Category

Investing

Category

There’s been a great deal of speculation surrounding a potential Starlink initial public offering (IPO), and the idea of an impending Starlink stock release date has investors excited.

Elon Musk’s satellite internet business been referred to by many as the future of global connectivity, offering low latency and high speed in even the most remote locations. The company controls roughly 7,000 satellites and recently surpassed over 4 million subscribers.

One reason for this interest is Musk’s reputation in the investment space, as he has been involved in multiple highly successful and high-profile tech companies. Starlink itself is an offshoot of one of his other companies, SpaceX.

Even without Musk’s involvement, Starlink has immense market potential. A lack of connectivity is one of the most significant bugbears facing the proliferation of technology like autonomous vehicles and the internet of things. By removing this restriction, Starlink could cultivate a flood of invention and innovation and allow edge computing to thrive.

The company’s satellites have been deployed in countries around the world in recent years. In June 2023, parent company SpaceX was awarded a contract by the Pentagon in the US to provide internet terminals for use in Ukraine. A few months later, following the launch of its war on Hamas, Israel entered into talks with SpaceX to secure the use of Starlink satellites as a backup communications system.

Additionally, the company launched a US$90 million deal with Mexico in November 2023 to provide free internet to remote regions, and Telstra Group (ASX:TLS,OTC Pink:TTRAF) became one of the first service providers to offer Starlink connectivity to rural Australians in July of that year.

More recently, the company has been making significant inroads into African countries, including Zimbabwe, Niger, Liberia, and Musk’s native country of South Africa.

In September 2024, Starlink inked a contract with United Airlines to provide in-flight wifi. A few months later, Starlink secured a deal with the Canadian province of Ontario to bring high-speed satellite internet access to homes and businesses in rural, remote and northern communities beginning in June 2025.

Will Starlink go public? Although a Starlink IPO has yet to be officially announced, there has been a great deal of speculation, and some experts have suggested that the occasion may be closer than many realize. That speculation has increased with US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House, and the possibility of more lucrative contracts for the satellite technology company. With that in mind, those considering a Starlink investment must ensure they understand the company and its technology as soon as possible.

In this article

    What is satellite internet?

    A satellite internet connection transmits and receives data via a network of near-Earth satellites. Though this technology isn’t new, it has evolved considerably over the past several years. At the time of its inception, it was generally only used by subscribers in remote areas who had few other options for connectivity.

    The history of satellite internet traces back to 1962, with the world’s first commercial communication satellite. Known as Telstar 1, the satellite was launched by NASA in response to Russia’s successful launch of the satellite Sputnik 1. It had a short life, however; Telstar launched one day after high-altitude nuclear weapons testing, and radiation from the tests damaged electronics on the satellite. It was only operational for seven months before it was rendered inoperable.

    Interestingly, the idea of transmitting information via satellite wasn’t new at the time of Telstar’s launch. Decades earlier, astronautics theorist Herman Potočnik first proposed the concept of geostationary orbital satellites in his 1929 book ‘Das Problem der Befahrung des Weltraums – der Raketen-Motor,’ which translates to ‘The Problem with Space Travel: the Rocket Motor.’ Renowned futurist Arthur C. Clarke would later cite Potočnik’s work in a 1945 paper envisioning satellite communication.

    The first real use of satellite internet would not occur until the late 20th century via the Teledisc project, funded by Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT). First proposed in 1994, Teledisc planned to establish a network of low-orbit broadband satellites. Unfortunately, the project was rendered defunct in 2002 shortly after the failure of two similar ventures, Iridium and Globalstar.

    One year later, in 2003, French satellite operator Eutelsat became the first company in the world to launch a successful satellite internet project. Since then, multiple service providers and telecommunications companies have dabbled in satellite connectivity. However, it has largely lagged behind its technological peers, primarily only seeing use in particularly isolated regions.

    To explain why, we need to first explain the different types of internet. The two most common are land-based connections and cellular or mobile connections.

    Landline internet uses telephone lines, coaxial cables or dedicated fiber-optic cables to send and receive data from a modem or router. This device then serves as an access point, allowing everything from computers to smart home appliances to connect to the internet. Mobile internet, meanwhile, leverages nearby cell phone towers to beam data directly to and from connected devices.

    Traditional satellite internet is something of a fusion between mobile and landline, albeit over a vastly larger distance. It leverages a satellite dish connected to two modems. One modem is used for sending data and the other for receiving.

    Historically, speed and capacity represent the two most significant drawbacks to satellite internet. Most satellite internet service providers only support speeds between 25 and 300 megabits per second (mbps). By contrast, landline fiber internet is capable of speeds up to 5 gigabits per second (gbps). Satellite internet also tends to be far costlier than a comparable landline connection, with higher latency and lower caps on data usage. It may also suffer from issues with reliability. Lastly, satellite internet may suffer from interference due to factors such as terrain or canopy coverage.

    That brings us around to what makes Starlink exciting. Although not yet competitive with landline internet in terms of cost, the company offers considerably higher data caps and speeds than any other provider on the market — up to 500 mbps with a 1 terabyte cap. Starlink’s low-orbit satellites are also less vulnerable to geographic interference while offering more consistent and reliable coverage.

    Does Starlink have an IPO date?

    At the time of this writing, Starlink is not publicly traded, and there is no concrete date for a Starlink IPO. Hints of a possible Starlink IPO originally came from several tweets made by Musk in 2021.

    ‘Once we can predict cash flow reasonably well, Starlink will IPO,’ he explained at the time. ‘(It will be) at least a few years before Starlink revenue is reasonably predictable. Going public sooner than that would be very painful.’

    Musk added later that year that Starlink’s parent company SpaceX ‘needs to pass through a deep chasm of negative cashflow over the next year or so to make Starlink financially viable.’

    At the time, Musk said a Starlink IPO wasn’t likely until at least 2025 or later.

    It’s no surprise then that market watchers’ eyebrows rose when listening to SpaceX President and Chief Operating Officer Gwynne Shotwell speak at the February 2023 Commercial Space Transportation Conference. While discussing a planned testing milestone for SpaceX’s rockets, Shotwell claimed that 2023 was the year Starlink would make money.

    She added that the company had a cashflow-positive quarter in 2022. There was also SpaceX’s reported revenue for 2022 — just over US$3.3 billion, US$1 billion of which originated from Starlink.

    In early November 2023, Musk reported that Starlink had once again “achieved breakeven cashflow.’

    Shortly after, an anonymous source told Bloomberg that a Starlink IPO could be on the table for 2024. But Musk quickly fired back in a post on X that the report was “false.”

    It seems fairly clear based on Musk’s comments that we shouldn’t expect a Starlink IPO anytime soon. So why is there so much speculation that one is just around the corner?

    Well, for one thing Starlink sales dominated SpaceX’s 2023 revenues, meaning the company made more money as an internet provider than as a space rocket company. Starlink revenues topped a massive US$4.2 billion that year, compared to US$3.5 billion for the firm’s core rocket launch business.

    Of course, these figures should be taken with a very large grain of salt. As is too often the case in technology investing, there is no shortage of hype surrounding Starlink, much of it drummed up by Musk himself. An April 2024 BNN Bloomberg article points out that even with all that revenue, Starlink “is still burning through more cash than it brings in.” Based on anonymous inside sources, Starlink accounting is “more of an art than a science.’

    Even if those numbers are inflated, the company does show promise, and analysts are still optimistic that a Starlink IPO is on the horizon. Justus Parmar, founder and CEO of venture capital firm Fortuna Investments, told Reuters he’s eyeing 2025 or 2026. “(Musk’s) waiting for a level of stability or predictability in revenue,” he said. Once the IPO is official, Parmar believes it will “be an extremely strong catalyst for everything space related.”

    How can you get exposure before the Starlink IPO date?

    While it’s impossible to invest directly in Starlink, you may be able to get a head start by investing in Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), as Musk stated he’ll ‘do his best’ to give preference to long-term Tesla shareholders. Additionally, there are platforms such as Hiive that enable accredited investors to purchase shares of pre-IPO companies, including SpaceX.

    Fortunately, you have several options if you simply want to invest in satellite internet and aren’t particularly attached to the idea of Starlink. In spite of their failed efforts in the early 2000s, both Iridium Communications (NASDAQ:IRDM) and Globalstar (NYSEAMERICAN:GSAT) are currently going strong. Globalstar’s performance is especially promising, as the company’s share price has increased in value by almost 300 percent over the past five years as of mid-January 2025.

    EchoStar (NASDAQ:SATS) is another satellite provider that’s performed strongly in recent years. Other potential satellite internet investments include ViaSat (NASDAQ:VSAT) and Gilat Satellite Networks (NASDAQ:GILT).

    As with any investment, it’s important to do your research and speak to an accredited brokerage or investment advisor before you commit any capital.

    Investor takeaway

    From an investment perspective, Starlink displays incredible promise. The company’s ties to Musk, a man with an established track record of successful technology startups, has generated considerable interest out of the gate. Yet even ignoring the connection to Musk, Starlink has a massive potential addressable market thanks to ongoing demand for better connectivity and a relative dearth of viable options for edge computing.

    Trends such as distributed work and the proliferation of internet of things devices will only further drive this demand.

    With that said, it’s best to exercise a degree of restraint where Starlink is concerned. Although the company will very likely be a sound investment once it or SpaceX goes public, there is currently a great deal of exaggerated hype and speculation surrounding it. Anyone who chooses to add Starlink shares to their portfolio if the company does go public should first ensure they understand what to expect — something they cannot do by listening to hype alone.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    As the energy transition continues to unfold, US electric vehicle (EV) pioneer Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has been making moves to secure supply of the raw materials it needs to meet its production targets.

