Author

admin

Browsing

Sona Nanotech Inc. (CSE: SONA) (OTCQB: SNANF) (the ‘Company’ or ‘Sona’) is pleased to announce that it has closed its non-brokered private placement that was announced on September 5, 2024 with the issuance of 6,575,000 common shares (each, a ‘Share’) at $0.25 per share (the ‘Financing’) for gross proceeds of $1,643,750. One Insider of Sona subscribed for 400,000 of those common shares for gross proceeds of $100,000. The subscription to the Financing by one insider of the Issuer is a related party transaction for the purposes of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (‘MI 61-101’). The Issuer is relying on exemptions from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements provided under sections 5.5(a) and 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101 on the basis that the fair market value of the insider’s subscription does not exceed 25% of the market capitalization of the Issuer as determined in accordance with MI 61-101. This Financing, together with Sona’s financing that closed on September 5, 2024, totals gross proceeds of $3,143,750.

As previously disclosed, Sona intends to use the net proceeds of the Financing for advancing studies to support regulatory permission for an international, multi-site, first-in-human clinical trial, further research and development of its Targeted Hyperthermia TherapyTM (‘THT’), as well as for general working capital purposes.

Numus Capital Corp. (the ‘Finder’), a registered Exempt Market Dealer, acted as exclusive finder for the Financing. In connection with the private placement, Sona paid the Finder a cash commission of $91,813 and issued 367,250 non-transferable share purchase warrants (the ‘Finder Warrants’). Each Finder Warrant entitles the Finder to acquire one Share at an exercise price of $0.25 until September 23, 2026. The Finder is a related party to Sona, a director of Sona being indirectly a principal shareholder of the Finder, as well such director of Sona also being a director and officer of the Finder.

All securities issued pursuant to the Financing will be subject to a hold period until January 24, 2025.

Contact:
David Regan, CEO
+1-902-536-1932
david@sonanano.com

About Sona Nanotech Inc.

Sona Nanotech, a nanotechnology life sciences company, is developing Targeted Hyperthermia™, a photothermal cancer therapy, which uses therapeutic heat to treat solid cancer tumors. The heat is delivered to tumors by infrared light that is absorbed by Sona’s gold nanorods in the tumor and re-emitted as heat. Therapeutic heat (41-48°C) stimulates the immune system, shrinks tumors, inactivates cancer stem cells, and increases tumor perfusion – thus enabling drugs to reach all tumor compartments more effectively. Targeted Hyperthermia promises to be safe, effective, minimally invasive, competitive in cost, and a valuable adjunct to drug therapy and other cancer treatments.

Sona has developed multiple proprietary methods for the manufacture of gold nanoparticles which it uses for the development of both cancer therapies and diagnostic testing platforms. Sona Nanotech’s gold nanorod particles are cetyltrimethylammonium (‘CTAB’) free, eliminating the toxicity risks associated with the use of other gold nanorod technologies in medical applications. It is expected that Sona’s gold nanotechnologies may be adapted for use in applications, as a safe and effective delivery system for multiple medical treatments, subject to the approval of various regulatory boards, including Health Canada and the FDA.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION: This press release includes certain ‘forward-looking statements’ under applicable Canadian securities legislation, including statements regarding the anticipated applications and potential opportunities of Targeted Hyperthermia Therapy, Sona’s preclinical and clinical study plans, future patent filings, regulatory submissions and approvals, and its product development plans. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions or estimates that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including the risk that Sona may not be able to successfully obtain sufficient clinical and other data to submit regulatory submissions, raise sufficient additional capital, secure patents or develop the envisioned therapy, and the risk that THT may not prove to have the benefits currently anticipated. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Sona disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Not for distribution to United States newswire services or for dissemination in the United States.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/224376

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Prismo Metals Inc. (CSE:PRIZ)(OTCQB:PMOMF)(FSE:7KU) (‘Prismo’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that drilling at its Palos Verdes project in Mexico has started. Hole PV-24-34 of this collaborative drilling program with Vizsla Silver Corp’s (TSXV:VZLA) (‘Vizsla’) was collared on Vizsla’s property. The planned length of the first hole is 250 meters out of a total expected 1,250 meters in the first phase of the program now underway

Dr. Craig Gibson, Co-Founder and Chief Exploration Officer of the Company explained: ‘The goal of the first phase of drilling is designed to explore the vein system to the west of the fault below the zone of bonanza grade intercepts from the previous campaigns. We expect the first hole to cut both the Palos Verdes vein as well as the higher gold-silver vein about 50 meters downdip from the previous intersections. Assays reported from last year’s drilling include hole PV-23-25 with 102 g/t gold, 3,100 g/t silver and 0.26% zinc over 0.5 meters, or 11,520 g/t silver equivalent – the highest-grade intercept recorded at the project to date (see News Release of July 27, 2023).’

As announced on July 31st, 2024, Prismo’s team mobilized at Palos Verdes in early August and immediately began preparation for the drill program with strategic partner Vizsla. The plan as designed will allow to test targets on the Palos Verdes concession with greater efficiency by utilizing drill pads located on Vizsla’s concessions adjacent to Palos Verdes.

