Category

Latest News

Category
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

For arguably the first time in his political career, President Donald Trump is asking his voters to take a big leap of faith regarding his administration’s tariff policy. 

I decided to travel to small-town Maryland and Ohio to try to find out just how much slack Trump voters are willing to cut him amid the uncertainty of this trade policy. What I found is that Trump has a lot more runway to play with before his support may or may not start to crumble.

Cumberland, Md., is a charming and sleepy hamlet near the Pennsylvania border which, like so many in the area, grew up around the railroad, and it shows. Trestles and 19th-century buildings abound, freight trains cut their fearless way right through the small downtown.

There I met Fred and his son Chris, who were eating dinner next to me at a local establishment. Fred’s bright red ‘Trump Was Right About Everything’ hat seemed like a bit of a clue that he had voted for the president, so we got to talking.

‘None,’ Fred told me when I asked if he was starting to have any doubts. The retired Navy veteran was especially pleased by the selection of Pete Hegseth as secretary of the Department of Defense. ‘He’s a serviceman,’ Fred told me. ‘He can handle it.’

I hear that from about nine out of 10 vets I talk to.

Fred’s son Chris, also a Navy vet, was a bit more circumspect. On the subject of tariffs and more broadly inflation, he said, ‘Trump ran on making things cheaper, not more expensive, but I’m still willing to trust him.’

‘Nothing happens overnight and without work,’ came some fatherly advice from Fred.

Now Chris has a point. Trump absolutely ran on imposing tariffs, but it was never clear if that was a negotiating tactic or an overall economic policy. We still don’t really know. Deals could still be cut, but Trump did not run on short-term economic pain, something all of his supporters I talked to admitted, but also accepted.

Later that night, I met four guys in their 30s, who work in the local energy industry, and once again, three of them were entirely on board.

‘I don’t think he has done enough,’ one quipped sarcastically about the avalanche of actions taken by Trump.

Another said Trump’s ac tions have strengthened his support.

‘A couple years ago, I was not politically aligned with either party, but now that Trump has become the president, and Elon is trying to eliminate, with the DOGE, the fraud and the illogical spending that is happening, I am totally for that.’ He added, ‘I am more happy now that I voted for Trump than I was when I voted for Trump.’

About two hours northwest of Cumberland lies tiny Columbiana, Ohio. Unlike the cozy Cumberland nestled in the mountains, Columbiana is a small place more of strip malls than town squares, but not without its own charming haunts to discover.

One of those is Factory 46, a restaurant and bar tucked behind one of the ubiquitous malls, where Joe, in his 20’s who has lived here his whole life, slings the drinks and grub.

There I met another father and son, again in the same industry, this time coal mining, and this time it was the dad who let me ask him a few questions on video. For both of them, removing the tax on overtime was a huge issue.

‘It’s killing the working man,’ the dad told me, and when I asked if he thought Trump could really do it, he absolutely did. He also told me, ‘I’d love to see him bring the coal industry back. Obama took it from us. I can understand gas, we need gas, it’s awesome, but we need both.’ 

The theme of no regrets remained steady for these two, as it did for Joe’s mom, who came in to visit a little while after. 

One thing that became clear, especially in Ohio, is that when Democrats and the media scream about how tariffs will tank the stock market and make foreign goods more expensive, many think our so-called prosperity came at the cost of domestic manufacturing and at the expense of towns like theirs.

The voters in these small towns very much see themselves as the losers in the game of globalism, and they are not too upset about its rules being changed.

Trump’s poll numbers have dipped a bit. He’s about two points underwater, though still higher than he was this time in his first term. And based on my conversations with his supporters this week, I do not expect a sharp decline anytime soon.

No, his people are willing to give Trump time, but make no mistake, in the long run, they are expecting results. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Dozens of activist and legal groups, elected officials, local jurisdictions and individuals have launched more than 120 lawsuits against the Trump administration since Jan. 20 in response to his more than 90 executive orders, as well as executive proclamations and memos, Fox News Digital found. 

Trump has long been a legal target, which hit a fever pitch during the 2024 election cycle when Trump faced four criminal indictments, including a criminal trial in Manhattan in the spring of 2024 when he was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records. 

Trump has maintained his innocence in the four cases, pointing to them as evidence of lawfare at the hands of Democrats working against his political efforts. 

Upon Trump’s election win in November 2024, state attorneys general, such as New York Attorney General Letitia James, publicly said they would prepare legal battles against the Trump administration for actions they view as illegal or negatively impact residents. 

‘We faced this challenge before, and we used the rule of law to fight back,’ James, who has repeatedly filed suits against Trump, said following his win. ‘And we are prepared to fight back once again because, as the attorney general of this great state, it is my job to protect and defend the rights of New Yorkers and the rule of law. And I will not shrink from that responsibility.’

Just weeks back in the Oval Office, Trump’s administration has been hit with at least 125 lawsuits working to resist his policies. 

Fox News Digital compiled a list of the groups, state attorneys general, cities or states, and individuals who have launched lawsuits against the Trump administration’s executive actions. The list includes the various groups and individuals challenging the Trump administration in court, as well as the executive order or proclamation that sparked the suit. 

