Semiconductors are at a crossroads, with innovation fueling growth and tariffs threatening profits.  How might you navigate this potentially volatile landscape and identify opportunities without getting burned?

In 2025, analysts predict AI will drive explosive demand in the semiconductor industry, fueling innovation and revenue growth. At the same time, this optimism is tempered by the new administration’s tariff policies, which threaten to disrupt global supply chains, increase costs, and reshape the competitive landscape for chipmakers.

This tug-of-war between bullish and bearish forecasts is best exemplified by the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) price action, a reliable proxy for the semiconductor industry. Here’s a weekly chart.

FIGURE 1. WEEKLY CHART OF SMH. Congestion narrowing within a wider trading range may indicate that bulls and bears are in temporary equilibrium, with neither buyers nor sellers showing enough conviction to drive a decisive breakout or breakdown. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

There’s a narrowing, range-bound movement between its all-time high near $283 and the swing low of $280 (see blue dotted lines). The increasingly tight congestion range over the last three months, as highlighted by the magenta rectangle, suggests increased indecision among bulls and bears. Despite the temporary standstill, semiconductor stocks are outperforming their tech sector peers (see price performance against XLK) by only 29% and the S&P 500 by 51%.

While AI chip demand will likely see significant growth in the future, the effects of tariffs and reshoring may bring sharp and near-term pain to most chipmakers, particularly semiconductor companies that are most reliant on Asian production. Domestic chipmakers with minimal reliance on overseas manufacturing may fare better under these conditions.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at SMH’s top three holdings—NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM), and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)—all of which play a leading role in AI chip development, but have different levels of reliance in the global chip supply chain.

FIGURE 2. PERFCHARTS COMPARING SMH AGAINST ITS TOP THREE HOLDINGS. Note the late jump in AVGO. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

All three of SMH’s top holdings are outperforming their industry peers with NVDA on top, TSM second, and AVGO third. Understanding that late jump in AVGO might require some context (which we’ll get into later).

• NVDA is the world’s AI chip leader.
• TSM, is the world’s top chip foundry, and main producer of NVDA’s GPUs.
• AVGO is a diversified supplier of data center components which are the backbone of AI infrastructure. Unlike NVDA, its business model is less exposed to reshoring effects.

NVIDIA (NVDA): The AI Semiconductor Leader

Take a look at the rounding top pattern on the daily chart.

FIGURE 3. DAILY CHART OF NVDA. Rounding tops are bearish, but tend to break higher more than 50% of the time. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

According to Thomas Bulkowski’s Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns, while rounding tops are typically viewed as bearish, more than half the time they break upwards, challenging that assumption. In many cases, the rim on the right is higher than the one on the left. In the case above, the rim is formed by a price bounce off the 100-day simple moving average (SMA). 

Both the 100-day and 200-day SMAs are likely to act as strong support unless there is a significant change in the chipmaker’s fundamentals. While NVDA’s uptrend remains intact, momentum seems to be weakening as suggested by the decline in the money flow index (MFI). Keep an eye on this development, especially if it breaks below the 100-day SMA and bounces off the 200-day SMA.

Next, let’s take a look at NVDA’s main chip foundry: TSM.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM): The Foundry

TSM’s daily chart doesn’t look too different from NVDA’s. Remember, TSM is NVDA’s main chip foundry, and so NVDA is highly dependent on TSM (rather than the other way around).

FIGURE 4. DAILY CHART OF TSM. The stock’s price is chugging along with plenty of support. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

You can see the difference between the stock’s volatile rise in price against a gradual decline in the RSI. TSM’s recent price action over the last three months has succumbed to this drop in bullish momentum. 

The stock is reacting strongly to the 100-day and 200-day SMAs, suggesting a high likelihood of bouncing off these levels again should price continue to decline from the current levels.

Broadcom (AVGO): A More Diversified AI and Semiconductor  Play

Broadcom also uses TSM’s foundry services, but it has a few other foundries in Asia and Europe. Because of its wide range of products and its focus on data centers, AVGO is more diversified and less exposed to the same supply chain risks as NVDA. Perhaps this (plus the company’s optimistic 2025 revenue projection) is why its shares have recently outperformed the other two companies above, hitting an all-time high in late December. 

Let’s take a look at AVGO’s daily chart.

FIGURE 5. DAILY CHART OF AVGO. The December gap followed strong company guidance. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

AVGO’s uptrend going back to November 2023 runs a similar course to NVDA and TSM. Its uptrend experienced some moments of volatility yet remained relatively sold. Its price fluctuations also reacted strongly to both the 100-day and 200-day SMAs, finding support with both.

