Category

Latest News

Category

President-elect Trump on Sunday nominated Harmeet K. Dhillon as the assistant attorney general for civil rights in the Justice Department.

Trump said Dhillon has consistently protected civil liberties throughout her career, including taking on Big Tech for censoring free speech, representing Christians who were not allowed to pray together during the COVID-19 pandemic, and suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their employees.

‘Harmeet is one of the top election lawyers in the country, fighting to ensure that all, and ONLY, legal votes are counted,’ Trump wrote on Truth Social. ‘She is a graduate of Dartmouth College and the University of Virginia Law School and clerked in the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.’

‘Harmeet is a respected member of the Sikh religious community,’ he added. ‘In her new role at the DOJ, Harmeet will be a tireless defender of our Constitutional Rights and will enforce our Civil Rights and Election Laws FAIRLY and FIRMLY.’

Trump also wrote in a separate post that Mark Paoletta will return as general counsel of the Office of Management and Budget.

In the role, Trump said, Paoletta will work closely with the Department of Government Efficiency to cut the size of ‘our bloated government bureaucracy and root out wasteful and anti-American spending.’

Trump called Paoletta a brilliant and tenacious lawyer, crediting him with working to advance his agenda in the first term, while leading the charge to find funding to build a wall at the southern border.

Mark is a partner at the law firm Shaerr Jaffe LLP and a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America.

‘Mark has served as a Chief Counsel for Oversight and Investigations in Congress for a decade and was a key lawyer in the White House Counsel’s Office to confirm Justice Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1991,’ Trump wrote. ‘Mark is a conservative warrior who knows the ‘ins and outs’ of Government – He will help us, Make America Great Again!’

And finally, Trump announced that KC Crosbie is running to become the next co-chair of the Republican National Committee to replace Lara Trump.

‘Lara, together with Chairman Michael Whatley, transformed the RNC into a lean, focused, and powerful machine that is empowering the MAGA Movement for many years to come,’ the president-elect said. ‘Thank you for your hard work, Lara, in MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!’

The incoming president also said Crosbie has helped ‘real’ Republicans get elected across the U.S. and would make a tremendous co-chair.

‘KC will work on continuing to ensure a highly functioning, fiscally responsible, and effective RNC that makes Election Integrity a highest priority,’ Trump said. ‘KC Crosbie has my Complete and Total Endorsement to be the next Co-Chair of the RNC!’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

: Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., is looking for answers from the FBI after President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the bureau was reportedly targeted by Iranian hackers. 

‘For an Iranian-backed group to have targeted the potential next Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is extremely alarming,’ the North Carolina senator wrote in a Monday letter to FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate. ‘Also alarming is the speed at which sensitive and potentially classified information about this attack spread to the news media.’

It was reported by several outlets last week that Kash Patel, who Trump has chosen to be his nominee for FBI director in his new administration, was the target of an Iranian hacking attempt.

In response to reports of the hack attempt, Trump transition spokesperson Alex Pfeiffer told Fox News Digital, ‘Kash Patel was a key part of the first Trump administration’s efforts against the terrorist Iranian regime and will implement President Trump’s policies to protect America from adversaries as the FBI Director.’ 

In his letter, Tillis pointed to various law enforcement sources that apparently communicated with news publications. 

‘As you know, it is imperative that the FBI and other intelligence agencies maintain confidentiality to ensure the American people are safe from enemies at home and abroad. The release of this information raises major national security and personal safety concerns,’ he wrote.

The Republican asked Abbate a series of questions, including whether FBI employees shared information about the cyberattack with either the media or with third parties that could’ve given it to the media.

The FBI told Fox News Digital that it received the letter but had no further comment.

Patel has been making the rounds on Capitol Hill and meeting with senators as he looks to shore up support before Trump is inaugurated in January.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Republican Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa, the first female combat veteran elected to the Senate and a member of the Armed Services Committee, has signaled toward supporting President-elect Trump’s nominee for defense secretary.

After meeting on Monday for a second time with Pete Hegseth, Ernst wrote in a statement that ‘as I support Pete through this process, I look forward to a fair hearing based on truth, not anonymous sources.’

An Army National Guard officer who deployed to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and who until last month was a longtime Fox News host, Hegseth has been the focus of a slew of reports spotlighting a series of drinking and sexual misconduct allegations. 