    Lithium in particular has been top of mind for CEO Elon Musk. Back in 2020, the battery metal had a spotlight moment at Tesla’s Battery Day, when Musk shared that the company had bought tenements in the US state of Nevada, and was looking for a new way to produce lithium from clay — a process yet to be proven at commercial scale.

    Lithium prices went on to hit all-time highs, but swiftly declined in 2023 and continued on a downward trend in 2024. Prices for other key battery metals have also decreased as EV sales growth has fallen across most global markets in the face of economic uncertainty and higher interest rates. According to Goldman Sachs research, EV battery costs are at record lows and are forecasted to fall by 40 percent between 2023 and 2025.

    In a mid-2023 Tesla earnings call, Musk seemed relieved to see prices for the battery metal had declined. “Lithium prices went absolutely insane there for a while,” he said. Lower battery prices will bring EVs closer to cost parity with internal combustion engines vehicles, leading to wider adoption and increased demand.

    During the 2024 US presidential election, Musk threw his support behind Republican candidate and former president Donald Trump, who has been historically critical on electric vehicles and subsidies. Following Trump’s election win on November 5, AP News reported that these stances could support Tesla as they would be more likely to harm smaller competitors who were less established than the EV giant. Tesla’s share price shot upwards in response to the election outcome.

    In the spring of 2024, Musk invited Argentine President Javier Milei to the Tesla factory in Austin, Texas, where the two reportedly discussed the investment opportunities in Argentina’s lithium sector. As a prominent member of the prolific Lithium Triangle, the South American nation is the fourth leading lithium producer by country.

    Australia’s hard-rock deposits and Chile’s brines are also top sources for the world’s lithium supply. But lithium refining is dominated by China, which accounted for 72 percent of global lithium processing capacity in 2022.

    With the limelight on Musk and Tesla, investors should know where the electric car company sources its lithium.

    Read on to learn more about where Tesla gets its lithium, how much lithium is in a Tesla battery and what the EV maker is doing to better secure its lithium supply chain.

    In this article

      Which lithium companies supply Tesla?

      Tesla has deals with multiple lithium suppliers, some that are already producers and some that are juniors developing lithium projects.

      At the end of 2021, Tesla inked a three-year lithium supply deal with top lithium producer Ganfeng Lithium (OTC Pink:GNENF,SZSE:002460), and the Chinese company began providing products to Tesla starting in 2022. Major miner Arcadium Lithium (NYSE:ALTM,ASX:LTM), which is set to be acquired by Rio Tinto (ASX:RIO,NYSE:RIO,LSE:RIO), also has supply contracts in place with the EV maker.

      China’s Sichuan Yahua Industrial Group (SZSE:002497) agreed to supply battery-grade lithium hydroxide to Tesla through 2030. Under a new, separate agreement finalized in June 2024, Yahua is set to supply Tesla with an unspecified amount of lithium carbonate between 2025 and 2027, with the option to extend the contract by another year.

      Liontown Resources (ASX:LTR,OTC Pink:LINRF) is set to supply Tesla with lithium spodumene concentrate from its AU$473 million Kathleen Valley project. The deal is for an initial five year period set to begin this year, and production began in July 2024.

      In January 2023, Tesla amended its agreement with Piedmont Lithium (ASX:PLL,NASDAQ:PLL), which now supplies the US automaker with spodumene concentrate from its North American Lithium operation, a joint venture with Sayona Mining (ASX:SYA,OTCQB:SYAXF). The deal is in place through the end of 2025.

      Even though Tesla has secured lithium from all these companies, the EV supply chain is a bit more complex than just buying lithium directly from miners. Tesla also works with battery makers, such as Panasonic (OTC Pink:PCRFF,TSE:6752) and CATL (SZSE:300750), which themselves work with other chemical companies that secure their own lithium deals.

      What are Tesla batteries made of?

      Tesla vehicles use several different battery cathodes, including nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA) cathodes and lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cathodes.

      Tesla is known for using NCA cathodes developed by Japanese company Panasonic. This type of cathode has higher energy density and is a low-cobalt option, but has been less adopted by the industry compared to the widely used nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) cathodes. Aside from that, South Korea’s LG Energy Solutions (KRX:373220) supplies Tesla with batteries using nickel-cobalt-manganese-aluminum (NCMA) cathodes.

      As mentioned, it wasn’t just lithium that saw prices climb in 2021 — cobalt doubled in price that same year, and although it has declined since then, the battery metal remains essential for many EV batteries. Most cobalt mining takes place in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which is often associated with child labor and human rights abuses, fueling concerns over long-term supply.

      That said, not all Tesla’s batteries contain cobalt. In 2021, Tesla said that for its standard-range vehicles it would be changing to lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cathodes, which are cobalt- and nickel-free. At the time, the company was already making vehicles with LFP chemistry at its factory in Shanghai, which supplies markets in China, the Asia-Pacific region and Europe.

      In April 2023, Tesla announced that it planned to use this type of cathode chemistry for its short-range heavy electric trucks, which it calls ‘semi light.’ The company is also looking to use LFP batteries in its mid-sized vehicles.

      At the top of 2024, Tesla made moves to produce LFP batteries at its Sparks, Nevada, battery facility in reaction to the Biden Administration’s new regulations on battery materials sourcing, especially on those sourced from China. Reuters reports Tesla battery supplier CATL will sell idle equipment to the car maker for use at the plant, which will have an initial capacity of about 10 gigawatt hours.

      What company makes Tesla’s batteries?

      Tesla works with multiple battery suppliers, including Panasonic, its longtime partner, as well as LG Energy Solutions, the second largest battery supplier in the world. They supply the EV maker with cells containing nickel and cobalt.

      China’s CATL has been supplying LFP batteries to Tesla for cars made at its Shanghai plant since 2020. It’s also been reported that BYD Company (OTC Pink:BYDDF,SZSE:002594) is supplying Tesla with the Blade battery — a less bulky LFP battery — which the car manufacturer has used in some of its models in Europe.

      Additionally, BYD is set to work with Tesla on its battery energy storage systems (BESS) in China, with a plan to supply 20 percent of Tesla’s anticipated BESS manufacturing capacity, with CATL expected to cover 80 percent. The factory, which began production at the close of 2024, uses the companies’ LFP batteries.

      How much lithium is in a Tesla battery?

      How much lithium do Tesla batteries actually contain? That question is tricky because many factors are at play. Typically, it depends on battery chemistry, as demonstrated by the chart below, as well as battery size.

      For example, the standard Tesla Model S contains about 138 pounds, or 62.6 kilograms, of lithium. It is powered by a NCA battery, which has a weight of 1,200 pounds or 544 kilograms.

      The amount of lithium in a Tesla battery can also vary based on model and year as the battery chemistries and weights are often changing with each new iteration.

      Back in 2016, Musk said batteries don’t require as much lithium as they do nickel or graphite — he described lithium as ‘the salt in your salad.’ As the chart below shows, the metal only makes up about a 10th of the materials in each battery.

      metal content of battery chemistries by weight

      Metal content of battery chemistries by weight.

      Chart via BloombergNEF.

      But a key factor to remember is volume — given the amount of batteries Tesla needs to meet its ambitious goals, it could hit a bottleneck if it can’t secure a steady supply of raw materials. Of course, this is true not just for Tesla, but for every carmaker producing EVs today and setting targets for decades to come.

      For that reason, demand for lithium-ion batteries is expected to soar in the coming years. By 2030, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence forecasts that demand will grow by 400 percent to reach 3.9 terawatt-hours. Over the same forecast period, the firm sees the current surplus in the lithium supply coming to end.

      Will Tesla buy a lithium mine?

      For carmakers, securing lithium supply to meet their electrification goals is becoming a challenge, which is why the question of whether they will become miners in the future continues to come up.

      But mining lithium is not easy, and despite speculation, it’s hard to imagine an automaker being involved in it, SQM’s (NYSE:SQM) Felipe Smith said. “You have to build a learning curve — the resources are all different, there are many challenges in terms of technology — to reach a consistent quality at a reasonable cost,” he noted. “So it’s difficult to see that an original equipment manufacturer (OEM), which has a completely different focus, will really engage into these challenges of producing.”

      Even so, OEMs are coming to the realization that they might need to build up EV supply chains from scratch after the capital markets’ failure to step up, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence’s Simon Moores believes. Furthermore, automotive OEMs that are making EVs will in effect have to become miners.

      “I don’t mean actual miners, but they are going to have to start buying 25 percent of these mines if they want to guarantee supply — paper contracts won’t be enough,” he said.

      However, Musk has made it clear to investors that Tesla is more focused on developing its lithium refining capabilities, rather than getting into the mining game.

      Where is Tesla’s lithium refinery?

      Tesla broke ground on its in-house Texas lithium refinery in the greater Corpos Christi area of the state in 2023. Tesla’s lithium refinery capacity is expected to produce 50 GWh of battery-grade lithium per year. Construction of the lithium refinery is nearly completed with full production anticipated in 2025.

      Tesla’s Texas lithium refinery was facing an obstacle in obtaining a contract for the 8 million gallons of water per day needed to run the plant, as the region of South Texas is in the middle of a serious drought and water supplies are tight.