However, unlike our previous examples, momentum as measured by the RSI appears steady and somewhat cyclical. To get a clearer view of momentum with volume, I added the On Balance Volume (OBV) with a 50-day SMA overlay which shows that buying pressure has steadily been increasing, fueling AVGO’s ascent, and culminating in the bullish jump in December.

Whether or not price falls to fill the gap, you might wait for RSI to dip below the 50-line to better time an entry if you’re looking to go long.

At the Close

The semiconductor industry faces a dynamic and uncertain 2025, with AI demand poised to spur growth while tariff talks threaten to reshape global supply chains and profit margins. Keeping an eye on SMH and monitoring its top holdings—NVDA, TSM, and AVGO—for shifts in momentum and action at key levels is critical if you’re looking to time your trades in this promising space. 

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

Nearly all of our charts currently show deeply oversold conditions. While this is usually a good thing, in a market downturn, it isn’t necessarily your friend. As you can guess, we believe that Wednesday’s big decline was the beginning of something more serious. But the question is, “what about oversold conditions?”

One of the Bear Market Rules that we have is this:

Oversold conditions in a bear market — “thin ice”, no solid foundation for price bounces. Bounces can be bull traps.

Now for certain, we aren’t in a bear market (yet), but we have experienced a serious decline that could lead to more. We are certainly susceptible to a bull trap. How oversold are our indicators? Here are the numbers as of the close on Thursday:

The Swenlin Trading Oscillators have reached deeply oversold territory. However, we wouldn’t get overly excited by an upside reversal. Oscillators must oscillate and they want to be on the zero line. Notice that only 7% have price above their 20-day EMA and a mere 5% of stocks have rising momentum!

The ITBM and ITVM are also oversold. They haven’t hit extremes and could accommodate more downside at this juncture. The big problem on this chart is the very few PMO BUY Signals left in the index.

Finally our Bias chart shows the oversold conditions of %Stocks > 20/50EMAs. %Stocks > 200EMA could definitely see more downside as could the Golden Cross and Silver Cross Indexes. Both of those indexes are below their signal line giving us a BEARISH Bias in the intermediate and long terms.

Conclusion: Oversold conditions are welcome in a bull market or bull market move. The market is still near all-time highs and mega-caps could continue to hold things together, but our thought is that these weak internals are coming home to roost. If not now, then January. Watch out for bull traps!

The DP Alert: Your First Stop to a Great Trade!

Before you trade any stock or ETF, you need to know the trend and condition of the market. The DP Alert gives you all you need to know with an executive summary of the market’s current trend and condition. It not only covers the market! We look at Bitcoin, Yields, Bonds, Gold, the Dollar, Gold Miners and Crude Oil! Only $50/month! Or, use our free trial to try it out for two weeks using coupon code: DPTRIAL2. Click HERE to subscribe NOW!

Learn more about DecisionPoint.com:

Watch the latest episode of the DecisionPointTrading Room on DP’s YouTube channel here!

Try us out for two weeks with a trial subscription!

Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 Subscribe HERE!

Technical Analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. –Carl Swenlin

(c) Copyright 2024 DecisionPoint.com

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

DecisionPoint is not a registered investment advisor. Investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. DecisionPoint newsletters, blogs or website materials should NOT be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to take any specific action.

Helpful DecisionPoint Links:

Trend Models

Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO)

On Balance Volume

Swenlin Trading Oscillators (STO-B and STO-V)

ITBM and ITVM

SCTR Ranking

Bear Market Rules

SPY and QQQ remain in long-term uptrends, but three big negatives are currently hanging over the stock market. Two negatives are tied to important cyclical groups and the third is reminiscent of summer 2022. The semiconductor business is cyclical and the Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) is one of the weakest industry group ETFs. Housing is an important part of the domestic economy and the Home Construction ETF (ITB) broke down. On top of this, the 10-yr Treasury Yield is breaking out and appears headed back to 5%, just as it did in summer 2022. The charts below tell the story.  

The Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) remains in a long-term downtrend. The chart below shows SOXX breaking down in July, forming a rising wedge into October and breaking wedge support at the end of October. Notice how this wedge retraced around 61.8% of the July decline and met resistance near the July support break. This advance was a counter-trend bounce and the wedge break signals a continuation lower. This is negative for semis, and by extension, the Technology sector and QQQ.

We recently covered weakening breadth and oversold conditions in two breadth indicators. These indicators could remain oversold. As such, we are setting bullish thresholds to distinguish between a robust bounce and a dead cat bounce. Click here to take a trial to Chart Trader and get two bonus reports!

The Home Construction ETF (ITB) failed to hold its late November breakout and reversed its long-term uptrend this month. ITB surged in November with a momentum thrust, similar to the July breakout. The July breakout held and ITB hit new highs in mid October. The November breakout, in contrast, failed as the ETF broke support and the 200-day SMA in December. ITB is in a long-term downtrend, which is negative for housing, and by extension, the Consumer Discretionary sector and the broader market.  

The 10-yr Treasury Yield is on the rise as it broke out of a 13 month falling channel, which was in place since November 2023. This breakout targets a move toward the October 2023 high around 5%. The chart below shows the falling channel extending from October 2023 to December 2024. TNX hit the upper line in late November and fell rather sharply into early December. The yield firmed in the 41-42 area (4.1%-4.2%) as a falling flag took shape. TNX broke out of the flag on December 11th and followed through with a channel breakout this week. This move reverses the long-term downtrend and argues for a higher 10-yr Treasury Yield. Much like summer 2022, this could weigh on stocks.

Even though SPY and QQQ are still in long-term uptrends, this negative trifecta will likely weigh on the market. Small-caps and mid-caps were slammed this week and breadth has been deteriorating for a few weeks. Our breadth models at TrendInvestorPro have yet to signal a bear market, but we will watch them closely in the coming days and weeks.

Click here to take a trial to Chart Trader and get two bonus reports!

//////////////////////////////////////////////

When running my StockCharts Technical Rank (SCTR) scan on Thursday, I was a little surprised to find that 75 exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and large-cap stocks made the cut, especially after Wednesday’s selloff. It was a little ray of hope.

A quick sweep of the list didn’t reveal a particular sector or asset class to be dominant. The stocks and ETFs represented a broad segment of the stock market.

After going through the list, one security that caught my eye was the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), which closely follows the S&P 500 ($SPX). After the 2.98% drop in the S&P 500 on Wednesday, is SPY still technically strong? Let’s look at the daily SPY chart (see below).

FIGURE 1. DAILY CHART OF SPY ETF. The last two bars in the chart show that SPY is wavering. It’s not breaking below the mid-November lows, yet it doesn’t seem to want to move higher. It is trading below its 50-day moving average, the RSI is indicating slowing momentum, and the S&P 500 Bullish Percent Index is below 50. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Since mid-August, the SCTR (pronounced s-c-o-o-t-e-r) score has been hovering between the 70 and 90 levels. It’s now almost at 80. On Thursday, the ETF’s price closed at around the same level as Wednesday’s and is below its 50-day simple moving average (SMA). The relative strength index (RSI) is getting close to its oversold level.

The bottom line is that even though the SPY has a SCTR score of 79, and it hasn’t broken below the mid-November low, the RSI indicates momentum is weak, and the S&P 500 Bullish Percent Index ($BPSPX) is at around 41%, i.e., leaning toward bearishness. 

So, after a selloff like we just had, does it make sense to consider adding long SPY positions at this level? At the moment, the SPY is acting indecisive, but at some point, it’ll have to make a directional up or down move. A reversal with strong follow-through would be a signal to go long. The indicators displayed in the chart of SPY should support the reversal. If, on the other hand, SPY breaks below the mid-November low and the SCTR score falls below the 76 threshold, it would be a signal to unwind some positions. 

This is one chart to monitor as we wind down the year. We’ll see if Santa comes through next week!

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The Yield Curve

The RRG above shows the rotations of the various maturities on the US-Yield Curve.

What we see at the moment is that the shorter maturities like BIL, SHY, and IEI are in relative uptrends against GOVT which means that the accompanying yields are being pushed lower.

The longer maturities, all inside the lagging quadrant, are in opposite moves and their yields are being pushed higher.

The result of such a rotation is a so-called “steepening” of the yield curve.

This chart shows the 10-2 yield curve. 10-year yield minus 2-year yield. In a normal situation, longer-dated maturities carry a higher yield than shorter-dated maturities. For almost 2.5 years this was not the case in the US. The negative values in the chart above indicate an “inverted” yield curve. This has happened a few times in the past but it is considered non-normal.

The recent rise of the 10-2 difference above 0 indicates a return to normal for the US yield curve.

Another way of showing the move of the yield curve is by using the Dynamic Yield Curve tool on the site. Here are three snapshots of the YC move since mid-2022.

This visualization shows the love of the entire curve. It not only shows the steepening vs flattening move but also the rise of the total curve of around 2% from just above 2% to over 4.5% currently.