Hegseth has denied allegations that he mistreated women and has vowed that he won’t drink ‘a drop of alcohol’ if confirmed as defense secretary. A separate report showcased allegations Hegseth mismanaged a veterans nonprofit organization that he once led.

Ernst, a conservative lawmaker first elected to the Senate in 2014, is considered a pivotal vote in the confirmation battle over Hegseth, who in the past has questioned the role of women in combat.

The senator is also a survivor of sexual assault who has a strong legislative record of addressing sexual assault and harassment in the military.

She said in her statement that ‘following our encouraging conversations, Pete committed to completing a full audit of the Pentagon and selecting a senior official who will uphold the roles and value of our servicemen and women – based on quality and standards, not quotas – and who will prioritize and strengthen my work to prevent sexual assault within the ranks.’

Ernst’s office told Fox News on Monday that ‘the senator has consistently followed the process, which she has said since the beginning, and doing her job as a United States senator.’

After meeting with Hegseth last week, Ernst said in a social media post that she and Trump’s defense secretary nominee had a ‘frank and thorough’ conversation. 

A day later, when asked in an interview on Fox News’ ‘America’s Newsroom’ if she wasn’t ready to vote to confirm Hegseth, the senator replied, ‘I think you are right.’

Musk, Ramaswamy meet with lawmakers on Capitol Hill

Ahead of his second meeting with the senator, Hegseth told Fox News’ Aishah Hasnie, ‘I’m really looking forward to meeting with Sen. Ernst. I appreciate her. I respect her background and her service. She’s incredible. And the ongoing conversation has been very fruitful.’

Over the past few days, a high-profile Trump ally has threatened to fuel a primary challenge against Ernst when she’s up for re-election in 2026.

‘This is the red line. This is not a joke. … The funding is already being put together. Donors are calling like crazy. Primaries are going to be launched,’ said Charlie Kirk, an influential conservative activist and radio and TV host who co-founded and steers Turning Point USA.

Kirk, on his radio program, warned that ‘if you support the president’s agenda, you’re good. You’re marked safe from a primary. You go up against Pete Hegseth, the president repeatedly, then don’t be surprised, Joni Ernst, if all of a sudden you have a primary challenge in Iowa.’

In Iowa, conservative commentator and media personality Steve Deace took to social media and used his radio program to highlight that he would consider launching a primary challenge against Ernst.

‘Defeating an incumbent US Senator takes high name ID, connections, and funding potential,’ Deace wrote. ‘I’m one of the few people in Iowa with all three.’

Deace, who supported Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in this year’s Iowa GOP presidential caucus, said, ‘I don’t want to be a Senator, but I am willing to primary her for the good of the cause if I’m assured I have Trump’s support going in. Or I am willing to throw my support and network behind someone else President Trump prefers to primary Joni Ernst instead.’

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird, a top Trump supporter in the Iowa caucuses, wrote a column on Breitbart urging Hegseth’s confirmation.

While she didn’t mention Ernst by name, Bird took aim at ‘D.C. politicians’ who ‘think they can ignore the voices of their constituents and entertain smears from the same outlets that have pushed out lies for years.’

David Kochel, a veteran GOP consultant who was a key strategist and early backer of Ernst during her successful 2014 Senate campaign, told Fox News that ‘Joni Ernst is doing what the Constitution says what her job is, which is advise and consent.’

‘I think that everybody should just give her the space to do her job, and making threats to a combat veteran usually doesn’t work out great,’ Kochel said.

Trump has praised Hegseth in the past few days.

‘Hegseth is doing very well. His support is strong and deep, much more so than the Fake News,’ the president-elect wrote on Friday.

But Fox News and other news organizations have reported that Trump is potentially considering nominating DeSantis as defense secretary as a possible replacement should Hegseth’s nomination falter.

Ernst’s name has also come up as a possible replacement.

But the senator said last week in an interview with RealClearPolitics that ‘I am not seeking to be secretary of defense.’

Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Tyler Olson and Julia Johnson contributed to this report.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Pro-life leaders are sounding off about the ‘serious and growing threat’ of chemical abortion pills after President-elect Trump said he would not restrict access to the pills as president.

Abortion pills, also known as chemical abortion, are now the most common abortion method, accounting for over 60% of all U.S. abortions.

During an interview with NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ this past weekend, Trump was asked whether he would restrict abortion pill access via executive action.

Trump responded definitively that ‘the answer is no.’