  1. Jan. 20, 2025: New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support; League of United Latin American Citizens; Make the Road New York (Executive Order: Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  2. Jan. 20, 2025: O. Doe; Brazilian Worker Center, Inc.; La Colaborativa (Executive Order: Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  3. Jan. 20, 2025: Center for Biological Diversity (Establishing and Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’)
  4. Jan. 22, 2025: Make the Road New York (Executive Order: Protecting the American People Against Invasion)
  5. Jan. 20, 2025: National Treasury Employees Union (Executive Order: Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce)
  6. Jan. 20, 2025: National Security Counselors, Inc. (Executive Order: Establishing and Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency)
  7. Jan. 20, 2025: American Public Health Association; American Federation of Teachers; Minority Veterans of America; VoteVets Action Fund; The Center for Auto Safety, Inc.; Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Executive Order: Establishing and Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’)
  8. Jan. 20, 2025: Le v. Trump (Executive Order: Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  9. Jan. 21, 2025: State of New Jersey; Commonwealth of Massachusetts; State of California; State of Colorado; State of Connecticut; State of Delaware; District of Columbia; State of Hawai’i; State of Maine; State of Maryland; Attorney General Dana Nessel for the People of Michigan; State of Minnesota; State of Nevada; State of New Mexico; State of New York; State of North Carolina; State of Rhode Island; State of Vermont; State of Wisconsin; City and County of San Francisco (Executive Order: Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  10. Jan. 21, 2025: CASA, Inc; Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (​​Executive Order: Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  11. Jan. 21, 2025: State of Washington; State of Arizona; State of Illinois; State of Oregon (Executive Order: ​​Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  12. Jan. 21. 2025: Delmy Franco Aleman, Cherly Norales Castillo, and Alicia Chavarria Lopez (Executive Order: Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  13. Jan. 23, 2025: Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center (Executive Order: Securing Our Borders)
  14. Jan. 25, 2025: Organized Communities Against Deportation; Brighton Park Neighborhood Council; Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights; Raise the Floor Alliance (Executive Order: Protecting the American People Against Invasion)
  15. Jan. 26, 2025: Maria Moe, transgender federal inmate (Executive Order: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government)
  16. Jan. 27, 2025: Jane Does 1-2 (Executive action on the solicitation of information from career employees)
  17. Jan. 27, 2025: Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends, New England Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends, Baltimore Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends, Inc., Adelphi Friends Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends, Richmond Friends Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends (Executive action related to ​​immigration enforcement in places of worship)
  18. Jan. 28, 2025: Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (Executive Order: Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce)
  19. Jan. 28, 2025: Public Citizen, Inc.; State Democracy Defenders Fund; American Federation of Government Employees (Executive Order: Establishing and Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency)
  20. Jan. 28, 2025: State of New York; State of California; State of Illinois; State of Rhode Island; State of New Jersey; Commonwealth of Massachusetts; State of Arizona; State of Colorado; State of Connecticut; State of Delaware; The District of Columbia; State of Hawai’i; State of Main; State of Maryland; State of Michigan; State of Minnesota; State of Nevada; State of North Carolina; State of New Mexico; State of Oregon; State of Vermont; State of Washington; State of Wisconsin (Executive action related to the temporary pause of grants, loans and assistance programs)
  21. Jan. 28, 2025: National Council of Nonprofits, American Public Health Association, Main Street Alliance, SAGE (Executive action related to the temporary pause of grants, loans and assistance programs)
  22. Jan. 28, 2025: Nicolas Talbott, Erica Vandal, Kate Cole, Gordon Herrero, Dany Danridge, Jamie Hash, Koda Nature, and Cael Neary, transgender U.S. military members or those seeking to enlist (Executive Order: Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness)
  23. Jan. 29, 2025: American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO (‘AFGE’); American Federation of State, County And Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (‘AFSCME’) (Executive Order: Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce)
  24. Jan. 30, 2025: OCA – Asian Pacific American Advocates (Executive Order: ​​Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  25. Jan. 30, 2025: County of Santa Clara (Executive Order: Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  26. Jan. 30, 2025: Jane Doe; Mary Doe; Sara Doe, transgender federal inmates (Executive Order: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government)
  27. Jan. 31, 2025: Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, American Gateways, Florence Immigrant Refugee Rights Project, Estrella Del Paso, Immigration Services and Legal Advocacy, National Immigrant Justice Center, NW Immigrant Rights Project, PA Immigration Resource Center, Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Center (Executive Order: Protecting the American People Against Invasion)
  28. Feb. 3, 2025: Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services (Presidential Proclamation Guaranteeing the States Protection Against Invasion)
  29. Feb. 3, 2025: Alliance for Retired Americans, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  30. Feb. 3, 2025: National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education; American Association of University Professors; Restaurant Opportunities Centers United; Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland (Executive Orders: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity)
  31. Feb. 4, 2025: PFLAG, Inc and American Association of Physicians for Human Rights, Inc. (Executive Orders: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government and Protecting Children From Chemical and Surgical Mutilation)
  32. Feb. 4, 2025: John and Jane Doe 1-9, employees and agents of the FBI (Executive Order: Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government)
  33. Feb. 4, 2025; Doctors for America (Executive order: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government)
  34. Feb. 4, 2025: Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents Association; seven John and Jane Doe plaintiffs (Executive Order: Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government)
  35. Feb. 4, 2025: Aids Vaccine Advocacy Coalition; Journalism Development Network, Inc (Executive Order: Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid)
  36. Feb. 5, 2025: American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, American Federation of Government Employees, AFLCIO, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Economic Policy Institute (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  37. Feb. 5, 2025: Gwynne Wilcox, former National Labor Relations Board member (Executive action related to removal of independent agency leaders)
  38. Feb. 6, 2025: Government Accountability Project and National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (Executive Order: Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce)
  39. Feb. 6, 2025: American Foreign Service Association, American Federation of Government Employees (Executive order: Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid)
  40. Feb. 6, 2025: Commander Emily Shilling; Commander Blake Dremann; Lieutenant Commander Geirid Morgan; Sergeant First Class Cathrine Schmid; Sergeant First Class Jane Doe; Staff Sergeant Videl Leins; Matthew Medina; and Gender Justice League (Executive Order: Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness)
  41. Feb. 7, 2025: City and County of San Francisco (Executive Order: Protecting the American People Against Invasion)
  42. Feb. 7, 2025: State of New York; State of Arizona, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Hawaii, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of New Jersey, State of North Carolina, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, and State of Wisconsin (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  43. Feb. 7, 2025: University of California Student Association (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  44. Feb. 7, 2025: State of Washington, State of Minnesota, State of Oregon, Physician 1, Physician 2, and Physician 3 (Executive Orders: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government and Protecting Children From Chemical and Surgical Mutilation)
