Category

Investing

Category

The BRICS nations, originally composed of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, have had many discussions about establishing a new reserve currency backed by a basket of their respective currencies.

The creation of a potentially gold-backed currency, known as the ‘Unit,’ as a US dollar alternative is also under consideration by BRICS members. However, whether or not these countries can fully separate themselves from the ruling global currency is up for debate even amongst themselves.

A potential BRICS currency would allow these nations to assert their economic independence while competing with the existing international financial system. The current system is dominated by the US dollar, which accounts for about 89 percent of all currency trading. Traditionally, nearly 100 percent of oil trading was conducted in US dollars; however, in 2023, one-fifth of oil trades were reportedly made using non-US dollar currencies.

Central to this situation is the US trade war with China, as well as US sanctions on China and Russia. Should the BRICS establish a new reserve currency, it would likely significantly impact the US dollar, potentially leading to a decline in demand, or what’s known as de-dollarization. In turn, this would have implications for the US and global economies.

If BRICS watchers were hoping for more fireworks at the 2025 BRICS meeting held in Brazil this July, they were sorely disappointed. Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping were not in attendance, and talk of a BRICS currency was much more muted. On top of this, according to Modern Diplomacy, that topic may be even less of a concern at next year’s BRICS meeting; it will be held in India, which has sought to distance itself from a move away from the US dollar.

It’s still too hard to predict if and when a BRICS currency will be released, but it’s a good time to look at the potential for a BRICS currency and its possible implications for investors.

In this article

    Why do the BRICS nations want to create a new currency?

    The BRICS nations have a slew of reasons for wanting to set up a new currency, including recent global financial challenges and aggressive US foreign policies. They want to better serve their own economic interests while reducing global dependence on the US dollar and the euro.

    In recent years, the US has placed numerous sanctions on Russia and Iran. The two countries are working together to bring about a BRICS currency that would negate the economic impacts of such restrictions, as per Iranian Ambassador to Russia Kazem Jalal, speaking at a press conference during the Russia-Islamic World: KazanForum in May 2024.

    In December 2025, the foreign ministries of Russia and Iran signed a deal for a three-year consultation program to further coordinate their resistance to Western sanctions.

    Some experts believe that a BRICS currency is a flawed idea, as it would unite countries with very different economies. There are also concerns that non-Chinese members might increase their dependence on China’s yuan instead. That said, when Russia demanded in October 2023 that India pay for oil in yuan as Russia is struggling to use its excess supply of rupees, India refused to use anything other than the US dollar or rupees to pay.

    While Russia and Iran are primarily advocating for a single unified currency, the other BRICS nations are more interested in developing interoperable digital payment systems.

    When will a BRICS currency be released?

    There’s no definitive launch date, although BRICS leaders have discussed the possibility at length.

    During the 14th BRICS Summit, held in mid-2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin said the BRICS countries plan to issue a ‘new global reserve currency,’ and are ready to work openly with all fair trade partners.

    In April 2023, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva showed support for a BRICS currency, commenting, “Why can’t an institution like the BRICS bank have a currency to finance trade relations between Brazil and China, between Brazil and all the other BRICS countries? Who decided that the dollar was the (trade) currency after the end of gold parity?”

    In the lead up to the 2023 BRICS Summit, there was speculation that an announcement of such a currency could be on the table. This proved to be wishful thinking, however. ‘The development of anything alternative is more a medium to long term ambition. There is no suggestion right now to creates a BRICS currency,’ Leslie Maasdorp, CFO of the New Development Bank, told Bloomberg at the time. The bank represents the BRICS bloc.

    At the 2024 BRICS Summit, the movement away from US dollar supremacy really came to a head when Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared on stage holding what appeared as a prototype of a possible BRICS banknote.

    However, he soon backed away from his previous aggressive calls for de-dollarization, stating the goal of the BRICS member nations is not to move away from the US dollar-dominated SWIFT platform, but rather to deter the ‘weaponization’ of the US dollar by developing alternative systems for using local currencies in financial transactions between BRICS countries and with trading partners.

    Government officials in Brazil, which took the rotating presidency of the BRICS group for 2025, have said there are no plans to take any significant steps toward a BRICS currency.

    ‘We are not refusing, not fighting the dollar, but if they don’t let us work with it, what can we do? We then have to look for other alternatives, which is happening,’ Putin told listeners.

    However, measures to reduce the reliance on the US dollar are very much on the table with cross-border payment systems, including exploring blockchain technology, a major theme at the 2025 BRICS summit, reported Reuters.

    As mentioned, in 2026, the BRICS Summit will be held in India, which earlier this year distanced itself from the idea of a move away from the US dollar. Speaking at an event in London in March 2025, India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar stated, ‘I don’t think there’s any policy on our part to replace the dollar. The dollar as the reserve currency is the source of global economic stability, and right now what we want in the world is more economic stability, not less. I don’t think there’s a unified BRICS position on this. I think BRICS members, and now that we have more members, have very diverse positions on this matter.’

    Which nations are members of BRICS?

    As of early 2026, there are 10 BRICS member nations: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This expanded group of 10 full member countries is sometimes referred to as BRICS+.

    The group was originally composed of the four nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China and called BRIC, which changed to BRICS when South Africa joined in 2010.

    At the 2023 BRICS Summit, six countries were invited to become BRICS members: Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. All countries but Argentina and Saudi Arabia officially joined the alliance in January 2024, and in 2025, Indonesia became the 10th full member of BRICS.

    Additionally, at the 2024 BRICS Summit, 13 nations signed on as BRICS partner countries, although they are not yet full-fledged members: Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Vietnam and Uzbekistan.

    Saudi Arabia has seemingly been on the fence about joining the BRICS. The Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s November 19, 2025, announcement of a US$1 trillion investment in the US economy during a visit to the White House may signal something about the Middle Eastern country’s allegiance.

    What would the advantages of a BRICS currency be?

    A new currency could have several benefits for the BRICS countries, including more efficient cross-border transactions and increased financial inclusion. By leveraging blockchain technology, digital currencies and smart contracts, the currency could revolutionize the global financial system. Thanks to seamless cross-border payments, it could also promote trade and economic integration among the BRICS nations and beyond.

    A new BRICS currency would also:

    • Strengthen economic integration within the BRICS countries
    • Reduce the influence of the US on the global stage
    • Weaken the standing of the US dollar as a global reserve currency
    • Encourage other countries to form alliances to develop regional currencies
    • Mitigate risks associated with global volatility due to unilateral measures and the diminution of dollar dependence

    What is Donald Trump’s stance on a BRICS currency?

    Trump has not been shy about upping the ante on American protectionism with tariffs. During the first US presidential debate between him and Vice President Kamala Harris on September 10, 2024, Trump doubled down on his pledge to punish BRICS nations with strict tariffs if they seek to move away from the US dollar as the global currency.

    He originally took a particularly strong stance against China, threatening to implement 60 percent to 100 percent tariffs on Chinese imports, although these hefty tariffs would be paid by American companies and consumers purchasing Chinese products, not by China itself.

    In early December 2024, Trump posted an even more direct threat to BRICS nations on Truth Social:

    “We require a commitment from these countries that they will neither create a new Brics currency nor back any other currency to replace the mighty US dollar or they will face 100% tariffs and should expect to say goodbye to selling into the wonderful US economy.’

    In response to Trump demanding a ‘commitment’ from BRICS nations not to challenge the supremacy of the US dollar, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov sounded less than threatened.

    ‘More and more countries are switching to the use of national currencies in their trade and foreign economic activities,’ Peskov said, per Reuters. ‘If the U.S. uses force, as they say economic force, to compel countries to use the dollar it will further strengthen the trend of switching to national currencies (in international trade).’

    In July 2025, President Trump took it a step further by threatening to slap an extra 10 percent in tariffs on countries who side with BRICS policies, although this has not been implemented as of November 2025. ‘Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,’ he wrote in a social media post.

    This additional BRICS targeted tariff has not yet been implemented as of November 2025.

    How will Trump’s tariffs affect BRICS nations?

    If US President Donald Trump were to come through on his promise to enact 100 percent tariffs on BRICS nations the outcome could prove costly for all parties involved.

    “The action would result in slower growth and higher inflation than otherwise in the US and most of the targeted economies,” according to analysis by the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    China would likely experience the worst slowing of its GDP growth as the US is its largest trading partner. One silver lining for China is that its disciplined central bank will help to save it from accelerated inflation.

    While neither the 100 percent or 10 percent tariffs specifically targeting BRICS countries for their membership have been implemented, the countries still face many other tariffs from the US.

    Trump’s blanket 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, set on June 3, 2025, impact Brazil, China and the UAE. Brazil is a top three source for US steel imports, while China and the UAE are significant sources of US aluminum imports.

    In late July, Brazil was also saddled with a 50 percent tariff on a broader range of goods, which US President Donald Trump inflicted on the nation in response to the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro for his alleged coup attempt.

    Trump’s tariffs could have a significant impact on Brazil’s economy, which is the largest in Latin America. However, most of the key trading sectors between the two nations are exempt from the tariff, including “civil aircraft, pig iron, precious metals, wood pulp, energy and fertilizers,” states Reuters.

    India is another BRICS nation facing 50 percent tariffs. The sectors targeted span from textiles, garments and footwear to food, leather goods, gems and automobiles. Key industries such as pharmaceuticals and computer chips.