      ‘In December, South Texas Water Authority passed an infrastructure deal that will allow Nueces Water Supply to sell rights to the pipe Tesla will need to obtain water, which was one of the hold-ups for a water deal,’ Bloomberg BNN reported in early January.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      First Helium Inc. (‘First Helium’ or the ‘Company’) (TSXV: HELI) (OTCQB: FHELF) (FRA: 2MC) today announced that it has begun drilling its proven undeveloped (‘PUD’) 7-30 oil location at its Worsley Property in Northern Alberta 1,2 . Following drilling of the 7-30 vertical well, the contractor’s drilling rig will move directly to the 7-15 location to begin drilling in early February, barring any unforeseen delays. The Company will continue to provide regular updates on ongoing field activities.

      ‘We are excited to be drilling again – starting with our 7-30 light oil development well which spudded this past weekend. We will follow up by drilling our high impact Leduc anomaly, 7-15, which on seismic is approximately 5X the areal extent of our successful 1-30 light oil pool discovery. Favorable results from these two wells will further de-risk our Leduc Play, where we have identified 10 additional primary locations on proprietary 3D seismic, and potential for further southeast extension across our 100% owned lands,’ said Ed Bereznicki, President & CEO of First Helium. ‘With success, the combined oil potential from these two operations would provide immediate cash flow and meaningful near-term value for our shareholders,’ added Mr. Bereznicki.

      The 7-15 vertical well location (see Figure 1) has been prepared for drilling. The proximity of the two locations, approximately 6 kilometers apart, will enable efficient rig transfer and minimize mobilization costs. Subject to results, necessary preparations are being made to complete, equip and tie-in the two wells prior to spring break up in Alberta (a period from mid/late March through May when Provincial highway restrictions limit heavy equipment movement), further setting the stage for systematic development across the Company’s extensive land base.

      Figure 1:
      Worsley Project Inventory

      photo1

      Notes:
      (1) Prepared by Sproule Associates Limited (‘Sproule’), independent qualified reserves evaluator, in accordance with COGE Handbook.
      (2) Assigned 196,700 Barrels of Gross Proved plus Probable Undeveloped reserves, per Sproule, Evaluation of the P&NG Reserves of First Helium Inc. in the Beaton Area of Alberta (as of March 31, 2023). See First Helium’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca .


      Option Grant

      Today the Company granted 8,000,000 incentive stock options to certain Directors, Officers and key Consultants of the Company. The Options are exercisable at a price of $0.09 and valid until January 21, 2030.

      ABOUT First Helium

      Led by a core Senior Executive Team with diverse and extensive backgrounds in Oil & Gas Exploration and Operations, Mining, Finance, and Capital Markets, First Helium seeks to be one of the leading independent providers of helium gas in North America.

      First Helium holds over 53,000 acres along the highly prospective Worsley Trend in Northern Alberta which has been the core of its exploration and development drilling activities to date.

      Building on its successful 15-25 helium discovery well, and 1-30 and 4-29 oil wells at the Worsley project, the Company has identified numerous follow-up drill locations and acquired an expansive infrastructure system to facilitate future exploration and development across its Worsley land base. Cash flow from its successful oil wells at Worsley has helped support First Helium’s ongoing exploration and development growth strategy. Further potential oil drilling locations have also been identified on the Company’s Worsley land base.

      For more information about the Company, please visit www.firsthelium.com .

      ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

      Edward J. Bereznicki
      President, CEO and Director

      CONTACT INFORMATION

      First Helium Inc.
      Investor Relations
      Email: ir@firsthelium.com
      Phone: 1-833-HELIUM1 (1-833-435-4861)

      Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

      FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

      This press release contains forward looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words ‘anticipate’, ‘plan’, ‘continue’, ‘expect’, ‘estimate’, ‘objective’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘project’, ‘should’, ‘predict’, ‘potential’ and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements. In particular, this press release contains forward looking statements concerning the completion of future planned activities. Although the Company believes that the expectations and assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements because the Company cannot give any assurance that they will prove correct. Since forward looking statements address future events and conditions, they involve inherent assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of assumptions, factors and risks. These assumptions and risks include, but are not limited to, assumptions and risks associated with the state of the equity financing markets and regulatory approval.

      Management has provided the above summary of risks and assumptions related to forward looking statements in this press release in order to provide readers with a more comprehensive perspective on the Company’s future operations. The Company’s actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits the Company will derive from them. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and, other than as required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise.

      SOURCE: First Helium Inc.

      A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ea92f055-5a98-4262-8475-38fb286df847

      Primary Logo

      News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Explorer Amarc Resources (TSXV:AHR,OTCQB:AXREF) experienced a sharp increase in its share price following the announcement of a new discovery at its JOY copper-gold district in BC, Canada.

      The company closed Friday (January 17) at C$0.72, up just over 165 percent from Thursday’s (January 16) close.

      In a press release, Amarc states that it has named the find AuRORA, describing it as a high-grade porphyry copper-gold-silver discovery. AuRORA is located in an area of JOY that hadn’t previously been drill tested.

      JP24057, the first hole drilled at the site, intersected this new copper-gold-silver system, and the company then worked with Freeport-McMoRan Mineral Properties Canada, a subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX), to complete step-out drilling with three core rigs. Friday’s release looks at JP24057 and results from six other holes.

      Freeport is fully funding work programs at JOY in order to earn an interest in the project.

      The seven holes were drilled at intervals of about 100 meters, and together have established a 600 meter wide zone of porphyry mineralization. Amarc states that it is near surface and has ‘excellent’ lateral and vertical continuity.

      Amarc Resources

      Amarc Resources’ January 17 drill results.

      Table via Amarc Resources.

      Amarc views the AuRORA deposit as a major highlight within the JOY district, which spans 495 square kilometers in the Toodoggone-Kemess region, an area known for significant porphyry deposits.

      ‘This impressive new, high grade porphyry copper-gold-silver discovery is a pivotal moment for Amarc and its shareholders,” said Amarc President and CEO Dr. Diane Nicolson, adding that it comes after years of groundwork.

      “It represents a significant inflection point in the exploration of the JOY District with Freeport.’

      The company followed Friday’s release up with additional drill results from AuRORA on Monday (January 20). The data spans six holes located 100 meters north of the first seven holes announced on Friday. They were also drilled at intervals of approximately 100 meters, and trace mineralization across a width of 600 meters.

      ‘These results are again confirming the continuity of the Au-rich AuRORA porphyry Cu-Au-Ag mineralized system from east to west and vertically, and now also to the north, and from near the surface,’ the company notes.

      The release prompted another share price boost for Amarc, which rose as high as C$0.88 on Monday.

      In Friday’s press release, Nicolson said that eight large-scale sulfide mineralized systems along several mineralized trends were drilled at JOY last year. A total of 33 scout holes were completed.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      European Lithium Limited (ASX: EUR, FRA: PF8, OTC: EULIF) (European Lithium or the Company) is pleased to announce Critical Metals Corp. (Critical Metals or CRML) has entered into a share subscription facility for up to US$125.0M from GEM Global Yield LLC SCS (GEM), a Luxembourg based private alternative investment group. Proceeds from the facility are expected to be used to fund the development of the Wolfsberg Lithium Project in Austria (Wolfsberg or Wolfsberg Project).

      HIGHLIGHTS

      • Critical Metals has signed an agreement for a share subscription facility for up to US$125.0M in transaction funding from Global Emerging Markets (GEM)
      • Critical Metals expects to provide an update on further equity funding in the near term
      • Funding will principally be used to accelerate the development of the Wolfsberg Lithium Project in Austria.

      Tony Sage, Chairman, commented: “Receiving this significant and binding commitment is a huge milestone for the Company. Combined with European Lithium’s recent deal with Saudi Arabian based, Obeikan Investment Group, the Company and Critical Metals have secured approximately 65% of the total expected capex of the Wolfsberg Project and brings us closer to our stated goal to be the first local producer of lithium spodumene for the green energy transition in Europe.

      Under the terms of the definitive agreement, Critical Metals will have access to up to US$125.0M in incremental capital to fund its operations upon closing of the business combination transaction. The facility would enable Critical Metals, in its discretion but subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the definitive agreements, to draw down funds (up to US$125.0M) through the issuance of new shares directly to GEM over a three-year period after the closing of the transaction. Assuming no further redemptions are made by public stockholders of Sizzle Acquisition Corp. (Sizzle) in connection with its shareholder vote to approve the transaction, Critical Metals would now be expected to have access to up to ~US$175.0M in transaction proceeds (comprising of the GEM finance package and existing cash reserves).

      The GEM finance package, together with European Lithium’s additional funding secured through the binding term sheet with Obeikan Investment Group (Obeikan)(refer to EUR announcement dated 2 June 2023), are expected to provide Critical Metals and European Lithium with significant capital to accelerate the development of the Wolfsberg Project once the transaction with Sizzle completes.

      The Company can report substantial progress has been made in the development plan for the Wolfsberg project with the achievement of several key milestones highlighted by:

      • Mining permit secured – spodumene mined from the project successfully demonstrated its capability to supply high-purity lithium (99.6% lithium carbonate equivalent) at pilot plant.
      • Mineral Resource Estimate1 – 12.88 Mt of Measured, Indicated and Inferred classified Resources at 1.00% Li2O grade in Zone 1 only:
      • Binding agreement to build hydroxide plant – partnership with Obeikan to build lithium hydroxide processing plant in Saudi Arabia with significant cost savings expected.
      • Advanced project with drilling upside – established mine and current resource estimate based only on Zone 1 with drilling undertaken showing prospectivity in Zone 2.