  45. Feb. 7, 2025: Ashton Orr, Zaya Perysian, Sawyer Soe, Chastain Anderson, Drew Hall, Bella Boe, and Reid Solomon-Lan (Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government)
  46. Feb. 9, 2025: Luis Eduardo Perez Parra, Leonel Jose Rivas Gonzalez, Abraham Josue Barrios Morales, and M.R.R.Y (Presidential Memorandum: Expanding Migrant Operations Center at Naval Station Guantánamo Bay to Full Capacity)
  47. Feb. 9, 2025: National Treasury Employees Union (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  48. Feb. 9, 2025: National Treasury Employees Union (Executive action related to the dismantling of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)
  49. Feb. 10, 2025: HIAS, Church World Service, and Lutheran Community Services Northwest (​​Executive Order: Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program)
  50. Feb. 10, 2025: American Federation of Teachers, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, National Federation of Federal Employees (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  51. Feb. 10, 2025: Electronic Privacy Information Center (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  52. Feb. 10, 2025: Hampton Dellinger, special Counsel of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (Executive action related to government employment termination)
  53. Feb. 10, 2025: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Attorney General Dana Nessel on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, State of Illinois, State of Arizona, State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Colorado, State of Delaware, State of Hawai’i, State of Maine, State of Maryland, State of Minnesota, State of New Jersey, State of New York, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of North Carolina, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Washington, and State of Wisconsin (Executive Action related to the reduction in indirect cost reimbursement rate for research institutions, such as National Institutes of Health)
  54. Feb. 10, 2025: Association of American Universities, American Council on Education, Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, Brandeis University, Brown University, the Regents of the University of California, the California Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Chicago, Cornell University, the George Washington University, Johns Hopkins University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Rochester, and Trustees of Tufts College (Executive Action related to the reduction in indirect cost reimbursement rate for research institutions, such as National Institutes of Health)
  55. Feb. 10, 2025: Association of American Medical Colleges; the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy; the Association for Schools and Programs of Public Health; the Conference of Boston Teaching Hospitals, Inc.; and Greater New York Hospital Association (Executive Action related to the reduction in indirect cost reimbursement rate for research institutions, such as National Institutes of Health)
  56. Feb. 10, 2025: Jane Jones, transgender federal inmate (Executive Order: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government)
  57. Feb. 11, 2025: American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO. (Executive action related to Office of Personnel Management directive on deferred resignation offer to federal employees)
  58. ​​Feb. 11, 2025: Global Health Council; Small Business Association for International Companies; HIAS; Management Sciences for Health; Chemonics International, Inc; Dai Global, Llc; Democracy International, Inc; American Bar Association (Executive Order: Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid)
  59. Feb. 11, 2025: Mennonite Church USA; the African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church; Central Atlantic Conference United Church of Christ; the Central Conference of American Rabbis; Christian Church (Disciples of Christ); Church of the Brethren, Inc; Convención Bautista Hispana De Texas; the Episcopal Church; Fellowship Southwest; Friends General Conference; General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (U.s.a.); General Commission on Religion and Race of the United Methodist Church; Latino Christian National Network; Massachusetts Council of Churches; the New York Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church; New York State Council of Churches; North Carolina Council of Churches; the North Georgia Conference of the United Methodist Church; the Rabbinical Assembly; Reconstructing Judaism; Rhode Island State Council of Churches; Union for Reform Judaism; Unitarian Universalist Association; the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism; the Western North Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church; Wisconsin Council of Churches; Wisdom, Inc. (Executive action related to ​​immigration enforcement in places of worship)
  60. Feb. 11, 2025: Cathy Harris, chair of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Executive action related to removal of independent agency leaders) 
  61. Feb. 11, 2025: American Oversight (Executive Action related to the terminations of inspectors general)
  62. Feb. 11, 2025: Denise Nemeth-Greenleaf, Jason Judkins, Jon Michel, Donna Nemeth, and Michael Rifer, who are a group of federal employees (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  63. Feb. 12, 2025: Andrea Gribbon, Cherice Prater, Helga Hertlein, Donald Custer, Lynn Boisrond, Dennis Titko (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  64. Feb. 12, 2025: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Economic Action Maryland Fund (Executive action related to the dismantling of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)
  65. Feb. 12, 2025: Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, American Gateways, Americans for Immigrant Justice (Presidential Memorandum: Expanding Migrant Operations Center at Naval Station Guantánamo Bay to Full Capacity)
  66. Feb. 12, 2025: Robert P. Storch; Michael J. Missal; Christi A. Grimm; Cardell K. Richardson, Sr.; Sandra D. Bruce; Phyllis K. Fong; Larry D. Turner; Hannibal ‘Mike’ Ware, who served as inspectors general (Executive Action related to the terminations of inspectors general)
  67. Feb. 12, 2025: Denver Public Schools (Executive action related to ​​immigration enforcement in places of worship and schools)
  68. Feb. 12, 2025: Tirrell v. Edelblut (Executive Order: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government)
  69. Feb. 13, 2025: J. Doe 1-26 (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  70. Feb. 13, 2025: Susan Tsui Grundmann (Executive action related to removal of independent agency leaders) 
  71. Feb. 13, 2025: States of New Mexico, Arizona, Michigan, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  72. Feb. 13, 2025: Josh Shapiro, in his official capacity as governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection; Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources; Pennsylvania Department of Transportation; and Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development (Executive action related to the temporary pause of grants, loans and assistance programs)
  73. Feb. 13, 2025: New York Immigration Coalition (Executive Order: ​​Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship)
  74. Feb. 17, 2025: Center for Taxpayer Rights (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  75. Feb. 17, 2025: John Does 1-6 and Jane Does 1-5 v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (Executive Orders: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity)
  76. Feb. 18, 2025: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (​​Executive Order: Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program)
  77. Feb. 18. 2025: Personal Services Contractor Association (Executive Order: Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid)
  78. Feb. 19, 2025: Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (Executive action related to the Department of Transportation rescinding an authorization for New York’s congestion pricing plan)
  79. Feb. 19, 2025: National Urban League, National Fair Housing Alliance, Aids Foundation of Chicago (Executive Orders: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity)
  80. Feb. 19, 2025: American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO; American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO; AFGE Local 1216; and United Nurses Associations of California/union of Health Care Professionals, AFSCME, AFL-CIO (Executive action related to the termination of probationary employees within the federal government)
