Author

admin

Browsing

Humanoid robotics is rapidly advancing.

Driven by the convergence of technological innovations, evolving labor market demands and growing investor interest, the humanoid robotics industry is expanding at a rapid rate. A handful of humanoid robotics companies have announced initial public offerings in 2025, such as China’s Unitree and Singapore’s Otsaw, with more predicted in 2026.

Ark Invest CEO, Cathie Wood, said in October 2025 that humanoid robots “will be the biggest of all” AI opportunities, highlighting their transformative potential in transportation, healthcare and productivity enhancement

Samimi shared the impact AI integration has had on the robotics industry, challenges such as labor shortages and supply chain disruptions and how the firm evaluates opportunities within this nascent yet promising market.

Key trends in humanoid robotics

According to Samimi, recent trends in robotics include enhanced automation in the industrial and logistics sectors. “We’re seeing a lot of new trends on foundation models and control stacks within the robotic sector, as well as new sorts of electronic assemblies to put all of these components together,” he explained, citing companies like BMW (OTCPINK:BMWKY), Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN)and Mercedes (OTCPPINK:MBGAF) as current adopters of humanoid robots in factories and warehouses.

Additionally, Samimi highlights that recent battery advances have improved energy density, enabling longer robot operation for industrial and logistics tasks. Meanwhile, lighter, more efficient actuators enhance precision and energy use, supporting dynamic interaction and human collaboration.

Finally, advances in robotics control systems are powered by cutting-edge AI algorithms. Platforms like RideScan, a Humanoid Global portfolio company, harness continuous, independent AI-driven monitoring, risk scoring and anomaly detection to optimize robot performance. The company recently filed a patent in the UK for its core AI technology

Samimi added that safety and reliability remain critical focal points amid these technological advances. Advances in algorithms, machine learning and operational intelligence systems are enabling comprehensive, scalable safety and maintenance solutions for robots deployed across different facilities, supported by digital twin technologies and a closed-loop data cycle for continuous improvement.

Addressing labor shortages

Labor shortages and constrained supply chains are accelerating innovation by prompting industrial sectors to adopt robotics to augment limited labor resources.

The 2025 MHI Annual Industry Report confirms robotics is thriving amid labor shortages and rising complexity in logistics and manufacturing. What’s more, during the US-Saudi Investment Forum, Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk made a bold prediction about the long-term effects of robotics and AI: work would become optional, and money would be obsolete.

“I don’t know what long term is, maybe it’s 10, 20 years or something like that,” Musk said, adding that there was still alot of work to be done before society gets to that point.

In the meantime, the labor workforce will likely see more human-robot collaboration. Samimi said he has observed that humanoid robots and collaborative robots (cobots) are increasingly taking over repetitive manual tasks.

“Human labor now shifts to more, higher-value tasks, rather than moving a warehouse box or a palette from A to B. So we’re seeing somewhat of a shift (that’s) helping make labor more scalable and more productive, and really less dependent on that shrinking labor pool,” he said.

Resource-heavy and industrial sectors present significant opportunities for robotics adoption, especially amid a limited labor pool. Areas like agriculture, mining, pharmaceuticals and lumber industries stand to benefit from automation and upskilling through robotics.

Investment thesis and portfolio evaluation

Humanoid Global views its role not only as an investor but as an ecosystem builder, actively fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing across its portfolio companies. By strategically connecting early-stage innovators with mature industry players, Humanoid Global seeks to accelerate the global deployment and scale of humanoid robotics technologies.

The firm emphasizes balancing risk across a portfolio that includes both disruptive technology developers and companies closer to full commercial deployment, allowing for diversified exposure while driving integrated growth.

Companies are evaluated with a strong prioritization of teams with proven execution capabilities and sustainable technological moats such as proprietary IP or unique data networks. Scalability and clear go-to-market strategies are equally important, as is a strong safety architecture embedded in the technology.

This approach highlights the importance of strategic relationships, market education and risk-managed growth in realizing the transformative potential of humanoid robotics.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Here’s a quick recap of the crypto landscape for Monday (December 1) as of 9:00 a.m. UTC.

Get the latest insights on Bitcoin, Ether and altcoins, along with a round-up of key cryptocurrency market news.

Bitcoin and Ether price update

Bitcoin (BTC) was priced at US$86,828.87, down by 5.2 percent over 24 hours.

Bitcoin price performance, December 1, 2025.

Bitcoin price performance, December 1, 2025.

Chart via TradingView

After a brief resurgence last week that saw prices break past the US$90,000 barrier, Bitcoin has come crashing back down post-Thanksgiving.

Bitcoin saw a 5 percent overall slide, which pushed prices near last month’s eight-month low of US$80,553.

The decline follows a difficult November, when Bitcoin shed more than US$18,000 and posted record outflows from U.S. bitcoin exchange-traded funds. CME futures pricing also reflected the shift in sentiment, with three-month Bitcoin contracts trading at their smallest premium to near-dated futures in at least a year.

Other major cryptocurrencies weakened as well. Ether fell nearly 6 percent to around US$2,840 after losing about 22 percent in November, its worst monthly performance since February’s 32 percent decline.

Since reaching a record market size of about US$4.3 trillion, the broader crypto sector has lost more than US$1 trillion in value,

After the recent steep decline, Ether (ETH) was currently priced at US$2,838.35, similarly down by 5.2 percent over 24 hours.

Altcoin price update

  • XRP (XRP) was priced at US$2.06, down by 7.1 percent over 24 hours.
  • Solana (SOL) was trading at US$127.65, down by 6.9 percent over 24 hours.

Today’s crypto news to know

Bitcoin’s weekend slide wipes out US$637M in leveraged positions

Bitcoin’s latest downturn over the weekend triggered a wave of liquidations that erased roughly US$637 million across futures markets.

The selloff pushed Bitcoin to an intraday low near US$85,700, extending its monthly decline past 21 percent and dragging Ethereum, XRP, and other majors sharply lower. The slump began as momentum-driven selling forced heavily leveraged longs to unwind, turning a routine correction into a fast, disorderly slide.

Comments from Strategy CEO Phong Le about potentially selling part of the company’s sizable Bitcoin holdings added to jitters, even though prediction markets continue to see a low probability of actual disposals this year.

“We can sell Bitcoin, and we would sell Bitcoin if needed to fund our dividend payments below 1x mNAV,” Le said in a podcast.

The company currently controls 649,870 BTC, which valued at about US$56.26 billion at current prices.

