

 

  0.40  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.63  

 

 

  11,872,000  

 

 

  239,000  

 

 

  0.30  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.50  

 

 

  21,854,000  

 

 

  351,000  

 

 

  0.15  

 

 

   Indicated   

 

 

  0.35  

 

 

  46,969,000  

 

 

  525,000  

 

         
 

  1.00  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  1.92  

 

 

  8,537,000  

 

 

  526,000  

 

 

  0.75  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  1.35  

 

 

  18,014,000  

 

 

  782,000  

 

 

  0.50  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.81  

 

 

  62,654,000  

 

 

  1,635,000  

 

 

  0.40  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.66  

 

 

  107,236,000  

 

 

  2,277,000  

 

 

  0.30  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.53  

 

 

  182,142,000  

 

 

  3,117,000  

 

 

  0.15  

 

 

   Inferred   

 

 

  0.34  

 

 

  444,266,000  

 

 

  4,898,000  

 

 

 

 
 
 

    Mineral Resources for the primary resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.50 g/t gold and constrained within an open pit shell using a gold price of $ US$2,490/ounce, US$2.50/t mining cost, US$25 processing cost, US$2.00/t G+A, 92% gold recovery, and a 45° pit slope. Tonnes and ounces rounded to the nearest thousand.    

 

 

 

The Golden Summit assay dataset for the current MRE includes collar locations for 444 drill holes and 89,485 assays within the grade shell boundaries used to constrain the MRE. The MRE is constrained within three lithological domains that have been used for resource estimation: High-Grade Schist, Low-Grade Schist and Intrusive. These three domains are further constrained by a 0.14 g/t Au gradeshell.

 

Compositing of samples is performed to mitigate the impact of sample length on the contribution of sample grade (sample support). Assays were composited to a length of three (3) meters, as over 90% of the samples within the three domains have a length equal to or less than three meters. Composites honour domain boundaries, and if the last sample within a domain was less than 1.0 meters in length, it was discarded.

 

Capping analysis was conducted for composites in three domains using cumulative frequency curves. A break in the cumulative frequency curve for the High-Grade Schist domain at 110 g/t suggested that this would be an appropriate capping level. However, it was determined that applying this cap resulted in a lower average gold grade for the block model compared to the corresponding composite population. Consequently, the capping level was increased to 170 g/t. At this new level, only two composites were affected, resulting in a 1.5% reduction in the cumulative value of the composite population.

 

In the Low-Grade Schist domain, the capping level was set at 70 g/t Au, where the cumulative frequency curve shows a sharp break. This affected ten composites, resulting in an approximate 1.5% decrease in the cumulative value of the composite population.

 

For the Intrusive domain, the cumulative frequency curve exhibits a break between 7 and 8 g/t, and the capping level was set at 8 g/t. Six composites were impacted by this cap, resulting in a reduction of about 1.5% in the aggregate value of the population.

 

In 2024, Freegold provided Tetra Tech with 75 specific gravity measurements, of which 33 were identified as intrusive and 42 as schist. The average specific gravity for intrusive samples was 2.68 g/cm³, while for schist samples, it was 2.67 g/cm³. These average values are very similar to previous measurements and were applied to the estimation domain wireframes.

 

Variographic ranges were analyzed using Sage 2001 software, which generates least-squares best-fit curves for the variogram values. The Schist parameters were utilized for the High-Grade domain, as it is primarily located within the Schist domain.

 

Grades were interpolated into the block model in a single pass using SGS Genesis software and the ordinary kriging method. For a grade to be interpolated into a block, a minimum of four (4) and a maximum of six (6) composites had to be present within the volume of the search ellipse. Additionally, a maximum of two composites was permitted from a single drill hole, ensuring that the grade interpolated into each block was informed by composites from at least two different drill holes. The dimensions of the search ellipses were determined by combining variographic ranges with the minimum requirements needed to include at least two drill holes.

 

Mineral Resources were classified as Indicated or Inferred as defined by CIM (2005, 2014).

 

Because the Golden Summit mineralization occurs in part at or near surface, the global estimated resource was constrained with a conceptual pit shell. The gold price was obtained from three-year trailing averages. Mining and processing costs were obtained from internal Freegold studies, and the process recovery is based on 2024 metallurgical tests.

 

The block model has been validated through visual comparison of blocks and associated assay grades, as well as numeric comparison of assay, composite, and block model grades using swath plots.