  81. Feb. 19, 2025: Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Alaska Wilderness League, Oceana, Inc., Sierra Club, Surfrider Foundation, Healthy Gulf, Center for Biological Diversity, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and Greenpeace, Inc. (Executive Order: Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions)
  82. Feb. 19, 2025: National TPS Alliance (Executive action related to DHS terminating Temporary Protected Status for Venezuela)
  83. Feb. 20, 2025: Casa, Inc., Make the Road New York (Executive action related to DHS terminating Temporary Protected Status for Venezuela)
  84. Feb. 20, 2025: San Francisco Aids Foundation; Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society; Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center, Inc. D/b/a San Francisco Community Health Center; Los Angeles LGBT Center; Prisma Community Care; Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center, Inc. D/b/a the LGBT Community Center; Bradbury-Sullivan LGBT Community Center; Baltimore Safe Haven Corp.; and Forge, Inc. (Executive Orders: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity)
  85. Feb. 20, 2025: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Executive action related to records retention and DOGE)
  86. Feb. 21, 2025: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Alliance for Retired Americans, American Federation of Teachers (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  87. Feb. 21, 2025: The City of New York (Executive action related to denying federal grants)
  88. Feb. 21, 2025: The Associated Press (Executive action related to denying media access to White House)
  89. Feb. 21, 2025: Project on Government Oversight, Inc.(Executive action related to records retention and DOGE)
  90. Feb. 23, 2025: City of Chelsea and City of Somerville (Executive Order: Protecting the American People Against Invasion)
  91. Feb. 24, 2025: Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Working Group (Executive action related to the Department of Agriculture removing climate change-related data from website)
  92. Feb. 24, 2025: Travis Leblanc and Edward Felten (Executive action related to removal of independent agency leaders) 
  93. Feb. 25, 2025: American Federation of Teachers, American Sociological Association, American Federation of Teachers Maryland (Executive action related to the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights’ letter banning DEI-related programs)
  94. Feb. 26, 2025: Chicago Women in Trades (Executive Orders: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity)
  95. Feb. 26, 2025: Democracy Forward Foundation (Executive action related to records retention and DOGE)
  96. Feb. 28, 2025: Democratic National Committee, DSCC, DCCC (Executive Order: Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies)
  97. Feb. 28, 2025: Democracy Forward Foundation (Executive action related to records retention and DOGE)
  98. March 1, 2025: Maiker Alejandro Espinoza Escalona (Presidential Memorandum: Expanding Migrant Operations Center at Naval Station Guantánamo Bay to Full Capacity)
  99. March 3, 2025: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, National Center for Teacher Residencies, the Maryland Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (Executive Orders: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity)
  100. March 3, 2025: Pueblo of Isleta; Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation; Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes; Ella Bowen; Kaiya Brown; Danielle Ledesma; Victor Organista; and Aiyanna Tanyan (Executive action related to Bureau of Indian Education layoffs)
  101. March 3, 2025: Environmental Defense Fund (Executive action related to records retention and DOGE)
  102. March 3, 2025: Alishea Kingdom, Solo Nichols, Jas Kapule (Executive Order: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government)
  103. March 3, 2025: Haitian-Americans United Inc.; Venezuelan Association of Massachusetts; Undocublack Network, Inc.; Sydney Doe; Marlene Doe; Gustavo Doe; and Natalia Doe (Executive action related to DHS terminating Temporary Protected Status for Venezuela)
  104. March 3, 2025: Center for Biological Diversity (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  105. March 3, 2025: Catholic Charities, Diocese of Fort Worth, Inc. (Executive action related to the temporary pause of grants, loans and assistance programs)
  106. March 3, 2025: Environmental Defense Fund (Executive action related to records retention and DOGE)
  107. March 5, 2025: National Endowment for Democracy (Executive action related to State Department funds)
  108. March 5, 2025: Japanese American Citizens League, Oca – Asian Pacific American Advocates, Sierra Club, Union of Concerned Scientists (Executive Action related to disclosure of personal and financial records to DOGE)
  109. March 4, 2025: Mary Comans (Executive action related to the disclosure of civil servant personnel records)
  110. March 6, 2025: States of Maryland, Minnesota, District of Columbia, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin (Executive action related to government employment termination)
  111. March 6, 2025: State of California; Commonwealth of Massachusetts; State of New Jersey; State of Colorado; State of Illinois; State of Maryland; State of New York; and State of Wisconsin (Executive Orders: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity)
  112. March 6, 2025: Rhode Island Latino Arts, National Queer Theater, the Theater Offensive, and Theatre Communications Group (Executive Orders: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing and Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity)
  113. March 6, 2025: Ward Brehm, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as President of the United States African Development Foundation (Executive Order: Commencing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy)
  114. March 7, 2025: Centro De Trabajadores Unidos, Immigrant Solidarity Dupage (Executive Orders: Securing Our Borders, Protecting the American People Against Invasion, and Establishing and Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’)
  115. March 9, 2025: Mahmoud Khalil (Executive action related to the detention and deportation of non-citizens)
  116. March 11, 2025: Perkins Coie LLP (Executive Order: Addressing Risks From Perkins Coie LLP)
  117. March 12, 2025: Gordon Schiff and Celeste Royce (Executive order: Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government)
  118. March 13, 2025: State of New York; Commonwealth of Massachusetts; State of Hawaiʻi; State of California; State of Arizona; State of Colorado; State of Connecticut; State of Delaware; the District of Columbia; State of Illinois; State of Maine; State of Maryland; Attorney General Dana Nessel for the People of Michigan; State of Minnesota; State of Nevada; State of New Jersey; State of Oregon; State of Rhode Island; State of Vermont; State of Washington; and State of Wisconsin (Executive action related to the dismantling of the Department of Education)
  119. March 13, 2025: American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO; American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO TSA Local 1121; Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO; and Association of Flight Attendants, CWA, AFL-CIO (Executive action related to collective bargaining)
  120. March 13, 2025: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting(Executive action related to the temporary pause of grants, loans and assistance programs)
  121. March 13, 2025: Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council; Eastern Rhode Island Conservation District; Green Infrastructure Center; and National Council of Nonprofits (Executive Order: Unleashing American Energy)
  122. March 14, 2025: Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc (Executive action related to the dismantling of the Department of Education)
  123. March 14, 2025: Democracy Forward Foundation (Executive action related to records retention and DOGE)
  124. March 15, 2025: J.G.G., G.F.F., J.G.O., W.G.H., J.A.V (Presidential proclamation: Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Regarding the Invasion of The United States by Tren De Aragua)
  125. March 17, 2025: Logan Ireland, and Nicholas Bear Bade (Executive Order: Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness)
  126. April 3, 2025: State Of California; State Of Nevada; Commonwealth Of Massachusetts; State Of Arizona; State Of Colorado; State Of Connecticut; State Of Delaware; State Of Hawai‘i; State Of Illinois; State Of Maine; State Of Maryland; People Of The State Of Michigan; State Of Minnesota; State Of New Jersey; State Of New Mexico; State Of New York; State Of Rhode Island; State Of Vermont; State Of Wisconsin (Election law reform executive order) 
  127. Emily Ley Paper, Inc. (Imposition of tariffs on China)