The Relative Rotation Graph showing the rotations of the various maturities will help investors to keep track of the steepening/flattening move.

The US Dollar

The RRG for the G10 currencies, using the USD as the benchmark, shows a picture that could not be more clear.

The USD is the strongest currency at the moment.

All currencies in this group are, moving further, inside the lagging quadrant, indicating downtrends against the USD which is the center of the RRG.

This is a pretty massive move showing the strength of the USD against all other currencies.

On the EUR/USD chart, we can see a test of a major support level of around 1.03.

Once that support breaks, the way down is wide open towards the 0.96 area where the market bottomed out in 2022.

On the flip side. When support holds and EUR/USD can take out 1.06 we will have a completed double bottom targeting the upper boundary of the current range.

Looking at the $USD index chart, which is the USD expressed against a basket of currencies, we see that an upward break has already taken place. Taking this as a lead suggests that the odds are tilted in favor of a downward break in EUR/USD.

Sectors and SPY

Despite the big drop earlier this week, the sector rotation on the weekly RRG has not drastically changed (yet). So far the strength for XLC and XLY remains present. Only XLF has rolled over but remains inside the leading quadrant.

A similar observation can be made on the daily version of this chart.

On the weekly chart of SPY, the price has dropped back to a double support area around 585 where the rising support line meets horizontal support coming off the October high.

So far this all remains within “normal behavior” for an uptrend.

When SPY breaks that double support level and leaves the channel a re-assessment of the situation is needed.

#StayAlert and have a great weekend — Julius

Uncertainty in the stock market makes it difficult to make investment decisions. When investors sell off stocks, everyone follows without giving it much thought and you’re left trying to figure out which path you should take. We saw this price action in the stock market on Wednesday after the Federal Open Market Committee cut interest rates by a quarter percentage point. Investors started to sell their holdings, which intensified toward the last few minutes of the trading day. 

The rate cut didn’t come as a surprise. The market had already priced it in. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s comments about slowing down rate cuts for the next two years led to the massive selloff. Inflationary concerns were one reason which may have heightened investor fear. The S&P 500 ($SPX) fell by 2.95%, and the Nasdaq Composite ($COMPQ) dropped by 3.56%. The S&P 600 Small Cap Index ($SML) got hit hard, falling over 4%.

It wasn’t just equities that sold off. Gold prices fell. Silver prices fell. Bond prices fell. Even cryptocurrencies felt the pain. 

So, how damaging was the selloff? Let’s dive into the charts of the broader stock market indexes. 

Equities Hammered Hard

Whenever there’s such a significant fall in equities, it’s natural to think about buying the dip. But before you jump into anything, it’s best to see if the uptrend is still in play. 

From its August low, the S&P 500 has been in an upward trend with a few pullbacks, the deepest one being in early September when it almost reached its 100-day simple moving average or SMA (see chart below). On Wednesday, the index closed below its 50-day SMA toward the low of the day. The daily chart below shows market breadth is declining. 

FIGURE 1. DAILY CHART OF THE S&P 500 INDEX WITH BREADTH INDICATORS. The index is close to hitting its late November lows, a key support level. If it breaks below that level and market breadth indicators continue to weaken, it could be a bearish signal. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

The NYSE Advance-Decline Line (!ADLINENYC), the percent of S&P 500 stocks trading above their 200-day moving average ($SPXA200R), and the S&P 500 Bullish Percent Index ($BPSPX) are all trending lower. That the $BPSPX is below 50 shows that bearish pressure is dominant, which is concerning. 

The weekly chart is more optimistic in that the S&P 500 is still trending higher and above its 21-week exponential moving average (EMA). All the moving averages on the chart are trending higher. Watch the November lows carefully (blue dashed line). A close below this level would mean a break in the “higher highs, higher lows” trend. 

FIGURE 2. WEEKLY CHART OF S&P 500 INDEX. All moving averages overlaid on the chart are trending higher. The S&P 500 is trading above its 21-day EMA. A break below the EMA would be the first signal of a reversal of a bull market. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

The takeaway: If the $BPSPX continues to decline and the S&P 500 falls below its November low and 21-week EMA, consider offloading partial positions. 

The Nasdaq Composite has a similar pattern in its chart, although it’s still above its 50-day SMA (see chart below). However, what is concerning about the daily chart of the Nasdaq is that it closed at its November high. A break below this level would break the series of higher highs and higher lows. So watch this level carefully.

FIGURE 3. DAILY CHART OF NASDAQ COMPOSITE WITH MARKET BREADTH INDICATORS. The Nasdaq has reached its November high. Market breadth indicators are weakening. Keep an eye on this chart. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

The NASDAQ Advance-Decline Line (!ADLINENAS), the percent of Nasdaq stocks trading above their 200-day moving average is at 54% and trending lower, and the Nasdaq Bullish Percent Index ($BPCOMPQ) are all trending lower with the $BPCOMPQ at 50. If you pull up the weekly chart by changing the Period dropdown menu to weekly and using a five-year range, the trend is still bullish, similar to the weekly chart of the S&P 500.

Fear Gauge Is Running Hot

The rise in fear can be seen in the action in the Cboe Volatility Index ($VIX) which closed at 27.62, a 74.04% increase. The chart of the S&P 500 vs. the VIX below shows how big of a move it experienced on Wednesday. 

FIGURE 4. S&P 500 VS. THE CBOE VOLATILITY INDEX ($VIX). Spikes in the VIX are accompanied by a pullback in the S&P 500. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes. A spike of such a magnitude occurred in early August, which is when the S&P 500 pulled back and resumed a very optimistic uptrend. 

Despite the spike in the VIX, investors weren’t flocking to “risk-off” investments. Gold and silver prices fell as did cryptocurrency prices. Treasury yields rose with the 10-year yield at 4.494% and the US dollar surged against other major currencies, especially the euro. 

The Bottom Line

Now that the last FOMC meeting for the year is behind us, there’s not much remaining in terms of economic data except the November Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) on Friday. There’s also the Santa Claus Rally to look forward to. So if Wednesday’s chaotic price action is an opportunity to buy the dip, i.e., if the indexes reverse without falling past critical support levels, you could make some end-of-year trades that could turn profitable as we head into the new year.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

While the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 have been holding steady into this week’s Fed meeting, warning signs under the hood have suggested one of two things is likely to happen going into Q1.  Either a leadership rotation is amiss, with mega cap growth stocks potentially taking a back seat to other sectors, or a risk-off rotation is coming where investors rotate to defensive positions.

A quick review of the Bullish Percent Indexes can help us review how the resilience of the markets can be attributed to the continued strength of the Magnificent 7 and related names.  Today we’ll compare breadth conditions for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, and update some key levels to watch into year-end and beyond.

The S&P 500 Bullish Percent Index is a breadth indicator driven by point and figure charts.  This data series basically reviews 500 point & figure charts and shows what percent of the stocks have most recently generated a buy signal.  I’ve found the Bullish Percent indexes to be most valuable around major market tops, because a downturn in a breadth indicator such as this can only happen if lots of stocks are pulling back in a fairly significant fashion.

Here we’re showing the S&P 500 index for the last 12 months along with the Bullish Percent Index for the S&P 500 as well as the BPI for the Nasdaq 100.  Note that toward the end of September, the S&P 500’s BPI was around 80% while the Nasdaq’s was around 70%.  

Going into this week, the S&P 500’s BPI had pushed down to around 60%, while the Nasdaq 100’s BPI was still around that 70% level.  This change of character is due to the fact that large cap growth stocks have remained largely constructive, while some of the most important breakdowns we’ve witnessed in recent weeks have been in more value-oriented sectors.

This divergence between the two Bullish Percent Indexes tells us that the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 have not remained strong because of broad support from a variety of sectors, but more because of concentrated support from a limited number of growth sectors like technology.

As the market is reeling this week in reaction to the Fed’s expectations for further rate cuts into early 2025, we can see that both of the Bullish Percent Indexes have now pushed below the 50% level for the first time since the August market correction.  This means we need to focus on a key “line in the sand” for the S&P 500 and to attempt to better define market conditions.

The SPX 5850 level has been the most important support level in my work, based on the fact that a break below that key pivot point would mean the S&P 500 has made a lower low.  We haven’t seen that sort of short-term weakness since the August pullback.  While the initial downturn post-Fed has pushed the SPX down toward the 5850 level, we would need to see a confirmed break below that point to unlock potential further downside targets.

Our latest video on StockCharts TV breaks down the Bullish Percent Index chart above, along with four key stocks reporting earnings this week.  While those charts will all most likely be affected by this week’s Fed announcement, earnings still matter!  I will be watching important levels of support in all four of those names, and I’d encourage you to leverage the alert capabilities on StockCharts to ensure you don’t miss the next big move!

RR#6,

Dave

PS- Ready to upgrade your investment process?  Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

President and Chief Strategist

Sierra Alpha Research LLC

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice.  The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.  

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication.    Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.