He added: ‘I’ll probably stay with exactly what I’ve been saying for the last two years,’ that abortion is a state, not a federal issue.

Pressed whether he would commit to not restricting abortion pills, the president-elect said: ‘Well I commit’ but noted circumstances may change.

‘Do things change? I think they change,’ he went on, pointing to how President Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden after repeatedly categorically committing otherwise. 

‘I don’t like putting myself in a position like that,’ he said. ‘So, things do change, but I don’t think it’s going to change at all.’

Chemical abortion access was significantly expanded under the Biden administration, which permanently removed a requirement for the pills to be administered through in-person appointments and allowed the drugs to be delivered via mail or obtained at retail pharmacies like CVS or Walgreens.

In a statement sent to Fox News Digital, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said ‘unregulated, mail-order abortion drugs are a serious and growing threat to women’s health and safety, as well as the lives of countless unborn children, all across this country.’

While she criticized the ‘reckless actions’ of the Biden-Harris administration to expand abortion pill access, Dannenfelser said ‘no one who cares about the health and well-being of women can afford to ignore this issue.’ 

Referring to the recent high-profile deaths of Catherine Herring, Amber Thurman, Candi Miller and Alyona Dixon due to abortion pill complications, Dannenfelser said ‘even the pro-abortion media can’t hide that these drugs are killing women and fueling dangerous new forms of domestic violence.’

Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life Action, indicated she was optimistic about Trump seeing the danger of unrestricted chemical abortion access, telling Fox News Digital: ‘Many leaders are just now learning about how the pills harm women and the environment.’  

‘We have a lot to talk about with the Trump-Vance administration,’ Hawkins said, adding, ‘President Trump has shown himself to be a reasonable leader who makes decisions based on the best information available.’

‘We hope to be agents of change, providing new information about how the changes made by the Biden-Harris administration on chemical abortion pill policy expose women to injury, infertility, and death, empowers abusers and allows for drinking water pollution through the flushing of medical waste,’ she said. ‘So, we look forward to a frank discussion about what three Democratic Party presidents did to help their friends in Big Abortion Pharma. We can’t wait to give President Trump the new information he needs to act.’ 

Meanwhile, Brian Burch, president of the conservative activism group ‘CatholicVote,’ told Fox News Digital that Trump’s admission that ‘things do change,’ signals ‘he would be open to addressing the overwhelming body of evidence that shows how harmful these drugs are to women.’

‘Big Pharma has exploited far too many women for too long, and the abortion industry should not get a pass when it comes to drug protocols and evidence-based regulations,’ he said. ‘Given President Trump’s pro-life record, together with the personnel he has nominated to key positions, we remain hopeful the new administration will take a serious look at these drugs and act accordingly.’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The fall of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, the culmination of years of civil war, has given way to a power vacuum with different factions protecting their own interests – and vying for power in the Middle Eastern nation. 

The U.S., worried about the resurgence of an ISIS stronghold, has struck targets associated with the Islamic State in central Syria. 

Turkey, which controls a zone of Syria on its northern border, has continued to attack U.S.-backed Kurdish forces. 

Both work with different proxy groups. 

Here’s a look at the different forces vying for control in the region:

Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)

HTS was the key faction behind the fall of Damascus and the fleeing of Assad, and now controls the capital city. But the Islamist militant group is far from a U.S. ally – its leader, Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, has a $10 million U.S. bounty on his head and has been designated a terrorist since 2013. The group governed just a sliver of northwest Syria in Idlib. 

The group, founded as an al Qaeda affiliate, still remains largely aligned with al Qaeda but focuses on establishing fundamentalist Islamic rule in Syria rather than a global caliphate. 

The U.N., U.S. and Turkey all designate HTS as a terrorist organization. The group, in recent years, has worked to soften its image and lobbied to be delisted as a terrorist group, highlighting its government services in Idlib and promising to protect religious and cultural sites, even churches, in Aleppo. 

Experts believe Turkey, which has long looked to topple Assad, may have been at play in HTS’ offensive. 

Syrian government forces 

Syria’s forces loyal to Assad have staved off coup attempts since 2011, often through violent crackdowns on protests and rebellion. 

By 2020, government troops backed by Iran, Russia and Lebanese Hezbollah had pushed rebel forces back to the northwest corner of Syria. 