Amid the flurry of lawsuits against Trump and his administration, Democratic elected officials and government employees have spoken out against the orders and the Trump agenda overall. 

Democrats and government employees have also staged protests as the Department of Government Efficiency investigates various federal agencies as part of its mission to cut government overspending and weed out corruption and mismanagement of taxpayer funds. 

‘That’s not acceptable,’ House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., declared in January. ‘We are going to fight it legislatively. We are going to fight it in the courts. We’re going to fight it in the streets.’ 

‘We will see you in the court, in Congress, in the streets,’ Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., said at a rally outside the Treasury Department earlier in February. 

‘We are gonna be in your face, we are gonna be on your a–es, and we are going to make sure you understand what democracy looks like, and this ain’t it,’ Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, said at the same rally. 

Trump joined Fox News’ Bret Baier for an exclusive interview ahead of the Super Bowl on Feb. 9, where he was asked about a lawsuit filed by attorneys general to restrict DOGE and its chair, Elon Musk, from accessing the Treasury Department’s systems and a judge temporarily blocking the DOGE team from the data. 

‘Nineteen states attorneys general filed a lawsuit, and early Saturday a judge agreed with them to restrict Elon Musk and his government efficiency team, DOGE, from accessing Treasury Department payment and data systems. They said there was a risk of ‘irreparable harm.’ What do you make of that?’ Baier asked Trump in the interview clip. ‘And does that slow you down and what you want to do?’ 

Trump defends Musk

‘No, I disagree with it 100%,’ Trump said. ‘I think it’s crazy. And we have to solve the efficiency problem. We have to solve the fraud, waste, abuse, all the things that have gone into the government. You take a look at the USAID, the kind of fraud in there.’  

‘We’re talking about hundreds of millions of dollars of money that’s going to places where it shouldn’t be going,’ Trump said when asked about what DOGE has found while auditing federal agencies in search of government overspending, fraud and corruption.

This tracker will be updated with additional lawsuits as they are confirmed.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Senate rejected a proposal by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., that would have blocked the Trump administration’s planned $8.8 billion arms sale to Israel. 

Sanders’ proposal was split into two votes, each of which failed, with 15 senators voting for the measure.

Fourteen Democrats voted with Sanders. They were Sens. Richard Durbin, Ill., Martin Heinrich, N.M., Mazie Hirono, Hawaii, Ben Ray Luján, N.M., Tim Kaine, Va., Andy Kim, N.J., Ed Markey, Mass., Jeff Merkley, Ore., Chris Murphy, Conn., Brian Schatz, Hawaii, Tina Smith, Minn., Chris Van Hollen, Md., Elizabeth Warren, Mass., and Peter Welch, Vt.

Prior to the vote, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch, R-Idaho, warned that in passing the resolutions, senators ‘would abandon Israel, our closes ally in the Middle East, during a pivotal moment for global security.’

On Wednesday, Sanders released a video discussing his proposal, in which he demanded that the U.S. ‘end our complicity in these atrocities’ in Gaza. He also accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government of behaving in a ‘barbaric’ fashion, saying that humanitarian aid has been blocked from reaching Gazans.

From Jan. 19, 2025 until March 2, 2025, while the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal was in place, a total of 25,200 aid trucks entered Gaza, according to the Coordinator for Government Activities in the Territories. This included 4,200 weekly aid trucks.

Before it fell apart earlier last month, the ceasefire deal saw the release of 33 hostages and nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners. 

Israel has long enjoyed bipartisan support in the U.S., but its latest war with Hamas has divided Democrats. Some, like Sen. John Fetterman, Pa., have been fierce defenders of Israel, while others, like Sanders, have been harsh critics.

Sanders introduced a similar proposal in November 2024 during the Biden administration, which also failed. Many of the same senators who voted in favor of his April 2025 proposal voted for the resolution under the Biden administration, except for Sens. Angus King, Maine, Jeanne Shaheen, N.H. and Raphael Warnock, Ga. Fox News Digital contacted their offices to inquire about what changed between November 2024 and now. 

Shaheen’s office referred to a statement that they put out on Thursday, in which the senator explains her vote.

‘As Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I am deeply concerned by the breakdown of the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. Immediately de-escalating the conflict is crucial for delivering humanitarian aid to Palestinians, releasing the remaining hostages and preventing a regional war. With the delicate negotiations to restore the ceasefire happening right now, I voted against the Joint Resolutions of Disapproval on arms sales to Israel to encourage progress in those conversations,’ Shaheen said.

When speaking about his joint resolution of disapproval in November, Sanders claimed the Israeli government was controlled ‘not only by right-wing extremists, but by religious zealots.’ He also accused Netanyahu of violating international law. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

For decades, President Donald Trump has remained a staunch advocate for tariffs — routinely declaring the word one of the most beautiful in the dictionary and regularly accusing foreign countries of ripping off the U.S. 

Following through on 2024 campaign promises and building upon policies his first administration introduced, Trump unveiled a series of historic tariffs at the White House’s Rose Garden on Wednesday for a ‘Make America Wealthy Again’ event as part of a day his administration dubbed ‘Liberation Day’ for the U.S. 

While some lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have voiced concern over the policy, tariffs are an area where Trump’s views have remained incredibly consistent over the years, as he has routinely decried that other countries have treated the U.S. unfairly in trade deals. 

For example, Trump wrote in his 2011 book, ‘Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again!’ that he backed a solid 20% tariff on all foreign items imported into the U.S. and singled out China as a high offender. 

‘I want foreign countries to finally start forking over cash in order to have access to our markets,’ Trump wrote in the book, according to an excerpt. ‘So here’s the deal: any foreign country shipping goods into the United States pays a 20 percent tax. If they want a piece of the American market, they’re going to pay for it. No more free admission into the biggest show in town — and that especially includes China.’ 

Trump also boasted about the benefits of tariffs during his campaign in the election for his first run at president, when he outlined his trade priorities during a June 2016 Pennsylvania speech. 