      For full details of the DFS, please refer to EUR announcement dated 8 March 2023, “Wolfsberg Lithium Project Definitive Feasibility Study Results”. The Mineral Resources underpinning the Ore Reserve have been prepared by a competent person in accordance with the requirements of the JORC Code (2012). The Competent Person’s Statement(s) are found in the section of this ASX release titled “Competent Person’s Statement(s)”. European Lithium confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in that release. All material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in that ASX release continue to apply and have not materially changed.

      Click here for the full ASX Release

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Rio Silver Inc. (TSXV:RYO) (‘Rio Silver’) and African Energy Metals Inc. (NEX: CUCO.H; FSE: BC2; WKN: A3DEJG) (‘African Energy Metals’) jointly announce they have entered into an option agreement for African Energy Metals (the ‘Option Agreement’) to earn an 100% undivided interest in the Niñobamba advanced gold silver project (the ‘Project’) located in the Department of Ayacucho in South Central Peru.

      Terms of the Option Agreement

      Under the terms of the Option Agreement dated January 21, 2025 with Rio Silver, African Energy Metals has the right to earn a 100% interest in the Project upon the full exercise of the option under the Option Agreement. As set out in the table below, the Option Agreement requires a payment of CAD$260,000 during the first year of the Option Agreement and further payments of up to US$2,000,000, US$500,000 of which are advance payments on any royalties payable under the royalty agreement, pursuant to which a net smelter return royalty of 2% is granted to Rio Silver. African Energy Metals retains the right to buy back 1% of the NSR for US$1,000,000 prior to commercial production on the Project.

      The Option Agreement also requires the issuance to Rio Silver of a total of 2,500,000 common shares of African Energy Metals upon receipt of regulatory approval and a further 2,500,000 common shares on the earlier of the date that is one year from the receipt of the Exchange’s approval and May 15, 2026. African Energy Metals has the right but not the obligation to issue African Energy Metals shares in lieu of 50% of any cash payment obligation. African Energy Metals paid a deposit of $10,000 on a non-refundable basis to Rio Silver when the Option Agreement was executed. Rio Silver will provide operational support and use of Rio Silver facilities in Peru for a minimum of one year at Rio Silver’s cost. Rio Silver is an arm’s length party to African Energy Metals. The share issuances and payments under the Option Agreement are subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange and the NEX Exchange.

      Chris Verrico, CEO of Rio Silver stated: ‘We are extremely pleased to be able to continue supporting progress at Niñobamba for the mutual benefit of all stakeholders. Rio Silvers management firmly believes that with the additional strength that this transaction brings to the table, that Niñobamba will imminently reap outsized reward. We remain ever impressed and optimistic by the resilience and ingenuity of the Peruvian people as the country continues to endorse supportive mining policies, ensuring continued growth and opportunity throughout the country. Rio Silver will fully assist African Energy Metals in advancing the Project for the mutual benefit of both companies, our shareholders and all stakeholders.

      About Rio Silver Inc

      Rio Silver is a Canadian exploration and development company with an oversized per cent of insider, friends and family ownership, focused on Peru. Rio Silver continues to review precious and base metal properties in Peru while maintaining its interest in its Ontario Gerow Lake, critical metals project. This transaction enables the Company to complete certain planned acquisitions that bring significant potential for near-term, cash flowing, production allowing the company to leverage other similar opportunities, going forward, in a non-dilutive shareholder friendly way.

      ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF Rio Silver INC.

      ‘Chris’ Christopher Verrico

      Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

      Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

      For further information,

      Christopher Verrico, President, CEO

      Tel: (604) 762-4448

      Email: chris.verrico@riosilverinc.com

      Website: www.riosilverinc.com

      This news release includes forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements within, other than statements of historical fact, are to be considered forward looking. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. There can be no assurances that such statements will prove accurate and, therefore, readers are advised to rely on their own evaluation of such uncertainties. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements except as required by applicable laws.

      Primary Logo

      News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Oversupply and shifting battery chemistries are set to define the cobalt market in 2025. Prices -subdued by excess supply since 2023- are expected to remain stable, with limited volatility.

      The rise of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, particularly in China, continues to suppress demand for cobalt chemicals, challenging sulphate refiners.

      Meanwhile, Indonesia’s rapid expansion in mixed hydroxide precipitate (MHP) production offers an alternative to the Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) dominance, though the DRC is expected to remain the primary producer in the near to medium term.

      Projected demand growth

      Critical minerals have become a key focus of several nations looking to secure their energy transition efforts and fortify domestic supply chains. The cobalt sector’s production concentration in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), makes it even more prone to geopolitical upheaval.

      According to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) 2024 Global Critical Minerals Outlook, the cobalt market has a heightened geopolitical risk rating because 84 percent of production is focused in a singular country.

      Despite the current glut, the IEA is also projecting that demand will soar from 213,000 metric tons in 2023, to 344,000 metric tons in 2030 and 454 metric tons in 2040.

      This steep uptick has also prompted the IEA to project a potential 16 percent shortfall by 2035.

      Although countries like Indonesia and Australia are starting to see growth in their cobalt sector, the DRC will continue to be the dominant player.

      “The DRC is going to maintain its position for the foreseeable future, however, Indonesian MHP is rapidly growing as an alternative source of cobalt in the market. In line with this, we’ve seen an influx of cobalt metal from Indonesia becoming more prevalent in recent months, being aggressively marketed by Indonesian producers,” said Aubry.

      However, a lack of expansion in the DRC’s cobalt production segment could lead to Indonesia capturing a larger piece of market share this year.

      “With CMOC (OTC Pink:CMCLF,SHA:603993) not planning any new expansions this year, it is unlikely we’ll see any significant growth from the DRC in cobalt production in 2025,” he added.

      Not only will mined supply be crucial in meeting the IEA’s cobalt growth forecast, refinement capacity will also play an important role.

      Australia’s Cobalt Blue (ASX:COB) advanced plans for the Kwinana Cobalt Refinery near Perth, proposing an initial production capacity of 3,000 tonnes per annum (tpa) of cobalt sulphate and approximately 500 tpa of nickel metal. Construction is slated to commence in the first half of 2025, with completion expected within 12 months.

      Changing battery chemistries threaten cobalt’s demand outlook

      In 2024, record-breaking global EV sales helped solidify cobalt’s critical role in the energy transition. With China spearheading a 40.7 percent surge in EV and hybrid adoption, supported by aggressive pricing and subsidies.

      China remained the largest growth market as domestic automakers outpaced foreign rivals.

      European sales rebounded from early-year setbacks, with stricter emission penalties set to drive further adoption in 2025.

      Despite US market uncertainties, growing EV demand globally will sustain cobalt’s importance, although supply chain challenges and alternative battery technologies may influence its trajectory.

      “As LFP becomes increasingly dominant in China, sentiment for cobalt chemicals used in batteries has turned more bearish,” Aubry said. “A downturn in demand may put sulphate refiners under additional pressure, particularly at a time where the current market dynamics already present significant challenges due to prices.”

      Rising copper and nickel production bolsters cobalt glut

      Another factor that could lead to additional cobalt surpluses is the production correlation with copper and nickel.

      A November 2024 Fastmarkets report noted that 76 percent of global cobalt supply comes from copper/cobalt mines in the DRC. The by-product status exposes cobalt to the market dynamics in the copper space.

      In 2024 copper production in the region was on the rise to facilitate the energy transition, which in turn weighed on the cobalt market.

      “But with cobalt demand remaining decidedly sluggish, copper’s upward trajectory will continue to fuel cobalt oversupply and, combined with the fact that copper production is poised to expand further, this will keep cobalt prices under pressure,” the Fastmarkets report read.

      A similar picture is also playing out in Indonesia where cobalt is mined as a byproduct of nickel.

      Indonesia’s rise as a cobalt powerhouse is poised to reshape the market, fueled by its booming mixed hydroxide precipitate (MHP) production.

      In 2024, the country supplied 10 percent of global cobalt, up from 7 percent in 2023, driven by Chinese-backed investments in nickel laterite ore projects using high-pressure acid leach (HPAL) technology.

      Despite weak nickel prices, these projects are ensuring long-term cobalt output growth, with MHP-derived cobalt production projected to rise 17 percent in 2025. Producers are increasingly favoring cobalt metal over sulfate due to higher profitability and easier storage.

      Additionally, cobalt from Indonesia may also be immune to US tariffs.

      Indonesia’s cobalt metal could potentially enter the US market tariff-free, unlike Chinese cobalt, which faces a 25 percent import tariff,” Fastmarkets reported. “That possibility could raise concerns about shifting global supply dynamics and increase the pressure on cobalt prices.”

      Due to these factors Fastmarkets is expecting a continued surplus of 21,000 metric tons in 2025 a slight decrease from 2024’s glut of 25,000 metric tons.

      Increased copper and nickel production is driving this trend, but challenges loom. Weak nickel pricing, driven by Indonesia’s rapid growth, is squeezing producers in higher-cost regions like Australia and Canada, threatening project viability.

      Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions, trade barriers, and a strong US dollar could further disrupt cobalt flows, especially from Chinese-backed Indonesian operations.

      The market’s trajectory will depend heavily on economic conditions, trade dynamics, and evolving technologies, the report concluded.

      Ethical supply concerns

      As the global mining sector faces increased scrutiny for its extraction practices, the DRC’s cobalt industry has proven to be a focal point for sustainability and social governance concerns.

      Child labour at artisanal and small scale cobalt mines in the country has drawn international attention and prompted the US Department of International Labour to establish the Combatting Child Labor in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s Cobalt Industry (COTECCO program.

      In its six years the project has trained 458 stakeholders from government, civil society, and private sectors on combating child labor and introduced tools like ILAB’s Comply Chain to 28 mining entities in Lualaba and Haut-Katanga.

      While these are moves in the right direction, the long running attention the DRC’s cobalt sector has faced could be a deterrent to new capital.

      “Alternatives to the DRC are likely to become more attractive to investors if it can sidestep other potential pitfalls, such as high refining energy costs. Until a more sustainable supply chain is embedded, or there are more substantial regulations implemented to limit the prevalence of artisanal mining, prices are unlikely to see a premium for sustainably sourced cobalt in the immediate term,” said Aubry.

      Trump’s tough tariff talk

      Although Indonesian supply may be exempt from current US trade rules, that could change in the near term.

      The re-election of President Donald Trump has introduced significant uncertainty into the cobalt market, particularly concerning the future of electric vehicle (EV) policies and potential trade measures.

      Market participants have expressed concerns that President Trump may reverse existing EV legislation, notably the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which has been instrumental in channeling approximately US$312 billion into US EV production and infrastructure.

      President Trump has previously indicated intentions to ‘end the electric vehicle mandate on day one,’ aiming to ‘save the auto industry from complete obliteration.’

      Despite these statements, the proliferation of EV manufacturing facilities in predominantly Republican states suggests that any policy reversals could face resistance due to the economic benefits these projects bring to local communities.

      Additionally, the possibility of imposing stricter tariffs on Chinese-origin cobalt and EVs is a concern among market watchers and participants.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      The broad graphite market faced continued price pressure in 2024, as supply and demand trends diverged pushing natural graphite into deficit.

      As the year progressed slower than forecasted end use segment demand, production uncertainty and moderate investment in capacity growth outside of China remained the dominant market themes.

      A late year recovery in global electric vehicle sales and a positive long term demand outlook have positioned the graphite market for a mild recovery in 2025. However, with China dominating global supply, geopolitical tensions, export restrictions, and policy changes could quickly alter the landscape.

      Due to the less geographically concentrated nature of the synthetic graphite market it is less exposed to Chinese disruption.

      “Although synthetic graphite producers are better off, natural graphite anode producers are almost completely reliant on China, so there’s a lot of concern around this at the moment,” he added.

      Even though Willoughby doesn’t foresee China limiting exports, incoming rules on US imports are adding pressure on North America to grow its domestic supply chains.

      “While we expect China to continue to allow battery-related exports, companies are looking to diversify their supply to reduce the risk,” he said.

      Willoughby continued: “On top of this, there is a need to shift away from China for the US battery supply chain. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) specifies that by 2027, any batteries that contain graphite from China won’t be eligible for substantial tax credits. While it’s not clear which of these will remain under the new administration, we expect the requirements for non-Chinese material to continue.”

      Graphite market facing dual supply challenges

      Natural graphite production ballooned in 2022 when global mined supply reached 1,680,000 metric tons, a 73.9 percent increase from 2020’s 966,000 metric tons.

      Global output registered a small 4.6 percent decline in 2023 totaling 1,600,000; however, the reduction was enough to send the market into deficit.

      According to Tony Alderson senior analyst for Benchmark Mineral Intelligence the shortfall has been attributed to rising demand from the battery anode segment.

      “EV demand is set to rise by nearly 400 percent over the next decade. As such, the need for both natural and synthetic graphite is rising notably in line with this,” Alderson wrote in an email. “With regards to this increased demand, the natural graphite balance is already not holding up with a 2024 deficit of nearly 150,000 metric tons per annum (tpa) emerging.”

      Conversely the synthetic graphite market is experiencing a supply glut.

      “On the side of synthetic graphite, it is fairing a little better when talking about the market balance as supply is stronger. The market is in a notable oversupply of 350,000 tpa, which is set to reach a deficit beyond the end of the decade,” he explained. “One of the reasons for this chemistry disparity is due to the greater supply and ease of building a facility in a far less time period than with natural.”

      Although the 2025 supply narrative is different, the future of both markets looks similar, Alderson noted.

      “Despite this, the currently announced supply is simply not enough to meet the forecasted demand out to 2034, with both [segments] reaching deficits of over 600,000 tpa which are only set to widen out to 2040,” he said.

      In a 2022 report from Benchmark it is noted that some 300 new mines are needed to support the energy transition, a percentage of which will need to be graphite mines.

      “We forecast battery sector demand for raw material graphite to rise by more than 1,400 percent between 2020 and 2050,” the report read. “By the end of the forecast period, total graphite demand could be three times the 2021 supply level.”

      Shifting battery chemistries complicate forecast

      Use in the EV sector is underpinning graphite demand, however as battery chemistries continue to shift market supply and demand fundamentals could also change.

      The rapid evolution of battery chemistries has posed significant challenges. While the shift in cathode materials from nickel ternary (NMC) to lithium iron phosphate (LFP) in China has garnered much attention, similar transformations are also occurring within the anode market, explained Willoughby.

      “China now primarily uses synthetic graphite anode materials as it’s faster to build out new production and easier to get the raw materials,” he said. “However, that has led to a massive oversupply for synthetic due to the number of new companies in the market, and in the natural [graphite market] demand has really fallen away in the last year.”

      While NMC cathodes and natural graphite anodes are still quite popular outside of China, slower demand growth in 2024 has seen many of the major anode producers cut back output, he added.

      Looking more long-term, Willoughby admitted the market could become opaque.

      “It’s been a challenge to keep the ever-evolving supply and demand dynamics in check, particularly when the market has to increasingly consider regional regulations like the Inflation Reduction Act,’ he said. “We see China continuing to operate at a surplus over the next decade because of its existing capacity, but the rest of the world still looks to need more capacity for both natural and synthetic anodes if it wants to meet its own demand.”

      This position was reiterated by Benchmark Intelligence’s Alderson who referenced the mounting geopolitical tensions between the East and West as a pain point in the long-term ex-China market buildout.

      “China dominates not only natural graphite production (76 percent) but also downstream markets, controlling 79 percent of natural graphite anode and 98 percent of synthetic graphite anode supply globally,’ he said. “This highlights that the deeper into the supply chain you go, the more entrenched China’s dominance becomes. They form the backbone of the anode supply chain, and it will be a challenge for the West to break.”

      Alderson pointed to China’s December 3, 2024, implementation of an immediate ban on dual-use exports intended for US military applications, along with heightened end-use reviews for exports like graphite to the US.

      Building a North American supply pipeline

      To offset Chinese control, the US has taken notable steps to onshore supply.

      “Since the US IRA’s announcement in August 2022, over 500,000 tpa of anode capacity has been added, over a 200 percent+ increase,” said Alderson.

      This move has been supported by government funding.

      In November, 2023 South Star Battery Metals (TSXV:STS,OTCQB:STSBF), received a US$3.2 grant from the Department of Defense (DoD) under the IRA to advance its flagship BamaStar graphite project in Alabama.

      Similarly, Graphite One’s (TSXV:GPH,OTCQX:GPHOF) Alaska-focused subsidiary was the recipient of a US$37.5 million DoD grant in July of 2023, to cover costs associated with “accelerated Feasibility Study” on its name sake project.

      In September of the same year, the company penned a US$4.7 million contract with the DoD’s Logistics Agency to develop a graphite and graphene-based foam fire suppressant as an alternative to incumbent PFAS fire-suppressant materials, as required by US law.

      “Private companies are also ramping up onshoring efforts by inking offtake agreements with U.S. anode producers, setting a record in 2024 for such deals,” said Alderson.

      “Despite these advancements, North America faces a 200,000 tpa market deficit in 2024, expected to grow as EV demand accelerates. As such, notable investment will be required to drive growth and achieve any form of self-sufficiency,” he added.

      As new North American supply becomes imperative, the sole continental producer Northern Graphite (TSXV:NGC,OTCQB,FRA:0NG), faced challenges in the low-price environment of 2024.

      “While we are also moving forward to open a new pit at the Lac des Iles (LDI) and restart the plant at a higher throughput in January to meet rising demand, unless we can see our way through to higher prices, long-term supply agreements with battery makers and support from governments in Ontario, Quebec, Canada and/or the United States, the Company will continue to struggle whilst these challenging market conditions prevail for ourselves and the rest of the industry,” Chief Executive Officer Hugues Jacquemin said in the Q3 update.

      To aid in offsetting these pressures, Northern Graphite was able to negotiate a price increase with its customers in early January to mitigate inflation and higher production costs.

      Trends to watch in 2025

      As 2025 progresses both market experts offered insight on which trends could be the most impactful to the market.

      “We’re expecting more bifurcation of the China and ex-China markets,” said Wood Mackenzie’s Willoughby.

      “In 2024, we saw domestic Chinese prices sink much more rapidly and to a greater extent than export prices,” he said. “We expect them to remain low in 2025, but for US and European benchmarks to begin to climb again as the shift away from China as their major supplier creates tightness in that market.”

      The sheer volume needed in the North American market is likely to provide price insulation for graphite produced outside of China.

      “Given the relative lack of ex-China mines, new production isn’t expected to dent this outlook too much,” he added.

      For Alderson, volatility will reign supreme in the first half of 2025.

      “Excess inventory overhang of battery-grade -100 mesh is expected to sustain high supply levels through 2025 despite forecasted reduction in production costs within the Chinese market,” he said. “Consequently, prices are forecasted to decline further in H1 2025, averaging US$413 per metric ton, down 22 percent year-over-year.”

      He sees more stability materializing in the latter half of the year.

      “In H2 2025, prices are set to recover moderately as inventories shrink and stock levels normalise with China’s overall production experiencing a gradual recovery,” he said. “However, ongoing competition from synthetic graphite for battery end use applications, will likely cap price growth.”

      Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Australian billionaire Gina Rinehart has become a formidable force in the global mining industry.

      After taking the helm of her father’s iron ore mining firm Hancock Prospecting in 1993, Rinehart embarked upon a diversification strategy that has vastly expanded her resource empire. Now Australia’s richest person, Rinehart has investments in many of the world’s most strategic commodities such as lithium, rare earths, copper, potash and natural gas.

      One of those investments is Arafura Rare Earths (ASX:ARU,OTC Pink:ARAFF), which even in a low price environment for rare earths has managed to secure nearly AU$1.5 billion in debt financing in mid-2024 to advance its Nolans project in the Northern Territory. With a 10 percent equity stake, Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting is Arafura’s largest shareholder.

      In addition to Arafura, entrepreneur Rinehart’s investment portfolio also contains other ex-China, green-transition-focused companies such as Australian lithium firm Liontown Resources (ASX:LTR,OTC Pink:LINRF), as well as rare earths producers MP Materials (NYSE:MP) and Lynas Rare Earths (ASX:LYC,OTC Pink:LYSCF). Rinehart’s role in the acquisition of Azure Minerals’ Andover lithium project in Western Australia alongside lithium giant SQM (NYSE:SQM) also made headlines in the past year.

      In this article

        Who is Gina Rinehart?

        Gina Rinehart is an Australian iron ore magnate and the executive chair of Hancock Prospecting, as well as the richest person in Australia and one of the world’s richest women. Rinehart is the daughter of Australian mining mogul and Hancock Prospecting founder, the late Lang Hancock. As the current executive chair of Hancock Prospecting, Rinehart won the inaugural Lifetime Achievement Award from CEO Magazine in 2019.

        Rinehart was appointed as an Officer of the Order of Australia in 2022 for her “distinguished service to the mining sector, to the community through philanthropic initiatives, and to sport as a patron.”

        How did Gina Rinehart get rich?

        Gina Rinehart inherited Hancock Prospecting after her father’s passing in 1992. The following year, Gina Rinehart’s company acquired the Roy Hill tenements. Centering the massive project as the cornerstone of the company, Hancock Prospecting has greatly benefited from the iron ore market boom that began in the early 2000s.

        Today, Roy Hill is Australia’s largest iron ore mine, producing 60 million tonnes of iron ore per year. The mine was recently approved to increase its annual production to 70 million tonnes. Success at Roy Hill has made Hancock Prospecting Australia’s most valuable private company, worth an estimated AU$15.6 billion.

        As with many of the world’s most successful billionaires, Gina Rinehart has developed an investment strategy based on strategic partnerships as well as diversification to mitigate risk and build value. Under her leadership, Hancock Prospecting Pty Limited (HPPL) as well as the HPPL Group of companies has expanded into some of the world’s most economically important markets, such as real estate, agriculture, energy and critical metals.

        For the 2024 fiscal year, Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting reported a bumper profit of AU$5.6 billion, up 10 percent from the previous year.

        What mining companies does Gina Rinehart own?

        Through her company Hancock Prospecting, Gina Rinehart owns interest in mining companies across many sectors, including iron ore, lithium, rare earths, copper, oil and gas, as well as potash. While much of her investment portfolio is focused on Australia and ASX companies, Rinehart is actively strengthening the geographical diversification of her investments.

        In recent years, Rinehart has made a series of key investments in mining companies, especially targeting critical metals projects in Germany, Brazil, Ecuador and the United States. These include exploration-stage firms such as Titan Minerals (ASX:TTM) and Azure Minerals as well as producers such as Atlas Iron and MP Materials.

        Where does Hancock Prospecting mine iron?

        Vehicles hauling ore at Roy Hill iron ore mine.

        Vehicles hauling ore at Roy Hill iron ore mine.

        Photo of Roy Hill iron ore mine via Roy Hill.

        Hancock Prospecting’s Roy Hill and Hope Downs iron ore mines are located in the resource rich Pilbara region of Western Australia.

        Roy Hill has attracted strategic partnerships with major global enterprises: Marubeni (TSE:8002) with a 15 percent equity stake; POSCO (NYSE:PKX,KRX:005490) holds a 12.5 percent stake; and China Steel (TPE:2002) has a 2.5 percent equity position. The minority partners purchase a combined 28.75 million tonnes of iron ore annually from Roy Hill’s production.

        In September 2024, Hancock Prospecting got the green light for its AU$600 million McPhee iron mine located about 100 kilometres north of the Roy Hill mine after a long approval process. The McPhee iron mine is expected to produce around 10 million tonnes of the metal each year over an estimated 15 year mine life. First production is expected to kick off next year, and ore will be transported by road trains to Roy Hill for processing and blending. The goal is to improve the larger mine’s product mix and sustain its production volumes.

        The Hope Downs iron ore complex is another of Australia’s largest iron ore projects. A 50/50 joint venture partnership with Rio Tinto (ASX:RIO,NYSE:RIO,LSE:RIO), Hope Downs hosts four open-pit mines and has an annual production capacity of 47 million tonnes. Hope Downs has also been the subject of a more than decade-long civil dispute in a Western Australian court over royalties, put forth by the descendants of Lang Hancock’s business partner Peter Wright as well as Rinehart’s own children.

        Gina Rinehart’s iron ore investments

        Gina Rinehart’s iron ore investments in Western Australia extend beyond Roy Hill and Hill Downs to its subsidiary Atlas Iron’s three producing mines and a pipeline of development projects, as well as an earn-in agreement on Legacy Iron Ore (ASX:LCY) and Hawthorn Resources’ (ASX:HAW) Mt Bevan project through its subsidiary Hancock Magnetite Holdings.

        Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting acquired Atlas Iron in 2018 through a AU$427 million deal that turned out to be dirt cheap as the company would go on to deliver AU$1.5 billion in revenues over the next three years alone.

        Today, Atlas Mines operates the Mt Webber, Sanjiv Ridge and Miralga Creek mines. Production from these mines in its fiscal year ended June 2023 led to a AU$222 million dividend payment for Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting.

        At Mt Bevan, as part of its earn-in agreement, Hancock completed a prefeasibility study (PFS) for a 12 million tonne per year high-grade magnetite project in July of 2024. The PFS incorporated a mineral resource estimate totalling 1,291 million tonnes, which was completed by Atlas, and delineates a capital cost of AU$5 billion to develop the potential Mt Bevan mine.

        Completion of the PFS increased Hancock’s stake in the JV ownership from 30 percent to 51 percent with Legacy now holding 29.4 percent and Hawthorn 19.6 percent.

        Like iron, coal is another essential material in steel manufacturing. To this end, Rinehart is also pursuing an investment in a past-producing metallurgical coal mine in Alberta, Canada. Hancock Prospecting subsidiary Northback Holdings is the owner of the proposed Grassy Mountain steelmaking coal project in the province’s Crowsnest Pass region. Northback is awaiting approval of its exploration licenses for the project.

        Gina Rinehart’s lithium investments

        Gina Rinehart’s lithium investments include Azure Minerals’ (ASX:AZS) Andover lithium project, Liontown Resources, Delta Lithium (ASX:DLI) and Vulcan Energy Resources (ASX:VUL). The majority of her lithium investments have came in a flurry over the past year.

        In June 2023, Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting signed a separate joint venture earn-in agreement for the Mt Bevan magnetite project, which is discussed above, this time for the lithium, nickel and copper mineralization at the project. The agreement will similarly see Hancock able to earn a 51 percent interest by completing certain milestones.

        Last September, Rinehart made headlines when she took a position in Liontown Resources and then rapidly increased the position to 19.9 percent over the following month. This allowed Hancock, which was now Liontown’s largest shareholder, to effectively block Albemarle’s (NYSE:ALB) accepted takeover of the smaller lithium company.

        However, since then, Liontown’s stock has taken a hit as the economics for its near-production Kathleen Valley lithium project in Western Australia have been damaged by the effects of high inflation and low lithium prices. Ultimately, in January, Albemarle decided to sell off its 4 percent stake in Liontown Resources. The lack of any further moves or comment by Rinehart in relation to Liontown Resources has led to speculation she may be waiting for the right opportunity to buy up the lithium company at a discount.

        Kathleen Valley entered production in late July 2024, and is expected to produce approximately 2.8 million tonnes per year of spodumene concentrate by the end of FY 2027.

        That wasn’t the only lithium bid Rinehart blocked in October 2023. As is her strategy, Rinehart scooped up an 18.9 percent stake in Azure Minerals last year after SQM announced its intention for a total takeover of the company and its Andover lithium project in the West Pilbara region of Western Australia. This story had a different ending, though, as Hancock Prospecting instead joined the lithium giant in a AU$1.7 billion deal to become a co-owner of the exploration-stage Andover project, which also hosts nickel, copper and cobalt mineralisation. The deal closed in May 2024.

        Shortly after its Liontown and Azure moves last year, Hancock Prospecting continued investing in Western Australia’s lithium prospects when it participated in a AU$70.2 million fundraising for Delta Lithium in November 2023. The proceeds of the fundraising will help Delta Lithium to fund the development of its Mt Ida lithium-gold project, which is adjacent to Hancock’s Mt Bevan joint venture project. As of November 2024, Hancock Prospecting owns 10.65 percent of Delta Lithium.

        Rinehart has made lithium investments outside of Australia as well. Looking further afield to Germany, with a 7.5 percent stake, Hancock Prospecting is the second largest shareholder in Vulcan Energy and its flagship Zero Carbon lithium project in Germany’s Upper Rhine Valley, a milestone Rinehart’s company reached after investing an additional AU$20 million in Vulcan, which made headlines in June. The Zero Carbon project is slated to produce an initial 24,000 tonnes of lithium hydroxide by the end of 2025, targeting Europe’s electric vehicle manufacturing sector.

        In November 2024, Vulcan Energy reached another major milestone with first production at its downstream lithium hydroxide optimisation plant, which is designed to produce lithium hydroxide and battery-grade lithium hydroxide monohydrate.

        Gina Rinehart’s rare earths investments

        Facilities at MP Materials

        Facilities at MP Materials’ Mountain Pass rare earths mine.

        clayton harrison / Shutterstock

        Through Hancock Prospecting, Gina Rinehart has recently made investments in some of the world’s most well known rare earths producing companies — US-based MP Materials and Australia’s Lynas Rare Earths — as well as development-stage Arafura Rare Earths and exploration-stage Brazilian Rare Earths (ASX:BRE). Rinehart taking a position in these rare earths companies shows she is looking to capitalise on the significant need for these critical metals outside of China.

        As mentioned in the introduction to this article, Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting is the largest shareholder of Arafura Rare Earths, giving it a 10 percent stake in the advanced-stage Nolans project in the Northern Territory. Rinehart made the investment in December 2022.

        In April of 2024, Rinehart made two significant moves into the sector. The first came on April 9, when it was revealed that Hancock Prospecting had acquired a 5.3 percent stake in MP Materials, the second largest rare earths producer outside of China. The company’s California-based Mountain Pass mine is the only integrated rare earth mining and processing operation in North America.

        Rinehart’s investment in MP Materials could later bring in “Roy Hill-type cash flow,” Dylan Kelly, head analyst at Terra Capital, told Australian Financial Review. “Anything that is producing and not China-aligned is highly strategic. These materials are very, very hard to make and there’s a lot of demand in making magnets for electric vehicles and wind turbines.’

        One week later, Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting also took up a 5.82 percent interest in Lynas Rare Earths, the largest ex-China rare earths producer. The Australian rare earths miner produces the critical metals at its Mount Weld mine in Western Australia and ships the raw material to Malaysia for processing. Lynas is also ramping up processing at its Kalgoorlie rare earth processing facility in Australia, and building light rare earths processing facilities and a heavy rare earths separation facility in Texas, US.

        Rinehart’s near simultaneous investments in both Lynas and MP Materials comes after merger talks between the two rare earths behemoths stalled in February. There is speculation stirring that Rinehart’s participation could renew merger discussions, Reuters reported. In November, the mining mogul increased her position in MP Materials to 8.5 percent, further raising the possibility of a merger down the road.

        Andy Forster, Lynas investor and senior investor of Argo Investments, had his interest piqued by Rinehart’s move ‘given she’s clearly made a play across the whole space. She obviously wants to potentially have a seat at the table if there’s any chance of consolidation.’

        Rinehart is also getting her foot in the rare earths door at the exploration level. In 2023, Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting made a pre-IPO investment for a 5.85 percent share in Brazilian Rare Earths, which went on to list on the ASX in December of that year. The rare earths explorer is working its district-scale Rocha da Rocha rare earth province in the state of Bahia, Brazil. The province is highly prospective for both heavy and light rare earths, with grades of over 40 percent total rare earth oxides found. Brazilian Rare Earths is working to complete an updated JORC mineral resource estimate.

        Gina Rinehart’s copper investments

        Gina Rinehart’s copper investments are centered on Ecuador’s Andean copper-gold belt, and include explorer Titan Minerals and Ecuador’s state-owned Empresa Nacional Minera (ENAMI).

        Ecuador has seen a rush of major mining companies taking up positions in key copper and gold projects in recent years, placing Hancock Prospecting in the company of Barrick Gold (TSX:ABX,NYSE:GOLD), Zijin Mining (HKEX:2899) and Anglo American (LSE:AAL,OTCQX:AAUKF).

        Rinehart’s Ecuadorian copper investments are in line with her shift toward the critical metals necessary for the green transition and her strategy to expand the global footprint of her mining empire.

        Hancock Prospecting subsidiary Hanrine Ecuadorian Exploration and Mining has been in the region since 2017, but recently began making more investments. In March 2024, Hancock Prospecting subsidiary Hanrine Ecuadorian Exploration and Mining acquired a 49 percent stake in six mining concessions for AU$186.4 million. The deal sees it partner with state mining company ENAMI for the concessions, which surround the stalled Llurimagua copper-molybdenum project in Northern Ecuador.

        In late April, Ecuador’s constitutional court nixed appeals by ENAMI and its partner in the Llurimagua project, Chile’s state-owned CODELCO, to review the March 2023 decision by Imbabura’s provincial supreme court suspending the environmental license for Llurimagua.

        Shortly after the investment with ENAMI, Rinehart’s Hanrine made another play in Ecuador by striking an earn-in agreement with Titan Minerals for up to an 80 percent ownership stake in the explorer’s Linderos copper-gold project contingent on up to AU$120 million in exploration spending. Linderos is an early-exploration stage project with the potential to host a large-scale copper porphyry system. Hanrine has made an initial investment of AU$2 million for a 5 percent stake.

        Gina Rinehart’s oil and gas investments

        Gina Rinehart’s oil and gas investments include private firms Warrego Energy in Western Australia and Senex Energy in Queensland.

        In February 2023, Hancock Prospecting won a protracted bidding war for the then-public Warrego with Warrego’s joint venture partner Strike Energy (ASX:STX) for a price of AU$0.36 per share. Warrego and operator Strike Energy maintain their 50/50 joint venture on the West Erregulla onshore gas field within exploration permit EP 469 near Perth in Western Australia.

        In mid-August 2024, the West Erregulla project received its production licence and the partners expect to start operations once a final investment decision is made later this year. During phase one, the project is expected to produce 87 terajoules per day.

        As for Senex Energy, it is a joint venture between POSCO (50.1 percent) and Hancock Prospecting subsidiary Hancock Energy (49.9 percent) that holds the Atlas and Roma North natural gas developments in Queensland’s Surat Basin. The two JV partners acquired Senex in 2022, with Rinehart’s company putting up AU$440.89 million.

        Senex Energy is embarking on a AU$1 billion expansion endeavor at Atlas and Roma North this year that will see 60 petajoules of natural gas delivered to Australia’s east coast market annually by the end of 2025. This figure represents more than 10 percent of the region’s demand. Regulatory approval for the expansion was finally approved following an uphill battle with a Federal government more keen on renewable energy projects than the natural gas variety. Hancock Prospecting reported the first flows of gas production from the expansion field in late November 2024.

        Rinehart once had a significant stake of nearly 20 percent in Lakes Oil, now Lakes Blue Energy (ASX:LKO), through subsidiary Timeview Enterprises. Timeview’s stake in Lakes Blue Energy has been lowered in recent years, but it remains the company’s fourth largest shareholder at 4.63 percent.

        In late October, Rinehart offered financial assistance to Mineral Resources (ASX:MIN,OTC Pink:MALRF), a diversified mining company with lithium, iron ore and oil and gas operations in Western Australia. Headed by another mining heavyweight, Chris Ellison, Mineral Resources, or MinRes, is reportedly drowning in debt and embroiled in a tax evasion investigation. At that time, Hancock Prospecting agreed to a AU$1.13 billion buyout of MinRes’ oil and gas projects in the Perth Basin and an exploration acreage in the Carnarvon Basin.

        The 100 percent sale of two of MinRes’ exploration permits to Hancock was completed in December for initial consideration of AU$780 million, with potential for up to AU$327 million depending on whether certain conditions and thresholds are met. The permits include the Moriarty Deep prospect and the Lockyer gas and Erregulla oil discoveries.

        Separate to that sale, the two companies are also forming two 50/50 exploration joint ventures for MinRes’ remaining permits in the Perth and Carnarvon Basins. Hancock will acquire 50 percent of the MinRes Explorer drill rig, which is the largest in Australia.

        Gina Rinehart’s potash and agriculture investments

        Gina Rinehart’s potash and agricultural investments center on Hancock Prospecting’s ownership interests in multiple premium cattle stations in Australia, and the company’s royalty revenue generated from the Anglo-American-controlled Woodsmith potash project currently under construction in the United Kingdom.

        With an original investment of AU$380.6 million in 2016 to then-owner Sirius Minerals, Hancock Prospecting has a 5 percent revenue royalty on the first 13 million tonnes of fertiliser produced from Woodsmith and 1 percent thereafter. Hancock also has a 20,000 tonne-a-year offtake option. The timeline for Rinehart’s royalty revenue has been pushed back, however, as Anglo is cutting spending at Woodsmith following BHP’s (ASX:BHP,NYSE:BHP,LSE:BHP) failed mega-merger with Anglo American.

        Investor takeaway

        With Gina Rinehart at the helm of Hancock Prospecting, the Roy Hill iron ore mine has generated stellar revenues. That wealth creation not only made her Australia’s richest person, but has also built a powerful war chest from which Rinehart is expanding her mining empire.

        Investors can take cues from her recent and future moves in the mining sector. Although she may be defensive toward renewable energy technologies encroaching on agricultural land, she understands the strategical importance of investing in critical metals for the green transition such as lithium, rare earths and copper.

        FAQs for Gina Rinehart

        How much is Gina Rinehart worth?

        Gina Rinehart’s net worth is reported to be AU$40.61 billion as of May 31, 2024. That’s up 8.5 percent over the previous year, according to figures from the Australian Financial Review’s Rich List 2024.

        ‘Rinehart’s net worth jumped $3.2b in the last year thanks to multiples in the sector expanding,’ the list’s authors explain. ‘However, her iron grip on the Rich List top spot may be weakened by ore price declines in 2024, on the back of concerns over steel output reducing in China.’

        What company does Gina Rinehart own?

        Gina Rinehart owns Hancock Prospecting, a private company founded by her late father Lang Hancock. Originally an iron ore mining company, today the firm has strategic stakes in a wide-range of metals and commodities from lithium and rare earths to copper and agriculture, which are detailed in this article.

        Can I buy shares in Hancock Prospecting?

        While investors can’t buy public shares in privately held Hancock Prospecting, they can take equity positions in the publicly traded stocks in which the company itself holds interest. Some of these stocks include Arafura Rare Earths (ASX:ARU,OTC Pink:ARAFF), Liontown Resources (ASX:LTR), MP Materials (NYSE:MP) and Lynas Rare Earths (ASX:LYC).

        Does Gina Rinehart own Rio Tinto?

        Although she has interest in many mining companies and the two companies share the Hope Downs joint venture, Gina Rinehart does not own mining giant Rio Tinto. Yahoo Finance reports that Aluminum Corporation of China (SHA:601600) is its largest shareholder at 11 percent, followed by BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) with 8.7 percent and the Vanguard Group at about 3.1 percent of shares.

        What does Gina Rinehart think about nuclear energy?

        Gina Rinehart is pro-nuclear energy. During a speech at The Australian Bush Summit in 2023, she railed against the impact of wind and solar farms on much needed agricultural land in Australia. She suggested that nuclear energy offers a more viable solution for reaching the country’s net zero targets.

        Is Gina Rinehart the richest person in Australia?

        Gina Rinehart is the richest person in Australia. In 2024, she made the Australian Financial Review’s Rich List for the fifth consecutive year in a row. The next richest Australian, real estate developer Harry Triguboff, trails her by about AU$14 billion.

        Is Gina Rinehart the richest woman in the world?

        Gina Rinehart is not the richest woman in the world, but she does rank as the world’s ninth richest woman in 2024. The distinction of richest woman in the world goes to France’s Francoise Bettencourt Meyer, the heir of L’Oréal (EPA:OR). Rinehart previously held the title in 2012.

        Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

        This post appeared first on investingnews.com

        Hollywood actors, professional athletes, and award-winning musicians alike have all relied on Don Saladino, coach and trainer of over 20 years, to reach their full potential in physical fitness. As an advisor to Cizzle Brands, Mr. Saladino will provide his insights, expertise, and access to his vast professional network for the commercialization and promotion of Cizzle Brands’ product lines at a global scale.

        Cizzle Brands Corporation (Cboe Canada: CZZL) ( the ‘Company or ‘Cizzle Brands’) , is pleased to announce that Don Saladino, a renowned coach and fitness expert to many A-List celebrities, professional athletes, and award-winning musicians has been engaged as an advisor to Cizzle Brands to help guide the Company’s commercialization journey in the health and wellness space. Under his agreement with Cizzle Brands, Mr. Saladino will provide sales, marketing, and promotional support for Cizzle Brands’ offerings, including through his TikTok (165k followers) and Instagram (432k followers) social media channels.

        This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250121943080/en/

        Don Saladino

        Don Saladino’s one-minute Intro Reel video can be viewed on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L57AYEjZF4 (Photo: Business Wire)

        Mr. Saladino has developed a reputation for training several A-List Hollywood stars, including Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively, Anne Hathaway, John Krasinski, Emily Blunt, Liev Schreiber, Hugh Jackman and Joanna Gaines. In 2020, Mr. Saladino pivoted from running a brick-and-mortar gym in New York City to operating a global online fitness business which includes workout programs and challenges, an e-commerce portal for supplements, the Don Saladino App (available on the Apple App Store and Google Play), and yearly fitness retreats. Mr. Saladino has an extensive network of celebrity personalities to whom he will be supplying Cizzle Brands’ products throughout the course of their training programs.

        Additionally, Mr. Saladino has received extensive media coverage. Magazines such as Men’s Health , Women’s Health , and Muscle & Fitness have cited Mr. Saladino as a fitness expert. Muscle & Fitness has also featured Mr. Saladino on its print magazine cover in March 2018, October 2021, and November 2023. Other publications have featured Mr. Saladino including People , US Weekly , Cosmo , and Shape . Additionally, Mr. Saladino has done live fitness demonstrations on The Golf Channel , The Today Show , Good Morning America , Page Six TV , People NOW , E News , Fox News , and WebMD .

        More information about Don Saladino can be found on his website at the following link: https://donsaladino.com/

        Cizzle Brands Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, John Celenza, commented, ‘We are keen to be working with Don, as he is one of the most recognized names in the fitness world with a highly engaged following, a well-earned reputation for generating results, and a broad network of highly influential executives. Cizzle Brands is only getting started with building out its presence in the world of health and wellness. With Don’s knowledge of what the world’s most elite athletes, entrepreneurs, and actors are demanding, we expect he will prove to be extraordinarily valuable to us as an advisor.’

        Regarding his appointment as an advisor to Cizzle Brands, Don Saladino commented, ‘In today’s marketplace, very few companies truly have what it takes to formulate and produce athlete-grade products for training, nutrition, hydration, and overall wellness while also being appropriate for active people of all ages. The proven team behind Cizzle Brands has already demonstrated their ability to meet this standard with the recent successful launch of CWENCH Hydration™ which has already sold more than one million ready-to-drink units in less than a year on the market, with even more exciting offerings set to hit the market soon. As someone who personally incorporates Cizzle Brands’ products into nutrition regimes for myself, my wife, and our two children, I am honoured to be part of the Cizzle Brands team, and there are exciting times to be had for all of us in 2025!’

        Cizzle Brands also announced the issuance of 455,645 common shares (the ‘Settlement Shares’) of the Company at a deemed price of $0.31 in settlement of $141,250 in debt. The Settlement Shares were issued to a provider who elected to receive part of their service fee in shares as opposed to cash. The Settlement Shares will be subject to a statutory hold period expiring four months and one day after the date of issuance pursuant to National Instrument 45-102 – Resale of Securities .

        Celenza added: ‘I’ve always sought to have our key partners invested in our success, so I was pleased when one of our key professional advisers opted to receive part of their fee in equity. To me, it is one of the highest endorsements we’ve received to date.’

        About Cizzle Brands Corporation

        Cizzle Brands Corporation is elevating the game in health and wellness. Through extensive collaboration and testing with leading athletes and trainers across several elite sports, Cizzle Brands has launched two leading product lines in the sports nutrition category: (i) CWENCH Hydration, a better-for-you sports drink that is now carried in over 1,200 stores in Canada, the United States, and Europe; and (ii) Spoken Nutrition, a premium brand of athlete-grade nutraceuticals that carry the prestigious NSF Certified for Sport® qualification. All Cizzle Brands products are designed to help people achieve their best in both competitive sports and in living a healthy, vibrant, active lifestyle.

        For more information about Cizzle Brands, please visit: https://www.cizzlebrands.com/

        Notice Regarding Images and Links: This press release may contain images and/or links to outside web pages, which could play an important role in providing the full context of the news update being conveyed through this press release. Some news aggregation services may remove these images and/or links at their discretion. Therefore, readers are encouraged to access SEDAR+ or the News section of the Cizzle Brands Corporation website to view this press release containing all images and/or links as originally published.

        On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company,

        Cizzle Brands Corporation

        ‘John Celenza’

        John Celenza, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

        CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

        This news release contains ‘forward-looking information’ which may include, but is not limited to, information with respect to the activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, such as, but not limited to: new products of the Company and potential sales and distribution opportunities; the role of Mr. Saladino with Cizzle Brands; the supply of Cizzle Brands’ products through Mr. Saladino’s training programs; the building of Cizzle Brands’ presence in the world of health and wellness; and the value of Mr. Saladino as an advisor to Cizzle Brands. Such forward-looking information is often, but not always, identified by the use of words and phrases such as ‘plans’, ‘expects’, ‘is expected’, ‘budget’, ‘scheduled’, ‘estimates’, ‘forecasts’, ‘intends’, ‘anticipates’, or ‘believes’ or variations (including negative variations) of such words and phrases, or state that certain actions, events or results ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘might’ or ‘will’ be taken, occur or be achieved. Various assumptions or factors are typically applied in drawing conclusions or making the forecasts or projections set out in forward-looking information. Those assumptions and factors are based on information currently available to the Company.

        Forward looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other risk factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Such risks include risks related to increased competition and current global financial conditions, access and supply risks, reliance on key personnel, operational risks, regulatory risks, financing, capitalization and liquidity risks. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company undertakes no obligation, except as otherwise required by law, to update these forward-looking statements if management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors change.

        View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250121943080/en/

        For further information, please contact:

        Setti Coscarella
        Head of Corporate Development
        investors@cizzlebrands.com
        1-844-588-2088

        News Provided by Business Wire via QuoteMedia

        This post appeared first on investingnews.com