 

The past five years have been transformational for the Company, and 2025 is set to be an exciting year for Freegold. Our plans include further metallurgical test work, as well as additional infill and expansion drilling. The 2024 program demonstrated our ability to both expand the resource and improve the overall resource grade. A Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS), which will incorporate the 2025 drilling results, is expected to commence later this year. We want to acknowledge the continued support of our shareholders and look forward to making further progress with the 2025 program.

 

  Qualified Person and Technical Information  

 

A sample quality control/quality assurance program has been in place throughout the program. Drill cores were cut in half using a diamond saw, with one-half placed in sealed bags for preparation and subsequent geochemical analysis by ALS Laboratories. Core samples were prepared in ALS’s facility using the PREP-31BY package. Each core sample is crushed to better than 70 %, passing a 2 mm (Tyler 9 mesh, US Std. No.10) screen. A split of 1kg is taken and pulverized to better than 85 % passing a 75-micron (Tyler 200 mesh, US Std. No. 200) screen; a portion of this pulverized split is digested by Four Acid and analyzed via ICP-AES (method code ME-ICP61). Fire Assay analyzes all samples with an AAS finish, method code Au-AA23 (30g sample size) and over 10 g/t are automatically assayed using a FA Grav method, Au-GRAV21. Additional Au screening is performed using ALS’s Au- SCR24 method; select samples are dry-screened to 100 microns. A duplicate 50g fire assay is conducted on the fine fraction, and an assay is conducted on the entire oversize fraction. Total Au content, individual assays, and weight fractions are reported. Analytical and assay procedures are conducted in ALS’s North Vancouver and Reno facilities. Several holes were analyzed by MSALABS. At MSALABS, the entire sample was dried and crushed to 70% passing -2mm (CRU-CPA). A ~500g riffle split was analyzed for gold using CHRYSOS PhotonAssay™ (CPA-Au1). From this, 250g was further riffle split from the original PhotonAssay™ sample, pulverized, and a 0.25g sub-sample was analyzed for multi-element geochemistry using MSA’s IMS230 package, which includes 4-acid digestion and ICP-MS finish. MSALABS operates under ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 9001 certified quality systems. A QA/QC program included laboratory and field standards inserted every ten samples. Blanks are inserted at the start of the submittal, and at least one blank every 25 standards.

 

The MRE, with an effective date of July 23, 2025 , was prepared by Tetra Tech Canada. Greg Mosher , P. Geo and Maurie Marks , P.Eng of Tetra Tech Canada are ‘Qualified Persons’ for the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate as defined in NI 43-101 and are ‘independent’ of Freegold for the purposes of NI 43-101. Greg Mosher and Maurie Marks have reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information herein regarding the Golden Summit project. Greg Mosher visited Golden Summit on November 11–12, 2022, and October 16, 2024 . Greg Mosher and Maurie Marks visited the project on September 12, 2023 .

 

The full technical report, which is being prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 by Tetra Tech Canada, will be available on SEDAR ( www.sedarplus.com) under the Company’s issuer profile within 45 days from this news release.

 

  Alvin Jackson , P.Geo, Vice President of Exploration and Development of the Company and a ‘Qualified Person’ as defined in NI 43-101, has supervised the preparation of this news release and has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained herein.

 

  Some statements in this news release contain forward-looking information, including, without limitation, statements as to planned expenditures and exploration programs, potential mineralization and resources, exploration results, the completion of an updated NI 43-101 technical report, and any other future plans. These statements address future events and conditions and, as such, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the statements. Such factors include, without limitation, the completion of planned expenditures, the ability to complete exploration programs on schedule, and the success of exploration programs. See Freegold’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31st, 2024 , filed under Freegold’s profile at www.sedar.com , for a detailed discussion of the risk factors associated with Freegold’s operations. On January 30, 2020 , the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global health emergency. Reactions to the spread of COVID-19 continue to lead to, among other things, significant restrictions on travel, business closures, quarantines, and a general reduction in economic activity. While these effects have been reduced in recent months, the continuation and re-introduction of significant restrictions, business disruptions, and related financial impact, and the duration of any such disruptions cannot be reasonably estimated. The risks to Freegold of such public health crises also include employee health and safety risks and a slowdown or temporary suspension of operations in geographic locations impacted by an outbreak. Such public health crises, as well as global geopolitical crises, can result in volatility and disruptions in the supply and demand for various products and services, global supply chains, and financial markets, as well as declining trade and market sentiment and reduced mobility of people, all of which could affect interest rates, credit ratings, credit risk, and inflation. As a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, Freegold has implemented a COVID management program and established a full-service Camp at Golden Summit to attempt to mitigate risks to its employees, contractors, and community. While the extent to which COVID-19 may impact Freegold is uncertain, it is possible that COVID-19 may have a material adverse effect   on Freegold’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.  