‘Our original Constitution did not even have an income tax,’ Trump said at the event. ‘Instead, it had tariffs emphasizing taxation of foreign, not domestic, production. Yet today, 240 years after the Revolution, we’ve turned things completely upside down. 

‘We tax and regulate and restrict our companies to death, and then we allow foreign countries that cheat to export their goods to us tax-free,’ Trump said. ‘How stupid is this? How could it happen? How stupid is this. As a result, we have become more dependent on foreign countries than ever before. Ladies and gentlemen, it is time to declare our economic independence once again.’

Following Trump’s victory in the 2016 election, Trump moved to impose a series of tariffs on countries and various products, including 25% duties on steel and 10% duties on aluminum from most countries, and others targeting China.In response to these tariffs, China issued its own retaliatory tariffs that cost the U.S. federal government billions of dollars in government aid to farmers who suffered financial losses due to the retaliation on their agricultural exports. 

Critiques of other countries’ trade practices have continued into Trump’s second administration, and he has routinely blamed them for allegedly engaging in unfair trade practices against the U.S. 

He also argues that tariffs will help return manufacturing jobs to the U.S. As a result, he and his administration have called for employing tariffs to address the nation’s 2024 record $1.2 trillion trade deficit. 

‘For decades, our country has been looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far, both friend and foe alike,’ Trump said Wednesday. 

Earlier in 2025, the Trump administration imposed up to 25% tariffs on certain goods from Mexico and Canada, as well as a 20% tariff on shipments from China. The White House said that tariffs already imposed on Canada and Mexico will remain in place; however, new tariffs on China will be added on top of existing duties on Beijing. 

Tariffs function as a tax that governments collect on foreign goods and services that manufacturers import, and are collected while undergoing customs clearance in foreign ports, according to the International Trade Administration. 

The new tariff plan sets out a baseline duty of 10% on imports to the U.S., while customized tariffs are set for countries, like China, which have higher duties in place on American goods. 

‘If you want your tariff rate to be zero, then you build your product right here in America,’ Trump said Wednesday at the White House. 

The tariffs are slated to impact a variety of goods, including electronics like iPhones that are predominantly manufactured in China, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. They are also expected to hit goods like wine and other alcohols originating from European Union countries like Italy. 

Both parties in Congress have voiced opposition to the new tariffs and have warned that the tariffs will raise prices for American consumers.

For countries considering implementing their own tariffs against U.S. products in retaliation, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent issued a simple message: ‘Don’t.’

‘My advice to every country right now: Do not retaliate,’ Bessent said in a Wednesday interview with Fox News Wednesday. ‘If you retaliate, there will be escalation.’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

All but one Senate Republican voted on Thursday to confirm President Donald Trump’s nomination of Harmeet Dhillon to serve as an assistant attorney general.

While the 52-45 vote was almost entirely along party lines, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska, joined Democrats in voting against Dhillon’s confirmation.

Fox News Digital reached out to a Murkowski spokesperson on Friday morning to request a comment from the lawmaker, but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

Then-President-elect Donald Trump announced in December that Dhillon was his choice to serve as assistant attorney general for civil rights at the Justice Department.

‘I am pleased to nominate Harmeet K. Dhillon as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice. Throughout her career, Harmeet has stood up consistently to protect our cherished Civil Liberties, including taking on Big Tech for censoring our Free Speech, representing Christians who were prevented from praying together during COVID, and suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their workers,’ Trump declared in his Truth Social post at the time.

‘Harmeet is one of the top Election lawyers in the Country, fighting to ensure that all, and ONLY, legal votes are counted. She is a graduate of Dartmouth College and the University of Virginia Law School, and clerked in the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Harmeet is a respected member of the Sikh religious community. In her new role at the DOJ, Harmeet will be a tireless defender of our Constitutional Rights, and will enforce our Civil Rights and Election Laws FAIRLY and FIRMLY. Congratulations, Harmeet!’ he added.

Trump recently accused Murkwoski, Maine Sen. Susan Collins, and Kentucky Sens. Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell of having ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome.’

The president called out the four GOP senators ahead of a vote on a measure to scuttle his tariff policy on Canadian products. 

All four Republican senators voted for the joint resolution anyway, and it cleared the Senate with all Democrats voting in favor.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Trump administration fired National Security Agency Director Gen. Timothy Haugh and civilian Deputy Director Wendy Noble, according to a report.

The reasons for the firing remain unclear as of early Friday. They were first reported by The Washington Post on Thursday.

Haugh also served as commander of the U.S. Cyber Command – a position from which he was also dismissed. Noble was reassigned to serve in the office of the undersecretary of defense for intelligence, according to the Post.

Sen. Mark Warner and Rep. Jim Himes, top Democrats on the Senate and House intelligence committees, reacted to the alleged firings late Thursday night.

 

Himes, a ranking member on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said he is ‘deeply disturbed’ by Haugh’s dismissal. 

‘I have known General Haugh to be an honest and forthright leader who followed the law and put national security first—I fear those are precisely the qualities that could lead to his firing in this Administration,’ he said in a statement, adding an ‘immediate explanation’ is needed for this decision.

Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, described Haugh’s firing as ‘astonishing’ in a statement.

 

‘General Haugh has served our country in uniform, with honor and distinction, for more than 30 years. At a time when the United States is facing unprecedented cyber threats, as the Salt Typhoon cyberattack from China has so clearly underscored, how does firing him make Americans any safer?’ Warner said.

The senator described Haugh as a ‘nonpartisan, experienced leader’ and said it is astonishing that President Donald Trump would fire him before holding ‘any member of his team accountable for leaking classified information on a commercial messaging app.’ 

He continued, ‘even as he apparently takes staffing direction on national security from a discredited conspiracy theorist in the Oval Office.’

Warner is appearing to refer to Laura Loomer, a far-right activist who reportedly presented Trump with a list of disloyal National Security Counsel staff members who should be fired.

An undisclosed number of NSC employees were dismissed on Thursday, but Trump has said Loomer was not involved in those firings.

Fox News Digital reached out to the NSA for comment but was referred to the Office of the Secretary of Defense. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump said he wants Elon Musk to stay on his team ‘as long as possible’ during a conversation with reporters Thursday, adding DOGE had found something ‘horrible’ without divulging details.

The president made his remarks during a conversation with reporters on Air Force One after Trump was asked how much longer Musk would stay on as a ‘special government employee.’ 

The questions followed a report from Politico this week claiming Trump had told his inner circle that Musk will be leaving his role as a ‘special government employee’ with DOGE soon. The report cited internal frustrations with Musk’s ‘unpredictability’ and his potential to be a ‘political liability.’  

‘Elon is fantastic. He’s a patriot,’ Trump told reporters, adding Musk can stay at the White House ‘as long as he’d like’ and that he personally wants him to stay ‘as long as possible.’

‘I like smart people, and he’s a smart person. I also like him, personally,’ Trump added. ‘We’re in no rush. But there will be a point at which time Elon’s going to have to leave.’

‘Special government employees’ are permitted to work for the federal government for ‘no more than 130 days in a 365-day period,’ according to data from the Office of Government Ethics. Musk’s 130-day timeframe, beginning on Inauguration Day, would expire May 30.

When asked if he would consider appointing Musk to a different post to keep him around longer, Trump said that could be a possibility. 

‘I would. I think Elon’s great,’ Trump responded. ‘But he also has a company to run, or a number of companies to run.’

According to the president, ‘the secretaries’ within his cabinet will take over the work Musk has been doing with DOGE upon Musk’s exit from DOGE.

That work, Trump added, found something ‘horrible’ and ‘incredible’ today, but he would not divulge further details to reporters.

Musk’s work with DOGE officially began after President Trump signed an executive order establishing the office Jan. 20. The role of ‘special government employee’ was created in 1962 to permit the executive or legislative branch to hire temporary employees for specific short-term initiatives.

When asked for a specific date of Musk’s potential departure, the president responded that it could be as long as ‘a few months.’

‘I’d keep him as long as I can keep him,’ Trump told reporters earlier this week. ‘He’s a very talented guy. You know, I love very smart people. He’s very smart. And he’s done a good job.’

The president added on Air Force One that he envisions many of the employees working under Musk at DOGE will eventually find their way into full-time positions in various federal agencies.

Fox News’ Emma Colton contributed to this report.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Senate Republicans cleared the way on Thursday for an eventual vote on the latest version of a budget to push through several key agenda items for President Trump, including the southern border and extending his 2017 tax cuts. 

A motion to proceed was agreed to in the upper chamber just one day after Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham unveiled the Senate’s amendment to the House’s budget plan. 

The Senate agreed to the motion by a vote of 52 to 48, along party lines. The only exception was Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who voted against it. Paul has criticized the budget framework’s provision on the debt ceiling. 

The changes made by the Senate include raising the debt ceiling by up to $5 trillion and making Trump’s tax cuts permanent by using what’s known as a current policy baseline, as determined by the chairman. 

The Thursday motion kicks off roughly a day’s worth of debate, before a ‘vote-a-rama’ begins. The marathon amendment votes are expected to take place at some point on Friday afternoon or evening after debate concludes. 

During a vote-a-rama, senators are able to introduce an unlimited number of amendments, and many are expected to get floor votes. 

After the amended budget resolution passes in the Senate, which it is expected to do at some point on Saturday, the House will need to take it up again. 

This is a significant step forward for Republicans in their quest to get Trump’s priorities done through the budget reconciliation process. This key budget process lowers the vote threshold in the Senate from 60 to 51, allowing the GOP to pass things without support from their Democrat counterparts. Reconciliation is considered a key tool for the Republican trifecta in Washington to get Trump’s policies passed. 

Early on, Republicans in the House and Senate were split on how to organize the key resolution. House Republican leaders largely preferred doing one reconciliation bill that addressed both the border and tax cuts, while Senate Republicans wanted to separate the issues into two bills. 

Republicans in the lower chamber made it clear they would only accept one reconciliation bill that included border funding and tax cut extensions, as they have less room for dissent in their slim majority. 

Each chamber passed their preferred resolution, but Trump’s support for one bill on multiple occasions put the House’s strategy over the top. Senate Republicans themselves even described their resolution as a backup plan to the House’s. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump confirmed that multiple employees within the National Security Council were fired Thursday, adding to National Security Advisor Mike Waltz’s recent political woes that have snowballed since Democrats first slammed him over March’s Signal chat leak. 

‘Always, we’re going to let go of people we don’t like, or people we don’t think can do the job, or people who may have loyalties to somebody else,’ Trump said from Air Force One when asked about reports on the NSC firings. 

Trump confirmed that NSC members had been fired, but remarked it was not many individuals. 

Trump added that he continues to trust his NSC team, remarking that they’ve ‘done very well’ and ‘had big success with the Houthis.’  

Waltz, who previously served as a Florida congressman and as a decorated combat Green Beret, has come under fire from Democrats and critics since March, when the Atlantic magazine’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg published a firsthand account of getting added to a Signal group chat with top national security leaders, including Waltz, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, while they discussed strikes against Yemen terrorists. Trump and his administration have repeatedly defended the national security leader amid criticisms over the chat leak.  

Signal is an encrypted messaging app that operates similarly to texting or making phone calls, but with additional security measures that help ensure communications are kept private to those included in the correspondence. 

The Atlantic’s report characterized the Trump administration as texting ‘war plans’ regarding a planned strike on Houthi rebels in Yemen. The Trump administration has maintained, however, that no classified material was transmitted in the chat, with Trump repeatedly defending Waltz amid the fallout. 

‘As the president has made it very clear, Mike Waltz continues to be an important part of his national security team,’ Trump administration press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the media in brief remarks outside of the White House’s press room Monday afternoon. ‘And this case has been closed here at the White House, as far as we are concerned.’ 

‘There have been steps made to ensure that something like that can obviously never happen again,’ she continued. ‘And we’re moving forward. And the president and Mike Waltz and his entire national security team have been working together very well, if you look at how much safer the United States of America is because of the leadership of this team.’ 

Fox News Digital has compiled a timeline of accusations and outrage directed at and involving Waltz since the Atlantic’s first report on the chat leak. 

  • March 24: The Atlantic publishes a report that Goldberg was added to a Signal chat that claimed national security leaders were discussing ‘war plans’ with one another.
  • March 25: Trump tells NBC News he believes a staffer in Waltz’s office was behind mistakenly adding the Atlantic’s editor-in-chief to the group chat.
  • March 25: Democratic outrage over the Atlantic article mounts, including Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, calling on Waltz and Hegseth to resign.
  • March 25: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe join an annual Senate Intelligence Committee hearing and report no classified material was shared in the chat and that the Signal chat was ‘lawful.’
  • March 25: Waltz joins Fox News and takes ‘full responsibility’ for the Signal chat leak. Waltz added that he ‘100 percent’ did not personally know Goldberg before the Signal debacle.’I take full responsibility. I built the group,’ Waltz said on ‘The Ingraham Angle’ March 25. ‘It’s embarrassing. We’re going to get to the bottom of it.’
  • ‘I take full responsibility. I built the group,’ Waltz said on ‘The Ingraham Angle’ March 25. ‘It’s embarrassing. We’re going to get to the bottom of it.’
  • March 26: Politico reports anonymous sources found Trump was irritated with Waltz over the leak, while the president publicly defended Waltz as ‘a very good man.’
  • March 26: The Atlantic publishes a follow-up story that included direct texts from the Signal chat, but notably did not include the phrase ‘war plans’ in its headline, instead characterizing the texts as ‘attack plans.’
  • March 26: Administration officials slam the Atlantic’s follow-up story as exposing a ‘hoax’ against Trump. Waltz also doubled-down that the Signal messages published in the Atlantic article did not include, ‘locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS.’
  • March 26: Leavitt says Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency team would help investigate the Signal leak.
  • March 28: Politico reports Trump did not want to fire Waltz and ‘give the press a scalp,’ according to anonymous sources reportedly familiar with private discussions.
  • March 30: Goldberg joins NBC News’ Kristen Welker and says Waltz’s claims the two had never met or spoken are ‘simply not true.’
  • March 31: Leavitt declares Signal case is ‘closed,’ reiterating that ‘Mike Waltz continues to be an important part of his national security team.’
  • April 1: Washington Post reports Waltz and National Security Counsel staff used Gmail to conduct government business. NSC spokesman Brian Hughes pushed back on the Washington Post report in a comment provided to Fox Digital Thursday:’This is the latest attempt to distract the American people from President Trump’s successful national security agenda that’s protecting our nation. Let me reiterate, NSA Waltz received emails and calendar invites from legacy contacts on his personal email and cc’d government accounts for anything since January 20th to ensure compliance with records retention, and he has never sent classified material over his personal email account or any unsecured platform.’
  • ‘This is the latest attempt to distract the American people from President Trump’s successful national security agenda that’s protecting our nation. Let me reiterate, NSA Waltz received emails and calendar invites from legacy contacts on his personal email and cc’d government accounts for anything since January 20th to ensure compliance with records retention, and he has never sent classified material over his personal email account or any unsecured platform.’
  • April 1: House Oversight Democrats open investigation into Waltz’s use of Gmail.
  • April 2: Politico reports Waltz’s office set up at least 20 different Signal group chats to coordinate with other officials. NSC pushes back that Signal is allowed on government devices and is an app used by both the Biden and Trump administrations:’Signal is an approved, encrypted messaging app and any claim NSC officials sending classified information over these channels is false. It can be used for unclassified messaging and a user has the responsibility to preserve any official record created,’ Hughes said in Thursday comment provided to Fox Digital. ‘Some in NSC, like those in the media and many areas across the federal government, use the Signal app. There are federal agencies that automatically install the app on government devices, as was testified to in congressional hearings last week. Using Signal to send unclassified information is appropriate and these same facts have been reported multiple times in the last few days. All communications are a reflection of a thoughtful dialog of those committed to the effective implementation of the President’s agenda.’
  • ‘Signal is an approved, encrypted messaging app and any claim NSC officials sending classified information over these channels is false. It can be used for unclassified messaging and a user has the responsibility to preserve any official record created,’ Hughes said in Thursday comment provided to Fox Digital. ‘Some in NSC, like those in the media and many areas across the federal government, use the Signal app. There are federal agencies that automatically install the app on government devices, as was testified to in congressional hearings last week. Using Signal to send unclassified information is appropriate and these same facts have been reported multiple times in the last few days. All communications are a reflection of a thoughtful dialog of those committed to the effective implementation of the President’s agenda.’
  • April 3: The New York Times reports far-right activist Laura Loomer reportedly presented Trump with a list of National Security Counsel staff who have been disloyal and should be fired.
  • April 3: Trump confirms some members at NSC have been fired. He told the media that Loomer was not involved with the firings of the NSC members on Thursday.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on the matter, but did not immediately receive a reply. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Two senior lawmakers have introduced a bipartisan bill that would reassert Congress’ powers over U.S. tariffs, a day after President Donald Trump announced a new wide-ranging tariff strategy during his ‘Liberation Day’ speech on Wednesday.

Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., on Thursday introduced the Trade Review Act of 2025, which would require the president to notify Congress about any new tariffs within 48 hours of imposition. 

The bill also requires that Trump provide an explanation of the rationale along with an analysis of the tariffs’ potential impact on the U.S. economy. Congress would have to approve the new tariffs within 60 days or allow them to expire.

If enacted, the bill would shift certain trade policymaking powers from the executive branch to the Congress. 

‘For too long, Congress has delegated its clear authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce to the executive branch,’ Grassley, a Trump ally who is skeptical of tariffs, said in a statement. 

‘Building on my previous efforts as Finance Committee Chairman, I’m joining Senator Cantwell to introduce the bipartisan Trade Review Act of 2025 to reassert Congress’ constitutional role and ensure Congress has a voice in trade policy,’ he continued.

Cantwell said in a statement that Trump’s tariffs would hurt sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing and technology and have reverberating effects on consumers.

‘Ultimately, consumers will pay the price,’ Cantwell said in a statement. ‘It’s time for Congress to take action to counter the president’s trade war.’

Grassley’s home state of Iowa heavily relies on farm crop exports, while Cantwell’s Washington state is home to many export-heavy companies such as Boeing.

Trump on Thursday compared the tariffs to a medical operation, and said the ‘patient lived, and is healing.’ ‘The prognosis is that the patient will be far stronger, bigger, better, and more resilient than ever before,’ he wrote on Truth Social.

Thursday’s bill was introduced after four Republican senators joined Democrats in approving a separate resolution on Wednesday that would repeal Trump’s emergency declaration levying tariffs on Canadian imports. Grassley was not one of the Republican defectors. The resolution is likely dead on arrival in the House.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS