Author

admin

Browsing

Gold and silver’s historic price rises are raising questions about the broader state of the world.

For Mark Moss, the surges reflect a deeper breakdown of trust in sovereign currencies.

“The real driver is not inflation,” the investor and commentator emphasized during a fireside chat at the recent Vancouver Resource Investment Conference. “The real driver is trust.”

Many investors remain focused on short-term price signals and conventional indicators, such as real interest rates, while overlooking deeper forces shaping capital allocation. According to Moss, the current state of the market favors long-term allocation. In his view, conviction — not timing — should guide investment decisions.

“You can’t borrow someone else’s conviction,” he said. “You have to start to learn to build your own thesis, and then you have to learn to look to find things that either confirm that thesis or deny that thesis.”

Precious metals are continuing a powerful price rally that began last year.

The gold price broke above US$5,500 per ounce for the first time on Wednesday (January 28), while silver broke through the triple-digit level last week and has continued rising, passing US$119 per ounce.

These moves are happening amid escalating geopolitical and policy uncertainty. However, Moss cautioned against focusing on shorter-term gold and silver price drivers, instead pointing to what he described as a fundamental dilemma facing governments with rising debt burdens — a dynamic he said is reshaping global capital flows.

Referencing comments by hedge fund founder Ray Dalio at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Moss described a “rock and a hard place” scenario. Governments face a choice between allowing debt crises that risk defaults and asset collapses, or continuing to expand money supply in ways that erode purchasing power.

“Either they have option one, the rock, which is a sovereign debt crisis, asset prices plunging — that’s what everybody’s kind of thinking. The markets are going to crash. My home values, my retirement value is going to crash. But the problem with that is they lose everything. They get wiped out, they have massive civil unrest,’ he said.

“And then the hard place is they can print the money. And so of course, they’ll always choose to bring the money.’

As a result, large institutional and sovereign investors face losses whether governments default or inflate, prompting a reassessment of traditional reserve assets. Moss said gold has emerged as one response to that reassessment, alongside broader interest in commodities and critical minerals. He further pointed to continued central bank gold buying as a signal that confidence in fiat currencies and the post-war financial order is weakening.

According to the World Gold Council, central banks have been purchasing gold at record levels in recent years.

Moss cited Poland as a notable example, describing it as a close US ally that has nonetheless been accumulating gold aggressively. Other large entities are following the same strategy — Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin issuer, recently revealed that part of its long-term plan is the stockpiling of gold in a Swiss bunker.

Gold’s rally is built on a strong multi-year advance. After starting 2025 at around US$2,640, the price had climbed to roughly US$3,200 by April before trading in a narrow range through the summer.

Momentum returned in late August, carrying gold above US$4,300 by mid-October. While the price briefly dipped below US$4,000 during a subsequent pullback, the retracement proved shallower and shorter than many market watchers expected. Gold resumed its ascent in mid-November and accelerated sharply toward the end of 2025.

Right now, the status quo is in favor of precious metals.

Regardless, Moss returned to the importance of taking a long-term perspective, stating that investors who fixate on short-term price moves risk missing the broader shift underway as trust dynamics change across the global economy.

“If you’re trying to understand why the price of gold dipped from US$5,000 and now it’s US$4,800, I can’t really help you with that,” Moss said. “But we understand the direction that’s at hand.”

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Investing in oil stocks can be a lucrative endeavor, but determining the right time to enter a sector known for volatile swings can be tricky.

Over the past five years, the oil market’s inherent volatility has been on clear display. Major declines in consumption brought on by the COVID-19 lockdowns was followed by oil prices surging to US$122 per barrel for Brent and US$115 per barrel for Western Texas Intermediate (WTI) in mid-2022, as the world economy began to recover and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine led to the consequent sanctions on Russian oil.

In 2023, oil prices experienced significant volatility. Fears of a global recession gave rise to bearish sentiment over much of the oil sector and pushed Brent prices as low as US$67 and WTI as low as US$64 per barrel in the first half of the year. Despite a Q3 spike in Brent above the US$98 level and WTI above US$90, oil prices trended back down in Q4 to dip below US$78 for Brent and US$71 for WTI even with conflict escalating in the Middle East.

In 2024, the oil market experienced a relatively stable but downward-trending year overall. As tensions flared up between Iran and Israel in the Middle East, prices for Brent and WTI respectively peaked at around US$93 and US$88 per barrel in mid-April. In the second half of the year, record US production and sluggish global demand growth, particularly in China, pushed prices down to below US$70 for Brent and US$65 for WTI.

In 2025, volatility was very much in play for global oil markets. Some of the biggest factors driving that volatility were OPEC+ production hikes, weaker demand from major economies like China and US President Donald Trump’s tariff wars. Brent and WTI crude both started the year above US$70 per barrel but late in the year, Brent dipped below US$60 per barrel and WTI fell as low as US$55 per barrel.

Since the start of 2026, the price of Brent crude oil has climbed by nearly 9 percent to US$66.37 per barrel and WTI crude oil is up by 8 percent to US$61.90 per barrel as of January 14 as geopolitical risks continue to threaten supply despite broader market oversupply pressures.

In this article:

    How do energy stocks compare to broader equities?

    Energy stocks performed positively in 2025, with the S&P 500 Energy index posting a gain of 4.96 percent for the year, although the sector lagged that of the broader S&P 500’s (INDEXSP:.INX) gain of 17.25 percent during the same period. Still, this was an improved performance over the 2.31 percent returns the energy sector posted in 2024 compared with the 23.3 percent gains made in the broader S&P 500.

    Oil stock prices typically track oil prices, but that was not the case in 2025. Many major oil stocks performed relatively well in the face of declining oil prices. Those oil companies seeing share price appreciation were more likely to be led by fiscally responsible management teams that were able to achieve debt minimization and strong cash flows even with lower oil prices.

    What will be the story in 2026?

    Trends impacting the oil market in 2026 and beyond

    In 2026, the outlook for the global oil market is looking bearish, as analysts are projecting a decline in oil prices due to a supply surplus.

    In mid-January, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) put forward a forecast predicting an average WTI crude oil price of US$52 per barrel for this year, and US$50 per barrel in 2027. As for Brent crude oil, the EIA forecast average prices of US$56 in 2026 and US$54 in 2027.

    These forecasts predict oil prices will decrease due to a number of trends, mainly rising inventories as production exceeds demand, a slowdown in economic growth and the adoption of renewable energy technologies. In addition, the geopolitical conflicts in Venezuela and the Middle East are expected to cause oil price volatility this year.

    Year of the glut?

    Arguably the biggest factor influencing the oil market this year will be the outsized surplus, leading some analysts to call 2026 the “year of the glut.”

    Deloitte is forecasting the largest oversupply in the oil markets since the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “The oversupply is real, and while demand and economies are waking up and moving forward, they’re not moving forward at the robust rates that we might hope,” Andrew Botterill, a partner at Deloitte Canada and lead author of the report. “We see ourselves in a big oversupply situation right now of about three million barrels a day. We should expect downward pressure on prices, especially in the first half of the year.”

    OPEC has a differing outlook for this year. Rather than a supply glut, the group of oil exporting nations sees a near balance emerging between supply and demand for 2026. Regardless, OPEC+ plans to pause its planned production hikes for the first quarter of the year.

    China’s oil demand

    As the world’s second most populous country, China is unsurprisingly the world’s second largest consumer of oil (after the United States) and the largest net importer of the energy fuel. With well over half of its imports coming from OPEC member countries, Chinese demand can strongly influence the oil market.

    China’s oil demand is forecast to slow this year as its economy struggles, and electric vehicles continue to replace internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles on its roads. The Asian nation’s economy is continuing to struggle with a beleaguered property sector, declining consumer confidence and debt-burdened local governments. Still, the World Bank is forecasting a 4.4 percent growth rate for China’s economy in 2026.

    Although China continues to import oil, a large portion is going toward strategic stockpiling rather than industrial consumption. Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) expects the nation to add 500,000 barrels per day to its inventories over the next five quarters in order to bolster its energy security, Bloomberg reported in September.

    Renewable energy’s market share

    Renewable energy sources are increasingly taking up a larger share of the overall energy mix, although oil and gas continue to represent the largest share of the pie.

    Another consideration is the continuing growth of electric vehicle sales. Global sales reached a record 20.7 million units in 2025, up 20 percent over 2024.

    However, the growth rate varied significantly by region. For example, the US market experienced a mere 1 percent growth rate, while the Canadian EV market saw a 41 percent decline in sales. On the other hand, EV sales in China grew 17 percent, and in Europe they grew by 33 percent.

    Despite the record growth, EVs still remain an economic luxury for the general North American consumer concerned with not only the price, but also the lack of charging infrastructure. US President Donald Trump’s negative stance toward the renewable energy sector is also hindering growth in the US market.

    As of 2026, ICE vehicles still dominate the global vehicle market compared to EVs, and that looks set to continue in the near future. In a late 2025 survey of potential car buyers from 28 countries, 50 percent of respondents said they plan to buy an ICE vehicle in the following 24 months, while 14 percent planned to buy an EV and 16 percent, a hybrid vehicle.

    US oil production

    After reaching record levels in 2025, US oil production is expected to decline this year. According to the EIA, the country’s oil production came in at 13.61 million barrels per day in 2025. That number is forecast to lower to 13.53 million barrels per day in 2026 as lower prices for the commodity are reducing the incentive for oil companies to drill new wells.

    US foreign policy and interventions in Venezuela and the Middle East are also likely to influence global oil markets this year.

    Venezuela, largest oil reserves in the world

    In January 2026, US forces removed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from the country and the Trump administration seized control of Venezuela’s state oil company. The US government is now moving to liquidate up to 50 million barrels of heavy crude oil from Venezuela on global markets, with funds from the sales added to US accounts. It also said it plans to modernize and upgrade the country’s oil infrastructure and electricity grid to increase Venezuela’s oil production, which totaled 800,000 barrels per day in 2025.

    Venezuela holds an oil reserve of 303 billion barrels, and if the administration were to succeed in these plans it could have major implications for oil prices in the years ahead. Additionally, an influx of Venezuelan oil lowering global prices could further disincentivize domestic production in the United States.

    However, analysts warn it will take many years, tens of billions of dollars in capital expenditures and buy-in from US oil majors to restore the country’s once vibrant oil industry due to the state of the neglected infrastructure.

    This would also require US oil majors to take the risk of investing in these upgrades. Venezuela’s heavy crude is suited for US Gulf Coast refineries, including major refiners like ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM). However, Exxon’s CEO commented that the country is currently ‘uninvestable’ and the company would require durable investment protections and buy-in from the Venezuelan people to begin operations in the country.

    “Industry estimates suggest production could recover toward 2 million barrels per day (up 500,000 – 1 million bpd from current levels) within one to two years under favorable conditions,” according to a report by TD Securities. “Beyond that, at least $20 billion worth of investment and a timeline spanning towards 10 years would be needed to add an incremental 500,000 bpd worth of production, with some $50 billion – $60 billion of investment required to return to 1998 levels.”

    Middle East conflict

    There are a number of major geopolitical conflicts playing out across the globe that have the potential to impact both oil production and transport, leading to higher prices for the commodity. Conflicts in the Middle East, responsible for a vast majority of global oil production, are of great consequence to the market.

    So far in 2026, Iran is the center of conflict in the Middle East due to widespread protests against the government, which the government has responded to by killing thousands of protestors. Initially, the US weighed military intervention in response, and threatened tariffs on countries doing business with Iran. The ramifications of the Iran-US tensions have the ability to impact other regions of the market, especially China.

    By the end of January, Trump was considering ‘airstrikes aimed at Iran’s leaders and the security officials believed to be responsible for the killings, as well as strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and government institutions,’ CNN reported.

    Is now a good time to invest in oil stocks?

    The investment landscape for oil stocks in 2026 is complicated by ongoing geopolitical and economic uncertainties. Another major complication is the projected supply glut that has the potential to depress prices.

    Whether analysts take a bearish or a bullish view on the outlook for global oil stocks in 2026, all would agree that investors will find the best value in high-quality companies with strong balance sheets that can weather lower pricing environments.

    Lower share prices can offer a buying opportunity for investors who believe oil stocks will eventually recover and are open to holding the stocks long-term.

    How to invest in oil stocks?

    Of course, investors will need to do their own due diligence to determine if oil stocks are right for their portfolio and which stocks are the best bet.

    Finally, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) offer an excellent avenue to investing in the oil sector as they allow for exposure to a diversified portfolio rather than a single stock. There are several oil ETFs available to investors, including options such as the iShares Global Energy Sector ETF (ARCA:IXC), the United States Oil Fund (ARCA:USO), and the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (ARCA:XOP).

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Platinum may be rare, but it is the third most-traded precious metal in the world, behind gold and silver.

    The world’s platinum demand varies widely across many sectors. Most notably, platinum metal is used in autocatalysts and jewelry, as well as for medical and industrial purposes. Those interested in investing in platinum would do well to be aware of the many platinum uses. After all, by knowing which industries require platinum, it’s possible to understand supply and demand dynamics, and to be aware of how the precious metal’s price may move in the future.

    With that in mind, here’s a list of the four main platinum uses. Scroll on to learn more about platinum’s key applications.

    In this article

      1. Autocatalysts

      One of the main platinum uses is in the construction of autocatalysts. An autocatalyst is a “cylinder of circular or elliptical cross section made from ceramic or metal formed into a fine honeycomb and coated with a solution of chemicals and platinum group metals.” An autocatalyst mounted inside a stainless steel canister is known as a catalytic converter.

      Catalytic converters are installed in a vehicle’s exhaust lines, between the engine and muffler, where they are used to moderate the dangerous qualities of exhaust. Specifically, the autocatalysts that vehicles contain convert over 90 percent of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide into carbon dioxide, nitrogen and water vapor. They can also convert pollutants from diesel exhaust into carbon dioxide and water vapor, which is immensely helpful in reducing pollution.

      Autocatalysts have been used in the US and Japan since 1974, and are now so common that over 95 percent of new vehicles sold each year have one. As a result, they are a significant source of platinum demand that is not likely to disappear in the future. Indeed, as pollution rules become more stringent, car companies are looking at creating even more efficient autocatalysts.

      According to data from the World Platinum Investment Council (WPIC), automotive demand is forecasted to fall 3 percent to 3.02 million ounces in 2025 before falling another 3 percent to 2.92 million ounces in 2026.

      2. Platinum jewelry

      Platinum has many qualities that make it ideal for use in jewelry, and that is the second largest source of platinum demand. The metal is strong, resists tarnish and can repeatedly be heated and cooled without hardening or oxidizing.

      When used to make jewelry, platinum is commonly alloyed with other platinum-group metals such as palladium, as well as copper and cobalt, so that it is easier to work with.

      The history of platinum jewelry is long. More than 2,000 years ago, Indigenous people in South America made rings and ornaments out of platinum. Egyptians used platinum for decoration as early as the 7th century BCE. Meanwhile, Europeans began to use the metal in jewelry in the 18th century. Currently, China is the largest market for platinum jewelry.

      The WPIC expected platinum demand for jewelry was expected to increase 7 percent year-over-year to 2.16 million ounces in 2025, then decline 6 percent in 2026 to 2.04 million ounces.

      3. Industrial applications

      Platinum’s industrial applications could fill a book all on their own. For instance, platinum catalysts are used to manufacture fertilizer ingredients, and the metal is a key component in silicones, hard disks, electronics, dental restoration, glass-manufacturing equipment and sensors in home safety devices.

      Another platinum use is in the construction of hard drives with extremely high storage densities. And, because it is reactive to oxygen, oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide, platinum can be used to detect changes in the amount of those materials in vehicles and buildings. For the same reason, platinum is also used in medical sensors, particularly medical instruments that measure blood gases, to detect oxygen.

      Among growing segments is platinum’s use as a catalyst in the production of green hydrogen. Similar to how the metal is used to convert automotive pollutants, it can also be used as an electrolyzer to convert water into hydrogen and oxygen, with the resulting hydrogen usable in emission-free fuel cell vehicles. In 2025, demand from hydrogen production is predicted to grow by 20 percent to 50 million ounces, then increasing another 36 percent in 2026 to 58,000 ounces.

      Overall, WPIC forecast that industrial demand for platinum, including medical demand, would fall 22 percent to 1.9 million ounces in 2025 before growing 9 percent to 2.08 million ounces in 2026.

      4. Medical applications

      Platinum is used in electronic medical devices like those mentioned above, as well as in catheters, stents and neuromodulation devices. It is ideal for these applications because of its durability, conductivity and biocompatibility. The metal is also inert within the body, making it safe for implantation.

      To meet other medical needs, platinum can be formed into rods, wires, ribbons, sheets and micromachined parts. Further, it helps fight cancer in the drugs cisplatin and carboplatin, which are widely used to treat testicular cancer, as well as ovarian, breast and lung cancer tumors.

      Medical demand for platinum has increased in recent years, and is forecast to rise 4 percent to 320,000 ounces in 2025 and another 4 percent to 322,000 ounces in 2026.

      FAQs about platinum

      How much is platinum worth?

      In 2026, the price of platinum has spiked significantly as part of a precious metals bull market trading as high as US$2,900. In 2025, the PGM ranged between US$960 and US$1,900 per ounce.

      Although the industry is facing a growing supply deficit, it is also dealing with lagging demand. The shortfall in supply is related to a hangover from COVID-19 lockdowns, Russia’s war in Ukraine and ongoing electricity shortages and railway issues in the top platinum producing country South Africa. Russia typically ranks as the world’s second largest platinum-producing country.

      Meanwhile, economic pressures worldwide have weighed on demand for platinum from the automotive industry. However, the same economic challenges have led to less demand for electric vehicles, which don’t require platinum-laden catalytic converters.

      Which is more valuable, gold or platinum? Why?

      Platinum in general has historically traded on par or at a premium to gold, but since 2015 the two metals have diverged in price, with gold taking the high road. This split has been attributed to gold’s safe-haven status and platinum’s reliance on the industrial and jewelry markets, which don’t fare well in times of economic uncertainty.

      This has led to increasing demand for platinum jewelry as a cheaper alternative to gold jewelry.

      Although platinum is 30 times rarer than gold, much harder to mine and in high demand due to its important industrial uses, precious metal gold has long been valued as a form of currency and a store of wealth. The gold price is almost double the price of platinum in 2026.

      What’s the best investment, gold or platinum?

      Both gold and platinum have wealth-generating potential, but it’s important to determine which precious metals fit your investment strategy; consider looking at supply, demand and prices for each option before making a decision.

      To learn more, check out our article What is the Best Precious Metal to Invest In?

      Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      The US Federal Reserve held its first meeting of 2026 from Tuesday (January 27) to Wednesday (January 28) amid growing tensions between Fed independence and the Trump administration.

      The central bank met analysts’ expectations by maintaining the federal funds rate in the 3.5 to 3.75 percent range. After three consecutive cuts at the end of 2025, the Fed decided to hold the line on interest rates. The board welcomed some positive signs of stabilization in the US economy, but has decided to take a “wait-and-see” approach.

      The Fed has a dual mandate to promote maximum employment and price stability.

      For several months now, its Board of Governors has been split between those concerned with preventing a further slowdown in the US labor market and those fearing the fight against inflation is far from over.

      The Fed’s preferred inflation metric, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, came in above the 2 percent target, landing at 2.8 percent for November 2025. Meanwhile, Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows that the US economy added a modest 50,000 jobs in December 2025 compared to 56,000 jobs added in the previous month.

      A weak labor market in the face of entrenched inflation has left the Fed in a pickle.

      Lowering rates in turn lowers the cost of borrowing, which can provide businesses with more runway to grow their workforce. However, increasing available money supply by easing access to borrowing can also increase inflation.

      The split between doves and hawks that began in late 2025 is still plaguing the Fed into the new year, which promises to see current Chair Jerome Powell replaced with someone more likely to be on board with the much lower rate environment desired by the Trump administration. Two Fed board members cast dissenting votes against holding rates steady, including Governor Stephen Miran and Governor Christopher Waller, who both pushed for a 0.25 percent cut.

      “Economic activity has been expanding at a solid pace,” explained the Fed. “Job gains have remained low, and the unemployment rate has shown some signs of stabilization. Inflation remains somewhat elevated.”

      The unemployment rate ended 2025 at 4.4 percent. While that’s historically low, data also shows limited job vacancies, and low rates of new hiring. Business Insider reporter Madison Hoff notes that economists are calling this a “low-fire, low-hire environment” due to uncertainty over where the economy is headed.

      “It’s likely Fed leaders will stick to the status quo in January, in hopes that steady rates will push inflation closer to their 2% goal,” she wrote. “Affordability is a major concern for American households, as prices rise on housing, groceries, healthcare, and more. Powell has consistently prioritized price stability during his time as chair.”

      During a press conference following the rate decision, Powell was careful not to commit to any future rate cut timeline. While the board still sees “some tension between employment and inflation,” that is moderating, and the Fed no longer sees any big risk either of accelerated inflation or a further significant breakdown in the labor market.

      There’s also not much chance of a rate hike, either.

      “We don’t take things off the table, but it isn’t anybody’s base case right now,” said Powell.

      While PCE remains elevated at 2.8 percent, Powell noted that if the impact of tariffs were removed that figure would be hovering just above 2 percent. He explained that the Fed thinks this impact is largely in the rear-view mirror now.

      Any day now, US President Donald Trump is expected to announce a replacement for Powell, whose term expires in May 2026. Trump has criticized the Fed and Powell in particular, saying they haven’t lowered rates quickly enough.

      On October 27, US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent announced a shortlist of candidates to replace Powell, including Fed governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh and BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) executive Rick Rieder.

      The Wall Street heavyweight is reportedly the favored candidate at the moment.

      “Under Warsh, the Fed would likely signal a preference for a smaller footprint. Despite recent support for near-term rate cuts, his longer-standing views favor a scarce-reserves framework and balance-sheet reduction, which markets would associate with higher term premium and greater yield-curve volatility,” he added.

      Trump’s feud with the Fed escalated earlier this month, when the US Department of Justice served the agency with grand jury subpoenas, threatening a criminal indictment over Powell’s testimony to the Senate Banking Committee this past June. In addition to that, last week, the Supreme Court sat for oral arguments over whether Trump can legally remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook from her position over allegations of mortgage fraud.

      Although Powell batted away any political questions from reporters during the press conference, he did acknowledge that the Supreme Court case between Trump and Cook is the most “important legal case in the Fed’s 113-year history.’

      The gold price spiked to a new high of US$5,361.31 per ounce after the Fed’s decision, although much of that boost likely came from a much weaker US dollar, which is trading at four year lows. Silver traded in a range of US$110 to US$116 per ounce, just below the all-time high of US$117.72 per ounce set on Monday (January 26).

      Equities reactions were fairly muted following the rate announcement on Wednesday, with the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:INX) up 0.083 percent to reach 6,972.78. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq-100 (INDEXNASDAQ:NDX) gained 0.31 percent to come in at 26,020.9, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDEXDJX:DJI) was down 0.0064 percent, coming to 49,000.29. It seems Wall Street had already factored in the Fed’s decision to hold.

      The next Fed interest rate decision will come on March 18, the second to last Fed meeting before Powell’s term as chair comes to an end. Most analysts expect interest rates to remain in a holding pattern until the second half of 2026.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      Here’s a quick recap of the crypto landscape for Wednesday (January 28) as of 9:00 a.m. UTC.

      Get the latest insights on Bitcoin, Ether and altcoins, along with a round-up of key cryptocurrency market news.

      Bitcoin and Ether price update

      Bitcoin (BTC) was priced at US$88,867.96, up by 2.0 percent over 24 hours.

      Bitcoin price performance, January 28, 2025.

      Bitcoin price performance, January 28, 2025.

      Chart via TradingView.

      Ether (ETH) was priced at US$2,990.46, up by 3.7 percent over the last 24 hours.

      Altcoin price update

      • XRP (XRP) was priced at US$1.91, up by 2.3 percent over 24 hours.
      • Solana (SOL) was trading at US$126.72, up by 2.9 percent over 24 hours.

      Today’s crypto news to know

      Tether amasses massive gold reserve in Switzerland

      Tether has quietly built what its CEO describes as the world’s largest non-sovereign gold hoard, holding roughly 140 tons of bullion worth about US$23 billion in a high-security Swiss bunker.

      In an interview with Bloomberg, CEO Paolo Ardoino said the company has been buying more than a ton of physical gold per week, a pace that places it among the most active buyers in the global bullion market.

      Executives say the strategy is designed to harden Tether’s balance sheet and hedge against fiat currency risk, particularly for its flagship stablecoin USDT and its gold-backed token XAUT.

      Bullion traders note that sustained, price-insensitive buying of this scale can tighten supply and affect liquidity, especially when central banks and ETFs are also accumulating.

      Critics, however, warn that concentrating so much physical gold in a single private entity adds a new layer of systemic and transparency risk.

      South Dakota revives Bitcoin push

      A South Dakota lawmaker has reintroduced legislation that would allow the state to allocate up to 10 percent of certain public funds to Bitcoin, reviving a proposal that stalled last year.

      Filed by Republican Representative Logan Manhart, the bill would permit exposure through direct holdings, regulated custodians, or approved exchange-traded products. It also sets out strict custody and security standards, including exclusive control of private keys, encrypted hardware storage, and regular audits.

      The measure has cleared its first procedural hurdle and is now with the state’s Committee on Commerce and Energy.

      Similar initiatives have gained traction elsewhere, with several US states exploring or adopting crypto reserve strategies.

      Paypal survey: large enterprises lead crypto payments adoption

      Crypto payments are moving closer to routine checkout, driven largely by big businesses, according to a new survey from PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) and the National Cryptocurrency Association.

      The survey found that about 40 percent of U.S. merchants now accept cryptocurrency, rising to 50% among companies with more than US$500 million in annual revenue.

      Merchants cited growing customer demand as the main driver, with most saying shoppers have asked about paying with crypto and expect to use it regularly.

      Ease of use remains the key barrier: respondents said adoption would accelerate if crypto payments felt as simple as card transactions.

      PayPal said this demand is shaping product design, as firms look to integrate crypto without disrupting existing checkout flows.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

      This post appeared first on investingnews.com

      The U.S. Capitol Police told Fox News Digital one person was arrested for disrupting Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday during his Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill. 

      The individual was escorted from the hearing room at the Dirksen Senate Office Building as Rubio was about to deliver his opening statement about U.S. policy towards Venezuela.  

      ‘All right, here we go … you know the drill, off to jail,’ Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, said after a man in the audience got up and started yelling about a ‘war crime’ while holding a sign that said ‘Hands Off Venezuela.’ 

      ‘That’s a one-year ban from the committee. Anyone who is a persistent violator will be banned for three years. So, I don’t know whether the guy falls in that category, looks like it,’ added Risch, who is the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. ‘I hope after three years he’ll find a more productive means of employment.’

      ‘Secretary Rubio, we have two hearings a week. You know, you seem to have a more robust following than most of our witnesses that come before us,’ Risch added. 

      ‘There’ll be a couple more. Thank you for stopping the clock, but I appreciate it,’ Rubio responded. 

      The U.S. Capitol Police said the individual was arrested for demonstrating in a committee.  

      ‘It is against the law to protest inside the congressional buildings,’ the U.S. Capitol Police told Fox News Digital.

      Prior to the outburst, Risch thanked the audience for their attendance but also warned, ‘This is a public hearing. It is also the official business of the United States of America. And as a result of that, the committee has a zero-tolerance policy for interruptions or for attempts by anyone in the room to communicate with somebody up here or the witness.

      ‘So, as a result of that, if you do disrupt, you will be arrested. You’ll be banned for a year,’ he continued. ‘However, I’m told that we have some guests today who have completed their ban and are back with us again today. We hope you’ve had the time to think about your indiscretions and will behave yourself today. If you don’t, as a persistent violator, you’ll be banned for three years this time.’ 


      This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

      The U.S. will ‘very quickly’ reopen its embassy in Venezuela and establish a diplomatic presence on the ground, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

      ‘We have a team on the ground there assessing it, and we think very quickly we’ll be able to open a U.S. diplomatic presence on the ground,’ Rubio told members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Wednesday. 

      The goal, he said, would be not just to interact with officials on the ground but also ‘civil society and the opposition.’

      Such a move would mean restoring diplomatic relations with Venezuela, which were broken off in 2019 when the U.S. embassy’s doors shuttered.

      The Trump administration has been in dialogue with Delcy Rodríguez, Nicolás Maduro’s former vice president whom U.S. officials describe as an interim leader, since the capture of the wanted Venezuelan dictator.

      Reopening the embassy would require the U.S. to acknowledge a governing authority in Caracas, Venezuela, capable of receiving diplomats — a step that would mark a clear shift from Washington’s long-standing refusal to engage Venezuela’s executive. 

      The current Venezuelan leadership has ‘been very cooperative on that front,’ Rubio said. ‘Obviously there’s been some hard asks along the way.’

      Rubio said the administration is not seeking further military action in Venezuela but stressed that force has not been taken off the table. 

      ‘The president never rules out his options as commander in chief to protect the national interest of the United States,’ Rubio told lawmakers, while emphasizing that the U.S. is ‘not postured to, nor do we intend or expect to have to take any military action in Venezuela at any time.’

      Rubio also offered details about the first $500 million of the U.S.-brokered sale of Venezuelan oil, saying $300 million went back to Venezuela to pay for public services, while $200 million remains in a U.S.-run account.

      He declined to share details on how long Rodríguez would remain in power, but said a diplomatic presence would help keep a check on the new government. 

      ‘I can’t give you a timeline of how long it takes. It can’t take forever,’ Rubio said. ‘But it’s not even been four weeks.’

      His comments come amid mixed signals from Venezuela’s interim leadership. In recent days, Rodríguez has struck a defiant tone toward Washington, declaring she had ‘enough’ of U.S. influence in Venezuelan politics during a speech to oil workers broadcast on state television.

      The remarks appeared aimed largely at a domestic audience, even as Venezuela remains constrained by U.S. sanctions and dependent on American decisions over oil licenses and revenue controls.

      Rubio said the administration’s goal is to push Venezuela toward a democratic transition, describing the Maduro regime as ‘a base of operation for virtually every competitor, adversary and enemy in the world.’ 

      He said the U.S. is aiming for a ‘friendly, stable, prosperous Venezuela and democratic… with free and fair elections,’ while acknowledging the process will take time.

      Pressed on corruption concerns, Rubio said an audit mechanism is being established. 

      ‘The audit will be on,’ he told senators, stressing that spending would be restricted to approved public needs.


      This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

      The White House invited rank-and-file Senate Democrats to discuss government funding options, but they declined, instead opting to unveil a list of demands to rein in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in exchange for their votes to avert a shutdown. 

      ‘The White House hopes to avoid another debilitating government shutdown, and invited Democrats for a listening session to better understand their position,’ a senior White House official told Fox News Digital in a statement. ‘It’s unfortunate their leadership blocked the meeting.’

      Meanwhile, Senate Democrats unveiled their laundry list of demands to rein in the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) immigration operations in exchange for their support to keep the government open. 

      Democrats in the upper chamber have been quietly formulating a list of legislative demands to bring Republicans to corral DHS and ICE after another deadly shooting in Minnesota over the weekend. 

      That incident, where Alex Pretti was fatally shot during an immigration operation in Minneapolis, spurred Democrats to reject the forthcoming six-bill funding package teed up for a key test vote on Thursday. 

      Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., laid out three requirements for Democrats as the upper chamber hurtles toward a Friday deadline to fund the government. He noted that his entire caucus was unified on theset of common sense and necessary policy goals that we need to rein in ICE and end the violence.’

      Schumer’s first demand was an end to roving patrols, tightening the rules governing the use of warrants, and requiring that ICE coordinate with state and local law enforcement. 

      Second on the list was a uniform code of conduct and accountability for federal agents, akin to the same standards applied to state and local law enforcement. Schumer contended that when those policies are broken, there should be independent investigations. 

      And third, Democrats want ‘masks off, body cameras on,’ and for federal agents to carry proper identification.

      ‘These are common sense reforms, ones that Americans know and expect from law enforcement,’ Schumer said. ‘If Republicans refuse to support them, they are choosing chaos over order, plain and simple. They are choosing to protect Ice from accountability over American lives.’

      Over the last few days, Senate Republicans have signaled their willingness to negotiate reforms to the agency beyond those baked into the existing DHS funding bill, but they have added the caveat that Senate Democrats have to actually produce a list, first. 

      And Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has made clear that Republicans would plow ahead with the current six-bill funding package, which among other bills includes funding for the Pentagon, for Thursday’s vote. However, he hasn’t entirely closed the door on stripping the DHS bill as Democrats have called for.

      Though conversations are ongoing at the rank-and-file level across the aisle, Thune said that Schumer and Senate Democrats should bring their asks to the White House and President Donald Trump.  

      ‘If there’s a way that the Democrats have things that they want the White House could accommodate, short of having to modify the bill, that would be, I think the best way to do what we need to do here, and that is to make sure the government gets funded,’ Thune said. 

      Plus, if the DHS bill were stripped from the broader package and advanced through the Senate as Schumer has promised Democrats would do, it would still need to return to the House. Lawmakers in the lower chamber are still on their week-long recess and aren’t slated to return until next week.

      There is a possibility that Democrats’ demands could also be split into a separate bill, similar to what Republicans offered during the previous shutdown when Schumer and company demanded a clean, three-year extension to the expiring Obamacare subsidies. 

      When asked if he would be amenable to that option, Schumer charged that the ‘White House has had no specific, good, concrete ideas.’

      ‘In terms of what we want, there’s two simple things to do to get this done, and we want to get it done, and we want to get it done quickly,’ Schumer said. ‘Number one, Leader Thune has to separate the Homeland Security bill out from the other five. He can simply put an amendment on the floor to do that.’ 

      ‘So it’s simple to do, and I am quite confident it would pass overwhelmingly,’ he continued. ‘Already I’ve seen 6 or 7 Republicans say they would vote for it. So that’s what we should do. And then we should sit down and go and come up with strong proposals to reform ICE and rein in ICE and end the violence.’ 


      This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

      Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell warned Wednesday that a Supreme Court showdown over sitting Fed governor Lisa Cook could have far-reaching consequences for the central bank’s independence and the U.S. economy.

      ‘I would say that that case is perhaps the most important legal case in the Fed’s 113-year history. As I thought about it, it might have been hard to explain why I didn’t attend,’ Powell told reporters Wednesday at the Federal Reserve.

      ‘Paul Volcker famously attended a Supreme Court case in, I guess, 1985 or so, so there is precedent,’ Powell said, referring to the former Federal Reserve chair who served under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan.

      Last week, the nation’s highest court heard oral arguments for two hours on whether President Donald Trump has the authority to remove Cook from the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors. The court is expected to issue a ruling in the case by summer.

      Cook’s legal fight traces back to late August, when Trump said he was firing her from the board.

      He alleged she misrepresented information related to a trio of mortgages she obtained before joining the central bank. Cook has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with a crime.

      She sued Trump in federal court in Washington, D.C., to block her removal. On Sept. 9, a district court judge barred Trump from firing her while the case proceeds, a decision later upheld by a federal appeals court.

      Her ascent to the Federal Reserve was historic from the start. Appointed by former President Joe Biden in 2022, she became the first Black woman to serve as a Fed board governor, the seven-member panel that sets national interest rates and oversees the banking system.

      Now, she stands at the center of an even more consequential moment, as Trump seeks to fire her — a step that would be unprecedented in the Fed’s history.

      What’s more, Powell’s long-standing insistence on finishing his term, which ends in May, now comes amid a Justice Department criminal investigation into his congressional testimony on the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation.

      Powell confirmed the investigation and said he respected the rule of law and congressional oversight, but described the action as ‘unprecedented’ and driven by political pressure.

      Asked by reporters at the Federal Reserve for further comment, Powell declined to discuss the Justice Department investigation, pointing instead to remarks he made in a video statement on Jan. 11.

      His decision to address the issue so publicly, after days of private consultations with advisors, marked a sharp departure from the central banker’s typically measured approach.

      What comes next remains unclear, as the Federal Reserve navigates largely uncharted territory.


      This post appeared first on FOX NEWS