In the waning days of November, rebel factions swiftly overpowered government troops, seizing control of Aleppo – a city previously reclaimed by Assad’s forces in 2016. Eight days later, the insurgents successfully captured not only Aleppo, but also Hama, Homs and Damascus.

On Monday, HTS granted Assad’s forces ‘a general amnesty for all military personnel conscripted under compulsory service.’

‘Their lives are safe and no one may assault them,’ the group said in a statement.

Syrian National Army (SNA) 

The SNA is a loosely bound coalition of Turkish-backed forces primarily intent on fighting Kurdish forces. But the coalition, which carries out Turkish President Recep Erdogan’s anti-Assad efforts, was also involved in the fall of Damascus. The groups have – in the past – also battled HTS and other Islamic State terrorists. 

The SNA coalition believes U.S.-backed Kurdish forces in Syria to be linked to Turkey’s Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), a militant group that has launched Kurdish nationalist attacks in Turkey.

Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) 

SDF is a coalition of U.S.-backed Kurdish forces, centered in northeastern Syria. They have long worked alongside the U.S. in battling Islamic State forces in Syria.

In addition to fighting the Islamic State, they’ve been fending off attacks from Turkish-backed fighters. 

Kurdish forces were not involved in the offensive that toppled Assad, but they hailed the offensive campaign. 

‘In Syria, we are living through historic moments as we witness the fall of the authoritarian regime in Damascus. This change presents an opportunity to build a new Syria based on democracy and justice that guarantees the rights of all Syrians,’ said Mazlum Abdi, the commander of the SDF, on Sunday morning. 

Turkey 

After relatively friendly relations with Syria throughout the early 2000s, Turkey condemned Assad over the violent 2011 crackdown on protesters. 

While Turkey and the U.S. are allies – bound to protect each other through NATO – they are on opposing sides in Syria, even as both celebrated Assad’s downfall. The Turkish military fired on U.S.-backed forces in Syria over the weekend, where fighting erupted between rebel groups in Manbij, a Kurdish-controlled city near Syria’s border with Turkey. Turkey has long had a goal of pushing the Kurds away from its border, and is looking to use the current turmoil to capture control along the border and decimate the Kurdish population there.  

Kurdish separatists have fought Turkey for years, looking to carve out their own autonomous nation. 

Russia

Russia has long propped up the Assad regime, and days ago granted the ousted leader asylum.

Since 2015, Russia has effectively acted as Assad’s air force, but its capacity to intervene on the dictator’s behalf has diminished since resources were needed for the war with Ukraine. 

Iran 

Iran was Assad’s biggest supporter, providing arms and military advice and directing its proxy Lebanese Hezbollah to fight the insurgents. But Hezbollah had to direct its troops back to Lebanon to fight Israel, leaving Assad’s forces in a weakened position. 

HTS leader al-Jolani lamented in a speech on Sunday that Syria had become ‘a playground for Iranian ambitions.’

Israel

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu credited his forces’ weakening of Hezbollah for playing a key role in the fall of Assad. Israel has consistently launched strikes against Syria with the strategic aim of disrupting the channels Iran uses to supply arms to Hezbollah.

After Assad’s fall, Israel, on Sunday, struck Assad’s chemical weapons facilities within Syria, for fear of what hands they may fall into in his absence. 

Israel also captured control of a buffer zone within the Golan Heights, the first time they’ve captured territory in Syria since the war in 1973. 

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) moved in on Sunday and told residents to remain in their homes until further notice. They said they needed to capture the territory to ensure border security. 

They also captured Mount Hermon – the highest point on the border between the two countries and a blind spot in their defenses that Iran had been exploiting to send low-flying drones. 

U.S. 

Some 900 U.S. troops remain in Syria, where they are partnered with the SDF to fight ISIS. 

On Sunday, President Biden said U.S. troops would remain there to ‘ensure stability.’ 

The U.S. carried out dozens of precision strikes on more than 75 ISIS targets in central Syria over the weekend to prevent the terrorist group from exploiting the unrest to rebuild. 

‘We’re clear-eyed about the fact that ISIS will try to take advantage of any vacuum to re-establish its capability to create a safe haven,’ Biden said. ‘We will not let that happen.’

Biden said the U.S. would support Syria’s neighbors – Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and Israel – ‘should any threat arise from Syria during this transition.’

The president added that the fall of Assad created a ‘historic opportunity for the long-suffering people of Syria.’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Republican Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley doubled down that he believes Christopher Wray has failed his ‘fundamental duties’ as FBI director in a blistering letter expressing he has ‘no confidence’ in Wray’s continued leadership over the agency. 

‘For the good of the country, it’s time for you and your deputy to move on to the next chapter in your lives. I’ve spent my career fighting for transparency, and I’ve always called out those in government who have fought against it,’ Grassley wrote in a letter to Wray on Monday morning, referring also to the FBI’s deputy director Paul Abbate. ‘For the public record, I must do so once again now.’

Grassley went on to say he ‘must express my vote of no confidence in your continued leadership of the FBI. President-elect Trump has already announced his intention to nominate a candidate to replace you, and the Senate will carefully consider that choice. For my part, I’ve also seen enough, and hope your respective successors will learn from these failures,’ Grassley, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, continued. 

The longtime Republican senator’s letter comes as Trump’s pick to lead the FBI, Kash Patel, headed to Capitol Hill on Monday to meet with lawmakers, including Grassley, and rally support for his confirmation. 

Before the Senate could potentially confirm Patel as FBI chief under the second Trump administration, Wray would need to step down or be fired, as he is in the midst of a 10-year appointment that does not end until 2027. 

Grassley’s lengthy letter to Wray, which spans 11 pages, detailed specific examples of Wray’s ‘failures​​’ as FBI director, which Grassley said ‘shattered my confidence in your leadership and the confidence and hope many others in Congress placed in you.’ The Iowa senator previously argued that Wray has ‘failed’ as FBI director in a social media message posted one day after Trump nominated Patel as FBI chief. 

Grassley pointed to the FBI’s ‘unprecedented raid’ of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Florida in August 2022 regarding classified documents as an example of Wray’s failures. The Republican senator noted the raid included about 30 armed agents who were authorized to ‘​​use lethal force if needed’ in order to execute the search warrant. 

The agents ‘even searched the former First Lady’s clothing drawers,’ Grassley continued. 

‘This raid occurred despite serious questions about the need for it. President Trump apparently was cooperating with the investigation, notwithstanding liberal press reports. He voluntarily turned over 15 boxes of documents months before the FBI’s drastic escalation,’ Grassley continued, adding that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton never faced such a raid ‘even though she and her staff mishandled highly classified information while using a non-government server.’

He also hit the FBI for acting as an ‘accomplice to the Democrats’ false information campaign designed to undermine my investigation of alleged Biden-family corruption.’

‘On August 6, 2020, as Senator Ron Johnson and I were finishing our report on the Biden family’s financial connections to foreign governments and questionable foreign nationals, you succumbed to pressure from Democrats in Congress and provided an unnecessary briefing that Democratic leadership requested in an effort to falsely label our investigation as Russian disinformation.’ 

‘That briefing consisted of information we already knew and information that wasn’t connected to our Biden investigation. We made clear at the time our concern that the briefing would be subject to a leak that would shed false light on the focus of our investigation. Predictably, on May 1, 2021, the Washington Post did just that, falsely labeling our investigation as Russian disinformation,’ he continued. 

He added that the FBI ‘sat on bribery allegations’ against Biden when he served as vice president, as well as Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, and Ukrainian officials. 

‘Consistent with that FBI failure, yet another glaring example of FBI’s broken promises under your leadership is its inexcusable failure to investigate bribery allegations against former Vice President Joe Biden, while strictly scrutinizing former President Trump. You’ve repeatedly claimed you would ensure the FBI does justice, ‘free of fear, favor, or partisan influence.’ The FBI under your watch, however, had possession of incriminating information against President Biden for three years until I exposed the existence of the record outlining those allegations, but did nothing to investigate it,’ he wrote. 

Grassley argued that under Wray’s leadership, the FBI has also shown an ‘​​outright disdain for congressional oversight,’ including failure to provide lawmakers with information related to the ‘​FBI’s ongoing mishandling of sexual harassment claims’ made by female employees. 

‘This request was not pulled out of a hat. It was based on credible whistleblower disclosures alleging hundreds of FBI employees had retired or resigned to avoid accountability for sexual misconduct,’ Grassley wrote. 

The FBI also ‘refused’ to provide information to lawmakers regarding the vetting process of Afghan nationals amid the Biden administration’s botched withdrawal from the nation in 2021, Grassley added. The FBI also came under fire from Grassley for ‘refusing to provide information to Congress on the FBI’s ‘Richmond memo,’’ which has become known as the anti-Catholic memo for depicting traditional Catholics as violent extremists. 

‘Your and Deputy Director Abbate’s failure to take control of the FBI has hindered my work and others’ work throughout multiple Congresses on matters that needed timely information, and has prevented the truth on some issues from ever reaching the American people. You’ve also shown a continuing double standard and failure to carry through on promises,’ Grassley wrote in his letter.

When asked about Grassley’s letter, the FBI told Fox News Digital that ‘the FBI has repeatedly demonstrated our commitment to responding to Congressional oversight and being transparent with the American people.’

‘Director Wray and Deputy Director Abbate have taken strong actions toward achieving accountability in the areas mentioned in the letter and remain committed to sharing information about the continuously evolving threat environment facing our nation and the extraordinary work of the FBI.’

Trump joined NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ for an interview that aired Sunday, where the president-elect also slammed Wray and said the ‘FBI’s respect has gone way down over the last number of years.’

‘He invaded my home. I’m suing the country over it. He invaded Mar-a-Lago. I’m very unhappy with the things he’s done. And crime is at an all-time high. Migrants are pouring into the country that are from prisons and from mental institutions, as we’ve discussed. I can’t say I’m thrilled,’ Trump said during the interview. 

‘I certainly can not be happy with him. Take a look at what’s happened. And then when I was shot in the ear, he said, maybe it was shrapnel. Where’s the shrapnel coming from? Is it coming from heaven? I don’t think so. So we need somebody to – you know, I have a lot of respect for the FBI. But the FBI’s respect has gone way down over the last number of years,’ Trump continued. 

Wray has not revealed whether he will voluntarily step down as FBI director, with Trump expected to fire Wray in order to make room for Patel as FBI director. 

Patel is a longtime Trump ally and crusader against the ‘deep state,’ who has advocated for the firings of  ‘corrupt actors’ within the FBI, ‘aggressive’ congressional oversight over the agency, complete overhauls to special counsels, and moving the FBI out of Washington, D.C.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on Grassley’s letter, but did not immediately receive responses. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Pentagon unveiled a new counter-drone strategy after a spate of incursions near U.S. bases prompted concerns over a lack of an action plan for the increasing threat of unmanned aerial vehicles. 

Though much of the strategy remains classified, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin will implement a new counter-drone office within the Pentagon – Joint Counter-Small UAS Office – and a new Warfighter Senior Integration Group, according to a new memo. 

The Pentagon will also begin work on a second Replicator initiative, but it will be up to the incoming Trump administration to decide whether to fund this plan. The first Replicator initiative worked to field inexpensive, dispensable drones to thwart drone attacks by adversarial groups across the Middle East and elsewhere.  

The memo warned that the increased use of unmanned systems must reshape U.S. tactics, as they make it easier for adversaries to ‘surveil, disrupt and attack our forces … potentially without attribution.’ 

The plan outlines a five-pronged approach: deepening understanding of enemy drones, launching offensive campaigns to thwart their ability to build such systems, improving ‘active and passive’ defenses to such attacks, rapid increase of production of counter-drone systems and making counter-drone focus a top priority for future force development. 

For the past year, Iran-backed Houthi rebels have been using small, one-way unmanned aerial systems to strike western shipping routes in the Red Sea. 

That has led to perilous waters along a trade route that typically sees some $1 trillion in goods pass through it, as well as shipments of aid to war-torn Sudan and the Yemeni people. 

Some experts have deemed the U.S. response inadequate in deterring the Houthis from inflicting billions of dollars worth of damage to the global economy. 

Additionally, the cost of U.S. response to such attacks is disproportionate. While the Houthi drones are estimated to cost around $2,000 each, the naval missiles the U.S. fires back can run around $2 million a shot. 

In September, Houthis took out two U.S. Reaper drones in a week, machinery that costs around $30 million a piece. 

Deadly drone strikes have also been launched by both sides in Russia’s war on Ukraine. 

‘Unmanned systems pose both an urgent and enduring threat to U.S. personnel, facilities, and assets overseas,’ the Pentagon said in a statement on Thursday announcing the strategy. 

‘By producing a singular Strategy for Countering Unmanned Systems, the Secretary and the Department are orienting around a common understanding of the challenge and a shared approach to addressing it.’

Three U.S. service members were killed in a drone strike in January in Jordan. Experts warned the U.S. lacks a clear counter-drone procedure after 17 unmanned vehicles traipsed into restricted airspace over Langley Air Force Base in Virginia last December. 

The mystery drones swarmed for more than two weeks. Lack of a standard protocol for such incursions left Langley officials unsure of what to do – other than allow the 20-foot-long drones to hover near their classified facilities. 

Langley is home to some of the nation’s most vital top secret facilities and the F-22 Raptor stealth fighters. 

Two months prior to Langley, in October 2023, five drones flew over the Energy Department’s Nevada National Security Site, used for nuclear weapons experiments. U.S. authorities were not sure who was behind those drones either. 

A Chinese surveillance balloon traversed over the U.S. for a week last year before the Air Force shot it down off the coast.

The Air Force’s Plant 42 in California, home to highly classified aerospace development, has also seen a slew of unidentified drone incursions in 2024, prompting flight restrictions around the facility.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Progressive Democrats are frustrated with how President Biden is handling his lame duck era, with President-elect Donald Trump dominating the news cycle with Cabinet nominations and meetings with world leaders.

Biden has remained relatively quiet in the weeks since Trump won re-election and has allowed Trump to steal the show at several notable events. Biden sent his wife, first lady Jill Biden, to attend the re-opening of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, giving Trump an opportunity to greet French President Emmanuel Macron and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in front of the cameras.

‘This is one of the lamest of lame ducks we’ve seen with a Democratic administration. A massive missed opportunity,’ Usamah Andrabi, spokesman for the progressive group Justice Democrats, told the Wall Street Journal.

Democrats also feel that Biden and the White House have not been critical enough of Trump’s Cabinet nominees. Trump has already had one nominee withdraw, former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., and Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee for defense secretary and a former Fox News host, has also drawn criticism.

‘We should be less hobbled and more spurred. We should be vocal, pushing back against these nominees who are nothing but a disaster in the making,’ Washington Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee told the Journal.

‘Most voters don’t know Kash Patel or even who Matt Gaetz or Tulsi Gabbard are,’ Waleed Shahid, a progressive Democratic strategist, told the outlet. ‘But many more Americans would know if President Biden spoke about them… The only way to win the war of attention is by going to the voters and explaining things to them, which President Biden has consistently avoided doing.’

However, the White House pushed back on the criticism, arguing that Biden has been busy on foreign trips.

‘President Biden is making every day of this term count as he accelerates the implementation of an unprecedented agenda that will benefit hardworking Americans for generations,’ White House spokesman Andrew Bates told the Journal.

Top Democratic governors have been far more vocal in criticizing the incoming administration. California Gov. Gavin Newsom declared an effort to ‘Trump-proof’ California last month. Part of that plan includes spending $25 million on potential legal battles with the Trump administration.

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy also said he is prepared to ‘fight like hell’ against the Trump administration, but he acknowledged the need to have a working relationship with the White House.

‘If your values are being attacked, or you’ve got communities or people who are being attacked that don’t deserve it, you’ve got to fight like hell,’ said Murphy. ‘And then over here, you’ve got to have a relationship with the guy.’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Billionaire business tycoon Elon Musk, who President-elect Donald Trump tapped to lead the new cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), agreed with former Rep. Ron Paul’s suggestion that the U.S. should end foreign aid.

‘Here’s an easy one for @DOGE !’ Paul declared in a post on X. ‘ELIMINATE foreign aid!’ 

‘It’s taking money from the poor and middle class in the US and giving it to the rich in poor countries – with a cut to the facilitators in between! Americans don’t want their government to borrow more money to spend on foreign aid. Besides, it is the immoral transfer of wealth and is unconstitutional,’ Paul asserted.

‘@DOGE will address this with full transparency for the American people,’ Musk replied.

Responding to someone else who posted about Paul’s call to eliminate foreign aid, Musk declared, ‘Ron is not wrong.’

Vivek Ramaswamy, another DOGE leader, responded to Paul’s post, writing, ‘Much of U.S. foreign aid *isn’t even authorized* by Congress.’

Musk and Ramaswamy were both tapped by Trump to work together on DOGE, which the president-elect said in a statement last month ‘will provide advice and guidance from outside of Government, and will partner with the White House and Office of Management & Budget to drive large scale structural reform, and create an entrepreneurial approach to Government never seen before.’

Musk and Ramaswamy have indicated that they believe funding for non-governmental organizations should be examined.

‘We need to scrutinize U.S. government funding of ‘non-government organizations,” Ramaswamy noted in a post on X. ‘It’s an oxymoron that represents a waste of taxpayer dollars, but the real problem runs deeper: Americans deserve transparency on opaque foreign aid & nonprofit groups abetting our own border crisis.’

‘Absolutely,’ Musk agreed.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President-elect Trump’s nomination of Kash Patel as FBI director has sparked a frenzy of outrage from the fake news media. I’m sure none of this surprises Kash, who has faced it all before. 

Fake news outlets don’t typically attack congressional staffers by name, but years ago they made an exception for Kash. At the time, he was my lead staff investigator on the House Intelligence Committee as we examined allegations that President Trump had colluded with Russia to hack the 2016 presidential election. 

We quickly began uncovering evidence that the entire Russia collusion narrative was a hoax funded by the Democratic Party and the Hillary Clinton campaign and weaponized by our own intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Shockingly, the abuses included the Department of Justice and FBI providing false information to a secret court to get a warrant to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter Page.

Back then, Kash was an outstanding sleuth and a bulldog investigator who drew on his own experience as a DOJ prosecutor to figure out what misdeeds these corrupt officials were committing. To get the evidence, we had to overcome their ceaseless stonewalling, over-classification of documents, and countless other tricks and maneuvers they employed to bury the truth. 

Fake news reporters and ‘resistance’ bureaucrats understood the evidence we found undermined their hoax narrative, so they launched an all-out jihad against Kash, with anonymous sources accusing him of committing every conceivable atrocity known to man. 

The attacks on Kash went beyond these information warfare operations—in a face-to-face meeting with us, top DOJ officials, who apparently didn’t appreciate their dirty laundry being aired, threatened to subpoena Kash’s communications. What we only found out years later was that they had already seized Kash’s emails, along with those of other congressional staffers investigating the collusion hoax, including staffers for Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. 

Andy McCarthy: The FBI and Justice Department turned Russian disinformation into a career path for advancement

In sum, the DOJ secretly spied on their own constitutionally mandated overseers to find out what we knew and how we knew it.  

You can imagine how intimidating it would be for a staffer to be directly threatened by top-level Department of Justice officials. But Kash could not be bullied. He was fearless, methodical, and intelligent, and ultimately played a decisive role in exposing the most consequential and damaging hoax in American history. 

In light of the Russia collusion hoax, the politicized January 6 investigations, assorted surveillance abuses, the misuse of confidential human informants for political purposes, pressure on Big Tech to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, the investigation of parent protesters at school board meetings, and countless other manipulations, the FBI and DOJ clearly need drastic, fundamental reform. 

Trump says he

Tinkering around the edges isn’t enough – the entire culture of these institutions needs to be revamped, and their workforces must be decentralized so they refocus on fighting criminals and terrorists instead of politics. 

To successfully execute that mission at the FBI, the bureau needs a director who understands the problems and how to fix them. Crucially, this person must have the guts to do it notwithstanding the wailing from the media and the whole galaxy of left-wing interest groups alongside the bitter opposition of the upper echelons of the FBI’s own workforce. 

Kash has an extensive record of distinguished government service as a public defender, terrorism prosecutor, senior staff member at the Office of National Intelligence and the National Security Council, and chief of staff to the Department of Defense. But his record at the House Intelligence Committee alone shows Kash has the courage and commitment to reform the FBI.

Trump promises FBI, DOJ overhaul

It’s amusing to watch discredited former officials leap on cable news shows to decry Kash’s nomination like it heralds the end of the republic. After all, those who abused, politicized, and discredited the FBI, and those who tried to cover up those abuses, have a lot to lose if Kash is confirmed. 

Imagine if these people could no longer rely on the FBI to investigate and arrest everyday Americans with dissenting political opinions, leak false information against their political opponents, and actively undermine presidents whom they are supposed to be serving.

Kash understands surveillance abuses and intimidation tactics because he experienced them himself – and he never backed down. 

If you want an FBI director who will go along to get along, you’re better off with someone else. If you want a director who will follow the Constitution and transform the bureau into an impartial, trustworthy law enforcement agency that zealously goes after criminals instead of political targets, then Kash is, bar none, the right man for the job. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS