Author

admin

Browsing

Empire Metals Limited – MRE Confirms World Dominant Titanium Discovery

Empire Metals Limited, the AIM-quoted and OTCQX-traded exploration and development company, is pleased to report a maiden Mineral Resource Estimate (‘MRE’) at its Pitfield Project in Western Australia (‘Pitfield’ or the ‘Project’). The MRE is reported in accordance with the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (‘JORC’) 2012 Code (The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources, and Ore Reserves) and includes both Indicated and Inferred categories.

Highlights

  • One of the largest and highest-grade titanium resources reported globally1, totalling:

2.2 billion tonnes grading 5.1% TiO2 for 113 million tonnes of contained TiO2

  • The MRE is reported only for Pitfield’s Thomas and Cosgrove deposits, and contains an in-situ Weathered Zone, inclusive of both the saprolite and weathered bedrock, of:

1.26 billion tonnes grading 5.2% TiO2 for 65.6 million tonnes of contained TiO2

  • The MRE also includes a significant Indicated Resource category, predominantly at the Thomas deposit, of:

697 million tonnes grading 5.3% TiO2 for 37.2 million tonnes contained TiO2

  • Multi-generational mine life: the Thomas and Cosgrove deposits that contain the MRE extend over 39km2 and 20km2 respectively, however they represent less than 20% of the known mineralised surface area. The underlying geophysical anomaly extends for kilometres below the extent of the current depth of drilling.
  • High-grade, high-purity titanium mineralisation: occurs from surface, showing exceptional grade continuity along strike and down dip.
  • Rapid Product Development Success: Conventional processing has already produced a high-purity product grading 99.25% TiO2 with negligible impurities, suitable for titanium sponge metal or pigment production.
  • Friable, in-situ weathered zone: contains naturally forming TiO2 minerals, anatase and rutile, suitable for low-cost strip mining, with no overburden, no inter-burden, and no blasting required.
  • Drilling at Thomas has defined a large, high-grade central core averaging circa 6% TiO2 across a continuous 3.6km strike length and over 2km width, expected to provide sufficient feedstock for over 30 years of initial mine life.
  • Further resource expansion planned: additional drilling is expected to increase the size of the maiden MRE and upgrade portions of the resource into Measured and Indicated categories.
  • Strategically located with access to global markets: Pitfield benefits from excellent logistics, with existing rail links to deep-water ports providing direct shipping access to Asia, USA, Europe and Saudi Arabia, ensuring secure and efficient delivery to global titanium and critical mineral markets.

1US Geological Survey, 2025 Summary Sheets, World Resources of Titanium Minerals.

Shaun Bunn, Managing Director, said:‘Pitfield is truly one of the natural geological wonders of the world: a district scale, giant titanium rich ore deposit which has remained hidden in plain sight until recently discovered by Empire. Credit goes to our talented exploration and technical team who have delivered one of the world’s largest titanium MRE, a metallurgical flowsheet and a saleable product, all within a remarkable short period of 30 months from our first drill hole.

‘The incredible success achieved to date has only spurred our team’s endeavours to untap the true potential of this phenomenal project and we remain focused on completing our processing optimisation testwork and moving rapidly into continuous piloting early next year. We have already commenced engineering, environmental and marketing studies which combined, will help confirm the commercial viability of Pitfield and form the basis for a Final Investment Decision.’

Pitfield Mineral Resource Statement (100% basis)

The Pitfield MRE incorporates the titanium mineralisation hosted within the interbedded succession of sandstones, siltstones and conglomerates as delineated through Diamond Core (‘DD’), Reverse Circulation (‘RC’) and Aircore (AC) drilling, that is supplemented with geophysical surveys, surface mapping and soil and rock chip sampling.

The Pitfield MRE is being reported in accordance with the 2012 JORC Code and estimated by a Competent Person as defined by the Code. The Pitfield MRE contains a high percentage of Indicated category, highlighting the confidence level of the resource within the maiden statement.

Notably, the MRE consists of two, distinct, high-grade, near-surface, in-situ weathered bedrock zones referred to as the Thomas and Cosgrove Deposits, which are defined by an area of 11.75km2 and 2.9km2 respectively (refer Figure 2). The MRE is within the larger Thomas and Cosgrove prospect areas of a combined area of 59km2.

The MRE has been subdivided to show the potential mineralisation at each prospect separately. It has been further subdivided to show the range of mineralisation within the in-situ saprolite zone and weathered bedrock zones, both being enriched in titanium dioxide minerals (anatase and rutile) and extending from surface to an average depth of approximately 30m to 50m (Table 1). Additionally, the MRE includes the uppermost portion of the underlying fresh bedrock mineralisation, which is primarily enriched with the titanium mineral titanite, as well as some rutile and titanium-iron oxides, and is completely open at depth.

Table 1 below summarises the MRE for Pitfield’s Thomas and Cosgrove deposits effective as of 13 October 2025 on a 100% basis. Empire owns 70% of Pitfield in a Joint Venture (JV) with Century Minerals Pty Ltd, which holds the remaining 30% JV interest. Empire is manager of the JV and the sole operator of the Project. Snowden Optiro was engaged to prepare a geological resource model for the MRE for Empire on the Pitfield Project. The MRE was reviewed and signed off in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) by Andrew Faragher (MAusIMM), Exploration Manager for Empire.

Notes:

The preceding statements of Mineral Resources conforms to the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) 2012 Edition. All tonnages reported are dry metric tonnes. Minor discrepancies occur due to rounding to appropriate significant figures. The MRE is reported above a 2.5% TiO2 cut-off, constrained to aReasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction (RPEEE)pitshell.

About the Pitfield Project

Located within the Mid-West region of Western Australia, near the northern wheatbelt town of Three Springs, the Pitfield titanium project lies 313km north of Perth and 156km southeast of Geraldton, the Mid West region’s capital and major port. Western Australia is a Tier 1 mining jurisdiction, with mining-friendly policies, stable government, transparency, and advanced technology expertise. Pitfield has existing connections to port (both road & rail), HV power substations, and is nearby to natural gas pipelines as well as a green energy hydrogen fuel hub, which is under planning and development (refer Figure 1).

Thomas and Cosgrove MRE

The MRE has been completed on the Thomas and Cosgrove Deposits, which are located approximately 10km south-west and north-west of the town of Three Springs respectively. The Thomas Deposit has significantly more drill holes then the Cosgrove Deposit, due to the extensive drilling programme that was completed there in July 2025 (announced 8 July 2025). The greater drilling density at Thomas has resulted in a far larger MRE at Thomas than at Cosgrove, however further MRE grid drilling (AC/RC) is planned at Cosgrove over the next six months. Further infill MRE drilling at the Thomas Deposit (AC/RC) is scheduled for Q1/Q2 CY 2026 with drill holes to be drilled on existing cleared track lines within native vegetation areas under a standard clearance permit, while diamond drilling is scheduled in Q4 CY 2025 at Thomas focused on metallurgical and geotechnical work.

It is important to note that the maiden MRE presented herein is constrained by only the current number and density of drill holes and not currently by geology or extent of TiO2 mineralisation. Additional resource development drilling is planned that is fully anticipated to both enlarge this maiden MRE but also provide for more higher confidence category tonnages, including both Measured and Indicated categories. This maiden MRE provides, without constraint, the basis for the preliminary engineering and economic studies that are underway.

Geology and Mineralisation Style

Pitfield lies in a unique geological setting along the western boundary of the Yilgarn Craton, within the Yandanooka Basin which consists mainly of interbedded sandstones, siltstone and conglomerates. The Basin is situated between the Eurella Fault to the west and the Darling Range Fault to the east, and is interpreted to be approximately 9km deep. Crustal mapping by Geoscience Australia shows there are several deep crustal faults intersecting beneath the Yandanooka Basin and these faults are potentially the conduits of hydrothermal fluids that have strongly altered the host sediments and provided an upgrade to the titanium mineralisation.

The titanium mineralisation is associated predominantly with anatase and rutile in the weathered cap and titanite and rutile in the underlying fresh bedrock. Three distinct events have controlled the formation and nature of the titanium mineralisation. A Ti-rich magmatic intrusion was initially formed, uplifted and eroded into a shallow basin whereby titanium minerals were concentrated into beds as the sediments were sorted by a natural density-based segregation on a significantly larger extent than occurs in surficial mineral sand type deposits. A subsequent hydrothermal event and regional greenschist metamorphism then altered the host sediments and titanium minerals within the sediments and produced an alteration assemblage dominated by titanite (CaTiSiO5), hematite, epidote, carbonate and chlorite. The titanium mineralisation was further upgraded by intense weathering altering the titanite to anatase by removal of the calcium and silica. The consequence of this geological history has been the upgrading of TiO2 content in the ore mineralogy ultimately to >95% TiO2 in the anatase found in the weathered cap. Uniquely, nature has in fact done much of the processing for Empire at Pitfield.

The mineralisation is completely stratabound and the best mineralisation is found within the weathered cap whereby the sandstones, siltstone and conglomerates have been altered to saprolite, predominantly quartz and kaolin and the titanite has altered to anatase (TiO2). The weathered bedrock consists of altered rock, but weathering is less intense, quartz and kaolin are predominant but as the weathering profile turns to fresher material there is an increase in chlorite, epidote, mica, hematite and carbonate; the anatase content decreases and the titanite content increases.

The Pitfield MRE incorporates the Thomas and Cosgrove Deposits. Both Thomas and Cosgrove deposits (see Figures 2, 3 & 4) have near-surface, high-grade mineralisation that contains significant quantities of Indicated Mineral Resources. Thomas and Cosgrove both have large, high-grade central cores as per the Block Model. This in-situ weathered cap at Thomas alone would be sufficient to provide adequate feed for the first of several generational mine lives.

Drilling Techniques

Drilling was undertaken between 2023 and 2025 with all drilling managed entirely by Empire using contractors. RC holes were drilled at a diameter of 146mm, AC holes were drilled at a diameter of 90mm or 76mm. Diamond core holes were drilled using PQ3 (85mm,) HQ3 (61mm) or NQ2 (51mm) equipment. Drill core was oriented using the industry standard Reflex orientation tool.

Twin drilling was conducted between five drillhole pairs for a comparison of air core to both diamond and reverse circulation with little difference between the grade of the RC and AC twin drillholes.

Since commencing the maiden drilling campaign at Pitfield on 27 March 2023, Empire has completed 382 drill holes for a total 32,256 metres comprising:

  • 17 DD drill holes for 2,704 m
  • 140 RC drill holes for 18,764 m
  • 225 AC drill holes for 10,797 m.

Sampling Techniques

Sampling at Thomas and Cosgrove utilised standard procedures employed across all drilling methods, with samples considered representative for the purposes of reporting.

  • Air core (AC) samples were collected directly from an AC drill rig using a cone splitter at intervals every 2m downhole.
  • Reverse circulation (RC) samples were collected directly from an RC drill rig using a cone splitter at intervals every 2m downhole.
  • Diamond core samples were taken from the diamond core (HQ and NQ) that was sawn in half, with half going for assay and other half retained in core tray. Hole drilled with PQ, predominantly for metallurgical samples, were cut in half and then one half cut in quarter. The quarter was sent for assay and the remaining three quarters retained for metallurgical sampling. Samples were taken based on the geological logging of the drill holes.

Sample Preparation and Assay

Sample preparation for all AC, RC and DD samples was undertaken at Intertek Minerals laboratory in Maddington WA, where the samples received were sorted and dried. Primary preparation for diamond core samples was to crush each sample in its entirety to 3mm. AC and RC samples were primarily crushed to 3mm. Larger volume samples (>5kg) were split with a riffle splitter. All samples were pulverised via robotic pulveriser. Internal screen sizing QAQC is done at 90% passing 75um.

Prior to October 2024 a 4-acid digestion was used with ICP-MS finish (procedure 4A/MS48) as the initial assay technique. If the initial Ti values exceeded 2% Ti, the samples were re-assayed using a borate fusion digestion to ensure complete dissolution of Ti-bearing minerals, with a ICP-OES analytical finish (procedure FP1/OM).

In October 2024 the analytical methodology was modified to reduce the number of initial elements analysed to 33. The samples underwent a 4-acid digestion and were analysed by ICP-OES finish (procedure 4A/OE33). All samples with initial values exceeding 2% Ti were analysed again with an ICP-OES finish, but with a borate fusion digestion to ensure complete sample dissolution and total TiO2 mineral assaying.

Certified analytical standards were inserted with sample numbers ending in 00, 25, 50 and 75 within the numbering sequence for all AC, RC and DD samples.

Duplicates were inserted with sample numbers ending in 20, 40, 60 and 80 sample numbers within the numbering sequence for all AC and RC samples.

Bulk Density

A total of 42 bulk density values were collected from diamond drill core from both Thomas and Cosgrove; the samples came from the saprolite, weathered bedrock and fresh bedrock zones and were sent to Terra Petrophysics in O’Connor, Perth. The density determinations were made using conventional laboratory procedures. The buoyancy (specific gravity) method is used to determine bulk rock densities, after the samples are saturated with distilled water for 24 hours. Dry bulk densities are determined by dry weight divided by the buoyancy determined volume of each sample. Porosities are calculated from water saturated weights, dry weights, and the buoyancy-determined volume.

The accuracy of the buoyancy technique of density measurement is better than 0.1 grams per cubic centimetre. The results of the laboratory density determinations are reported in grams per cubic centimetre.

Estimation Methodology

Geological interpretation was completed using Leapfrog Geo (v 2025.2.1) software to construct a material type (cover, saprolite, weathered and fresh rock domains) model, which used a combination of geological logging and element geochemical data. A further geological model representing the principle lithological units was constructed using logging codes to represent the Yandanooka sandstone and interbedded conglomerate units present at both deposits. Mineralisation domains were defined using a lower modelling cut-off approximating a 2% TiO2 threshold, with a clear northwest-southeast trending boundary striking through both the Cosgrove and Thomas deposits.

Exploratory data analysis was then conducted by reviewing multi-element geochemical relationships for TiO2 with Al, Fe, Ca, Mg, K and Na in each of the forementioned domains. Estimation domains were defined based on weathering intensity and above and below the TiO2 modelling cut-off.

Drillholes were composited to 2m increments, representing the typical sampling interval used. Geostatistical analysis and grade continuity modelling was reviewed using Datamine’s Snowden Supervisor Software (v8.15.2) and estimation conducted using Datamine’s Studio RM Pro (v2.1.125.0).

The TiO2 grade was estimated using ordinary kriging, employing a three-pass estimation strategy within parent blocks measuring 50 m(X) by 50 m(Y) by 10 m(RL). Sub-blocking was permitted to 2m in all directions.

Variograms were modelled separately for each deposit using normal scores transformed data, which was back-transformed on export. At Thomas, the nugget effect was modelled at <20% of total variance, with the remaining three structures modelled at 155m (0.31), 285m (0.11), and 535m (0.41). The variogram is aligned 000->345 for the major direction, 00->255 for the semi-major and 90->000 for the minor (vertical). Cosgrove has less data outside of the closely spaced drill area. At Cosgrove, the nugget effect accounted for approximately 25% of variance of the data. The remaining two structures were modelled at 125m (0.316) and 375m (0.435). The orientations were like Thomas, however favoured a slight rotation of the major to 00->340 was used, with 00->070 for the semi-major and 90->00 for the minor.

Density was assigned to the parent blocks based on bulk densities determined form the Archimedes water immersion method, conducted at Terra Resources. A total of 40 samples from both deposits were submitted across all weathering types. Density were assigned to the block model on the basis of material type, as per Table 3 below.

Due to the size of the deposits, any un-estimated blocks were hard-coded and were flagged in the model by way of an indicator variable and excluded from classified Mineral Resources.

Cut-off grade(s) and basis of selection

A cut-off grade of 2.5% TiO2 was used and determined from optimisation studies which indicated a break-even cut-off of 2.36% TiO2. Grade and tonnes have been reported within a constrained pit shell reported from a Whittle optimisation. The underlying parameters are listed in Table 4.

This decision was based on a high-level preliminary evaluation of potential modifying factors.

NB* Calculation derived from Total ore cost / (Process recovery*(Price*(1-Royalty)-Product Transport))*100

See JORC Table 1 Section 2 for more detailed explanation.

Future Drilling to Support MRE Upgrade in 2026

The MRE model is currently being reviewed to ensure future drilling supports an MRE upgrade in mid CY 2026, focused on conversion of some Indicated Resources to Measured at Thomas and Cosgrove deposits. This MRE upgrade would further assist with mine development planning, as well as growth in the overall resource from a substantial Cosgrove MRE grid drilling and Thomas infill drilling programmes, further bulk density work to increase density figure used and ongoing metallurgical test work focused on determining a final process flow sheet and end product specifications.

The Mineral Resource Estimate for Cosgrove is estimated based on the limited drilling completed to date, with no MRE grid drilling completed on a large scale.

The Company has lodged a Programme of Works with the WA government’s Department of Mining, Petroleum and Exploration to support an extensive grid drill out of the Cosgrove Deposit over the next six months. The grid drilling will be designed primarily based on the Thomas MRE grid drilling, being AC drilling on a 400m by 200m lines over a 2km by 5km area and infill RC drilling.

The Company plans to use this planned drilling as a basis to upgrade and expand the Cosgrove MRE.

Further drilling at the Thomas Deposit is being reviewed on the basis of increasing confidence in the weathered zone to support future scoping studies. The Company will base any future drilling at the Thomas Deposit on the ability to increase the confidence of the resource, i.e. targeting a Measured Classification Resource, as well as to increase the size of the resource by additional grid drilling, both internally within the resource (i.e. in areas that have not yet been infill drilled) and also outside the extent of the resource. The focus on Thomas will be the existing high grade core of the resource which sits withing the existing Thomas MRE.

Classification

The MRE has been classified following the guidelines of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, 2012 (the JORC Code). The MRE has been classified as Inferred and Indicated on the basis of confidence in geological and grade continuity, the quality of the sampling and assay data, and confidence in the estimation of titanium across the deposit. This is based on the robustness of the grade estimate as determined from the drillhole spacing, geological confidence and grade continuity.

Mineralogy and Metallurgical Factors or Assumptions

The main titanium minerals at Pitfield are anatase (TiO2) within the saprolite and weathered bedrock and titanite (CaTiSiO5) within the fresh bedrock, rutile (TiO2) is found within all rock types. The minerals have been identified from thin section petrography, SEM and microprobe work. The microprobe work has identified that there are no deleterious elements within the anatase, rutile or titanite.

Metallurgical testwork has been undertaken on a range of samples from the exploration programme. The focus of the testwork has been on the weathered zones, as this is near-surface and extensive. There has been some limited testwork in the underlying fresh bedrock zone and this will continue in subsequent testwork programmes as the flowsheet details start to be confirmed. It is likely that only small modification to the process flowsheet would be required in order to treat the fresh bedrock ore, this assumption will be tested as the project progresses.

Multiple samples from DD core drilling and AC drilling programmes have been selected for metallurgical testwork. Testwork is being managed by Empire’s technical team and being undertaken at a number of commercial laboratories in Perth, Western Australia. The programme has three key areas:

  • Understanding the mineralogy and physical characteristics of the mineralisation that influence metallurgical performance
  • Mineral separation process development
  • Elemental extraction process development

Progress results have been reported previously via RNS, including most recently:

  • ‘Breakthrough in Process development’ (28/08/25)
  • ‘Exceptional High-Purity TiO2 Product Achieved’ (09/06/25)
  • ‘Significant Progress Achieved on Process Flowsheet’ (13/02/25)

Competent Person Statement

The technical information in this report that relates to the Pitfield Project has been compiled by Mr Andrew Faragher, an employee of Empire Metals Australia Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Empire. Mr Faragher is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Faragher has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Faragher consents to the inclusion in this release of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The scientific and technical information in this report that relates to process metallurgy is based on information reviewed by Ms Narelle Marriott, an employee of Empire Metals Australia Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Empire. Ms Marriott is a member of the AusIMM and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code 2012. Ms. Marriott consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.

Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Disclosure

Certain information contained in this announcement would have been deemed inside information for the purposes of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014, as incorporated into UK law by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, until the release of this announcement.

**ENDS**

For further information please visit www.empiremetals.co.uk or contact:

About Empire Metals Limited

Empire Metals Ltd (AIM:EEE)(OTCQX:EPMLF) is an exploration and resource development company focused on the rapid commercialisation of the Pitfield Titanium Project, located in Western Australia. The titanium discovery at Pitfield is of unprecedented scale, and hosts one of the largest and highest-grade titanium resources reported globally, with a Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) totalling 2.2 billion tonnes grading 5.1% TiO₂ for 113 million tonnes of contained TiO₂.

The MRE, which covers only the Thomas and Cosgrove deposits, includes a weathered zone resource of 1.26 billion tonnes at 5.2% TiO₂ and a significant Indicated Resource of 697 million tonnes at 5.3% TiO₂, predominantly from the Thomas deposit. Titanium mineralisation at Pitfield occurs from surface and displays exceptional grade continuity along strike and down dip. The MRE extends across just 20% of the known mineralised footprint, providing substantial potential for further resource expansion.

Conventional processing has already produced a high-purity product grading 99.25% TiO₂, suitable for titanium sponge metal or pigment feedstock. The friable, in-situ weathered zone supports low-cost, strip mining without the need for blasting or overburden removal.

With excellent logistics and established infrastructure, including rail links to deep-water ports with direct access to Asia, the USA, Europe and Saudi Arabia, Pitfield is strategically positioned to supply the growing global demand for titanium and other critical minerals.

Empire is now accelerating the economic development of Pitfield, with a vision to produce a high-value titanium metal and/or pigment quality product at Pitfield, to realise the full value potential of this exceptional deposit.

The Company also has two further exploration projects in Australia; the Eclipse Project and the Walton Project in Western Australia, in addition to three precious metals projects located in a historically high-grade gold producing region of Austria.

Source

Click here to connect with Empire Metals Limited (LON:EEE)(OTCQX:EPMLF), to receive an Investor Presentation

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Silver Hammer Mining Corp. (CSE: HAMR) (the ‘Company‘ or ‘Silver Hammer‘) is pleased to announce that, on October 10, 2025, the Company received an updated exploration drill permit for its 100%-controlled Silverton Project in Nye County, Nevada and has subsequently posted its reclamation bond with the United States Bureau of Land Management. The Company is now finalizing its selection from various drill contractors to complete a fully funded, exploration drill program of up to 5,000 feet in up to eight (8) reverse circulation (‘RC’) holes and anticipates drilling will commence in the latter part of October to early November 2025. The Company plans to announce further news related to the Silverton drill program as we finalize the program timing and final scope of work.

‘Silver Hammer acquired 100% of the Silverton Project in 2021, and has only completed surface exploration which included trenching, sampling and geophysics while the Company focused efforts on its 100% controlled Silver Strand project in Idaho and its larger-scale and 100% controlled high-grade Eliza Silver Project, where five historical mines are situated. The Company is excited to finally test below the near-surface historical Silverton underground workings, a high-grade silver mine which last saw production in the early 1950s, and with the goal to determine what the old silver miners potentially missed below the existing workings nearly 80 years ago,’ commented Peter A. Ball, President & CEO. ‘It will be a busy year ahead as we look to drill test under potentially all seven (7) high-grade, historic silver mines. The Company is also positioned well in a current and robust silver market pushing over US$50 per ounce, and the recent completion of a fully subscribed private placement. The Company is also reviewing interesting accretive projects that have recently been presented to our team for acquisition, joint venture and corporate opportunities.’

Projects Overview:

Silverton Project, Nevada

Silver Hammer has identified several targets at its Silverton Project and currently has multiple drill targets identified. The Company’s technical team has ranked and prioritized the key targets at Silverton designed to initially test the mineralized area proximal to, and under, the historic high-grade, near surface mine workings with up to eight (8) RC drill holes, totalling up to 5,000 feet.

A potential subsequent Phase II drill program, based on the results of Phase I, would be designed to test extensions of any new mineralization. The drill program is designed to test primarily for down-dip continuity of the high-grade silver mineralization previously mined in the 1930s and 1950s.

Previous Company exploration work, including rock and soil sampling, geologic mapping and satellite imagery, provided evidence for two separate mineralized systems: and eastern, gold-dominant system and a western, silver-dominant system. Prior exploration on the volcanic-hosted, gold system returned grades ranging from 0.06 grams per tonne (‘g/t’) to 6.1 g/t gold (‘Au’). The silver dominated mineral system is hosted by silicified limestone with grades ranging from 0.32 g/t silver (‘Ag’) to 692 g/t Ag, from Company exploration work (please refer to the Company’s press release dated Nov 29, 2021 for previous disclosure).

Silver was discovered at the Silverton Mine in 1921. Small-scale production is recorded from the 1930s and the mine produced its last shipment in 1953, totalling less than 100,000 tons, with historic production grades ranging from 300 g/t Ag to 933 g/t Ag (Source: westernmininghistory.com and thediggings.com). In addition to the identified 100 foot shaft and underground workings (five known adits), the area to the west and the north of the mine shaft has been the subject of only surface exploration comprised of numerous small test pits and trenches. In-situ rock samples by the Company (chip and channel) returned silver grades, up to 692 g/t Ag, with a further six samples having returned over 100 g/t Ag, from this Central Zone from past mining, pitting and trenching; the Central Zone measures approximately 1,000 feet in diameter (refer to Figure 1).

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://insiderlegacysecret.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/270359_57ceea3f449198f6_001.jpg

Figure 1: Silverton Mine, Project Geology and Exploration Map Fall 2025

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/9597/270359_57ceea3f449198f6_001full.jpg

The Silverton Mine Silver Project is situated within the Williams Ridge Caldera, near its eastern rim. The caldera is a large-scale structure, over 30 miles in diameter, with ring faults, radial faults and low-angle faults providing ample conduits for hydrothermal solutions following the Tertiary eruption of rhyolitic magmas, forming ash-flow tuffs within the caldera structure. The lithologic unit overlying the caldera magma chamber was thick Devonian sedimentary units, predominantly dolomite, with intercalated arenite, a setting which may be prospective for CRD-type mineral occurrence in the carbonates and epithermal-type in the tuff units.

Alteration noted in area has been mapped as pervasive weak silicification in the Devonian-aged carbonate units and weak argillic in the Tertiary-aged tuffs. Alteration intensifies in two areas of the property, in the vicinity of mapped faults and shears:

  • In the western portion of the property, in the Central Zone, in proximity of the intersection of the N-S Silverton and the E-W Basin Faults, silicification comprises veins, zones of stockwork and occurrences of jasperoid with significant silver mineralization – the primary drill target.
  • In the eastern portion of the property an area of quartz veinlets and extensive jasperoid alteration with gold mineralization forms a secondary exploration target.

Qualified Person

The scientific and technical aspects of this press release have been reviewed and approved under the supervision of Damir Cukor, P.Geo. Mr. Cukor is a Qualified Person (QP) under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and as a consultant for the Company as Technical Director – Projects.

Silver Hammer also announces, that further to its news release of September 15, 2025, the Company has issued an aggregate of 1,500,000 common shares (the ‘Shares’) of the Company having a deemed value of C$0.0837 per Share to settle a debt of US$90,684 pursuant to past consulting completed by a former service provider to the Company. The shares are subject to resale restrictions, including a four-month hold period under applicable Canadian securities laws.

About Silver Hammer Mining Corp.

Silver Hammer Mining Corp. is a junior resource company focused on advancing past-producing high-grade silver projects in the United States. Silver Hammer controls 100% of seven previously producing silver mines which are located within the Silver Strand Project in the Coeur d’Alene Mining District in Idaho, USA, and within the Eliza Silver Project and the Silverton Silver Mine in Nevada. The Company also controls the Lacy Gold Project in British Columbia, Canada. Silver Hammer’s primary focus is to explore, define and develop silver projects near past-producing mines that have not been adequately tested. The Company’s portfolio also provides exposure to copper and gold.

On Behalf of the Board of Silver Hammer Mining Corp.

Peter A. Ball
President & CEO, Director
E: peter@silverhammermining.com

For investor relations inquiries, contact:

Peter A. Ball
President & CEO
778.344.4653
E: investors@silverhammermining.com

Forward Looking Information

This press release contains ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information in this press release includes, without limitation, statements relating to the Offering, the intended use of proceeds from the Offering, and other statements which are subject to a number of conditions, as described elsewhere in this news release. These statements are based upon assumptions that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including risks regarding the mining industry, commodity prices, market conditions, general economic factors, management’s ability to manage and to operate the business, and explore and develop the projects of the Company, and the equity markets generally. Because of these risks and uncertainties and as a result of a variety of factors, the actual results, expectations, achievements or performance of the Company may differ materially from those anticipated and indicated by these forward-looking statements. Any number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements as well as future results. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in forward looking statements are reasonable, they can give no assurances that the expectations of any forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any intention and assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, changes in factors affecting such forward-looking statements or otherwise.

This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to sell any of securities in the United States. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available.

The Canadian Securities Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. The Canadian Securities Exchange has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this press release.

Source

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

This year’s Nobel Prize in Economics recognizes groundbreaking work on how innovation, entrepreneurship, and creative destruction fuel sustained economic growth. The 2025 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel went to Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion, and Peter Howitt for their complementary research on how societies generate technological progress and long-run prosperity. 

Their work highlights the institutional and dynamic forces that make knowledge productive and prosperity possible. It is also timely: as governments worldwide turn toward protectionism and bureaucratic control, the prize re-centers attention on what actually drives growth—open societies that reward experimentation and tolerate disruption.

The prize was given to Joel Mokyr “for having identified the prerequisites for sustained growth through technological progress,” and to Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt “for the theory of sustained growth through creative destruction.” 

Mokyr’s historical work argues that enduring economic growth follows when societies create institutions and foster a culture that values the development and dissemination of productive ideas. Aghion and Howitt’s theoretical work, by contrast, formalizes the dynamic process in capitalism where new technologies, products, and business models emerge and replace outdated ones. Taken together, their contributions offer a unified picture: sustained prosperity requires both an institutional foundation that enables discovery and a dynamic market process that continually overturns the old in favor of the new. As both sets of scholars make clear, this process can only function when societies are open to economic disruption.

The most enduring question in all of economics is why some nations are rich while others remain poor. As Robert Lucas famously remarked, “once you start thinking about economic growth, it’s hard to think about anything else.” 

For most of human existence, per capita incomes were flat for centuries then suddenly surged during the Industrial Revolution—a phenomenon known as the “hockey stick” of growth. Both technological advances and population growth existed long before the Industrial Revolution, but they had never before combined to produce sustained increases in living standards. Why? The standard textbook story, growth as a function of labor and capital accumulation, cannot fully explain the takeoff. As Mokyr and others have shown, technological progress long pre-dated the modern era, and the global population remained relatively stable for centuries before exploding in tandem with growth. Something else had to be at work, something institutional, cultural, and deeply tied to how societies treat knowledge and innovation.

The work of Mokyr, Aghion, and Howitt speaks directly to this mystery. Each of them, from different perspectives, provides an answer to where growth comes from and why it persists. Their recognition by the Nobel Committee represents a powerful reaffirmation of economics grounded in theory, institutions, and long-run processes, as opposed to the short-term, randomized control trial-based approach that has dominated recent years. 

This is a victory for economists who see markets and ideas as evolutionary systems and who understand capitalism not as static efficiency but as a dynamic engine of discovery. 

Mokyr’s Work: Institutions, Knowledge, and the Cultural Roots of Innovation

Joel Mokyr, winner of half the prize, has long argued that technological change alone cannot explain modern economic growth. As he observes, technological creativity existed in China, the Islamic world, and classical antiquity, but none of these civilizations experienced the self-sustaining rise in productivity that transformed Europe after 1750.

The difference, Mokyr insists, lay not merely in inventions but in the institutions and culture that supported them. His career has been devoted to demonstrating that sustained growth arises when societies develop both a respect for useful knowledge and the social infrastructure to apply it.

Mokyr’s most influential works are, fittingly, books rather than journal articles, which are testaments to his identity as an economic historian and storyteller. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress (1992) explored how inventions and institutions interacted throughout history. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (2002) and A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy (2016) deepened this analysis, distinguishing between propositional knowledge (understanding why things work) and prescriptive knowledge (knowing how to make them work). The Enlightened Economy: An Economic History of Britain, 1700–1850 (2010) synthesized these themes into a sweeping narrative of how the Enlightenment ideals of openness, curiosity, and empiricism helped catalyze industrial progress.

As Mokyr points out, a society needs all three ingredients for growth: the accumulation of useful knowledge, the capability to transform ideas into tangible production, and the cultural openness to embrace change. These conditions did not align until the Enlightenment era, when Western Europe began to institutionalize curiosity and reward experimentation. As Deirdre McCloskey and others have shown, Britain’s Industrial Revolution was as much moral and cultural as material, as it celebrated innovation as a virtue rather than a threat. Mokyr’s work complements this view, showing that without a society willing to tolerate dissent, fund experimentation, and protect property rights, no amount of technical genius could have produced industrialization.

Crucially, Mokyr identifies the diffusion of knowledge as the linchpin of growth. The printing press, the rise of scientific societies, and a competitive yet pluralistic political order all accelerated the circulation of ideas. Political pluralism, by preventing any single authority from suppressing inquiry, ensured that heretical thinkers found refuge elsewhere, a process referred to as “the Republic of Letters.” Mokyr’s economic history thus connects technological and economic progress to the broader liberal institutions of the West. In his view, it was not a single invention but a self-reinforcing ecosystem of knowledge and openness.

It is fitting that Mokyr quipped after receiving the prize when asked if he ever expected to win, “Are you kidding me? I’m an economic historian; we don’t win Nobel Prizes!” Yet his recognition underscores how indispensable historical reasoning is to economics. His work reminds us that the great questions of economic science—i.e. why growth happens, why it happens when it does, and why some societies sustain it—cannot be answered by data alone. They require narrative, institutional analysis, and an understanding of human culture. Mokyr’s body of work demonstrates that sustained progress is not an inevitable outcome of technology or capital accumulation, but the fragile product of societies that prize inquiry and protect freedom.

In celebrating Mokyr, the Nobel Committee has honored the tradition of economic history itself. He stands in the lineage of Adam Smith, who treated markets as moral and social systems, and of Douglass North, who emphasized institutions as the “rules of the game.” 

Aghion and Howitt’s Work Modeling Growth and Creative Destruction

If Mokyr’s contribution is historical and qualitative, the work of Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt is mathematical and theoretical. Together they developed the formal model of endogenous growth through creative destruction, which is an idea inspired by Joseph Schumpeter’s vision of capitalism as an evolutionary process of “industrial mutation.” Their seminal 1990 paper, “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction,” and the subsequent book Endogenous Growth Theory (1998, MIT Press), established a new framework for understanding how innovation drives long-term prosperity from within the system rather than as an external shock.

In the Aghion-Howitt model, firms invest in research and development in the hope of discovering better technologies. Successful innovators temporarily enjoy monopoly profits, but their success simultaneously renders existing technologies obsolete. This “business-stealing effect” forces incumbent firms to exit or reinvent themselves. 

Far from being a flaw, this process of continual renewal is the very engine of progress. As they emphasize, creative destruction is not destruction for its own sake; it is the replacement of inferior technologies by superior ones, a cleansing mechanism that reallocates resources toward higher productivity uses. It accounts for the microeconomic turbulence within industries, even as the macroeconomy seems to grow steadily.

Their model elegantly balances the social benefits of innovation against its private costs. Because innovators cannot capture all the benefits their discoveries confer on society, there is a case for public support of research and education. But the model also warns against policies that shield incumbents from competition or attempt to “pick winners.” Governments that try to protect existing firms misunderstand the nature of growth. The process of creative destruction depends on openness and the freedom for new entrants to challenge the old. Innovation policy must simultaneously encourage entrepreneurship and allow failure, Aghion and Howitt note.

Creative destruction, of course, traces back to Schumpeter’s Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942), where he described capitalism as “the perennial gale of creative destruction.” Aghion and Howitt’s contribution was to formalize this intuition into a coherent model that could be tested, extended, and applied to real-world questions. Their framework now underpins much of modern growth theory and has influenced empirical research on everything from patent policy to industrial organization and inequality.

To illustrate, consider their metaphorical “innovation ladder.” Firms climb this ladder by investing in R&D, while others fall off as new technologies render them obsolete. The process is painful but necessary: without turnover, there is stagnation. Importantly, in societies with well-functioning institutions that secure property rights, foster open markets, and provide a safety net that enables risk-taking, firms that fall can get up again after they’ve been knocked down. In such systems, failure is not terminal; it is part of the learning cycle.

Aghion and Howitt’s insights also carry profound policy implications. Aghion has been outspoken about the dangers of protectionism and deglobalization, warning that they “are obstacles to growth because you need a big market to grow. Openness is a driver of growth; anything that gets in the way of openness is an obstacle.” In interviews about the economic impact of tariffs, he lamented the “dark clouds currently pushing for barriers to trade and openness,” emphasizing that tariffs and industrial policy threaten the very conditions necessary for innovation.

Speaking at the Committee’s announcement, Aghion also addressed contemporary fears about artificial intelligence. He acknowledges that AI may accelerate creative destruction but insists that its potential for growth is enormous if societies maintain good “competition policies.” The key, he argues, is not to resist automation but to prepare workers through education systems that teach adaptability: “At school we learn to learn.” History, he reminds us, is replete with examples of technological revolutions such as the steam engine, electricity, and information technology that provoked fears of mass unemployment. Yet in every case, the productivity gains eventually created more and better jobs. The same, he predicts, will hold for AI, if institutions remain flexible and open.

In recognizing Aghion and Howitt, the Nobel Committee reaffirmed the central insight of modern growth theory, that progress is endogenous. It arises not from fate or exogenous shocks but from human creativity operating within a competitive framework. Their model helps policymakers understand the dual imperative of supporting innovation while ensuring that markets remain contestable. When governments intervene to protect existing firms, they freeze the very churn that drives progress. 

This message could not be timelier. As the laureates receive their prizes, the United States and other major economies are implementing the most protectionist and state-directed industrial policies since the 1930s—spending hundreds of billions of dollars to subsidize favored industries and erecting tariff barriers that stifle trade. The rhetoric of “strategic independence” may sound modern, but its logic is ancient mercantilism. The research honored by the Nobel Committee this year offers a rebuke to this approach. It reminds us that economic growth thrives under freedom, not control, and that innovation flourishes when governments protect property rights and competition rather than try to pick winners.

The Broader Meaning of the Prize for the Field of Economics

This is a deeply satisfying Nobel Prize for those who emphasize economic theory, markets, openness, and the power of human ingenuity. The laureates’ work underscores that economic progress depends on two intertwined forces: the institutions that nurture and diffuse knowledge and the process that continually reinvents the economy through creative destruction. Mokyr provides the historical and cultural foundation; Aghion and Howitt provide the mathematical and theoretical framework. Both perspectives converge on the same conclusion: societies that welcome innovation and tolerate disruption will prosper, while those that cling to protection and privilege will stagnate.

This year’s Nobel is also a reminder of what economics, at its best, can be. It is not merely the science of measuring short-term interventions or estimating causal effects. It is a grand inquiry into how human societies create wealth, freedom, and progress. 

Mokyr, Aghion, and Howitt remind us that these outcomes are not guaranteed; they rest on institutions built by fallible human beings and shared beliefs about the value of knowledge and competition. Their research points us back to first principles: that prosperity arises from the freedom to think, to build, to fail, and to try again.

As policymakers around the world grapple with slow productivity growth and rising populism, they would do well to revisit the insights of these laureates. 

Suggested Readings

Mokyr:

A Culture of Growth

The Gifts of Athena

The Intellectual Origins of Modern Economic Growth

Aghion and Howitt:

A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction

The Economics of Growth

Research and Development in the Growth Process

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, asked former special counsel Jack Smith on Tuesday to sit for an interview about what he said were Smith’s ‘partisan and politically motivated’ prosecutions of President Donald Trump.

Jordan told Smith in a letter first obtained by Fox News Digital to schedule the closed-door testimony with his committee by Oct. 28. The move comes at the same time congressional Republicans have been raising alarm over the recent revelation that Smith subpoenaed phone records of sitting senators.

‘As the Committee continues its oversight, your testimony is necessary to understand the full extent to which the Biden-Harris Justice Department weaponized federal law enforcement,’ Jordan wrote.

Jordan’s request comes amid Republicans intensifying their focus on Smith, who brought criminal charges against Trump over the 2020 election and classified documents but later dropped them because of a Justice Department policy that advises against prosecuting sitting presidents.

The request to appear for an interview marks the first instance of Congress summoning Smith after the former special counsel spent more than two years investigating and prosecuting Trump. The president has repeatedly referred to Smith as ‘deranged,’ a ‘thug’ and a ‘sleazebag’ and said Smith is a ‘criminal’ who should be arrested.

Jordan also made a broad request for all records from Smith on his work related to Trump. If Smith were to resist the requests for an interview and documents, Jordan could subpoena him. Fox News Digital reached out to Smith’s lawyers for comment.

The Senate is also ramping up its scrutiny of Smith. Last week, 18 Senate Republicans, led by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, demanded that the DOJ and FBI release documents on Smith’s decision to subpoena phone companies for toll records of eight Senate Republicans, material that could be protected by grand jury rules.

The senators said they had ‘serious constitutional concerns’ about the subpoenas and that the DOJ should ask courts to unseal the records if needed. Seeking toll records is a routine part of an investigation and sheds light on when calls were placed and to whom. They do not provide any details about the contents of phone calls or messages.

Jordan called the subpoenas and his recent discovery that the FBI monitored Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., before seizing his phone ‘abusive surveillance.’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Transition Metals Corp. (TSXV: XTM) (‘Transition’ or ‘the Company’) is pleased to report assay results from the summer sampling activities at its Pike Warden Project, located near Whitehorse, Yukon. These samples were collected in conjunction with an induced polarization (IP) geophysical survey conducted over accessible portions of the Copper North and Copper Junction target areas (see news release dated September 9, 2025). The program aimed to broaden the project’s geochemical coverage across multiple high-priority target areas, including Olympus, Copper Junction, Copper North, ERT, and peripheral targets to the IP survey area (Figure 1).

  • Four new showings identified: Apollo, Typhon, Signal, and Bork
  • Select highlight assay values from different samples range up to >10,000 ppm Ag, 2.8 g/t Au, 1.9% Cu, 3.41% Mo and 4.31% Pb
  • Results from summer sampling refine target areas in connection with the summer IP survey program

Scott McLean, P.Geo., CEO of Transition Metals, commented, ‘The results from our summer sampling work continue to expand our property scale datasets towards vectoring within this large and prospective geodynamic setting. This work has helped us advance targets to the drill-ready stage, particularly at 3 of 5 large system scale target areas.’

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://insiderlegacysecret.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/270345_35531cfb641ab964_001.jpg

Figure 1: Pike Warden Property highlight areas with system scale copper porphyry and/or epithermal gold-silver potential identified on a backdrop of the digital elevation model. Rock and soil sampling results highlight areas of elevated base and/or precious metal mineralization. The new showings are indicated with a green star.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/2766/270345_35531cfb641ab964_001full.jpg

Discussion of Results

In total, 64 grab samples of bedrock and float material were collected and submitted for analysis, resulting in the discovery of four new polymetallic showings across both the Olympus and Copper Junction target areas: Apollo, Typhon, Signal, and Bork. A brief synopsis of sampling results are: four (4) samples returned values higher than 0.2 ppm gold (Au), three (3) samples returned values higher than 100 ppm silver (Ag), three (3) samples returned values higher than 0.1% copper (Cu), four (4) samples returned values higher than 1,000 ppm molybdenum (Mo), and two (2) samples returning values greater than 1% lead (Pb). A selection of highlight values from the summer sampling actives are presented below in Table 1.

Table 1: Highlight Results from Summer Sampling Program

Target Area Showing Sample Sample Type* Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) Cu % Mo % Pb %
Olympus Apollo E811857 Float 2.8 16.8 0.01 0.03 0.03
Olympus Artemis E811853 Float 0.2 183.0 0.15 0.00 4.31
Olympus Typhon K667999 Grab 0.0 0.7 0.00 3.41 0.00
Olympus Nemean Lion E811851 Float 0.0 0.2 0.08 0.21 0.02
Copper Junction Whistle E811893 Grab 1.0 6.4 0.00 0.00 0.01
Copper Junction Silver Train K665109 Float 0.1 409.0 1.90 0.00 0.00
Copper Junction Signal E811877 Float 0.0 13.7 0.08 0.23 0.00
Copper Junction Bork E811891 Float 0.0 0.5 0.01 0.23 0.00
ERT ERT Zone E811860 Float 2.0 >10,000* 0.59 0.00 3.04


* Note: Grab samples of rock (bedrock and float/scree) are selective by nature, and the values reported do not provide direct evidence for the extent or continuity of mineralization. Values stated as >10,000 ppm are over-limit results, which in and of themselves were over-range ore-grade results determined by ore-grade methods.

Drilling Update

Previously Transition announced the initiation of a drill program (Photo 1) at Pike Warden, testing accessible target zones within the Copper Junction area of the Pike Warden Project (see news release dated October 6, 2025). Despite seasonal challenges, the Company is pleased to report it has successfully completed two drill holes. The drill and all auxiliary equipment have been demobilized from the property, and all impacted sites have been remediated in full compliance with permit requirements prior to the onset of winter conditions, including the reduced visibility and challenging weather typical of mountain environments.

Drill core has been transported to Whitehorse for detailed geological logging and sampling. Geochemical and assay analyses will be completed in due course, with results to be released once available. Transition extends thanks to Platinum Diamond Drilling Inc., Archer Cathro (1981) Ltd., and Capital Helicopters for their support in executing a safe and efficient drill program late in the season.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://insiderlegacysecret.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/270345_35531cfb641ab964_002.jpg

Photo 1: View of the drill mast from one of the drill pads at the Pike Warden property.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/2766/270345_35531cfb641ab964_002full.jpg

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

Transition Metals adheres to sampling and analytical protocols that meet or exceed industry standards. Samples are securely stored until they are transported in batches to the ALS Geochemistry facility in Whitehorse, Yukon. Each sample batch includes certified reference materials, blanks, and duplicates, all processed under the control of ALS. The samples were analyzed in Vancouver by ALS Chemex, with ALS Laboratories’ quality system meeting the requirements of International Standards ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and ISO 9001:2015. The analysis was conducted using the ME-MS61 method, which reports 48 elements through four-acid digestion followed by ICP-MS. Gold was analyzed using the AU-ICP21 method, involving fire assay fusion with an ICP-AES finish. In cases of over-limit results, gold was determined by fire assay with a gravimetric finish, and base metals were analyzed using ore-grade (OG62) four-acid digestion with an ICP-AES finish.

About the Pike Warden Property

The Pike Warden property (Figure 1) is in the traditional territory of Carcross/Tagish First Nation and is situated on the northern rim of the Bennett Lake Caldera Complex, one of the largest extinct volcanic centers in Canada.

The property is located approximately 65 kilometres southwest of Whitehorse, Yukon, and is composed of 203 contiguous mining claims totaling approximately 41 km². The property encompasses a combination of historic and recently discovered high-grade polymetallic gold, copper, and silver epithermal showings that are indicative of a large epithermal-porphyry system in the vicinity of the Bennett Lake Volcanic Complex. In June 2022, Transition entered into an option agreement to acquire a 100% interest in the property from the Vendor in exchange for cash, shares, and work expenditures over a four-year period.

Qualified Person

The scientific and technical content of this release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Benjamin Williams, P.Geo. (PGO), Senior Geologist at Transition Metals Corp. and a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101.

About Transition Metals Corp.

Transition Metals Corp. (TSXV: XTM) is a Canadian-based, multi-commodity explorer. Its award-winning team of geoscientists has extensive exploration experience which actively develops and tests new ideas for discovering mineralization in places that others have not looked, often allowing the company to acquire properties inexpensively. Joint venture partners earn an interest in the projects by funding a portion of higher-risk drilling and exploration, allowing Transition to conserve capital and minimize shareholder’s equity dilution.

Further information is available at www.transitionmetalscorp.com or by contacting:

Scott McLean
President and CEO
Transition Metals Corp.
Tel: (705) 667-6178

Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Information

Except for statements of historical fact contained herein, the information in this news release constitutes ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of Canadian securities law. Such forward-looking information may be identified by words such as ‘plans’, ‘proposes’, ‘estimates’, ‘intends’, ‘expects’, ‘believes’, ‘may’, ‘will’ and include without limitation, statements regarding estimated capital and operating costs, expected production timeline, benefits of updated development plans, foreign exchange assumptions and regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate; actual results and future events could differ materially from such statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, among others, metal prices, competition, risks inherent in the mining industry, and regulatory risks. Most of these factors are outside the control of the Company. Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking information. Except as otherwise required by applicable securities statutes or regulation, the Company expressly disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Source

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Empire Metals Limited (LON:EEE)(OTCQX:EPMLF), the AIM-listed and OTCQX-traded resource exploration and development company, is pleased to inform investors that the Company will be attending and participating in the following upcoming events and conferences:

    These events will provide further opportunities for the Company to engage with shareholders and potential investors, offering updates on the Company’s maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for the Pitfield Project in Western Australia, in addition to the Company’s future to move Pitfield towards commercialisation. An updated corporate presentation has been published and can be found here: https://www.empiremetals.co.uk/investors/reports-presentations/

    **ENDS**

    For further information please visit www.empiremetals.co.uk or contact:

    Empire Metals Ltd

    Shaun Bunn / Greg Kuenzel / Arabella Burwell

    Tel: 020 4583 1440

    S. P. Angel Corporate Finance LLP (Nomad & Broker)

    Ewan Leggat / Adam Cowl

    Tel: 020 3470 0470

    Shard Capital Partners LLP (Joint Broker)

    Damon Heath

    Tel: 020 7186 9950

    St Brides Partners Ltd (Financial PR)

    Susie Geliher / Charlotte Page

    Tel: 020 7236 1177

    About Empire Metals Limited

    Empire Metals Ltd (AIM: EEE and OTCQX: EPMLF) is an exploration and resource development company focused on the rapid commercialisation of the Pitfield Titanium Project, located in Western Australia. The titanium discovery at Pitfield is of unprecedented scale, and hosts one of the largest and highest-grade titanium resources reported globally, with a Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) totalling 2.2 billion tonnes grading 5.1% TiO₂ for 113 million tonnes of contained TiO₂.

    The MRE, which covers only the Thomas and Cosgrove deposits, includes a weathered zone resource of 1.26 billion tonnes at 5.2% TiO₂ and a significant Indicated Resource of 697 million tonnes at 5.3% TiO₂, predominantly from the Thomas deposit. Titanium mineralisation at Pitfield occurs from surface and displays exceptional grade continuity along strike and down dip. The MRE extends across just 20% of the known mineralised footprint, providing substantial potential for further resource expansion.

    Conventional processing has already produced a high-purity product grading 99.25% TiO₂, suitable for titanium sponge metal or pigment feedstock. The friable, in-situ weathered zone supports low-cost, strip mining without the need for blasting or overburden removal.

    With excellent logistics and established infrastructure, including rail links to deep-water ports with direct access to Asia, the USA, Europe and Saudi Arabia, Pitfield is strategically positioned to supply the growing global demand for titanium and other critical minerals.

    Empire is now accelerating the economic development of Pitfield, with a vision to produce a high-value titanium metal and/or pigment quality product at Pitfield, to realise the full value potential of this exceptional deposit.

    The Company also has two further exploration projects in Australia; the Eclipse Project and the Walton Project in Western Australia, in addition to three precious metals projects located in a historically high-grade gold producing region of Austria.

    This information is provided by Reach, the non-regulatory press release distribution service of RNS, part of the London Stock Exchange. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.

    Source

    Click here to connect with Empire Metals Limited (LON:EEE)(OTCQX:EPMLF), to receive an Investor Presentation

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    THIS NEWS RELEASE IS NOT INTENDED FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES NOR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

    Apex Resources Inc. (TSXV: APX) (‘Apex’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that it has closed the flow-through funding (the ‘FT Financing’) with the issuance of 3,571,429 FT Units (the ‘FT Units’) at a price of $0.07 per FT Unit for gross proceeds of $250,000.

    Each FT Unit is comprised of one flow-through common share (the ‘FT Share’) plus one-half (1/2) non-transferable non-flow-through share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a ‘NFT Warrant’). Each NFT Warrant is exercisable to purchase one additional non-flow-through common share of the Company (the ‘NFT Warrant Share’) at $0.10 for a period of two years expiring on October 10, 2027.

    The FT Shares will qualify as ‘flow-through shares’ (within the meaning of subsection 66(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the ‘Tax Act‘). The gross proceeds raised from the issuance of the FT Shares will be used by the Company to incur ‘Canadian exploration expenses’ (within the meaning of the Tax Act).

    In connection with the FT Financing, the Company paid cash finder’s fees of $17,500 and issued 250,000 finder’s warrants (the ‘Finder’s Warrant’) with respect to the sale of FT Units to an arm’s length subscriber. Each Finder’s Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at $0.07 for a period of two years expiring on October 10, 2027.

    The securities issued pursuant to the FT Financing and Finder’s Warrants are subject to a four-month and one day hold period expiring on February 11, 2026.

    About Apex Resources Inc.

    Apex is a Vancouver-based exploration company with a suite of precious and critical minerals projects and historic mines located in the United States and Canada.

    The Jersey-Emerald Property is wholly owned by Apex and encompasses the historic Jersey Lead-Zinc Mine – British Columbia’s second largest historic zinc mine, and the Emerald Tungsten Mine – Canada’s second largest historic tungsten mine, both located in southern British Columbia.

    The Lithium Creek Project is Apex’s flagship project with placer claims covering hundreds of square miles within the aerially extensive Fernley, Humboldt, and Carson Sinks, and includes widespread naturally flowing lithium brine groundwater. The Lithium Creek Project is strategically located near the City of Reno and within 40 minutes of the principle North American battery hub, hosting the Tesla Gigafactory and other key industry players in the Lithium Ion battery supply chain.

    On Behalf of the Board of Directors of

    Apex Resources Inc.
    Ron Lang,
    President & CEO
    Ph. +1(250) 212-7119 or info@apxresources.com website: www.apxresources.com

    Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term in defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. CAUTIONARY

    NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: This news release may contain forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws (‘forward-looking statements’). Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words ‘expects,’ ‘plans,’ ‘anticipates,’ ‘believes,’ ‘intends,’ ‘estimates,’ ‘projects,’ ‘potential’ and similar expressions, or that events or conditions ‘will,’ ‘would,’ ‘may,’ ‘could’ or ‘should’ occur. These forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: risks related to fluctuations in metal prices; uncertainties related to raising sufficient financing to fund exploration work in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; changes in planned work resulting from weather, logistical, technical or other factors; the possibility that results of work will not fulfill expectations and realize the perceived potential of the Project; risk of accidents, equipment breakdowns and labour disputes or other unanticipated difficulties or interruptions; the possibility of cost overruns or unanticipated expenses in conducting work programs; the risk of environmental contamination or damage resulting from Apex’s operations and other risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date it is made and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise.

    Corporate Logo

    To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/270332

    News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Appointment of Seasoned Defense and Technology Leader Reinforces Company’s Position in America’s Race for Critical Minerals Independence

    Locksley Resources (ASX: LKY,OTC:LKYRF; OTCQX: LKYRF), the company focused on critical minerals with their Mojave Project in California targeting rare earth elements (REEs) and antimony, today announced the appointment of Major General (Ret.) Peter J. Lambert to the company’s Advisory Board. He brings to Locksley more than three decades of leadership in intelligence, defense and advanced technology integration, combining a distinguished U.S. Air Force career with senior executive experience in the private sector, most notably with General Dynamics Information Technology, one of America’s leading defense and technology companies. More details can be found here: https:cdn-api.markitdigital.comapiman-gatewayASXasx-research1.0file2924-03007481-6A1289992&v=undefined

    Major General (Ret.) Peter J. Lambert

    ‘Peter’s appointment to the Locksley Advisory Board comes at a pivotal time for the United States as the country seeks to secure and strengthen its domestic supply of critical minerals. His exceptional background, which spans military intelligence, defense industry leadership and strategic operations will bring immense value to Locksley as we advance our Mojave Project and broader North American expansion strategy,’ said Kerrie Matthews, Locksley’s Chief Executive Officer.

    Matthews stressed that Gen. Lambert’s appointment aligns with Locksley’s 100% American mine-to-market vision, levering defense grade systems integration, operational intelligence and secure supply-chain development, specifically in the critical minerals space.

    His expertise is expected to be invaluable in the areas of:

    • Advanced systems integration and intelligence driven decision-making.
    • Strategic capability development and organizational design
    • Government, defense and industry engagement
    • Strategic foresight and risk intelligence.

    Locksley Resources is focused on critical minerals in the U.S. The company is actively advancing the Mojave Project in California, targeting rare earth elements (REEs) and antimony. Locksley is executing a mine-to-market strategy for antimony, aimed at re-establishing domestic supply chains for critical materials, underpinned by strategic downstream technology partnerships with leading U.S. research institutions and industry partners. This integrated approach combines resource development with innovative processing and separation technologies, positioning Locksley to play a key role in advancing U.S. critical minerals independence.

    Contact: Beverly Jedynak, beverly.jedynak@viriathus.com, 312-943-1123; 773-350-5793

    Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/locksley-appoints-former-us-airforce-major-general–general-dynamics-it-executive-to-advisory-board-302582621.html

    SOURCE Locksley Resources

    News Provided by PR Newswire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    (TheNewswire)

    Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.

    TORONTO TheNewswire – October 14, 2025 Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. (‘ Noble ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) (TSXV: NOB,OTC:NLPXF) (OTCQB: NLPXF) is pleased to announce that it has entered into an agreement to sell its Island Pond claims in Newfoundland & Labrador to Benton Resources Inc. (‘ Benton ‘) (TSXV: BEX).

    The Island Pond claims are a group of 7 mining claims located in Central Newfoundland, covering an area of approximately 175 hectares. The Island Pond property is strategically located north of Benton’s South Pond Gold Zone within the Great Burnt Copper-Gold Project area . Under the agreement that was signed, Noble would sell these claims to Benton in exchange for 1,000,000 common shares of Benton and a payment of $30,000.  The shares will have a standard four-month hold period as required under TSX Venture Exchange policies.  In addition, Noble would retain a 1% net smelter returns royalty that would not be subject to any buyback rights.  However, Benton would hold a right of first refusal over any proposed sale of the royalty by Noble.  The property is also subject to a pre-existing 2% net smelter returns royalty.

    Closing of the transaction is subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including obtaining approval of the Board of Directors of Noble, as well as any required approval of the TSX Venture Exchange.

    Noble’s CEO, H. Vance White, said ‘We wish to congratulate Benton on the success they have had to date on the Great Burnt and look forward to results in the future. Noble will retain a 1% NSR on the 7 mining claims being sold subject a right of first refusal to Benton.’

    About Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.

    Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. is a Canadian-based junior exploration company, which has holdings of securities in Canada Nickel Company Inc., Homeland Nickel Inc., East Timmins Nickel Inc. (20%), and its interest in the Holdsworth gold exploration property in the area of Wawa, Ontario.

    Noble holds mineral and/or exploration rights in ~70,000ha in Northern Ontario and ~14,000ha elsewhere in Quebec and Newfoundland, upon which it plans to generate option/joint venture exploration programs.

    Noble holds mineral rights and/or exploration rights in ~18,000 hectares in the Timmins-Cochrane areas of Northern Ontario known as Project 81, ~2,215 hectares in Thomas Twp/Timmins, as well as an additional 20% interest in ~38,700 hectares in the Timmins area and ~175 hectares of mining claims in Central Newfoundland. Project 81 hosts diversified drill-ready gold, nickel-cobalt and base metal exploration targets at various stages of exploration. Noble also holds ~4,600 hectares in the Nagagami Carbonatite Complex and its ~3,200 hectares in the Boulder Project both near Hearst, Ontario, as well as ~3,700 hectares in the Buckingham Graphite Property, ~10,152 hectares in the Havre St Pierre  Nickel, Copper, PGM property, and ~1,573 hectares in the Cere-Villebon Nickel, Copper, PGM property, ~569 hectare Uranium/Rare Earth property (Chateau) and a ~461 hectare Uranium/Molybdenum property (Taser North),  all of which are in the province of Quebec.

    Noble’s common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ‘NOB.’

    More detailed information on Noble is available on the website at www.noblemineralexploration.com .

    Cautionary Note and Statement Concerning Forward Looking Statements

    This press release contains certain information that may constitute ‘forward-looking information’ under applicable Canadian securities legislation.  Forward-looking information is necessarily based upon several assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information.  Factors that could affect the outcome include, among  others:  future prices and the supply of metals, the future demand for metals, the results of drilling, inability to raise  the money necessary to incur the expenditures required to retain and advance the property, environmental liabilities  (known  and  unknown), general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties, results of  exploration programs, risks of the mining industry, delays in obtaining governmental approvals, failure to obtain  regulatory or shareholder approvals.  There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information.  Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.  All forward-looking information contained in this press release is given as of the date hereof and is based upon the opinions and estimates of management and information available to management as at the date hereof.  Noble disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward- looking information, whether because of new information. Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.   No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

    Contacts:

    H. Vance White, President

    Phone:        416-214-2250

    Fax:        416-367-1954

    Email: info@noblemineralexploration.com

    Investor Relations

    Email: ir@noblemineralexploration.com

    Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

    News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    The House GOP is releasing a report accusing Democrats of trying to undermine U.S. healthcare as the standoff over federal funding escalates.

    The government shutdown is in its 14th day with Republicans and Democrats still unable to agree on a path forward for at least part of fiscal year (FY) 2026.

    Republicans are pushing a relatively straightforward extension of FY2025 funding through Nov. 21, but Democrats have said they will not agree to any federal funding bill that is not paired with significant reforms on healthcare.

    The new report led by the House GOP, however, accuses Democrats of trying to undermine the system with their counter-proposal for a federal funding bill — specifically its suggested rollback of healthcare measures in Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA).

    The report said the bill, which was rebranded as the ‘Working Families Tax Cuts’ (WFTC), ‘advanced a vision of Medicaid that balances compassion with accountability, prioritizing care for the most vulnerable Americans while ensuring that federal resources are used responsibly.’

    ‘The legislation’s reforms to rural hospital funding, Medicaid financing practices, and federal reimbursements for non-citizen medical care collectively strengthen the long-term sustainability of the program,’ it said.

    ‘By contrast, the Democratic Continuing Resolution would dismantle these reforms, reversing progress toward a more efficient, transparent, and equitable Medicaid system. Such a repeal would undermine rural healthcare stability, reintroduce opportunities for funding misuse, and impose unnecessary costs on American taxpayers.’

    A continuing resolution (CR) is meant to be a short-term extension of current federal funding levels aimed at giving negotiators more time to strike a deal for the next fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1.

    Republicans’ CR would extend FY2025 funding levels through Nov. 21, while Democrats’ counter-proposal would run through Oct. 31.

    In addition to the OBBBA repeal being pushed in Democrats’ CR, they are also calling for any deal to also extend Obamacare subsidies that were enhanced during the COVID-19 pandemic and which are set to expire at the end of this year.

    Republicans have painted Democrats’ counter-proposal as a means to return healthcare to illegal immigrants after the OBBBA tightened certain measures that made it harder for non-citizens to access federal Medicaid dollars.

    Democratic leaders have accused the GOP of lying about the situation.

    But the GOP has also pointed out that repealing all of their healthcare reforms would also mean repealing $50 billion their bill adds to fund rural hospitals.

    ‘This targeted investment supports states in stabilizing critical healthcare infrastructure and ensures that rural Americans, often located far from major medical centers, can continue to access essential services,’ the report said.

    The five-page memo appears to be a rebuttal to Democrats’ defense in the shutdown fight that they are fighting to preserve Americans’ healthcare access.

    The GOP’s CR passed the House on Sept. 19 but has been stalled in the Senate, where at least five Democrats are needed under the current tally to reach a 60-vote threshold to break a filibuster.

    Senate Democrats rejected the GOP CR seven times, however. The chamber is expected to vote on it again Tuesday evening.

    Fox News Digital reached out to the office of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., for a response to the GOP report but did not immediately hear back.


    This post appeared first on FOX NEWS