Further, China’s central bank reiterating its hard line against crypto activity further weighed on sentiment heading into the final month of the year.

Tether blasts S&P after fresh downgrade

Tether pushed back forcefully this week after S&P Global cut its assessment of USDT’s peg stability, assigning the stablecoin the lowest score on the agency’s scale.

S&P pointed to weaker reserve quality, shrinking cash-equivalent holdings, and rising exposure to secured loans and Bitcoin as reasons for the downgrade.

The report noted that Tether’s Bitcoin holdings now exceed the cushion meant to absorb volatility, increasing the risk that a sharp price drop could leave the token undercollateralized.

Tether’s leadership dismissed the rating as biased and politically motivated.

‘Some influencers are either bad at math or have the incentive to push our competitors,’ Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said in a recent post on X.

After the downgrade last week, Ardoino also maintained that ‘the traditional finance propaganda machine is growing worried when any company tries to defy the force of gravity of the broken financial system.’

The downgrade also comes as Tether’s mining affiliate winds down operations in Uruguay after months of unpaid power bills and stalled expansion plans.

Japan prepares 20 percent flat tax on crypto gains

Japan is moving toward a flat 20 percent tax on cryptocurrency gains, a change that would replace the current progressive regime that can push rates above 50 percent for active traders.

Nikkei Asia reported that under the proposal, crypto income would be placed into a separate category similar to equities, with the goal of reducing distortions that discourage trading or push users offshore.

Lawmakers backing the plan say aligning digital assets with other investment products could draw liquidity back to domestic exchanges and boost overall tax receipts.

The reform is expected to be finalized as part of the country’s 2026 tax framework, with revenue split between the national and local governments.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Copper Quest Exploration Inc. (CSE: CQX,OTC:IMIMF; OTCQB: IMIMF; FRA: 3MX) (‘ Copper Quest ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) is pleased to announce it has entered into a strategic partnership with U.S. based Exploration Technologies Inc. (‘ ExploreTech ‘) to deploy generative artificial intelligence across its project portfolio, beginning with the Kitimat Copper-Gold Project in British Columbia. The Company has also completed an initial work program at Kitimat and expanded its geological thesis based on historical datasets and updated field observations.

EXPLORETECH PARTNERSHIP OVERVIEW

ExploreTech integrates drilling, IP/magnetics, geochemistry, structural data, satellite imagery, and field observations into a unified 3D geological framework. The system generates thousands of subsurface model scenarios, evaluates probability, and optimizes drill plans for the highest-priority copper-gold targets. The technology has been successfully applied on multiple porphyry systems.

ExploreTech will collaborate with Copper Quest’s team on their portfolio of projects, with the Kitimat Copper-Gold Project being processed first.

ExploreTech will:

  • Conduct AI-driven reprocessing and inversion of historical geophysical datasets
  • Generate geological simulations to resolve concealed intrusive centers, alteration, and mineralization
  • Produce probability-ranked target clusters
  • Recommend optimized drillhole placement, orientations, and depths
  • Integrate Copper Quest’s 2025 soil and rock geochemical data
  • Provide a fully integrated drill targeting package for the Kitimat Project

The technology is ideally suited for covered porphyry systems such as Kitimat, where limited outcrop and shallow till cover obscure significant subsurface features.

KITIMAT WORK PROGRAM SUMMARY

Copper Quest engaged Hardline Exploration to complete a reconnaissance field program at Kitimat in November 2025, collecting soil and rock samples, documenting structural and lithological observations, and assessing access routes.

Field Highlights

  • 24 soil samples collected along two soil lines (assays pending)
  • Eight rock samples collected from outcrop and historical working exposures (assays pending)
  • Bedrock consists of quartz monzonite
  • Strong silicification
  • 5–10% disseminated fine-grained pyrite
  • Traces of chalcopyrite
  • Local molybdenum
  • Orange-rusty weathering, consistent with sulphide-rich alteration
  • Access roads on the claims are intact
  • Historical logging/exploration roads provide excellent future drill access

These observations are indicative of the presence of a large altered intrusive system consistent with a productive porphyry environment.

HISTORICAL DRILLING: CONFIRMATION OF A SIGNIFICANT CU-AU SYSTEM

Exploration at Kitimat dates to the late 1960s. The most significant work was completed by Decade Resources Ltd. in 2010, which drilled 16 diamond holes totaling 4,437.5 m at the Jeannette Cu-Au Zone.

Notable Drill Intervals (2010)

  • Hole J-7: 117.07 m @ 1.03 g/t Au and 0.54% Cu (from 1.52 m to 118.60 m)
  • Hole J-1: 103.65 m @ 1.00 g/t Au and 0.55% Cu (from 9.15 m to 112.80 m)
  • Hole J-2: 107.01 m @ 0.80 g/t Au and 0.45% Cu (from 6.10 m to 113.11 m)
  • Hole J-8: 112.20 m @ 0.41 g/t Au and 0.33% Cu (from 11.89 m to 124.09 m)
    (Kruchkowski, E., 2010, BC Assessment Report #31807)

Interpretation

  • Long, continuous, near-surface copper-gold intervals
  • Mineralization remains open at depth
  • Geological indicators suggest the system extends laterally beyond the drilled area
  • Vectoring from 2010 drilling trends northeast toward a concealed porphyry center
  • No systematic follow-up drilling has been completed in 15 years

Copper Quest believes these results represent a strong opportunity for discovery within a larger, buried hydrothermal system.

2010 Drilling – Collar Location Data:

Hole ID Easting Northing Elevation Depth (m) Dip Azimuth
J-7 517657.0 6001864.5 366 167.38 -50 070
J-1 517662.0 6001843.0 359 192.07 -45 045
J-2 517662.0 6001843.0 359 304.88 -50 045
J-8 517657.0 6001864.5 366 295.43 -60 070
Coordinates given in NAD83, UTM Zone 9N. Data from Kruchkowski, E., 2010, BC Assessment Report #31807.

MANAGEMENT COMMENTS

Brian Thurston, CEO of Copper Quest

‘The Kitimat Project hosts excellent, historic mineralized intervals interpreted to represent a buried porphyry system. The long, near-surface copper-gold intercepts drilled in 2010 remain open and were never systematically followed up. ExploreTech’s AI platform will allow us to integrate decades of fragmented datasets and directly target the buried porphyry center that the geological evidence strongly supports.’

Alex Miltenberger, CEO of ExploreTech

‘Our generative AI technology evaluates thousands of geological and geophysical scenarios to identify the most probable mineralized centers. We look forward to supporting Copper Quest in unlocking the full potential of their portfolio of projects starting with the Kitimat Copper-Gold project.’

NEXT STEPS

  1. Deliver all historical datasets to ExploreTech
  2. Begin AI-driven modeling and geophysical inversion
  3. Integrate 2025 soil and rock geochemical results
  4. Receive probability-ranked target clusters and drillhole trajectories
  5. Finalize the 2025–2026 exploration and drilling program
  6. Assess applying ExploreTech’s technology to additional Copper Quest properties

NON-BROKERED FULLY-SUBSCRIBED FINANCING

Copper Quest is pleased to announce that the Company has arranged a non-brokered private placement financing of 10,142,104 common shares of the Company to be issued on a flow-through basis (the ‘ Flow-Through Shares ‘) at a price of $0.19 per Flow-Through Share for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,927,000 (the ‘ Flow-Through Offering ‘).

The Flow-Through Offering is fully subscribed and finder’s fees will be applicable.

Each Flow-Through Share will be designated as either a ‘flow-through share’ or ‘critical mineral flow-through share’, as applicable, within the meanings of the Income Tax Act (Canada). The gross proceeds from the issuance of the Flow-Through Shares will be used to incur ‘Canadian exploration expenses’ that qualify as ‘flow-through mining expenditures’ or ‘flow-through critical mineral mining expenditures’, as applicable, as such terms are defined in the Income Tax Act (Canada), which will be renounced to subscribers with an effective date no later than December 31, 2026, all in accordance with the Income Tax Act ( Canada ) and applicable provincial legislation.

All securities to issued in connection with the Flow-Through Offering will be subject to a statutory hold period of four months from the date of issuance in accordance with applicable Canadian securities legislation. Closing of the Flow-Through Offering is anticipated to occur within a week from the date hereof and is subject to the receipt of all requisite approvals, including the acceptance of the Canadian Securities Exchange.

An insider of the Company will be participating in the Offering. The issuance of Flow-Through Shares to an insider will constitute a ‘related party transaction’ as defined in Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (‘ MI 61-101 ‘). The Company will be relying on the exemptions from the valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements of MI 61-101 contained in sections 5.5(a) and 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101, as neither the fair market value of the securities to be purchased by the insider, nor the consideration for the securities to be paid by such insider, will exceed 25% of the Company market capitalization. The Company will not file a material change report in respect of the related party transaction at least 21 days before the closing of the Flow-Through Offering, which the Company deems to be reasonable in order to complete the Offering in a timely manner.

The securities described herein have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘ U.S. Securities Act ‘), or any state securities laws, and may not be offered or sold within the United States except in compliance with the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or pursuant to available exemptions therefrom. This release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in the United States.

ABOUT EXPLORETECH

ExploreTech is a geological technology company specializing in AI-driven geological modeling, geophysical inversion, and drill-target optimization. Its platform is designed to rapidly identify concealed intrusive centers and mineralized systems with improved accuracy and efficiency.

COPPER: GLOBAL DEMAND & SUPPLY

Globally, copper demand continues to surge, driven by electrification, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and the massive expansion of AI and data center infrastructure. Yet supply remains constrained, with declining grades at existing mines, limited new discoveries, and prolonged permitting timelines. The resulting supply-demand imbalance underscores the importance of advancing new porphyry discoveries in stable jurisdictions like the U.S. and Canada. Copper Quest is aligned with this macro trend, positioning its North American portfolio of projects to become part of the next generation of copper and critical mineral discoveries.

QUALIFIED PERSON STATEMENT

The scientific and technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Jeremy Hanson, P.Geo., a Qualified Person as defined under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (‘ NI 43-101 ‘). Mr. Hanson is independent of Copper Quest Exploration Inc. for the purposes of NI 43-101 and has verified the data disclosed in this news release, including sampling methods, geological descriptions, and historical exploration information.

ABOUT Copper Quest Exploration Inc.

Copper Quest (CSE: CQX,OTC:IMIMF; OTCQB: IMIMF; FRA: 3MX) is focused on building shareholder value through project acquisition, and exploration and development of its North American Critical Mineral portfolio of assets. The Company’s land package currently comprises five projects that span over 40,000+ hectares in great mining jurisdictions as well as the Kitimat Cu-Au Project and the past-producing Alpine Gold Mine that are both pending acquisition following due diligence.

Copper Quest has a 100% interest in the Stars Property, a porphyry copper-molybdenum discovery, covering 9,693 hectares in central British Columbia’s Bulkley Porphyry Belt. Contiguous to the Stars Property, Copper Quest has a 100% interest in the 5,389 hectare Stellar Property. CQX also has an earn-in option up to 80% and joint-venture agreement on the 4,700 hectare porphyry copper-molybdenum Rip Project, also in the Bulkley Porphyry Belt.

Copper Quest has a 100% interest in the Nekash Copper-Gold Project, a porphyry exploration opportunity located in Lemhi County, Idaho, along the prolific Idaho-Montana porphyry copper belt that hosts world-class systems such as Butte and CUMO. The project is fully road-accessible via maintained U.S. highways and forest service roads and currently consists of 70 unpatented federal lode claims covering 585 hectares.

Copper Quest has a 100% interest in the Thane Project located in the Quesnel Terrane of Northern BC which spans over 20,658 ha with 10 high-priority targets identified demonstrating significant copper and precious metal mineralization potential.

Copper Quest’s leadership and advisory teams are senior mining industry executives who have a wealth of technical and capital markets experience and a strong track record of discovering, financing, developing, and operating mining projects on a global scale. Copper Quest is committed to sustainable and responsible business activities in line with industry best practices, supportive of all stakeholders, including the local communities in which it operates. The Company’s common shares are principally listed on the Canadian Stock Exchange under the symbol ‘CQX’. For more information on Copper Quest, please visit the Company’s website at www.copper.quest.

On behalf of the Board of Copper Quest Exploration Inc.

Brian Thurston, P.Geo.
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Tel: 778-949-1829

For further information contact:

Investor Relations
info@copper.quest

Forward Looking Information

This news release contains certain ‘forward-looking information’ and ‘forward-looking statements’ (collectively, ‘ forward-looking statements ‘) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included herein, including without limitation, statements regarding the terms and completion of the Flow-Through Offering, the payment of finder’s fees and issuance of Finder’s Warrants, the anticipated closing date and the planned use of proceeds of the Flow-Through Offering, and future operations and activities of Copper Quest, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as ‘expects’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘potential’, ‘possible’, and similar expressions, or statements that events, conditions, or results ‘will’, ‘may’, ‘could’, or ‘should’ occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements reflect the beliefs, opinions and projections on the date the statements are made and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation, the ability to obtain regulatory approval of the Flow-Through Offering, risks associated with possible accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, risks associated with the interpretation of exploration results, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration plans, the risk that the Company will not be able to raise sufficient funds to carry out its business plans, and the risk of political uncertainties and regulatory or legal changes that might interfere with the Company’s business and prospects. Readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and information contained in this news release concerning these items. The Company does not assume any obligation to update the forward-looking statements of beliefs, opinions, projections, or other factors, should they change, except as required by applicable securities laws.

The Canadian Securities Exchange has not reviewed, approved or disapproved the contents of this press release, and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Primary Logo

News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

KEY POINTS

  • Homerun also announces that a new patent application has been filed for a subject invention resulting under the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA No. CRD-23-24168) between Homerun and Alliance. The invention relates to a thermal energy storage (TES) system integrated with silica sand purification that results in advanced silica material that can be utilized in technology and energy end-uses for example battery anode precursor materials.

  • Under the commercialization plan, Homerun Energy’s AI Energy Management System (EMS) will be integrated into the NREL particle-based thermal energy storage systems.

Reno, Nevada–(Newsfile Corp. – December 1, 2025) – Homerun Energy USA, Inc. (‘Homerun’ or the ‘Company’) a newly formed 100% owned subsidiary of Homerun Resources, Inc. (TSXV: HMR,OTC:HMRFF) (OTCQB: HMRFF) is pleased to announce that the Company has signed an Intellectual Property Agreement (‘IPA’) with Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (‘Alliance’), management and operating contractor of the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (‘NREL’).

Brian Leeners, CEO of Homerun stated, ‘This IPA is the culmination of a two-year partnership between Homerun and NREL and is the realization of the synergy across the Homerun vertical strategy where our unique silica sand facilitates particle-based energy storage and silica calcination purification integrated with the Homerun Energy EMS to complete and advance the potential commercial offerings. Having achieved this level of integration on the capital expended to date, is a complement to the vision and creativity within our electrification strategy. Working with the team at NREL, lead by Zhiwen Ma, has fast-tracked the development cycle to where we are today at the precipice of commercialization into a global electrification revolution demanding economic long-life, long duration energy storage and industrial heating/cooling solutions.’

Homerun entered a CRADA with NREL (CRD-23-24168), and subsequently formed a U.S. based startup company, Homerun Energy USA, Inc. that is securing the option for the license to certain intellectual property belonging to Alliance, which was brought into the IPA and/or developed under the CRADA (‘Option’). Alliance is the owner of the Alliance Intellectual Property and is granting the Option through the IPA, for Homerun to advance the technologies toward commercial application. The option period runs for twelve (12) months, subject to ongoing negotiations during that period.

As a part of any license, Alliance requires Homerun to use commercially reasonable efforts to bring Alliance Intellectual Property to market through a thorough, vigorous, and diligent commercialization program. The NREL particle-based thermal energy storage system was originally developed using funding from ARPA-E, and the IP portfolio consists of many issued patents and patent applications filed in the U.S., Canada, and Brazil.

Figure A shows the diagram of long duration energy storage technology using sand-based thermal energy storage developed in the ARPA-E supported project that is under the license agreement.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4082/276424_08c27c92d41a1970_001full.jpg

Figure A. Sand-Thermal Energy Storage System Consists of: (1) Particle-Lifting Device, (2) Charging Electric Heater, (3) Internally Insulated Storage Silos, (4) Discharge Heat Exchanger, and (5) Combined Cycle Power Generation.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4082/276424_08c27c92d41a1970_001full.jpg

Homerun also announces that a new patent application has been filed for the invention resulting under the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA No. CRD-23-24168) between Homerun and Alliance. The invention relates to a thermal energy storage (TES) system integrated with silica sand purification processing.

Key relevant aspects of the innovation include:

  • A system comprising a sand thermal energy storage process and a silica purification process where silica sand is used as the thermal energy storage medium and as a final product of the silica purification process.

  • The storage charging/discharging devices are contained in a single system, and silica calcination and/or drying devices are contained within that system.

Sustainable Impact

  • Synergize energy storage with silica purification and maximizes energy utilization.

  • Efficiency: recovers and reuses process heat for both internal plant operations and external industrial customers (pulp & paper, food, chemicals, metallurgical applications and data centres).

  • Flexible Revenue: the dual-purpose system opens multiple profit channels in power sales, industrial process heat contracts, and processed silica materials supply.

Under the commercialization plan for the NREL Energy Storage System, Homerun Energy will integrate its advanced AI energy management and control system (EMS). Homerun’s technology is designed to operate across devices and brands to optimize energy capture, maximize storage efficiency and enable smarter, more sustainable energy use. By integrating AI into the edge Hub and into the cloud, Homerun empowers the end-user to better monitor, control and predict energy generation, usage and needs, enhancing performance while reducing costs and environmental impact and enabling advanced services such as energy trading.

Figure B shows the innovative modular sand thermal energy storage that Homerun is looking to bring to the market as a first step of commercializing the sand energy storage method.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4082/276424_08c27c92d41a1970_002.jpg

Figure B. Modular Sand Thermal Energy Storage System for Heat and/or Power.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/4082/276424_08c27c92d41a1970_002full.jpg

About Homerun (https://www.homerunenergy.com/ and https://homerunresources.com/) Homerun Energy USA, Inc (Reno, NV) is a 100% subsidiary of Homerun Resources, Inc.

Homerun Resources Inc. (TSXV: HMR,OTC:HMRFF) is building the silica-powered backbone of the energy transition across four focused verticals: Silica, Solar, Energy Storage, and Energy Solutions. Anchored by a unique high-purity low-iron silica resource in Bahia, Brazil, Homerun transforms raw silica into essential products and technologies that accelerate clean power adoption and deliver durable shareholder value.

  • ⁠Silica: Secure supply and processing of high-purity low-iron silica for mission-critical applications, enabling premium solar glass and advanced energy materials.

  • Solar: Development of Latin America’s first dedicated 1,000 tonne per day high-efficiency solar glass plant and the commercialization of antimony-free solar glass designed for next-generation photovoltaic performance.

  • Energy Storage: Advancement of long-duration, silica-based thermal storage systems and related technologies to decarbonize industrial heat and unlock grid flexibility.

  • ⁠Energy Solutions: AI-enabled energy management, control systems, and turnkey electrification solutions that reduce costs and optimize renewable generation for commercial and industrial customers.

With disciplined execution, strategic partnerships, and an unwavering commitment to best-in-class ESG practices, Homerun is focused on converting milestones into markets-creating a scalable, vertically integrated platform for clean energy manufacturing in the Americas.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of
Homerun Resources Inc.

‘Brian Leeners’

Brian Leeners, CEO & Director
brianleeners@gmail.com / +1 604-862-4184 (WhatsApp)

Tyler Muir, Investor Relations
info@homerunresources.com / +1 306-690-8886 (WhatsApp)

FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE

The information contained herein contains ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements relate to information that is based on assumptions of management, forecasts of future results, and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. Any statements that express predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be ‘forward-looking statements’.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/276424

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

(TheNewswire)

Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.

Toronto, Ontario TheNewswire – December 1, 2025 Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. ( ‘Noble’ or the ‘Company’ ) (TSX-V:NOB, FRANKFURT: NB7, OTCQB:NLPXF) is pleased to announce the signing of a drill contract for 1000 meters in two holes located in Carnegie Township near Timmins, Ontario, Canada.  The two 500-meter holes have been located to follow up on drilling done in 2022 and in order to further define the geology and mineralization.

An additional 1000m (2 holes) have been scheduled for Southwest Carnegie Township in early 2026, after freeze-up, due to swampy conditions at the proposed drill site.

The technical content of this release has been reviewed and approved by Wayne Holmstead, P.Geo., an independent Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects .

About Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.

Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. is a Canadian-based junior exploration company, which has holdings of securities in Canada Nickel Company Inc., Homeland Nickel Inc., East Timmins Nickel Inc. (20%), and its interest in the Holdsworth gold exploration property in the area of Wawa, Ontario.

Noble holds mineral and/or exploration rights in ~70,000ha in Northern Ontario and ~24,000ha elsewhere in Quebec upon which it plans to generate option/joint venture exploration programs.

Noble holds mineral rights and/or exploration rights in ~18,000 hectares in the Timmins-Cochrane areas of Northern Ontario known as Project 81, ~2,215 hectares in Thomas Twp/Timmins, as well as an additional 20% interest in ~38,700 hectares in the Timmins area and ~175 hectares of mining claims in Central Newfoundland. Project 81 hosts diversified drill-ready gold, nickel-cobalt and base metal exploration targets at various stages of exploration. Noble also holds ~4,600 hectares in the Nagagami Carbonatite Complex and its ~3,200 hectares in the Boulder Project both near Hearst, Ontario.  ~3,700 hectares in the Buckingham Graphite Property, ~10,152 hectares in the Havre St Pierre  Nickel, Copper, PGM property, and ~1,573 hectares in the Cere-Villebon Nickel, Copper, PGM property, ~569 hectare Uranium/Rare Earth property (Chateau), ~461 hectare Uranium/Molybdenum property (Taser North),  ~4,465 hectares REE Mehmet Property, and the ~3300 hectare Gull Lake REE Property all of which are in the Province of Quebec.

https://www.noblemineralexploration.com

Noble’s common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ‘NOB’.

Cautionary Statement

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.

The foregoing information may contain forward-looking statements relating to the future performance of Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. Forward-looking statements, specifically those concerning future performance, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the Company’s plans and expectations. These plans, expectations, risks and uncertainties are detailed herein and from time to time in the filings made by the Company with the TSX Venture Exchange and securities regulators.  Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. does not assume any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Contacts: H. Vance White, President

Phone:        416-214-2250

Fax:                416-367-1954

Email: info@noblemineralexploration.com

Investor Relations: ir@noblemineralexploration.com

Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

President Donald Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One Sunday that he would release the results of an MRI he had done in October.

‘If they want to release it, it’s OK with me to release it,’ Trump said. ‘It’s perfect.’ 

‘If you want to have it released, I’ll release it,’ he told reporters as he traveled back to Washington, D.C., after spending the Thanksgiving weekend at Mar-a-Lago.

A reporter asked Trump what part of the body the MRI was focused on in the scan.

‘I have no idea,’ the president responded. ‘What part of the body? It wasn’t the brain because I took a cognitive test and I aced it. I got a perfect mark.’

The White House released a memo on Oct. 10 from Sean Barbabella, the White House physician, that said Trump underwent advanced imaging as part of a scheduled follow-up evaluation at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

Barbabella said the evaluation was part of the president’s ongoing health maintenance plan and included laboratory testing and preventive health assessments.

‘Comprehensive laboratory studies performed in conjunction with the visit were exceptional, including stable metabolic, hematologic, and cardiac parameters,’ the memo read in part.

A reporter previously asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt in early November at a White House press briefing about releasing the results of the MRI because it is a very specific procedure and not generally routine. 

‘As I said, I’ll check back for you,’ Leavitt responded.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Heliostar Metals Ltd. (TSXV: HSTR,OTC:HSTXF) (OTCQX: HSTXF) (FSE: RGG1) (‘Heliostar’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that Mr James Perry has succeeded the retiring Mr. Jacques Vaillancourt as Chairman at the Company’s Annual General & Special Meeting (‘AGM’) held on November 26th, 2025.

Heliostar’s new Chairman Mr. James Perry commented, ‘I am excited to join Heliostar at this important inflection point. The Company has built a strong foundation through disciplined operations and strategic acquisitions, and I look forward to working closely with the experienced Board and management team as we advance the next phase of growth. Heliostar has the ingredients to become a leading gold producer in the Americas. I will draw on my experience to help steer the Company’s disciplined growth, reinforce strong governance practices, and create lasting value for our shareholders and host communities.’

Charles Funk, President and & CEO, stated – ‘I once again thank our retiring chair for his long service to Heliostar. I strongly welcome James as our new Chairman at a time of considerable growth. Having worked with James previously at Newcrest Mining, I know his ambition for our Company, his growth mindset and the high regard in which he is held across the industry. We are delighted to attract someone of his caliber as we continue advancing toward our goal of becoming a 500,000 ounce per year producer by the end of this decade.’

Mr. Perry is currently President of Sweetwater Royalties, one of the largest landowners in the United States, majority-owned by Orion Resource Partners following its acquisition of Sweetwater’s extensive land and mineral portfolio from Occidental Petroleum in 2020 for approximately US$1.3 billion. Sweetwater’s vast mineral position extends across more than 4.5 million mineral acres in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, and Michigan, providing an expansive royalty platform spanning industrial minerals, base metals, and renewable-energy opportunities.

Mr. Perry has over 17 years of global mining and resources experience across Asia, Africa, and the Americas, spanning business development, corporate strategy and governance, legal and permitting, ESG, and operations. He spent a decade at Newcrest Mining – one of the world’s largest gold mining companies headquartered in Australia – serving as Business Development Manager and Corporate Counsel. Newcrest was acquired for approximately US$19 billion by Newmont Mining in 2023. Mr. Perry has extensive international experience managing large and complex transactions, including leading Newcrest’s entry into Ecuador and its investment in Lundin Gold’s world-class Fruta del Norte gold district. He possesses broad expertise in project evaluation and negotiation across diverse sectors and jurisdictions. He is a lawyer and holds an M.Sc. in History and International Relations from the London School of Economics.

Incentive plan issuance

Heliostar further announces that, pursuant to the Company’s Omnibus Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, it has granted 250,000 stock options (‘Options’) at an exercise price of $2.63 and 200,000 restricted share units (each, an ‘RSU’) to directors, officers and consultants of the Company. The Options are exercisable for a period of five years and will vest over the next three years. The RSUs will vest in three equal annual instalments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date.

About Heliostar Metals Ltd.

Heliostar is a gold mining company with production from operating mines in Mexico. This includes the La Colorada Mine in Sonora and the San Agustin Mine in Durango. The Company also has a strong portfolio of development and exploration stage projects in Mexico and the USA. These include the Ana Paula project in Guerrero, the Cerro del Gallo project in Guanajuato, the San Antonio project in Baja Sur, all in Mexico and the Unga project in Alaska, USA.

For Additional Information Please Contact:

Charles Funk
President and Chief Executive Officer
Heliostar Metals Limited
Email: charles.funk@heliostarmetals.com
Phone: +1 844-753-0045
Rob Grey
Investor Relations Manager
Heliostar Metals Limited
Email: rob.grey@heliostarmetals.com
Phone: +1 844-753-0045

 

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release includes certain ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and ‘forward-looking information’ under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘target’, ‘plan’, ‘forecast’, ‘may’, ‘would’, ‘could’, ‘schedule’ and similar words or expressions, identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information relate to, among other things, the Company’s annual production goals.

Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information relating to the terms and completion of the Facility, any future mineral production, liquidity, and future exploration plans are based on management’s reasonable assumptions, estimates, expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on management’s experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the receipt of necessary approvals, price of metals; no escalation in the severity of public health crises or ongoing military conflicts; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs of development of exploration projects; and the Company’s ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms.

These statements reflect the Company’s respective current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political, and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: precious metals price volatility; risks associated with the conduct of the Company’s mining activities in foreign jurisdictions; regulatory, consent or permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company’s management team and outside contractors; risks regarding exploration and mining activities; the Company’s inability to obtain insurance to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all; currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the environment, health and safety; the ability of the communities in which the Company operates to manage and cope with the implications of public health crises; the economic and financial implications of public health crises, ongoing military conflicts and general economic factors to the Company; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company’s interactions with surrounding communities; the Company’s ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; lack of liquidity for shareholders of the Company; litigation risk; and the factors identified under the caption ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Readers are cautioned against attributing undue certainty to forward-looking statements or forward-looking information. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements or information, other than as required by applicable law.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/276385

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

COVID may be on its way to being a chapter in our history books, but it’s left its fingerprints all over life as we know it. The world post-pandemic is not the same as the one we had in the early days of 2020. Work-from-home is now normalized; many companies are partially (and even fully) remote. Entire city populations have shifted as large numbers of Americans relocated around the country.

Perhaps less obvious to the naked eye — although not less significant — is COVID’s effect on the public school system.

The pandemic, and all the social changes that came with it, shattered some of our culture’s biggest educational taboos. More importantly, it shattered the illusion that our public schools are a great and trustworthy American institution.

Everybody talks about “COVID learning loss” (and the large gaps in learning students are still suffering months after school closures and missed lessons). Far less discussed is the “COVID trust loss” in our public schools (at a 25-year low) and all the ways that the social norms that bound public school together as an American bedrock have begun to fragment.

Since 2020, a wave of school choice policy has swept across the country. Its seeds were sown long before the pandemic, but COVID trust loss created the culture ripe to harvest them.

Four shifts post-pandemic are changing the fabric of American education: increased transparency inside the classroom (and more light shed on all the shortcomings of public schooling), the breakdown of the homeschooling taboo, the shift toward remote work, and demographic migrations into states prioritizing school choice.

Each of these paradigm shifts is quietly rewriting the education world. Each is important, and each is reshaping education in its own way.

If you’re a skeptic of government-run schools, there’s a lot to be excited about.

Zoom School Revealed the Rot in Public Education

In the early days of COVID, public schools went online, and parents had the chance to watch what was happening in their child’s classroom in real time. Many were not pleased.

Teachers and administrators were trying to translate an already broken model of education onto a format it didn’t fit, breaking it even further in the process.

Parents, also shut up inside their houses and in close proximity to their children, saw Zoom school and were horrified — is this really what my kid does all day?

Some chalked it up to the shortcomings of the medium: public school was designed for real-life rooms and three-dimensional interactions, not computer screens.

Others (more astutely) blamed the model itself.

It’s no secret that America’s public school outcomes aren’t great — the Nation’s Report Card, published by the federal government, publicly documents as much. But many parents were confused by the content of their children’s classes — like the parents documented in the Sold a Story podcast, who were horrified to discover their children weren’t learning to read.

Public school enrollment dropped sharply. Many families switched to private schools (which re-opened faster than public schools) or began homeschooling. Some of those families returned to public school after the lockdowns ended, but many didn’t, and public school enrollment is trending downward. Nationally, enrollment dropped 2.5 percent between 2019 and 2023, and continues to decline.

Even in cities like Austin (with population trending upward), public school enrollment is falling — Austin’s school district has lost 10,000 students over the past decade, despite the city population growing by 10 percent (nearly 100,000 new residents) over the same period.

If public schools were private companies, and surveyed their customers (the parents) — or just looked at their retention data — the market feedback would be clear. Parents aren’t happy with the results public schools are delivering, and are looking elsewhere.

Zoom School Made Homeschooling Less Taboo

Millions of parents pulled their kids out of public school in 2020 and started homeschooling them, confident that their homespun instruction would be better than whatever Zoom school was meting out.

Nearly overnight, homeschooling — once a strange practice reserved for the hippies and religious zealots and social outcasts — became normal. It went from a fringe concept to a shared cultural experience.

Nearly everybody knows somebody who homeschooled for at least a few months during the pandemic. And you can’t say “homeschoolers are weirdos” without a tinge of irony if you yourself (or your sister, or your best friend, or your cool neighbor) were once a homeschooling parent, no matter what the extenuating circumstances.

More importantly, even if you weren’t homeschooling, you still had your kids at home all day — one of the core (unimaginable?) realities of homeschooling life. Pre-COVID, parents could say “I could never homeschool my kids, I can’t imagine having them home all day.” Post-COVID, no longer: having your kids home all day was something everyone could imagine, because it was something everyone had experienced.

By the time the lockdown had abated, having your child home all day had gone from unimaginable, to practical, to a very viable possibility for the future.

Work-From-Home Broke Up “Default” Childcare 

At the same time Zoom school was in full swing, COVID was permanently rearranging the workplace. Technology had long before made remote work possible; the pandemic forced employers to catch up. Parents went from 9-5 office residencies to commuting only as far as the kitchen table, taking meetings while waiting for their sourdough to rise.

One of the core services public school offers, to families and to society generally, is childcare. Parents who go to work need somewhere for their kids to go. But if parents work from home, they can be the adult in the room while kids do school — especially if their child is enrolled in an online program (so mom doesn’t have to be the teacher).

For many kids, especially an older student who doesn’t need constant supervision, doing school online (with mom or dad in the other room for support if you need them) is a viable option. If your child doesn’t like the public school curriculum, or prefers working at their own pace, or is on the butt end of public school bullying and social hierarchies, online school can offer a compelling prospect.

During COVID, all sorts of online schools grew quickly: Sora School, an online project-based middle and high school; Synthesis, the game-based spinoff program from Elon Musk’s Ad Astra school; Kubrio, a “world school” with three time zone swaths and students from all around the globe — to name just a few.

More traditional models like online charter schools and public cyber schools are also on the menu; but for families with self-directed children, more custom combinations of tools and programs (Khan Academy paired with Teaching Company lectures, IXL supplemented with Coursera MOOCs) abound.

Post-COVID, remote work appears to be here to stay. As Cal Newport wrote in his book Slow Productivity, referencing Apple employees refusing to go back to the office: “These frustrated Apple employees [are] at the vanguard of a movement that’s leveraging the disruptions of the pandemic to question so many more of the arbitrary assumptions that have come to define the workplace.” 

This questioning of assumptions, not incidentally, applies equally to schooling.

Perhaps equally importantly, remote work also frees families from work-induced geographic constraints, making it easier for them to relocate to states with the best schools or robust school-choice supports.

COVID Migration Moved Families To Choice-Friendly States

COVID policy rearranged the demographic spread of the country en masse: people fled in droves from locked-down states (like New York and Illinois and California) to open ones (like Texas and Tennessee and Florida).

States with less-restrictive school closure policies also tend towards freer education policy (both are correlated with the relative power of teachers unions). Many fewer states have since passed sweeping school choice policies, where families have access to public vouchers for use at private schools.

The effect is that a large number of kids — who would’ve otherwise been stuck in states without school choice — now live in states with a huge number of school options emerging.

Eighteen states have implemented universal school choice since 2020. Some of those states, like Florida and Texas, are becoming hotbeds for education innovation, and many are seeing an increasing number of private school options emerging.

Incidentally (or perhaps not incidentally at all), many of these school choice-friendly states are also the places people are having the most kids — a positive indicator of the education market’s future growth. Where there is demand (young students) and capital (school choice dollars), supply (interesting new schools) will follow.

Part of the reason public schools in America have had such a monopoly on education is because of other extenuating circumstances: parents need to work all day; no one was at home to watch the kids; tax dollars were exclusively bundled into the public school system — and everybody trusted the public school system. After all, it’s one of the great American institutions (or so we’re led to believe).

But with those undergirdings starting to shift, public school’s Herculean hold on the American psyche (and the American way of life) is shifting too. Logistically, we don’t need public schools the way we did a decade ago. We’re more skeptical of them. And alternatives have been destigmatized.

The 2.5 percent public school enrollment drop is still small; it’s early days. Nearly 50 million kids are still enrolled in public schools. Public education is still the default.

But the cultural landscape — and the cultural paradigm — has shifted. And the education landscape will continue to shift in response — slowly now, but more and more, until the unquestioned “default” of one school for all children feels as distant as normal reality did during the height of the pandemic.

The US housing market in late 2025 is defined by contradictory forces: rising prices but slowing growth, increasing inventory but falling affordability, and a demographic shift that is weakening long-run demand even as short-run supply remains structurally constrained. 

Against this backdrop, President Trump’s proposal for a 50-year mortgage is an attempt to stretch affordability in a market that has outpaced incomes, and it exposes deeper issues. Mortgage duration is both a financial feature and a policy artifact shaped by decades of government intervention dating back to the New Deal. A 50-year mortgage may expand access by lowering monthly payments, but it also dramatically increases lifetime interest costs and could raise prices depending on supply elasticity. The debate over this proposal is ultimately a debate over the real frictions in the housing market, namely interest-rate lock-in, constrained supply, and the institutional architecture that prevents solutions like portable mortgages from being widely available.

The American housing market rarely changes in sudden leaps. Prices adjust gradually, construction responds slowly, and mortgage product design barely shifts at all. That is why the mere suggestion of a 50-year mortgage by President Trump is so economically revealing. If housing finance policymakers are floating half-century debt structures, something fundamental in the market is out of balance.

Today’s housing market presents a strange tableau: home prices are still rising, but at a slowing pace. According to the latest Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) data, prices are up roughly 2.2 percent year-over-year in Q3 2025. Sales have ticked up modestly, with existing-home transactions rising 1.2 percent in October. Inventory is finally improving, up about 12.6 percent year over year, driven mostly by new construction rather than existing homes. Mortgage rates have eased from their peaks and now sit in the six-percent range for many buyers. On paper this resembles a soft landing, but in reality the market remains defined by broad affordability stress.

Many homes are sitting unsold for long stretches, not because buyers are absent but because sellers are holding out for pandemic-era prices. Renters’ expectations of becoming homeowners have collapsed from 52.6 percent in 2019 to just 33.9 percent today, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. And demographic headwinds are emerging: births are declining, population growth is slowing, and long-run demand will weaken as the nation ages. Housing should be cooling naturally, yet it isn’t. The affordability crisis is so acute in the short run that policymakers are reaching for financial engineering solutions rather than addressing structural constraints.

It is amidst this backdrop that Trump proposed the 50-year mortgage, casting himself in the lineage of major housing-finance reforms, much like President Roosevelt’s role in ushering in the modern 30-year mortgage during the New Deal. By extending loan terms, the administration argues it can meaningfully lower monthly payments and open the door to homeownership for buyers priced out of today’s market. In that narrow sense, the idea appears palatable; when affordability is collapsing, and buyers are increasingly constrained by monthly cash flow, stretching the mortgage horizon looks like an intuitive policy lever. But as with any major change in mortgage design, the economic logic is more complicated.

A longer mortgage lowers monthly payments at the cost of paying much more interest over many more years. For a median-priced $415,000 home purchased with an FHA loan at 3.5 percent down, here is how the math works:

Mortgage TermInterest RateMonthly PaymentNumber of PaymentsTotal of All PaymentsTotal Interest Paid
15-year5.5%$3,272.21180$588,998.69$188,523.69
30-year5.99%$2,398.48360$863,451.30$462,976.30
50-year6.4%$2,227.44600$1,336,462.35$935,987.35

The 50-year mortgage trims the monthly payment relative to the 30-year, but at the cost of doubling the total interest burden. For households focused solely on monthly cash flow, particularly first-time buyers, this tradeoff can appear worth it. A lower payment either gets a family into the home they want or allows them to buy a more expensive house. Economically, it functions like any intertemporal tradeoff: more affordability now, much higher cost later.

Critics argue that introducing ultra-long mortgages will push home prices higher. The answer is that it depends entirely on supply elasticity. In markets where new housing is constrained by zoning, permitting delays, or not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY)-driven land-use restrictions, extended mortgage terms can, in fact, capitalize into higher prices. In elastic markets, the effect is muted. This is not a moral failing of the policy; it is simple microeconomics. If your policy goal is to increase homeownership, you accept certain tradeoffs, just as every country with 40- to 100-year mortgages has.

What often gets lost in the discussion is that the United States did not adopt the 30-year mortgage because markets naturally arrived at it. The product is fundamentally the outcome of government intervention. During FDR’s New Deal, the Federal Housing Administration standardized long-term amortized mortgages, displacing the short-term, interest-only loans that had dominated before the Great Depression. Fannie Mae later expanded liquidity and uniformity in mortgage finance. The 30-year mortgage was authorized by Congress in the late 1940s and eventually became dominant because federal agencies guaranteed it.

In other words, the “normal” American mortgage is not a market creation; it is a political one. A 50-year mortgage would simply be the next step in an 80-year continuum of policy-driven mortgage evolution.

The deeper issue in the housing market is not the absence of exotic mortgage products. It is that existing homeowners are frozen in place. Millions of households locked in 2–4 percent mortgage rates during the pandemic. With current rates near six percent, these homeowners don’t want to move, even when downsizing or scaling up might make sense. That keeps existing inventory off the market. Meanwhile, a record share of homes for sale are new construction, not existing properties.

One innovative solution would be portable mortgages, where the borrower could keep their existing mortgage rate but shift the collateral to a new home. Instead of being trapped in their current house because of a pandemic-era 3 percent mortgage, a household could sell, buy a different property, and simply move the lien from House A to House B. In theory, this would dramatically improve mobility, unfreeze existing-home inventory, and loosen one of the tightest bottlenecks in the current housing market: interest-rate lock-in.

But portable mortgages do not exist in the United States for reasons deeply rooted in the structure of American mortgage finance. The US system is built around long-term, fixed-rate mortgages that are pooled into mortgage-backed securities, financial instruments priced according to the specific borrower and the specific property at the moment the loan is issued. Letting borrowers carry their old loan to a new house would upend that securitization model, causing investors to absorb unknown collateral risk midstream and making the securities far harder to price.

The dominance of the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage compounds the issue. If borrowers could port low rates across multiple moves, they would have little reason to refinance, starving lenders of the fee income and interest-rate resets they depend on to originate new loans. Investors could also face greater duration risk, being stuck earning three percent for decades even as market rates rise, causing them to demand higher rates across the entire mortgage market. And unlike countries such as the UK or Canada, where portable mortgages are common, US mortgages are secured by a specific property for the life of the loan and fixed for thirty years, not two to five.

Changing collateral midstream would require new appraisals, new legal filings, and a fundamental reengineering of mortgage securitization. All of this means that while portable mortgages could meaningfully improve housing mobility, they run directly counter to the incentives and infrastructure of the US mortgage system. Banks and investors prefer refinancing into higher rates, and the legal plumbing is built around property-specific collateral, not borrower-specific contracts. As a result, portable mortgages remain economically appealing in theory but institutionally implausible in practice.

If, however, banks and regulators could find a way to make portability compatible with the existing system, it could be a genuine game changer for American homeowners. Imagine a world where a young couple who locked in a low rate on their starter home is not punished financially for having a third child and needing more space, or where empty nesters can downsize without watching their mortgage payment jump simply because they move. Portability would make the mortgage contract follow the household’s life cycle rather than anchor it to a single property, smoothing mobility across labor markets, helping people move closer to better jobs, and reducing the mismatch between housing stock and household needs.

This would mean more efficient use of the existing housing stock, less pressure to overbuild in certain markets, and a healthier, more dynamic relationship between housing and labor-market mobility. It is precisely because the gains to households and to the broader economy are so large that portable mortgages are worth serious experimentation, even if the institutional and regulatory hurdles are high.

Ultimately, the debate over 50-year mortgages is less about exotic loan structures and more about the deeper structural limits of America’s housing system. Affordability has deteriorated because supply is constrained, mobility is frozen, and our mortgage architecture has not evolved with economic realities.

Extending mortgage terms may offer short-term relief, but the real innovations, like portable mortgages or reforms that unlock supply, require rethinking the institutional plumbing that has defined US housing finance since the New Deal. If policymakers want lasting affordability rather than financial patches, they must address the structural forces that make such extreme proposals politically viable in the first place.