    One of the major sticking points for the Trump administration is India continuing to purchase Russian oil. India and China are the two largest buyers of Russian oil, but the US has yet to punish China for purchasing oil from Russia.

    Although China is the US’s biggest economic rival on the global stage, Trump hit the pause button on the escalating tariff war between the two nations until November 10, 2026.

    In the meantime, the US’s 30 percent tariff on Chinese goods remains in place. Negotiations are underway, including on a proposed 245 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicle imports.

    In July, the Trump Administration imposed 30 percent tariffs on South Africa, the US’s second biggest trading partner. The African nation’s agriculture, mining and manufacturing sector are at significant risk from the tariffs, but there are exceptions in place for “copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, some critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy products,” reports the BBC.

    How are BRICS nations responding to US tariffs?

    Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva convened an online BRICS summit on September 8, 2025, to address the threat of US trade policies and tariffs to member nations.

    “Tariff blackmail is being normalized as an instrument to seize markets and interfere in domestic affairs,” stated Lula, according to a prepared statement from the Brazilian government.

    “Our countries have become victims of unjustified and illegal trade practices.”

    Both Lula and Jinping called upon their BRICS peers to stand together and push back against unfair trade practices, and strengthen trade and cooperation between member nations.

    However, the South China Morning Post reports that summit attendees fell short of directly criticizing US President Donald Trump in a bid not to further stoke his ire. That may also be why most BRICS members are trying to negotiate with the US rather than fight back with retaliatory tariffs.

    Critics have suggested Trump’s tariffs are having the undesirable effect of driving major trading partners like Brazil, India and South Africa further into the arms of US rivals China and Russia.

    While currently only 9 percent of China’s exports are to other BRICS members, according to Reuters, trade between China and Russia reached a record US$244.8 billion in 2024.

    In addition, China is Brazil’s largest trading partner, importing 70 percent of its soybeans from the Latin American country. In fact, 28 percent of Brazil’s total exports go to China and 24 percent of its imports are from China.

    BRICS trade relations may strengthen as the bloc seeks to mitigate the economic impact of US tariffs. Or each member country may choose to do what’s in their own best interest rather than that of the group.

    Take India for instance. On February 2, 2026, India broke ranks with its BRICS peers and signed a trade deal with the US in which it agreed to halt purchases of Russian oil. In exchange, the US promised to cut tariffs on a broad range of products (excluding steel and aluminum) from 50 percent down to 18 percent.

    How would a new BRICS currency affect the US dollar?

    Pile of US paper dollar bills spread out in different denominations.

    RomanR / Shutterstock

    For decades, the US dollar has enjoyed unparalleled dominance as the world’s leading reserve currency. According to the US Federal Reserve, between 1999 and 2019, the dollar was used in 96 percent of international trade invoicing in the Americas, 74 percent in the Asia-Pacific region and 79 percent in the rest of the world.

    According to the Atlantic Council, as of November 2025 the US dollar is used in approximately 89 percent of currency exchanges, and 56 percent of all foreign currency reserves held by central banks. Due to its status as the most widely used currency for conversion and its use as a benchmark in the forex market, almost all central banks worldwide hold dollars.

    Additionally, the dollar is used for the vast majority of oil trades.

    Although the dollar’s reserve currency share has decreased as the euro and yen have gained popularity, the dollar is still the most widely used reserve currency, followed by the euro, the yen, the pound and the yuan.

    The potential impact of a new BRICS currency on the US dollar remains uncertain, with experts debating its potential to challenge the dollar’s dominance. However, if a new BRICS currency was to stabilize against the dollar, it could weaken the power of US sanctions, leading to a further decline in the dollar’s value. It could also cause an economic crisis affecting American households. Aside from that, this new currency could accelerate the trend toward de-dollarization.

    Nations worldwide are seeking alternatives to the US dollar, with examples being China and Russia trading in their own currencies, and countries like India, Kenya and Malaysia advocating for de-dollarization or signing agreements with other nations to trade in local currencies or alternative benchmarks.

    While it is unclear whether a new BRICS currency would inspire the creation of other US dollar alternatives, the possibility of challenging the dollar’s dominance as a reserve currency remains.

    And, as countries continue to diversify their reserve holdings, the US dollar could face increasing competition from emerging currencies, potentially altering the balance of power in global markets.

    However, a study by the Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center released in June 2024 shows that the US dollar is far from being dethroned as the world’s primary reserve currency. ‘The group’s ‘Dollar Dominance Monitor’ said the dollar continued to dominate foreign reserve holdings, trade invoicing, and currency transactions globally and its role as the primary global reserve currency was secure in the near and medium term,’ Reuters reported.

    Warwick J. McKibbin and Marcus Noland of the Peterson Institute for International Economics agree with this sentiment, writing in their analysis of the impacts of US tariffs on BRICS nations that ‘the BRICS pose no serious threat to the dollar’s dominance.’

    Dr. Shanthie Mariet D’Souza, founder and president of Mantraya Institute for Strategic Studies, sees validity in questioning the dollar’s supremacy, but views the possibility of any other currency catering its control of global finances and trade as not baked in reality.

    ‘Why the currency of a single country should remain the sole currency for international trade is a valid question. However, it is also true that the protraction of dollar-led international financial system has given the currency a set of decisive advantages, unlikely to be paralleled by any other currency,’ she stated in a November 2025 op-ed for the Lowy Institute.

    Ultimately, the impact of a new BRICS currency on the US dollar will depend on its adoption, its perceived stability and the extent to which it can offer a viable alternative to the dollar’s longstanding hegemony.

    Will the BRICS have a digital currency?

    BRICS nations do not as of yet have their own specific digital currency, but a BRICS blockchain-based payment system is in the works, according to Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov in March 2024.

    Known as the BRICS Bridge multi-sided payment platform, it would connect member states’ financial systems using payment gateways for settlements in central bank digital currencies. The planned system would serve as an alternative to the current international cross-border payment platform, the SWIFT system, which is dominated by US dollars.

    “We believe that creating an independent BRICS payment system is an important goal for the future, which would be based on state-of-the-art tools such as digital technologies and blockchain,’ Ushakov said in an interview with Russian news agency TASS, emphasizing that it should be convenient, as well as cost effective and free of politics.

    While development is underway, it has been a slow go and implementation isn’t likely before the end of the decade.

    In January 2026, the Reserve Bank of India proposed linking the Central Bank Digital Currencies of member nations. An ‘interoperability’ plan is set for the 2026 BRICS Summit agenda in India.

    Another dollar-alternative digital currency cross-border payment system in the works is Project mBridge, which is under development via a collaboration between the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Bank of Thailand, the Digital Currency Institute of the People’s Bank of China and the Central Bank of the UAE. Saudi Arabia joined the project in 2024.

    The central bank digital currencies traded on the platform would be backed by gold and local currencies minted in member nations.

    In June 2024, Forbes reported that the mBridge platform had reached a significant milestone by completing its minimal viable product stage (MVP).

    ‘The MVP platform can undertake real-value transactions (subject to jurisdictional preparedness) and is compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), a decentralized virtual environment that executes code consistently and securely across all Ethereum nodes,’ the publication stated. ‘MVP thus is suitable as a testbed for new use cases and interoperability with other platforms.’

    As of November 2025, the Project mBridge platform had reportedly processed 4,047 transactions worth US$55.49 billion. That’s compared to the 160 transactions worth US$22 million that were processed by October 2022.

    How does the BRICS Unit relate to Project mBridge?

    Watch the full interview with Andy Schectman.

    ‘(New Development Bank President Dilma Rousseff) came out and publicly said that there has been an agreement in principle to use a new settlement currency called the Unit, which will be backed 40 percent by gold and 60 percent by the local currencies in the BRICS union — the BRICS+ countries. That gold will be in the form of kilo bars and will be deliverable or redeemable for those entities,’ Schectman said.

    ‘The basket of gold and the basket of currencies will be minted in the member countries … it will be put into an escrow account, taken off the ledger so to speak — off of their balance sheet and put onto the mBridge ledger, and held in an escrow account in their own borders. It doesn’t need to be sent to a central authority.’

    More recently, on a panel at the 2026 Vancouver Resource Investment Conference (VRIC), Schectman spoke about mBridge and other ex-dollar digital currency systems being explored by BRICS nations.

    ‘MBridge is now operational, and so is ZIPS, the cross border payment system, both of which are free from Swift intervention, and both of which are using gold through . . . the expansion of the Shanghai Gold Exchange,’ he said.

    Schectman added that mBridge partners have expanded into the key Association of Southeast Asian Nations, home to hundreds of millions of people. ‘You’re adding all of these countries, and as you add all of these countries that have the ability to use their own monetary ecosystem, their own local currencies . . . chipping away at the dollar hegemony.’

    He also noted that Russian Minister of Foreign Sergey Lavrov had said Russia is expanding not only the BRICS payment system, but mBridge, which is cross border between central banks and BRICS Pay.

    According to Shectman, BRICS Pay is ‘a B2B retail like credit card . . . now being expanded into the Belt and Road Initiative, which is the largest infrastructure project in human history. It’s 75 percent of the human population. So little by little, all of these countries that used to purchase things and settle in dollars and to save excess dollars in Treasuries are slowly moving away. So, yeah, I think it has a profound effect over time.’

    How would a BRICS currency impact the economy?

    A potential shift toward a new BRICS currency could have significant implications for the North American economy and investors operating within it. Some of the most affected sectors and industries would include:

    • Oil and gas
    • Banking and finance
    • Commodities
    • International trade
    • Technology
    • Tourism and travel
    • The foreign exchange market

    A new BRICS currency would also introduce new trading pairs, alter currency correlations and increase market volatility, requiring investors to adapt their strategies accordingly.

    How can investors prepare for a new BRICS currency?

    Adjusting a portfolio in response to emerging BRICS currency trends may be a challenge for investors. While it does not currently seem like a BRICS currency is on the immediate horizon, Trump’s aggressive trade tactics have pushed allies away from the US, making diversification important.

    Several strategies can be adopted to capitalize on these trends and diversify your portfolio:

    • Gain exposure to BRICS equity markets through stocks and ETFs that track BRICS market indexes.
    • Consider alternative investments such as real estate or private equity in the BRICS countries.

    Prudent investors will also weigh these strategies against their exposure to market, political and currency fluctuations.

    In terms of investment vehicles, investors could consider ETFs such as the iShares MSCI BIC ETF (ARCA:BKF) or the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (NASDAQ:ECOW). They could also invest in mutual funds such as the T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Fund, or in individual companies within the BRICS countries.

    Simply put, preparing for a new BRICS currency or potential de-dollarization requires careful research and due diligence by investors. Diversifying currency exposure, and investing in commodities, equity markets or alternative investments are possible options to consider while being mindful of the associated risks.

    Investor takeaway

    While it is not certain whether the creation of a BRICS reserve currency will come to pass, its emergence would pose significant implications for the global economy and potentially challenge the US dollar’s dominance as the primary reserve currency. This development would present unique investment opportunities, while introducing risks to existing investments as the shifting landscape alters monetary policy and exacerbates geopolitical tensions.

    For those reasons, investors should closely monitor the progress of a possible BRICS currency. And, if the bloc does eventually create one, it will be important watch the currency’s impact on BRICS member economies and the broader global market. Staying vigilant will help investors to capitalize on growth prospects and hedge against potential risks.

    FAQs for a new BRICS currency

    Is a BRICS currency possible?

    Some financial analysts point to the creation of the euro in 1999 as proof that a BRICS currency may be possible. However, this would require years of preparation, the establishment of a new central bank and an agreement between the five nations to phase out their own sovereign currencies; it would most likely also need the support of the International Monetary Fund to be successful internationally.

    The impact of its war on Ukraine will continue to weaken Russia’s economy and the value of the ruble, and China is intent on raising the power of the yuan internationally. There is also a wide chasm of economic disparity between China and other BRICS nations. These are no small obstacles to overcome.

    Would a new BRICS currency be backed by gold?

    Additionally, speaking at the New Orleans Investment Conference 2023, well-known author Jim Rickards gave a detailed talk on how a gold-backed BRICS currency could work. At the time, he suggested that if a BRICS currency unit is worth 1 ounce of gold and the gold price goes to US$3,000 per ounce, the BRICS currency unit would be worth US$3,000, while the dollar would lose value compared to the BRICS currency as measured by the weight of gold.

    Importantly though, he doesn’t see this as a new gold standard, or the end of the US dollar or the euro.

    “(With) a real gold standard, you can take the currency and go to any one of the central banks and get some gold,” Rickards said at the event. “With BRICS they don’t have to own any gold, they don’t have to buy any gold, they don’t have to prop up the price. They can just rise on the dollar gold market.’

    How much gold do the BRICS nations have?

    The combined central bank gold holdings of the original BRICS nations plus Egypt (the only nation of the five new additions to have central bank gold reserves) accounts for more than 20 percent of all the gold held in the world’s central banks. Russia, India and China rank in the top 10 for central bank gold holdings.

    Russia controls 2,326.42 metric tons (MT) of the yellow metal, making it the fifth largest for central bank gold reserves. China follows in the sixth spot with 2,306.3 MT of gold and India places eighth with 880.17 MT. Brazil and South Africa’s central bank gold holdings are much smaller, coming in at 172.44 MT and 125.5 MT, respectively. New BRICS member Egypt’s gold holdings are equally small, at 129.36 MT.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    (TheNewswire)

    Spartan Metals Corp.

       

    Vancouver, Canada, February 24, 2026 TheNewswire Spartan Metals Corp. (‘Spartan’ or the ‘Company’) (TSX-V: W | OTCQB: SPRMF | FSE: J03) reports that Burton Egger (the ‘Acquiror’) a director of the Company has  acquired 1,400,000 common shares of the Company (the ‘Acquired Shares’) by way of the exercise of 1,400,000 common share purchase warrants at a purchase price of $0.075 per Acquired Share (the ‘Acquisition’).

     

    Prior to the completion of the Acquisition, Mr. Egger beneficially owned or exercised control or direction over 7,222,341 common shares, 1,604,166 common share purchase warrants (‘Warrants‘) and 50,000 restricted share units (‘RSU’s‘), representing approximately 18.3% per cent of the issued and outstanding common shares on an undiluted basis and 21.56% on a partially diluted basis. Upon completion of the Acquisition, Mr. Egger beneficially owns or exercises control or direction over 8,622,341 common shares 204,166 Warrants and 50,000 RSU’s, representing approximately 21.7% per cent of the issued and outstanding common shares on an undiluted basis, and 21.56% per cent of the issued and outstanding common shares on a partially diluted basis, assuming that Mr. Egger exercised all of his warrants and RSU’s, and no other holders of convertible securities exercised or converted any of their securities.

     

    The Acquired Shares were acquired for investment purposes. Depending on market conditions, the Acquiror may, from time to time, acquire additional securities, exercise convertible securities, dispose of some or all of the existing or additional securities or may continue to hold the securities of the Company.

     

    About Spartan Metals Corp.

    Spartan Metals is focused on developing critical minerals projects in well-established and stable mining jurisdictions in the Western United States, with an emphasis on building a portfolio of diverse strategic defense minerals such as Tungsten, Rubidium, Antimony, Bismuth, and Arsenic.

     

    Spartan’s flagship project is the Eagle Project in eastern Nevada that consists of one of the highest-grade historic tungsten resources in the USA (the past-producing Tungstonia Mine) along with significant under-defined resources consisting of: rubidium; antimony; bismuth; indium; as well as precious and base metals. More information about Spartan Metals can be found at www.SpartanMetals.com  

     

    On behalf of the Board of Spartan

    ‘Brett Marsh’

    President, CEO & Director

     

    Further Information:

    Brett Marsh, M.Sc., MBA, CPG

    President, CEO & Director

    1-888-535-0325

    info@spartanmetals.com

     

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release

     

    Copyright (c) 2026 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

    News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Golconda Gold Ltd. (‘Golconda Gold’ or the ‘Company’) (TSX-V: GG; OTCQB: GGGOF) is pleased to announce that it has been included in the TSX Venture 50 list.

    TSX Venture 50 is a ranking of the 50 top-performing companies on the TSX Venture Exchange over the last year. Companies are ranked based on three equally-weighted criteria of one-year share price appreciation, market capitalization increase, and Canadian consolidated trading value.

    Ravi Sood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, commented: ‘We are very pleased to see that the years of investment of both capital and human resources in our business are being recognized in our share price. While it has left us capital constrained for long periods of time, our focus on minimizing shareholder dilution is also now being rewarded. Despite Golconda Gold being 5th on the TSX Venture 50 in terms of price appreciation, we closed 2025 with fewer shares outstanding than we started the year with.’

    More details on the TSX Venture 50 can be found at: www.tsx.com/Venture50.

    About Golconda Gold

    Golconda Gold is an un-hedged gold producer and explorer with mining operations and exploration tenements in South Africa and New Mexico. Golconda Gold is a public company and its shares are quoted on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ‘GG’ and the OTCQB under the symbol ‘GGGOF’. Golconda Gold’s management team is comprised of senior mining professionals with extensive experience in managing mining and processing operations and large-scale exploration programmes. Golconda Gold is committed to operating at the highest standards, focused on the safety of its employees, respecting the environment, and contributing to the communities in which it operates.

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its regulation services provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    For further information please contact:
    Ravi Sood
    CEO, Golconda Gold Ltd.
    +1 (647) 987-7663
    ravi@golcondagold.com
    www.golcondagold.com

    Primary Logo

    News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Eagle Energy Metals Corp. (“Eagle”), a next-generation nuclear energy company with rights to the largest conventional, measured and indicated uranium deposit in the United States, today announced that it has completed its business combination with Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. II (OTC: SVIIF) (“SVII”), a special purpose acquisition company (the “Business Combination”). The Business Combination was approved by SVII shareholders in a special meeting held on February 23, 2026 and formally closed on February 24, 2026.

    The new combined company will operate as “Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp.” (“Eagle Nuclear”). On February 25, 2026, Eagle Nuclear’s common stock and public warrants will begin trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbols “NUCL” and “NUCLW”, respectively.

    Mark Mukhija, Eagle’s CEO, commented: “The completion of our business combination with SVII is the culmination of months of hard work and company development. The closing of this transaction marks another key milestone in our efforts to rebuild a secure domestic nuclear supply chain here in the United States. Anchored by our significant uranium deposit and SMR technology, we believe we are well positioned to restore American leadership in the nuclear industry at a time when AI, quantum computing, and cryptocurrency are driving unprecedented electricity demand. We are optimistic about the path ahead and look forward to addressing electricity demand and uranium market needs moving forward.”

    Chris Sorrells, Chairman & CEO of SVII, added: “Today’s successful merger completion marks a significant milestone for our company, our shareholders and the future of the U.S. nuclear industry. Eagle is a unique partner, with significant domestic uranium capabilities that can directly respond to market demand, alongside record private investments in U.S. nuclear projects. We look forward to working closely with the Eagle team as they continue to address the need for domestic uranium production.”

    Advisors

    Cohen & Company Capital Markets, a division of Cohen & Company Securities, LLC, is the exclusive financial advisor, lead capital markets advisor and private placement agent to SVII. Greenberg Traurig, LLP is serving as legal counsel to SVII, and Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP is serving as legal counsel to Eagle. Gateway Group is serving as investor relations and public relations advisor for the transaction.

    About Eagle Energy Metals Corp.

    Eagle Energy Metals Corp. is a next-generation nuclear energy company that combines domestic uranium exploration with proprietary Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology. The Company holds the rights to the largest conventional, measured and indicated uranium deposit in the United States, located in southeastern Oregon. This includes the Aurora deposit, with 32.75Mlbs Indicated and 4.98Mlbs Inferred (SK-1300 TRS) of near-surface uranium resource, and the adjacent Cordex deposit, which offers significant potential to expand the project’s overall resource inventory. By integrating advanced SMR technology with a sizeable uranium asset, Eagle is building an integrated nuclear platform positioned to help restore American leadership in the global nuclear industry.

    For more information about Eagle Energy Metals Corp., visit www.eagleenergymetals.com.

    About Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. II

    Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. II (“Spring Valley II”) is part of a family of investment vehicles formed for the purpose of acquiring or merging with a business focused on the Power Infrastructure and Decarbonization sectors. Over the past five years, Spring Valley has raised $920 million across four IPOs. Spring Valley II is led by Christopher D. Sorrells, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Robert Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer and Head of Business Development. Spring Valley I successfully completed its business combination with NuScale Power (NYSE: SMR), a leading U.S. small modular reactor (“SMR”) technology company, and Spring Valley II successfully completed its business combination with Eagle Energy Metals, a next-generation nuclear energy company that combines domestic uranium exploration with proprietary SMR technology. Spring Valley III has announced a business combination with General Fusion, a global leader in fusion energy developing a differentiated, engineering-driven approach to commercial fusion power.

    SVII maintains a corporate website at https://sv-ac.com.

    Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements included in this press release are not historical facts but are forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this press release are forward-looking statements. Any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are also forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “strategy,” “future,” “opportunity,” “may,” “target,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “preliminary,” or similar expressions that predict or indicate future events or trends or that are not statements of historical matters, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, SVII’s, Eagle Nuclear’s, Eagle’s, or their respective management teams’ expectations concerning the Business Combination and expected benefits thereof; the outlook for Eagle’s or Eagle Nuclear’s business; the abilities to execute Eagle’s or Eagle Nuclear’s strategies; projected and estimated financial performance; anticipated industry trends; the future price of minerals; future capital expenditures; success of exploration activities; mining or processing issues; government regulation of mining operations; and environmental risks; as well as any information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of Eagle or Eagle Nuclear. The forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of the respective management teams of Eagle, Eagle Nuclear, and SVII, as applicable, and are inherently subject to uncertainties and changes in circumstance and their potential effects. There can be no assurance that future developments will be those that have been anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, (i) market risks; (ii) the effect of the Business Combination on Eagle’s business relationships, performance, and business generally; (iii) risks that the Business Combination disrupts current plans of Eagle and potential difficulties in its employee retention as a result of the Business Combination; (iv) the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against Eagle or SVII related to the Business Combination; (v) failure to realize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination; (vi) the inability to maintain the listing of Eagle Nuclear’s securities on Nasdaq Capital Market or a comparable exchange; (vii) the risk that the price of Eagle Nuclear’s securities may be volatile due to a variety of factors, including changes in laws, regulations, technologies, natural disasters or health epidemics/pandemics, national security tensions, and macro- economic and social environments affecting its business; (viii) fluctuations in spot and forward markets for lithium and uranium and certain other commodities (such as natural gas, fuel oil and electricity); (ix) restrictions on mining in the jurisdictions in which Eagle operates; (x) laws and regulations governing Eagle’s operation, exploration and development activities, and changes in such laws and regulations; (xi) Eagle’s ability to obtain or renew the licenses and permits necessary for the operation and expansion of its existing operations and for the development, construction and commencement of new operations; (xii) risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining (including environmental hazards, potential unintended releases of contaminants, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected geological or structural formations, pressures, cave-ins and flooding); (xiii) inherent risks associated with tailings facilities and heap leach operations, including failure or leakages; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; the inability to determine, with certainty, production and cost estimates; inadequate or unreliable infrastructure (such as roads, bridges, power sources and water supplies); (xiv) environmental regulations and legislation; (xv) the effects of climate change, extreme weather events, water scarcity, and seismic events, and the effectiveness of strategies to deal with these issues; (xvi) risks relating to Eagle’s exploration operations; (xvii) fluctuations in currency markets; (xviii) the volatility of the metals markets, and its potential to impact Eagle’s ability to meet its financial obligations; (xix) disputes as to the validity of mining or exploration titles or claims or rights, which constitute most of Eagle’s property holdings; (xx) Eagle’s ability to complete and successfully integrate acquisitions; (xxi) increased competition in the mining industry for properties and equipment; (xxii) limited supply of materials and supply chain disruptions; (xxiii) relations with and claims by indigenous populations; (xxiv) relations with and claims by local communities and non-governmental organizations; and (xxv) the risk that other capital needed by Eagle Nuclear may not be raised on favorable terms, or at all. The foregoing list is not exhaustive, and there may be additional risks that neither SVII, Eagle, nor Eagle Nuclear presently know or that SVII, Eagle, and Eagle Nuclear currently believe are immaterial. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors, any other factors discussed in this press release and the other risks and uncertainties described in the “Risk Factors” section of the Form 10-K filed by SVII for the year ended December 31, 2024, the risks described in the registration statement on Form S-4 initially filed by Eagle Nuclear on September 30, 2025, and the definitive proxy statement / prospectus contained therein, and any amendments or supplements thereto, and those discussed and identified in other filings made with the SEC by SVII, Eagle Nuclear or Eagle from time to time, which may be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Eagle, Eagle Nuclear, and SVII caution you against placing undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect current beliefs and are based on information currently available as of the date a forward-looking statement is made. Forward-looking statements set forth in this press release speak only as of the date of this press release. Neither Eagle, SVII, nor Eagle Nuclear undertakes any obligation to revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events, changes in circumstances, or changes in beliefs. In the event that any forward-looking statement is updated, no inference should be made that Eagle Nuclear, Eagle or SVII will make additional updates with respect to that statement, related matters, or any other forward-looking statements.

    Investor Relations Contact:

    775-335-2029
    info@eagleenergymetals.com

    Media Relations Contact:

    Gateway Group
    Zach Kadletz, Brenlyn Motlagh
    949-574-3860
    EAGLE@Gateway-grp.com

    Source

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Faraday Copper (TSX:FDY,OTCQX:CPPKF) has signed a letter of intent (LOI) to acquire BHP’s (ASX:BHP,NYSE:BHP,LSE:BHP) San Manuel property, which sits next to its Copper Creek project in Arizona.

    The company says the move will combine the two adjacent assets into a single US-focused copper district.

    San Manuel includes the legacy San Manuel and Kalamazoo deposits, the former plant site, closed tailings facilities and surrounding BHP-owned land, along with related mineral rights, quarries and associated assets.

    The mine operated between 1955 and 1999 as one of the largest underground copper mines in the US, producing more than 4.5 million metric tons of copper. Faraday will assume all environmental and closure liabilities tied to the property.

    Copper Creek, which is located roughly 80 road kilometers northeast of Tucson and about 19 kilometers from San Manuel, is a porphyry copper project that is 100 percent owned by Faraday.

    The firm released an updated resource estimate and a preliminary economic assessment in 2023.

    The deposit remains open in all directions and hosts both breccia-hosted and vein-style mineralization. Faraday says significant exploration upside remains, with less than 15 percent of known breccia occurrences drill tested.

    The proposed consolidation would add approximately 27,000 acres of private land and access to existing regional infrastructure. Faraday has also outlined a staged development concept prioritizing copper cathode production, followed by open-pit sulfides and later underground operations.

    If completed, the transaction would see Faraday issue common shares to BHP equivalent to a 30 percent interest in the company on a fully diluted basis at closing.

    BHP would also receive customary investor rights so long as it maintains a minimum shareholding.

    “This agreement provides the opportunity for a transformative acquisition as it looks to consolidate two adjacent and complementary assets in the heart of the Arizona copper corridor at a time when sourcing of critical minerals within the USA is essential,” Faraday President and CEO Paul Harbidge said in a release.

    “The combined project has the potential to become a multi-generational copper district delivering made-in-America copper, while providing significant economic opportunities to the local communities.”

    For BHP, the deal would convert a legacy asset into a strategic equity position in a junior developer focused on US copper at a time when market participants are increasingly calling for a supply crunch.

    The LOI includes a six month exclusivity period and a financing participation clause under which BHP has agreed to subscribe for 30 percent of any Faraday equity raise over the next 24 months, up to US$20 million.

    Separately, Faraday recently announced a non-brokered private placement of up to C$100 million priced at C$4.20 per share. Strategic investors, including the Lundin Family Trusts and BHP, intend to participate.

    The proceeds are earmarked primarily for advancing copper projects in Pinal County, including expenses related to the planned San Manuel acquisition.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Germany’s medical cannabis market exploded in 2025, with prescriptions surging 3,300 percent from March 2024 to December 2025, per Bloomwell Group’s Cannabis Barometer.

    That’s according to Niklas Kouparanis and Dr. Julian Wichmann, co-founders of the Bloomwell Group, a Frankfurt-based cannabis company that operates Germany’s largest digital platform for medical cannabis.

    According to the report’s authors, this environment is setting the stage for Germany’s medical cannabis market to quickly become one of the largest in Europe.

    Reform fuels cannabis growth in Germany

    Bloomwell’s review, built on anonymized real-world data from hundreds of thousands of self-paying patient prescriptions filled via its app, e-prescriptions and partner pharmacies from January 2024 to December 2025, shows Germany’s medical cannabis market saw a 3,300 percent surge in prescriptions by December 2025 compared with March 2024, the final month before medical cannabis was reclassified and removed from the country’s list of narcotics.

    “What we’re seeing is a fundamental shift in patient access to legally prescribed, medically supervised and digitally accessible cannabis following regulatory reform,” said Kouparanis.

    The country’s Cannabis Act (CanG) removed cannabis from its Narcotics Act (BtMG) and enacted the Medical Cannabis Act (MedCanG), shifting prescriptions from strict narcotic controls to standard pharmaceutical processes. The act enabled telemedicine and easier approvals to boost access for chronic conditions.

    Prescriptions hit record highs in late 2025, reflecting telemedicine’s role in transitioning self-medicating patients to regulated care; however, misuse debates erupted that same year, with the Federal Ministry of Health drafting amendments driven by Minister of Health Nina Warken’s concerns over a 400 percent import surge, which she cited as evidence of potential abuse via telemedicine platforms.

    In October 2025, the German Cabinet formally approved a draft of the amendment, which banned new remote prescriptions and mail-order sales. The draft was submitted to the European Union’s Technical Regulations Information System for review, with the first Bundestag reading occurring on December 18, 2025. As of February 2026, the parliamentary process is ongoing; second and third readings are targeted for this spring.

    Amid these headwinds, Kouparanis emphasized resilience.

    “In the face of political uncertainty and proposed regulatory pushback, the biggest achievement for Germany’s medical cannabis industry is that we’ve continued to guarantee a secure and stable supply of prescriptions for more than a million medical cannabis patients,” he said. “Imports are breaking records, and medical cannabis has firmly established itself as part of mainstream healthcare.”

    German cannabis market trends

    The report identifies several growth trends in the German medical cannabis market, including an increase in products — while fewer than 470 strains were available at the start of 2025, by the fourth quarter there were 720.

    At the same time, patient preferences for specific flower attributes have shifted.

    Patients increasingly favor non-irradiated flowers, which captured roughly 90 percent of the market share from July to December 2025, reflecting demand for natural products.

    “Despite this rise in demand, Germany’s supply of medical cannabis has remained stable and more affordable. We’ve found that the average price per gram of medical cannabis flower fell by more than 3 euros over the course of 2025, declining from 8.33 euros in January to 5.23 euros in December,’ commented Kouparanis.

    ‘These developments show that the market is successful, competitive, resilient and continues to deliver safe and reliable medical cannabis to patients in need,’ the expert added.

    According to the report, telemedicine and mail-order pharmacy efficiencies can save health insurers 2.9 billion euros annually versus in-person care, while cannabis therapy cuts sick leave by 2.7 billion euros yearly, with no evidence of increased hospitalizations or daily use post-reform.

    “At a time when Germany’s healthcare system is overstretched, and health insurers are under financial pressure, this model should serve as a benchmark, not a target for rollback,” said Kouparanis.

    The report also emphasizes the role of importers, wholesalers and pharmacies that have invested substantial resources — and created jobs — to build an innovative digital supply chain to ensure nationwide access. Kouparanis emphasized that this chain is now at risk due to the regulatory risks introduced by the proposed amendment.

    Regulatory risks in Germany’s cannabis market

    The authors believe the Ministry of Health’s proposals are based on unsubstantiated misuse fears.

    Wichmann argued against the idea of these risks from pharmaceutically supplied medical cannabis.

    “This is especially true when compared to other prescription medications commonly used to treat the same conditions, as the addiction risks for opioids and Z-drugs have already been well established,’ he continued, highlighting the benefits of affordable digital access for medical cannabis therapy on the private market.

    “If policymakers continue to stigmatize medical cannabis and restrict telemedicine and shipping pharmacies, they risk pushing vulnerable patients back to medications with more severe side effects as well as unsafe cannabis from unregulated sources, undermining both the wellbeing of individual patients and public health as a whole.”

    German cannabis market outlook

    North American investors are betting on Germany’s medical cannabis staying power, as seen in recent acquisitions of key players in the country like Sanity Group and Remixian.

    “Legal cannabis is here to stay,” said Kouparanis, underscoring market resilience despite the regulatory debates.

    Highlighting the sector’s evolution, he noted that despite falling prices, major wholesalers may still be profitable. “But of course, as with all product-touching business models, such as wholesale and pharmacy, margins are decreasing.”

    This shift favors scalable digital platforms amid intensifying competition.

    As regulatory hurdles loom, Germany’s medical cannabis market proves a potentially lucrative investment frontier for digitized platforms like Bloomwell, provided policymakers embrace data over dogma.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Fathom Nickel Inc. (CSE: FNI) (FSE: 6Q5) (OTCQB: FNICF) (‘Fathom’, or the ‘Company‘) is pleased to announce the completion of the winter trail, and mobilization of drilling and ancillary equipment to the Gochager Lake project. Drilling of the 3,000-to-4,000-meter program is expected to begin during the first week of March 2026.

    Ian Fraser, Fathom CEO and VP Exploration stated, ‘Our field crews have worked very hard getting the winter trail in place in spite of abnormally warm weather and challenges created by recent wildfires in the area. With overland access and lake trails now in place, it is go time! We plan to be drilling by the first week of March. The initial drillholes will test the very robust ‘Camp’ multi-element soil/rock geochemical anomaly, located 1.5km along strike of the historic deposit. The expanded ‘footprint’ and potential scale at the project is supported by the mapped Gochager-like geology/mineralization now recognized 3.5km along strike east-northeast of the deposit. Drillholes will also test the strike extension of the historic deposit to the immediate east-northeast, in an area of favourable geology and geochemistry that extends >500 meters towards Scurry Lake. This is a very exciting time for our Company and shareholders. We have methodically developed these high priority drill targets, and we very much look forward to the results.’

    The Company is fully funded to complete the proposed drill program. If the full drill program is not completed by spring break-up in mid-April, we intend to complete the full 3,000-to-4,000-meter drill program in late-May/early- June 2026.

    Comments on Figures 1 and 2:

    • Figure 1 emphasises the >8km trend defined by Ni in-soil geochemical anomaly(s). The Ni in-soil anomalous trend is also supported with anomalous to very anomalous Cu, Co in-soil, along with anomalous to very anomalous Mg and Cr. Mg and Cr are key pathfinder elements and indicators of subsurface mafic-ultramafic rock; the Gochager Lake deposit ‘Container Rock’. The east-northeast trend coincides with mineralized variable-texture gabbro mapped in outcrop up to 3.5km along trend of the deposit. Mineralized variable-texture gabbro at the deposit hosts the steeply oriented, high-grade chutes and lenses of Ni-Cu-Co semi-massive to massive sulphide mineralization intersected by Fathom drilling.
    • Figure 2 illustrates initial drill target priority areas:
      • Area A – The Camp anomaly is defined by the >900m long multi-element soil geochemical anomaly and associated with mapped outcrops of variable-texture gabbro and mafic to ultramafic rock. Elevated Cu, coincident with elevated Ni in rock samples, strongly indicates control by magmatic sulphide processes. A mapped and sampled outcrop occurring between Scurry and Rainbow Lakes that mimics the deposit stratigraphy and, specifically, mineralized variable-texture gabbro, has a Ni-tenor of 4.51% Ni* (Fathom Press Release January 28, 2026). Furthermore, rock grab samples collected in this area returned anomalous Pt values (40-60ppb), and Pd values (20-30ppb).
      • Area B – Gochager East Extension Anomalies cover the >500m distance along strike east-northeast of the Gochager Lake deposit to the shore of Scurry Lake. Within this area, the soil anomalies exhibit a stronger response than the Gochager deposit. EM anomalies, defined by surface geophysical surveys remain untested, and off-hole BHEM anomalies from drillhole GL23011 remain untested. Mapped geology confirms the extension of mineralized variable-texture gabbro, and Ni-tenors up to 5% Ni* in outcrop have been recorded. Coincident with elevated Ni in outcrop, elevated Cu is prominent which strongly suggests a magmatic sulphide control.
      • Area C – The North Gochager Lake Anomaly defines the highest Ni in-soil geochemical anomaly observed to date (1650 ppm Ni, 116.5ppm Cu, 373ppm Co). Rock samples collected (grab, and pXRF chip samples) at this anomaly returned elevated Ni, Cu, Cu but in a non-mafic to ultramafic rock type. Drilling here is designed to better understand the geology and to ascertain a possible subsurface, mineralized mafic-ultramafic body as the source of the multi-element soil geochemical anomaly.
      • Area D – The Wolf Lake Anomaly is a standalone multi-element (Ni, Cu, Co, Mg, Cr) soil anomaly measuring 1500m x 400m (note: the anomaly not fully defined due to the gap in data caused by the 2025 wildfire). Drilling in this area is designed to gain an understanding of the underlying geology. An initial understanding of the Wolf Lake Anomaly will impact follow-up summer field activities and surface geophysics in the area. It is unlikely that this target will be tested during the winter drilling campaign due to logistical and time constraints.

    *Ni-tenor is the quantity of nickel contained within the sulphide component of the rock. At the Gochager Lake deposit, various styles of sulphide mineralization in gabbroic and ultramafic rock demonstrate Ni-tenors ranging from 2% to 5%. Ni-tenor is the percentage of nickel in sulphide only and is reported as the weight percent nickel in 100% sulphide. Fathom only reports Ni-tenor calculations in drill core and rock assay samples where assays report ≥1% sulphur. Calculations on samples below 1% sulphur tend to be inaccurate with respect to contained nickel in the sulphide component.

    Cannot view this image? Visit: https://insiderlegacysecret.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/285052_a74673f88416797c_002.jpg

    Figure 1 – Gochager Lake Deposit Hosted in >8km Multi-Element Soil Geochemistry Trend

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
    https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7843/285052_a74673f88416797c_002full.jpg

    Cannot view this image? Visit: https://insiderlegacysecret.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/285052_a74673f88416797c_003.jpg

    Figure 2 – Drill Target Areas

    To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
    https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7843/285052_a74673f88416797c_003full.jpg

    Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Disclosure Statement

    As part of its ongoing exploration activities, Fathom is utilizing a portable Vanta™ XRF Analyzer (‘pXRF’) to provide real-time lithogeochemical, multi-element data on surface rock chip samples and rock grab samples collected in the field. The Vanta™ XRF Analyzer is a hand-held device, held in position for a total 120 seconds – beam 1 (30 seconds), beam 2 (60 seconds) and beam 3 (30 seconds) to allow for an effective reading of elements occurring at that specific point, and at that specific surface of a rock sample. All elements detected at that specific point; nickel, copper, cobalt plus key pathfinder elements, chrome and magnesium, are recorded. The reader is cautioned that pXRF data should be treated only as an indication of elements, as the accuracy of the beam position on a particular element is variable.

    Qualified Person and Data Verification

    Ian Fraser, P.Geo., CEO, VP Exploration and a Director of the Company and the ‘qualified person’ as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101, has verified the data disclosed in this news release, and has otherwise reviewed and approved the technical information in this news release on behalf of the Company.

    About Fathom Nickel Inc.

    Fathom is an exploration company that is targeting magmatic nickel sulphide discoveries to secure the supply of North American Critical Minerals and to support the global green energy transition. The Company now has a portfolio of three high-quality exploration projects located in the prolific Trans Hudson Corridor in Saskatchewan:

    1) The Albert Lake Project, a 90,000+ hectare project that hosts the historic Rottenstone Mine1. Fathom exploration to date at the Albert Lake project confirms:

    • The high-grade Ni-Cu-Co+3E1 Rottenstone deposit mineralization extends to the south a minimum 40m and remains open.
    • The Rottenstone deposit is potentially offset and continues within the footwall of a prominent fault defined by drilling.
    • A new Rottenstone-like discovery (similar host rock, and similar mineralization) by drilling 500-550m W-NW of the historic mine; the 300+m Bay Island Trend, remains open along strike.
    • Similar Rottenstone-like host rock and mineralization intersected by drilling approximately 1.5km S-SW of the historic mine (the Nic5-Tremblay-Olson area).

    2) The 33,000+ hectare Gochager Lake Project that hosts the historic Gochager Lake deposit2. Fathom exploration to date at the Gochager Lake project confirms:

    • Vertical extension of Ni-Cu-Co mineralization a minimum of 150m below the historic Gochager Lake deposit interpreted boundary, and very good potential for expansion of mineralization in all directions.
    • Multiple high-grade vertically oriented Ni-Cu-Co sulphide breccia mineralization zones and chutes occur within the historic deposit, and the zones, chutes remain open for further expansion and delineation in all directions.
    • Surface mapping and rock geochemistry has confirmed the Gochager Lake deposit host/container rock extends 3.5+ km along strike east-northeast of the deposit.
    • Soil geochemistry has defined a favourable geochemical footprint, inclusive of the historic deposit, that now extends 8.6+ km.

    3) The 10,000+ hectare Friesen Lake Project located 40km southwest of the historic Rottenstone Mine and 30km northwest of the historic Gochager Lake deposit.

    The Friesen Lake property hosts the Olsen Cu-Ni-Pt Showing also referred to as the Friesen Lake Cu-Ni-Pt showing and is described as an ultramafic dyke that historic trenching and drilling demonstrates Cu-Ni-Pt-Pd and Au mineralization within the ultramafic dyke (Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index (SMID) #0928a). To date Fathom has not performed any exploration at the Friesen Lake Project.

    1 – The Rottenstone Mine; a small open-pit mining / milling operation was in production 1965-1969. Mining in 1965 produced 5,500 short tons with a reported average production grade of 3.23% Ni, 1.83% Cu, 0.14 oz/ton Pt, 0.10 oz/ton Pd, 0.03 oz/ton Au (9.26 g/t*3E, 3E = Pd-Pt+Au) and 0.20 oz/ton Ag. Initial milling of mine concentrate; September 5 – November 7, 1965, produced 1,070 dry short tons of concentrate that averaged 10.83% Ni, 5.74% Cu, 0.33 oz/ton Pt, 0.53 oz/ton Pd, 0.10 oz/ ton Au (32.91 g/t* 3E) and 1.25 oz/ton Ag. Richards, B.R. and Robinson, B.G.W. (1966), Mining and milling a small ore deposit …. Rottenstone Mining Limited: The Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulleting for December 1966. The Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index (SMDI) #0958 reports final mine production in 1969 of 28,724 tons with an average grade of 3.28% Ni, 1.83% Cu and 9.63 g/t 3E and that approximately 9,000 tons of concentrate were sold to the International Nickel Company of Canada Limited. * A factor of 34.286 g/tonne was used to convert 1 oz/ton to g/tonne (g/t).

    2 – The Gochager Lake property is host to the historic Gochager Lake Ni-Cu deposit. There is no source or available Technical Reports to verify the historic resource estimate for the Gochager Lake deposit; hence, Fathom will treat the historic estimate as an Exploration Target. Available records in the Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index (SMDI) and Saskatchewan Mineral Assessment Database (SMAD) suggest an Exploration Target of 4-5 million tons grading 0.3% Ni – 0.4% Ni and 0.08% Cu – 0.09% Cu. The potential quantity and grade are conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource, and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the target being delineated as a mineral resource. At present, Fathom has drilled 16 drillholes (5,549m) into the historic Gochager Lake deposit and has confirmed Ni-Cu grades comparable to and higher than the historical grades reported, thus confirming that a deposit of Ni-Cu+Co metal accumulation does exist at the historic Gochager Lake deposit / property. The disclosed potential quantity and grade has been determined by historic records notably; the Saskatchewan Mineral Deposit Index and Saskatchewan Mineral Assessment Database. (SMDI #0880) reports delineation drilling outlined a deposit at the historic Gochager Lake Deposit; Steel, J.S. (1990), (SMAD 73P15-0091): Report on a Diamond Drilling Program on the Gallagher (Gochager) Lake Property of McNickel Inc., reported that Scurry-Rainbow Oil Ltd. constructed vertical sections and a longitudinal section from drill data collected 1966-1968, and an orebody with reasonably well-defined limits was interpreted. As stated above, the historic estimate is not well documented and there are no available Technical Reports to support the historic resource estimate(s).

    For further information, please contact:

    Ian Fraser, Chief Executive Officer & Vice-President Exploration
    1-403-650-9760
    Email: ifraser@fathomnickel.com

    or

    Doug Porter, President & CFO
    1-403-870-4349
    Email: dporter@fathomnickel.com

    Forward-Looking Statements:

    This news release contains ‘forward-looking statements’ that are based on expectations, estimates, projections and interpretations as at the date of this news release. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as ‘plan’, ‘expect’, ‘project’, ‘seek’, ‘intend’, ‘believe’, ‘anticipate’, ‘estimate’, ‘suggest’, ‘indicate’ and other similar words or statements that certain events or conditions ‘may’ or ‘will’ occur, and include, without limitation, statements regarding completion of the Offering, price of the FT Units, Charity FT Units and HD Units, dates for closing of the Offering, amount of proceeds under the Offering, approval of the Offering by regulatory authorities, payment of commissions and finder warrants to finders and the Company incurring Qualifying Expenditures. Forward-looking statements relate to information that is based on assumptions of management, forecasts of future results, and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. Any statements that express predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be ‘forward-looking statements.’ Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms; risks related to the outcome of legal proceedings; political and regulatory risks associated with mining and exploration; risks related to the maintenance of stock exchange listings; risks related to environmental regulation and liability; the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies; the uncertainty of profitability; risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits; risks related to the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses; results of prefeasibility and feasibility studies, and the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations; risks related to commodity price fluctuations; and other risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s prospects, properties and business detailed elsewhere in the Company’s disclosure record. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and the Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Actual events or results could differ materially from the Company’s expectations or projections.

    Source

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    The Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) will bring together the mineral exploration and mining community in Toronto for its 94th annual Convention, taking place March 1 – 4, 2026, at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre (MTCC).

    As the World’s Premier Mineral Exploration & Mining Convention, PDAC 2026 will draw industry leaders, investors, government representatives, Indigenous communities and students from around the world for four days of investment, insight and networking.

    “PDAC 2026 comes amid intensifying global competition to secure the minerals underpinning modern economies,” said PDAC President Karen Rees. “At a time of accelerating demand, the convention is where leaders convene to advance projects, strengthen partnerships and shape the future of the industry.”

    The convention will span the full Metro Toronto Convention Centre, reflecting strong internationaldemand and underscoring PDAC’s role at the centre of the sector. Participants will have access to expansive exhibit halls, comprehensive programming including technical sessions, short courses and keynote presentations addressing the trends and challenges shaping mineral exploration and development.

    “PDAC 2026 will feature the largest trade show footprint in our history, with more than1,300 exhibitors across the North and South buildings of the MTCC,” Rees added. ‘That breadth gives participants a clear view of the projects, technologies and ideas defining the sector.’

    Opportunities to evaluate projects and connect with company leadership will be available through the Trade Show, Investors Exchange, Core Shack, Prospectors Tent and Corporate Presentations for Investors. Throughout the week, networking events, including the Awards Celebration & Nite Cap,will bring the global industry together to recognize excellence and build new relationships.

    Registration is available at pdac.ca/convention-2026.

    About PDAC

    The Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) is the leading voice of the mineral exploration and development community, an industry that employs more than 724,000, and contributed $156 billion to Canada’s GDP in 2024 (Natural Resources Canada, February 2025). Currently representing over 8,200 members around the world, PDAC’s work centres on supporting a competitive, responsible, and sustainable mineral sector. Visit pdac.ca for more information.

    Media contact

    Scott Barber
    Director, Communications
    sbarber@pdac.ca
    416-362-1969 x 244

    Source

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Blencowe Resources Plc (LSE: BRES) is pleased to report the final set of assay results completed from the 87 shallow holes drilled at the Iyan deposit, part of the Company’s Orom-Cross Graphite Project in Uganda. These results represent the third batch from the Stage 7 drilling programme, with results continuing to exceed expectations and supporting the imminent maiden JORC resource estimate for the Iyan deposit, which will increase the overall Orom-Cross resource base. This maiden JORC resource will represent the first formal resource estimate for Iyan and further strengthen Orom-Cross as a multi-deposit graphite project.

    This final batch completes the Stage 7 drilling programme at Iyan, providing the last data required for the maiden Iyan JORC Resource estimate, expected shortly.

    Iyan forms the western extension of the Northern Syncline graphite system and is being advanced as a bulk blending deposit intended to provide consistent, near-surface, high tonnage graphite feed to support long-life, low-cost production. Results at Orom-Cross continue to demonstrate that the bulk mineralisation at Iyan is accompanied by repeated higher-grade zones, providing flexibility within mine planning for blending and supporting overall project value.

    These latest shallow holes were drilled to approximately 30 metres depth, deliberately selected to define near-surface mineable material rather than test geological limits. Mineralisation was intersected from surface in most holes, with several ending in mineralisation, indicating potential for continuation below the current drilling depth. This is consistent with all previous results at Iyan. The northern area highlights some barren intrusions in the upper areas but also indicates strong grade intercepts at depth below the barren overlying materials.

    Iyan Drilling – Highlights

    • Final assay batch drilling results continue to exceed expectations and support imminent maiden JORC resource estimate for Iyan, increasing the overall Orom-Cross resource base
    • Thick, laterally continuous near-surface graphite mineralisation confirmed
    • Multiple intercepts of >30m from surface, with several holes ending in mineralisation
    • Iyan will be developed as a bulk blending deposit, supporting efficient, low-strip mining
    • Higher-grade zones persist within bulk mineralisation, enhancing blending flexibility
    • Results support near-term resource growth, larger-scale development and ongoing funding and offtake discussions
    • Southern drill lines indicate potential extension of mineralisation toward the Northern Syncline hinge

    Selected Significant Shallow Intercepts – Iyan Deposit

    (Selected downhole intervals; mineralisation from surface unless stated otherwise)

    • NSDD-L103: 15.64m @ 10.13% TGC, including 5.02m @ 14.42% TGC and 1.00m @ 18.37% TGC
    • NSDD-L307: 9.44m @ 11.42% TGC, including 4.00m @ 15.96% TGC and 1.00m @ 18.89% TGC
    • NSDD-L508: 13.71m @ 8.26% TGC, including 4.01m @ 11.00% TGC (ended in mineralisation)
    • NSDD-L503: 10.72m @ 8.18% TGC, including 3.06m @ 12.37% TGC
    • NSDD-L408: 9.60m @ 8.95% TGC from surface, including 2.50m @ 13.76% TGC
    • NSDD-L402: 10.00m @ 7.96% TGC, including 4.00m @ 10.82% TGC

    These results are consistent with the broader Orom-Cross system and support mine planning and the bulk blending strategy, reinforcing the scale and continuity ahead of the maiden Iyan JORC resource estimate.

    JORC Update Q1 2026

    The final assay results are now being validated and modelled by the independent geological consultants, Minrom, and are expected to deliver the maiden JORC resource estimate for Iyan in Q1 2026. This will increase the overall Orom-Cross resource and support ongoing funding and offtake discussions as they continue to advance.

    Beehive Drilling Results Pending

    In parallel, substantial assay results at the nearby Beehive deposit remain pending. Earlier deep drilling returned very strong grades at depths of up to approximately 100 metres. Assay results from the completed shallow drilling programme at Beehive, comprising approximately 110 holes drilled to approximately 30 metres depth, are expected to be reported regularly in batches and are anticipated to further contribute to overall Orom-Cross resource growth, with a maiden JORC resource estimate for Beehive expected to follow.

    Blencowe Resources Executive Chairman, Cameron Pearce commented:

    ‘These further great results from Iyan continue to exceed our expectations. We are seeing thick graphite from surface, strong grades, and excellent consistency across the deposit, which is exactly what we need as we build scale at Orom-Cross.

    With the maiden Iyan JORC estimate now imminent, these results clearly demonstrate the size and quality of the resource. This is particularly important as we progress funding discussions, as it reinforces the long-life, large-scale development potential of Orom-Cross.

    The maiden Iyan JORC will mark another important step in demonstrating the full scale of Orom-Cross.

    Importantly, we still have significant upside ahead. Many holes continue to end in mineralisation, and Beehive drilling results remain to come, which we expect will further strengthen the overall resource base.’

    Iyan Deposit – Key Drill Results

    Figures 1-2: Iyan Deposit drill sections showing thick, continuous graphite mineralisation remaining open at depth, remaining sections 1-5, 7, and 9

    A collage of graphs and charts Description automatically generated

    For further information please contact:

    Blencowe Resources Plc

    www.blencoweresourcesplc.com

    Sam Quinn (Director)

    Tel: +44 (0)1624 681 250

    info@blencoweresourcesplc.com

    Sasha Sethi (Investor Relations)

    Tel: +44 (0) 7891 677 441

    sasha.sethi@blencoweresourcesplc.com

    Tavira Financial (Joint Broker):

    Jonathan Evans

    Tel: +44 (0)20 3192 1733

    jonathan.evans@tavira.group

    Oak Securities (Joint Broker):

    Calvin Man /Mungo Sheehan / Jerry Keen

    Tel: +44 (0)20 3973 3678

    Twitter

    Tweets by BlencoweRes

    LinkedIn

    https://www.linkedin.com/company/72382491/admin/

    Map 1: Showing the 4x Orom-Cross deposits, including Camp Lode, Northern Syncline, and new Iyan (NS western limb) and Beehive (GT 01a) deposits.

    A map of a city AI-generated content may be incorrect.

    Source

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    USANewsGroup.com Market Intelligence Brief —

    WHAT’S HAPPENING:

    The infrastructure holding the global economy together is being stress-tested in real time:

    • Gold at $5,552 per ounce as central banks loaded another 755 tonnes into reserves [1]
    • The G7 issued formal guidance treating the quantum threat to current encryption as a ‘systemic concern’ [2]
    • The FDA cleared a record 295 AI-powered medical devices in a single calendar year [3]
    • The functional wellness category accelerating toward $179 billion as consumers reject legacy formats for precision delivery [4]

    The common thread is structural replacement. Old systems are failing. New ones are being installed. This report profiles five companies positioned at the installation point.

    THE ENCRYPTION UPGRADE — CSE: QSE / OTCQB: QSEGF

    Quantum Secure Encryption Corp. (CSE: QSE) (OTCQB: QSEGF) builds the migration tools enterprises need to survive the quantum transition. The G7’s January 2026 guidance made it plain: current encryption is a systemic vulnerability, and organizations that wait will be caught exposed.

    Earlier this month, QSE formalized its three-stage Enterprise Post-Quantum Migration Methodology, delivered through its Quantum Preparedness Assessment platform. The system provides a post-quantum compliancy dashboard with risk indicators mapped to compliance frameworks, guided data input workflows, and automated scoring. It integrates alongside existing cybersecurity architectures without wholesale system replacement.

    The financial and infrastructure sectors are the primary targets. The methodology gives enterprises measurable indicators and visibility into where they stand, turning an abstract threat into a structured remediation plan.

    Read this and more news for Quantum Secure Encryption Corp. at:

    https://usanewsgroup.com/2024/04/26/the-currency-of-tomorrow-why-investing-in-cutting-edge-ai-recognition-tech-could-mean-big-money/

    THE GOLD STANDARD — TSX: RUA,OTC:NZAUF / OTCQB: NZAUF

    Rua Gold Inc. (TSX: RUA,OTC:NZAUF) (OTCQB: NZAUF) just uplisted to the Toronto Stock Exchange and closed an oversubscribed $25 million financing, giving the company ~C$38 million in available cash to drill across two gold projects in New Zealand.

    The company’s recent outlook confirmed four drill rigs operating across the Reefton Goldfield, targeting resource expansion at Auld Creek and new discovery across the historic 2Moz past-producing district. RUA is targeting a Fast-Track mining permit referral in Q1 2026, with a regulatory decision expected in Q2. New Zealand just joined the international Minerals Security Partnership, aligning government policy with RUA’s development timeline.

    The Reefton Goldfield carries gold-antimony mineralization. Antimony is classified as a critical mineral by multiple governments, adding a strategic dimension to the resource base. An updated NI 43-101 Technical Report is expected by month-end.

    Read this and more news for Rua Gold Inc. at:

    https://usanewsgroup.com/2025/04/02/others-found-1911-g-t-here-before-now-a-proven-11b-mining-team-is-back-to-finish-the-job/

    THE DIAGNOSTIC SIGNAL — TSXV: VPT / OTCPK: VPTDF

    VentriPoint Diagnostics (TSXV: VPT) (OTCPK: VPTDF) is commercializing AI-powered cardiac imaging that delivers MRI-grade heart chamber analysis from a standard ultrasound. The FDA cleared VMS+ 4.0 via 510(k) in February 2025, and the company has spent the last twelve months building the commercial infrastructure to scale it.

    Recently, VentriPoint provided a corporate update confirming advancement across multiple fronts: U.S. go-to-market refinement, ongoing distributor alignment in Europe and the UK, integration discussions with ASCEND Cardiovascular, collaboration with the Ollie Hinkle Heart Foundation for system placements, and continued work with Lishman Global on China market entry. A shareholder videoconference is scheduled for later this month.

    The 295 AI medical device clearances the FDA issued in 2025 confirm the regulatory environment is open. VentriPoint is building from that cleared position into clinical adoption.

    Read this and more news for VentriPoint Diagnostics at:

    https://usanewsgroup.com/2025/11/21/the-mri-grade-disruption-hiding-in-plain-sight-why-the-smart-money-is-watching-ventripoint

    THE DELIVERY MECHANISM — CSE: MOOD / OTCPK: DOSEF

    Doseology Sciences Inc. (CSE: MOOD) (OTCPK: DOSEF) is building precision oral delivery systems for the functional wellness category. The company appointed Larry Latowsky as Executive Chairman earlier this month. Latowsky previously served as President and CEO of Katz Group Canada, the parent of Rexall-Pharma Plus, IDA, and Guardian Drug stores, operating 1,500 pharmacy locations nationally before a ~C$3 billion acquisition by McKesson.

    In late January, Doseology began pilot production of non-nicotine, caffeine-based energy pouches under its Feed That Brain brand. The pouch format delivers measured, portion-controlled energy without sugar, carbonation, or large-volume consumption. A direct-to-consumer launch is expected within weeks.

    The $179 billion functional beverage rotation is real. Doseology is attacking it with a pharmacy-grade governance team and a delivery platform designed for precision, not intensity.

    Read this and more news for Doseology Sciences Inc. at:

    https://usanewsgroup.com/2025/12/19/what-comes-after-cigarettes-vapes-and-energy-drinks/

    THE TERRITORIAL PLAY — CSE: GGR / OTCQB: GGRFF

    Golden Goose Resources Corp. (CSE: GGR) (OTCQB: GGRFF) just expanded its investor access by listing on the OTCQB Venture Market under the symbol GGRFF. DTC eligibility is pending.

    The company controls three exploration-stage gold projects across two jurisdictions: the Gran Esperanza Project (~44,000 hectares, Río Negro, Argentina), the Goldfire Project (4,680 hectares, Windfall Camp, Quebec, near Gold Fields’ Windfall deposit), and the El Quemado Project (46 mining concessions, ~58,000 hectares, Salta Province, Argentina).

    With gold above $5,500, junior explorers with defined land packages in proven districts are the leverage play on the commodity cycle. The OTCQB listing gives U.S. investors a direct line.

    Read this and more news for Golden Goose Resources Corp. at:

    https://usanewsgroup.com/2026/01/28/two-gold-projects-two-major-neighbors-what-does-this-junior-know-that-the-market-doesnt/

    CONTACT:
    USA News Group
    info@usanewsgroup.com
    (604) 265-2873

    DISCLAIMER:

    Nothing in this publication should be considered as personalized financial advice. We are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular financial situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. Please consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decision. This is a paid advertisement and is neither an offer nor recommendation to buy or sell any security. We hold no investment licenses and are thus neither licensed nor qualified to provide investment advice. The content in this report or email is not provided to any individual with a view toward their individual circumstances. USA News Group is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Market IQ Media Group, Inc. (MIQ). This article is being distributed for Baystreet.ca Media Corp. (BAY), who has been paid a fee for an advertising contract with Rua Gold Inc. (a fee for a three month contract subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement from the company direct) and Ventripoint Diagnostics Ltd. This article is also being distributed for Maynard Communications (MAY), who has been paid a fee for an advertising campaign for Doseology Sciences Inc. and Golden Goose Resources Corp. MIQ has been paid a fee for QSE – Quantum Secure Encryption Corp. advertising and digital media from the company directly. MIQ has not been paid a fee for Doseology Sciences Inc., Rua Gold Inc., Ventripoint Diagnostics Ltd., or Golden Goose Resources Corp. advertising or digital media, but the owner/operators of MIQ also co-owns BAY, and expects to be paid a fee from MAY. There may be 3rd parties who may have shares of these companies and may liquidate their shares which could have a negative effect on the price of the stock. This compensation constitutes a conflict of interest as to our ability to remain objective in our communication regarding the profiled companies. Because of this conflict, individuals are strongly encouraged to not use this publication as the basis for any investment decision. The owner/operator of MIQ/BAY owns shares of QSE – Quantum Secure Encryption Corp. (purchased via private placement), Doseology Sciences Inc. (purchased via private placement), Ventripoint Diagnostics Ltd., and Golden Goose Resources Corp. (purchased in the open market). They do not currently own shares of Rua Gold Inc. but reserve the right to buy and sell, and will buy and sell shares of all mentioned companies at any time without further notice. All material disseminated by MIQ has been approved by the mentioned companies. Technical information relating to Rua Gold Inc. has been reviewed and approved by Simon Henderson, CP, AUSIMM, a Qualified Person who is the COO of the company and therefore not independent. While all information is believed to be reliable, it is not guaranteed by us to be accurate. Individuals should assume that all information contained in our newsletter is not trustworthy unless verified by their own independent research. Because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, there will likely be differences between any predictions and actual results. Always consult a licensed investment professional before making any investment decision. Be extremely careful: investing in securities carries a high degree of risk; you may likely lose some or all of the investment.

    SOURCES:

    [1] J.P. Morgan Global Research, ‘Gold price predictions,’ February 2026 – https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/commodities/gold-prices

    [2] The Quantum Insider, ‘January 2026 Quantum Recap,’ February 2, 2026 – https://thequantuminsider.com/2026/02/02/january-2026-quantum-recap-quantum-moves-deeper-into-policy-and-manufacturing/

    [3] Innolitics, ‘2025 Year in Review: AI/ML Medical Device 510(k) Clearances,’ December 28, 2025 – https://innolitics.com/articles/year-in-review-ai-ml-medical-device-k-clearances/

    [4] GlobeNewsWire / Equity-Insider.com, ‘Functional Wellness Stocks Explode as $179 Billion Beverage Market Ditches Sugar for Science,’ January 29, 2026 – https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/01/29/3228948/0/en/Functional-Wellness-Stocks-Explode-as-179-Billion-Beverage-Market-Ditches-Sugar-for-Science.html

    Primary Logo

    News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com