 

SOURCE Freegold Ventures Limited

 

 

 

 Cision View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2025/24/c0851.html  

 

 

 

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., an outspoken opponent of antisemitism, said Wednesday that those who refuse to speak out against the heinous acts Hamas perpetrated in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 ‘have no business’ claiming to be humanitarians.

‘If you refuse to condemn Hamas for the murder, maiming, mutilation, rape, torture, and abduction of thousands of Jews and Israelis on October 7, then you have no business calling yourself a humanitarian,’ Torres wrote on X. 

‘A humanitarianism that devalues Jewish life is no humanitarianism at all, for it has been hollowed out by antisemitism,’ he added.

The congressman has been a strong voice of support for Israel.

‘The singular stumbling block to ending the war is the terrorist organization that barbarically began it: Hamas. Scapegoating Israel is so second nature to the international community that Hamas’ role in precipitating and perpetuating the war has been all but forgotten,’ Torres wrote on X earlier this month.

In another post on X this month he opined that ‘Antisemitism is the deadliest disease ever to afflict the human heart.’

In a post last month, he asserted, ‘If Israel is the sole country in the Middle East—indeed the world—for which you reserve the label ‘apartheid’—then your use of the term is probably propagandistic rather than principled and your purpose is not constructive criticism but the destructive delegitimation of Israel as a Jewish State.’

Rep. Torres says Biden Admin made

Torres has served in the U.S. House of Representatives since early 2021.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Medicare has become one of the most expensive and inefficient federal programs in history, projected to cost over $1.1 trillion in 2025. Its costs are growing faster than inflation and wages, contributing mightily to our $36 trillion national debt. Worse, it delivers this mountain of spending through a bureaucratic system that incentivizes fraud, waste, overtreatment, and poor health.

There’s a simple, bold alternative. Let states opt out of Medicare as it exists today and pay their share of Medicare funds directly to seniors, as a direct cash transfer, alongside Social Security. Instead of government price-setting and provider payments, seniors could purchase health insurance and care in open, competitive markets. The result would be lower costs, healthier people, and vastly less fraud.

A System Built to Overspend

Medicare pays providers through the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule — a price list of over 10,000 services largely determined by the American Medical Association (AMA). A committee of 32 doctors, known as the RUC, meets behind closed doors to decide how much should be reimbursed. This is not a competitive marketplace — it’s a medical cartel. And the consequences of cartel price-setting are exactly what economists would predict: rising prices, distorted incentives, and rampant waste.

Medicare fraud is especially staggering. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has labeled Medicare a “high-risk” program for over three decades, with “serious vulnerabilities to waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement.” In Miami, a Medicare Fraud Strike Force once visited 1,600 businesses that had billed Medicare for equipment — only to find that nearly a third didn’t even exist. Over 10 percent of Medicare’s entire budget — more than $60 billion every year — is lost to fraud, waste, and improper payments.

Imagine if that money were in the hands of seniors, not bureaucrats. Fraud would plummet overnight.

Misaligned Incentives Lead to Disease

Medicare also discourages healthy behavior. Under its rules, seniors’ premiums aren’t affected by whether they exercise daily or smoke two packs a day. Insurance companies can’t offer lower rates for better health. Americans now suffer skyrocketing rates of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease — behavioral choices contribute significantly to outsized medical costs.

Before Medicare, insurers could price policies based on risk, charging each individual a premium that reflected their expected medical costs. That gave individuals strong financial incentives to stay healthy. Today, people with chronic disease pay no more than those who take care of themselves, removing one of the most powerful motivators for good health.

Medicare’s bureaucracy is slow to adopt new medical knowledge, and often blocks access to innovative treatments. Getting a new treatment covered as “reasonable and necessary” by Medicare can take years — 16 years, in the case of one lifesaving alternative to coronary bypass surgery. But how many lives — and how many billions of dollars — were lost to preventable surgery, unnecessary stents, and symptom-managing drugs in the meantime? 

Overpriced and Overprescribed

The current system also encourages overtreatment. Doctors and hospitals are paid based on volume of services, not results. Want to implant a heart stent that’s been proven ineffective for stable coronary artery disease? Medicare will pay. Want to teach a patient how to reverse heart disease with diet and exercise? You’ll be lucky to break even.

Studies have shown that stents don’t prevent heart attacks or prolong life in most patients. But Medicare still incentivizes them because the pricing formula hasn’t been updated to reflect current science — or because doing so would reduce provider income. As a result, millions of unnecessary stents have been implanted in the last two decades. 

Even doctors estimate that up to 20 percent of care, including prescribed medication, is unnecessary, and admit physicians are more likely to prescribe unnecessary procedures when they’re reimbursed more. Doctors also tend to steer patients toward specialists and newer, higher-cost treatments, because primary care and long-established treatments are routinely underreimbursed. Both over- and under-utilization of care harm patients and drive up costs. 

The Alternative: Pay Seniors, Not Providers

Instead of paying hospitals and providers, we should pay the seniors themselves. Divide the projected $1.1 trillion Medicare budget by the 68.5 million beneficiaries, and each senior could receive over $1,350 per month in cash. That’s more than $32,000 a year for a married couple — enough to buy catastrophic insurance and shop wisely for care.

Seniors could choose their own coverage and care — even abroad. They could save unspent funds for future care or pass them on. Medical providers would compete for their business, driving down prices and improving service. Innovation would flourish.

A pilot state could prove the concept. Let one state adopt the cash option, allow insurers to price based on risk, and let markets work. The outcomes — lower costs, healthier seniors, fewer fraud cases — would sell themselves.

What About the Sick?

Critics argue that markets would leave the sick behind. But the opposite is more likely. A competitive system would reduce waste, freeing up resources to help those who truly need it. Insurance companies would be motivated to find and promote lifestyle programs that prevent or reverse chronic illness. Risk pools or supplemental aid could protect the uninsurable more generously than our current system does.

Health care was never meant to be a federal responsibility. The Constitution delegates no such power to Washington, and the Tenth Amendment reserves unenumerated powers to the states and the people. Letting states test free-market reforms not only honors our federalist system — it empowers local innovation.

As Milton Friedman argued, the best way to help people is to give them money, not services. People spend their own money more wisely than bureaucrats ever will. Medicare should follow the model of Social Security: give the funds to individuals, and let them choose how to spend it.

A Win for Everyone

This is a solution conservatives can embrace, taxpayers can afford, and seniors can love. It puts money in the hands of patients, not middlemen. It restores incentives for health. It slashes fraud and waste. And it opens the door to 50 experiments in delivering better care at lower cost.

America’s seniors deserve more than rationed care and bureaucratic bungling. They deserve freedom — and the power to manage their own health.

It’s time to pay them, not the providers.

President Trump recently signed the GENIUS Act into law, establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for stablecoin issuance. Much of the celebration surrounding its passage has focused on what appears to be a remarkable policy reversal by the US government. While it’s true that many politicians have embraced cryptocurrency (or have been replaced in office by those who have), the Act’s passage is not purely based on the promise of the underlying technology. That stablecoins function as a form of financial repression is at least as important, given the rising, and increasingly unsustainable, national debt.

According to the Congressional Budget Office‘s January report, the US debt-to-GDP ratio is approximately 100 percent and is expected to reach 118 percent over the next ten years. This level of debt is not unprecedented. The US experienced similar levels following the Second World War. In fact, history is replete with examples of high levels of government debt. What makes the current US debt situation particularly concerning is that it is not the result of war — and nearly every projection suggests the debt will continue to grow.

If one examines historical debt-to-GDP ratios in advanced economies, a pattern emerges. A prolonged period of war tends to cause a rapid increase in debt. Following the war, military spending declines and the debt-to-GDP ratio gradually and slowly falls over time. This pattern makes sense. For much of modern history, national defense was the state’s primary expenditure. Wars are extremely costly, both in human and monetary terms. Rather than covering the monetary cost with sufficiently higher taxes during the war, governments tend to borrow in order to spread the burden of taxation over time. A prolonged war therefore leads to a rapid growth in debt, followed by a gradual decline.

The recent history of the United States and other modern states is quite different. Expenditures on social safety net programs have dominated the budget in the postwar period, exceeding national defense. Furthermore, the dramatic increase in US government debt combined with the significant rise in interest rates in recent years have resulted in the US paying more in interest on the debt than it does on national defense. This is not sustainable.

To address its growing debt problem, the US government has four broad policy options:

  • broad-based tax increases
  • entitlement reform
  • allowing inflation to erode the debt’s real value
  • financial repression.

In the current political climate, the first two options are largely off the table. Members of both major political parties claim to be better stewards of entitlement programs and those discussing higher taxes often confine such taxes to the “wealthy.”

Since the debt is owed in nominal terms, one way to reduce the debt would be to issue more dollars to buy it back. This would lead to higher inflation. Although technically not a default, higher inflation would effectively reduce the real (inflation-adjusted) repayment lenders receive. 

It would be difficult for the US government to intentionally engineer a higher rate of inflation. The 1951 Federal Reserve-Treasury Accord separated the roles of debt management and monetary policy. A policy to deliberately inflate away the value of the debt would require that the Federal Reserve relinquish its independence.

That said, even an independent Federal Reserve could end up effectively monetizing the debt. Should debt continue on its unsustainable path, for example, concerns about the ability of the government to repay might lead to volatility in the bond market. The Federal Reserve would likely respond by acting as a buyer of last resort, expanding its balance sheet and ultimately causing higher inflation. Still, there is probably some limit to how much the Fed would monetize the debt, so long as it maintains its independence.

That leaves financial repression. Financial repression is defined as a formal requirement by the government that certain financial institutions purchase government debt. The government might prevent certain financial institutions from holding any financial assets other than government debt. Alternatively, the government could require financial institutions to hold a specific fraction of assets in US Treasury securities. The effect of such policies is to increase the demand for the government’s debt, which weakens the tendency for rising debt issuance to lead to higher borrowing costs.

Enter the GENIUS Act.

Stablecoins are digital dollars, similar to the digital dollars in traditional bank accounts. Both are claims to a physical dollar issued by the financial institution. Whereas the digital dollars in one’s bank account reside on a ledger controlled by the financial institution and are transferred over the payment rails of the traditional financial system, stablecoins reside (and are transferred) on the blockchains of various cryptocurrency projects.

Stablecoin issuers are financial intermediaries. One deposits a dollar to receive a stablecoin. The issuer sets a fraction of the dollars it receives aside to meet redemption requests, and uses the remaining fraction to buy interest-earning assets. This is where the financial repression comes in. The GENIUS Act requires that these stablecoin issuers hold their assets in cash, short-term US Treasury securities, or as reserve balances at the Federal Reserve.

The hope is that stablecoins will expand global access to dollars. The issuers will then invest a fraction of those dollars into US government debt. To the extent that these stablecoin holders were not previously holding dollars or dollar-denominated assets, the new policy could significantly increase the demand for US government debt and keep borrowing costs down. 

This isn’t mere happenstance. A number of current and former members of Congress are on record arguing that stablecoins expand the reach of the US dollar globally, reinforcing dollar dominance, while also creating a growing, passive demand for US government debt.

In short, the GENIUS Act may look like a forward-looking regulatory framework for a new technology — and it is. But it is also a clear step toward a modern form of financial repression, which appears to be the government’s favored strategy for managing its increasingly unsustainable debt.

 

Walker Lane Resources Ltd. (TSX – V: WLR) (F r ankfurt:6YL ) (‘WLR’ o r t h e ‘ Comp a ny’) is pleased to announce, further to its news releases of June 10, 2025, that it has received TSX Venture Exchange approval to close the non-brokered private placement (the ‘ Private Placement ‘). On July 23, 2025, the Company issued 2,508,335 non-flow through Units (each a ‘ NFT Unit ‘) at a price of $0.12 per NFT Unit, for gross proceeds of $301,000, and 607,143 flow-through Units (each a ‘ FT Unit ‘) at a price of $0.14 per FT Unit, for gross proceeds of $85,000, for aggregate gross proceeds of $386,000. Each NFT Unit is composed of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a ‘ NFT Warrant ‘). Each FT Unit is composed of one common share and one common share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a ‘ FT Warrant ‘), each NFT Warrant and each FT Warrant are exercisable for two (2) years at $0.16 per common share.

 

An insider of the Company subscribed for an aggregate of 1,178,571 Units, composed of 750,000 NFT Units and 428,571 FT Units. Such participation was considered to be a ‘related party transaction’ as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Securityholders in Special Transactions (‘ MI 61-101 ‘). The Company relied on the exemption from valuation requirement and minority approval pursuant to subsection 5.5(a) and 5.7(a) of MI 61-101, respectively, for the insider participation in the Offering, as the securities do not represent more than 25% of the Company’s market capitalization, as determined in accordance with MI 61-101.

 

The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of FT Units to incur ‘Canadian exploration expenses’ and ‘flow through mining expenditures’ as these terms are defined in the Income Tax Act (Canada) and, in particular, the Company’s exploration program at its Amy and Silver Hart Properties in the Rancheria Silver District, (Yukon/British Columbia), and potentially limited activities at Logjam (Yukon). Such proceeds will be renounced to the subscribers with an effective date not later than December 31, 2025, in the aggregate amount of not less than the total amount of gross proceeds raised from the issue of FT Units. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the sale of NFT units for its properties in Nevada including Tule Canyon, Cambridge and Silver Mountain and for general working capital. The FT and NFT Units issued under the financing are subject to a four-month hold.

 

   A     bout Walker Lane Resources Ltd.   

 

 Walker Lane Resources Ltd. is a growth-stage exploration company focused on the exploration of high-grade gold, silver and polymetallic deposits in the Walker Lane Gold Trend District in Nevada and the Rancheria Silver District in Yukon/B.C. and other property assets in Yukon. The Company intends to initiate exploration programs to advance the drill-ready Tule Canyon (Walker Lane, Nevada) and Amy (Rancheria Silver, B.C.) projects to resource definition stage through proposed drilling campaigns that the Company desires to undertake in the near future.

 

The company intends to conduct early stage exploration efforts on its Cambridge and Silver Mountain Properties in the Walker Lane Area, Nevada, evaluate its Silver Hart/Blue Heaven property for medium term development, and advancing exploration on its Logjam property in Yukon.

 

On behalf of the Board:
   ‘Kevin Brewer’    
Kevin Brewer, President, CEO and Director
Walker Lane Resources Ltd.

For Further Information and Investor Inquiries:  

 

Kevin Brewer, P. Geo., MBA, B.Sc. (Hons), Dip. Mine Eng.
President, CEO and Director
Tel: (709) 327 8013
  kbrewer80@hotmail.com   
 
Telephone (604) 602-0001   
  www.walkerlaneresources.com  
 
Suite 1600-409 Granville St.,
Vancouver, BC, V6C 1T2

 

   Ne     i     t     h     er     t     h     e     TS     X     Ven     t     ure     Exc     h     a     n     ge     n     o     r     its     Reg     u     l     a     ti     o     n     S     ervices     Prov     i     der     (as     t     h     at     term     is     de     fi     ned     in     t     h     e p     o     li     c     ies     of     the     T     SX     Vent     u     re     Excha     n     ge)     accepts     re     s     ponsi     b     ility     f     or     t     he     ade     q     u     acy     or     accuracy     of     this     release.   

 

  Cautionary and Forward-Looking Statements  

 

This press release and related figures, contain certain forward-looking information and forward-looking statements as defined in applicable securities laws (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). These statements relate to future events or our future performance. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. The use of any of the words ‘anticipate’, ‘plans’, ‘continue’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘project’, ‘predict’, ‘potential’, ‘should’, ‘believe’ ‘targeted’, ‘can’, ‘anticipates’, ‘intends’, ‘likely’, ‘should’, ‘could’ or grammatical variations thereof and similar expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this presentation. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: our strategy and priorities including certain statements included in this presentation are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Canadian securities laws, including statements regarding the Tule Canyon, Cambridge, Silver Mountain, and Shamrock Properties in Nevada (USA), and its Silverknife and Amy properties in British Columbia, the Silver Hart, Blue Heaven and Logjam properties in Yukon all of which now comprise the mineral property assets of WLR. WLR has assumed other assets of CMC Metals Ltd. including common share holdings of North Bay Resources Inc. and all conditions and agreements pertaining to the sale of the Bishop mill gold processing facility and remains subject to the condition of the option of the Silverknife Property with Coeur Silvertip Holdings Ltd. These forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current beliefs and are based on information currently available to the Company and assumptions the Company believes are reasonable. The Company has made various assumptions, including, among others, that: the historical information related to the Company’s properties is reliable; the Company’s operations are not disrupted or delayed by unusual geological or technical problems; the Company has the ability to explore the Company’s properties; the Company will be able to raise any necessary additional capital on reasonable terms to execute its business plan; the Company’s current corporate activities will proceed as expected; general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner; and budgeted costs and expenditures are and will continue to be accurate. Actual results and developments may differ materially from results and developments discussed in the forward looking statements as they are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties, including: public health threats; fluctuations in metals prices, price of consumed commodities and currency markets; future profitability of mining operations; access to personnel; results of exploration and development activities, accuracy of technical information; risks related to ownership of properties; risks related to mining operations; risks related to mineral resource figures being estimates based on interpretations and assumptions which may result in less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently anticipated; the interpretation of drilling results and other geological data; receipt, maintenance and security of permits and mineral property titles; environmental and other regulatory risks; changes in operating expenses; changes in general market and industry conditions; changes in legal or regulatory requirements; other risk factors set out in this presentation; and other risk factors set out in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Although the Company has attempted to identify significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other risks that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Certain of these risks and uncertainties are beyond the Company’s control. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurances that the actual results or developments will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences or benefits to, or effect on, the Company. The information contained in this presentation is derived from management of the Company and otherwise from publicly available information and does not purport to contain all of the information that an investor may desire to have in evaluating the Company. The information has not been independently verified, may prove to be imprecise, and is subject to material updating, revision and further amendment. While management is not aware of any misstatements regarding any industry data presented herein, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made or given by or on behalf of the Company as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this presentation and no responsibility or liability is accepted by any person for such information or opinions. The forward-looking statements and information in this presentation speak only as of the date of this presentation and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by applicable law. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Because of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions contained herein, prospective investors should not read forward-looking information as guarantees of future performance or results and should not place undue reliance on forward looking information. Nothing in this presentation is, or should be relied upon as, a promise or representation as to the future. To the extent any forward-looking statement in this presentation constitutes ‘future-oriented financial information’ or ‘financial outlooks’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, such information is being provided to demonstrate the anticipated market penetration and the reader is cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for any other purpose and the reader should not place undue reliance on such future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks. Future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks, as with forward-looking statements generally, are, without limitation, based on the assumptions and subject to the risks set out above. The Company’s actual financial position and results of operations may differ materially from management’s current expectations and, as a result, the Company’s revenue and expenses. The Company’s financial projections were not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of International Financial Reporting Standards and have not been examined, reviewed or compiled by the Company’s accountants or auditors. The Company’s financial projections represent management’s estimates as of the dates indicated thereon.

 

  Primary Logo 

 

 

News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Joe Cavatoni, senior market strategist, Americas, at the World Gold Council, explains that market risk and uncertainty are driving gold, with H1 2025 seeing multiple record highs.

‘Think strategically when you think about gold, and keep that allocation in mind,’ he said.

He also shares thoughts on the importance of central bank allocations and the potential impact of tariffs and US economic conditions on gold during the second half of 2025.

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Oil prices fell sharply during the second quarter, after reaching year-to-date highs early in the year.

Between January and the end of June, Brent shed 18.26 percent from US$81.69 to US$66.77. West Texas Intermediate made a similar decline falling 16.94 percent from US$78.86 to US$65.50, over the same time period.

The contraction was largely attributed to OPEC+ easing production cuts and increasing output.

Global supply was further bolstered by China’s strong import volumes and rising domestic output, giving refiners room to delay purchases and adding to a mild US inventory build, both of which added downward pressure.

Conversely, seasonal demand from the US summer driving season and solid Q2 GDP growth in China offered some support.

Despite that backdrop, the five top-performing oil and gas stocks on the TSX and TSXV have seen share price growth over Q2 2025. All year-to-date performance and share price data was obtained on July 16, 2025, using TradingView’s stock screener, and oil and gas companies with market caps above C$10 million at that time were considered.

1. Falcon Oil & Gas (TSXV:FO)

Year-to-date gain: 43.75 percent
Market cap: C$127.55 million
Share price: C$0.115

Headquartered in Dublin, Ireland, Falcon Oil & Gas is an international oil and gas company incorporated in BC, Canada. The company specializes in the exploration and development of unconventional oil and gas assets, with interests in assets in Australia, South Africa and Hungary.

On January 24, Falcon issued its first corporate update of 2025, announcing the launch of a well stimulation campaign for two wells for the Shenandoah South pilot project in the Beetaloo Sub-Basin, located in Australia’s Northern Territory.

The company has a 22.5 interest in the Beetaloo joint venture, with Tamboran Resources (NYSE:TBN,ASX:TBN) owning the remaining 77.5 percent.

Falcon’s share price spiked several times in June, reaching a year-to-date high of C$0.14 on June 17, which it maintained through late June. The stock movement coincided with Beetaloo updates, including “stellar” flow test results on June 17.

“The IP30 flow rate results announced today of 7.2 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d), are truly stellar and marks another major data point in the Beetaloo Sub-basin again demonstrating that it compares to the best shale wells in the United States,” CEO Philip O’Quigley wrote in the press release.

2. Imperial Oil (TSX:IMO)

Year-to-date gain: 25.67 percent
Market cap: C$57.37 billion
Share price: C$112.70

Calgary-based Imperial Oil is a prominent Canadian energy company involved in the exploration, production, refining and marketing of petroleum products. With a history spanning over 140 years, Imperial operates diverse assets across Canada, including oil sands, conventional crude oil and natural gas assets.

On January 31, Imperial released its Q4 2024 results, reporting an estimated net income of C$1.23 billion in Q4 2024, slightly down from C$1.24 billion in Q3. The decline was attributed to lower price realizations, partly offset by higher production and improved refinery utilization in the Downstream segment.

On May 2, the company announced a Q2 2025 dividend of C$0.72 payable on July 1.

Imperial shares reached a year-to-date high of C$113.05 on July 13. The rally occurred after Scotiabank raised its share price target for Imperial from C$100 to C$110 on July 11, citing stronger refining margins and earnings outlook.

3. MEG Energy (TSX:MEG)

Year-to-date gain: 10.07 percent
Market cap: C$6.7 billion
Share price: C$26.35

MEG is an energy company solely focused on in-situ thermal oil production in the southern Athabasca oil region of Alberta, Canada. Utilizing innovative enhanced oil recovery projects, including steam-assisted gravity drainage extraction methods, the company aims to increase oil recovery responsibly while reducing carbon emissions.

In mid-May, Strathcona Resources (TSX:SCR) made an unsolicited C$4.1 billion offer for MEG, a move company executives quickly denounced.

In a subsequent press release on June 16, MEG called the offer “inadequate, opportunistic, and NOT in the best interests of MEG or its shareholders.”

Chairman of the Board James McFarland stated in the release, ‘A combination with Strathcona would expose shareholders to inferior assets and significant capital markets risks, including a C$6 billion overhang resulting from Waterous Energy Fund’s 51 percent ownership in the combined company.”

MEG has launched a strategic review and welcomed alternative bids from other companies.

Shares of MEG rose to a year-to-date high of C$26.14 on June 20, on the heels of the statement and alongside news that operations at the company’s Christina Lake operations in Alberta would resume at full capacity following wildfire interruptions.

4. Headwater Exploration (TSX:HWX)

Year-to-date gain: 3.75 percent
Market cap: C$1.65 billion
Share price: C$6.92

Headwater Exploration is a Canadian oil and gas company focused on developing high-quality assets in Alberta’s Clearwater play and low-decline natural gas in New Brunswick’s McCully Field.

In March, Headwater reported strong 2024 results, with annual production up 13 percent year-over-year to 20,310 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d) and net income rising 20 percent to C$188 million.

Headwater released its Q1 2025 results and a company update in May, highlighting the receipt of TSX approval for a normal course issuer bid, allowing it to repurchase up to 10 percent of its public float over the next year.

Additionally the company reported record production of 22,066 boe/d during Q1 and adjusted funds flow of C$92.4 million. Net income for the period came in at C$50 million. The company declared a quarterly dividend of C$0.11 per share during Q1 and ended the quarter with no debt and C$63.6 million in adjusted working capital.

Company shares spiked to a year-to-date high of C$7.43 on January 9, and reached a Q2 high of C$7.22 on June 19, which coincided with a broader surge in the oil market.

5. Athabasca Oil (TSX:ATH)

Year-to-date gain: 3.72 percent
Market cap: C$2.84 billion
Share price: C$5.57

Athabasca Oil is focused on developing thermal and light oil assets within Alberta’s Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. The company has established a substantial land base with high-quality resources. Its light oil operations are managed through its private subsidiary, Duvernay Energy, in which the company holds a 70 percent equity interest.

On March 5, Athabasca Oil released its 2024 year end results, highlighting strong production and significant cash flow increases. The company averaged 36,815 boe/d during 2024, marking a 7 percent year-over-year increase.

Its Q1 2025 results released on May 7 reported further production growth, with average petroleum and natural gas production of 37,714 boe/d and average thermal oil output of 34,742 barrels per day.

Athabasca Oil generated C$130 million in adjusted funds flow and C$71 million in free cash flow. The company returns capital to shareholders through annual share buybacks, and at the time of the release, it had completed C$94 million in buybacks since the start of 2025.

Broad market positivity in mid-June pushed shares of Athabasca Oil to a year-to-date high of C$6.16 on June 20.

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com