‘Getting to this stage is the result of joint efforts from both the Prismo and Vizsla teams in Mexico,’ said Alain Lambert, CEO of Prismo. ‘The planning and preparation effort included our team and our driller’s team learning Vizsla’s safety, work and environmental protocols before work could begin as the drill pads are located on their ground. Also, the type of drill permit obtained by Vizsla allows for sites to be accessed by man-portable equipment. Furthermore, the rugged nature of the terrain required that the access to the site and the site itself be done by hand, lengthening the team’s preparation time. We have now reached the drilling phase.’

Lambert added: ‘We are very excited to resume drilling the Palos Verdes vein system which has already returned outstanding results. Combined with our fully permitted Hot Breccia copper project in the heart of the Arizona copper belt, Prismo expects a very active second half of 2024 with multiple drill results from these two world class exploration projects.’ For more information about the drill campaign, please watch Prismo’s latest video at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX116H1a2qA

Figure 1: Location and orientation of the proposed drill holes

Photo 1. Drill pad preparation at Palos Verdes

Photo 2. Drill installed on drill pad at Palos Verdes

‘We are eager to resume tracing the high-grade mineralization we’ve cut previously in the Palos Verdes vein by taking advantage of better hole geometry created by drilling from our Strategic Partner Vizsla Silver’s ground,’ said Dr. Craig Gibson, Co-Founder and Chief Exploration Officer of the Company.

‘Drilling farther from the vein outcrops will let us drill Palos Verdes well below the limited depths we could reach from our claims. We deeply appreciate Vizsla’s willingness to allow the drilling from their ground and the collaboration from their team down in Mexico.’

He commented further on the second hole and expected timing: ‘The second hole is planned to test a further 50 to 70 meters downdip and may be completed from the same site as the first hole or may be drilled from a second site 100 meters farther from the vein. These holes are expected to take three to four weeks to complete.’

Geologic modelling completed after that drilling shows that the Palos Verdes vein system is apparently comprised of at least three discrete structures:

The main Palos Verdes vein with a steep southeast dip located on the west side of the northwest-southeast fault.

A steeply southeast dipping hanging wall vein; and

A relatively flat lying vein that has high gold-silver ratios, similar to those in the western part of the Panuco district where Vizsla Silver has found the Napoleon and Copala resource areas.

Figure 2. Geologic and drill hole map of the Palos Verdes and adjacent concessions showing the surface projection of interpreted mineralized shoots based on surface assays and the location of an interpreted high-level alteration assemblage identified in core. Note NW-SE fault in the center of the claim is believed to have dropped-down the NE extension of the vein system. Drill pads for holes to be collared on Vizsla Silver ground are shown in purple and will test target areas indicated on the surface by the red ellipses. The location of new hole PV-24-34 is also shown.

Figure 3. 3D view of the sub-surface at Palos Verdes looking westerly showing veins in the southwestern Palos Verdes concession and planned holes in light blue and green. For clarity, the veins in the NE and the NW shear are not shown.

Prismo’s 3,000-meter drill program follows three main target recommendations made by the Panuco Joint Technical Committee comprised of Prismo’s Chief Exploration Officer Dr. Craig Gibson, Vizsla Silver’s VP Exploration Dr. Jesus Velador and Advisor Dr. Peter Megaw. The three main goals (See Figs. 2 & 3 below) are:

Trace the down dip extension of the mineralized shoot defined by previous drilling on the southwest portion of the vein.

Seek continuation of the vein on the northeast extension of the vein across a cross-fault believed to have offset the vein downward.

Test the extreme northeasterly extension of the Palos Verdes vein system near the concession limit adjacent to the historical Jesusita mine.

For more information about this news release, please watch Prismo’s latest In The News video at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX116H1a2qA

Present during the In The News interview were: Alain Lambert CEO, Steve Robertson President, Dr. Craig Gibson Co-Founder and Chief Exploration Officer.

Qualified Person
Dr. Craig Gibson, PhD., CPG., a Qualified Person as defined by NI-43-01 regulations has reviewed and approved the technical disclosures in this news release. Dr. Gibson is also Chief Exploration Officer and a director of the Company.

About Palos Verdes
The Palos Verdes project is located in the historic Panuco-Copala silver-gold district in southern Sinaloa, Mexico, approximately 65 kilometers NE of Mazatlán, Sinaloa, in the Municipality of Concordia. The Palos Verdes concession (claim) covers 700 meters of strike length of the Palos Verdes vein, a member of the north-easterly trending vein family located in the eastern part of the district outside of the area of modern exploration. Shallow drilling (

About Prismo
Prismo (CSE:PRIZ) is mining exploration company focused on two precious metal projects in Mexico (Palos Verdes and Los Pavitos) and a copper project in Arizona (Hot Breccia).

Please follow @PrismoMetals on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, and YouTube

Prismo Metals Inc.
1100 – 1111 Melville St., Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 3V6

Contact:
Alain Lambert, Chief Executive Officer

Steve Robertson, President steve.robertson@prismometals.com

Jason Frame, Manager of Communications jason.frame@prismometals.com

Neither the Canadian Securities Exchange accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This release includes certain statements and information that may constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect the expectations or beliefs of management of the Company regarding future events. Generally, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as ‘intends’ or ‘anticipates’, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘should’, ‘would’ or ‘occur’. This information and these statements, referred to herein as ‘forward‐looking statements’, are not historical facts, are made as of the date of this news release and include without limitation, statements regarding discussions of future plans, estimates and forecasts and statements as to management’s expectations and intentions with respect to, among other things: the timing, costs and results of drilling at Palos Verdes and Hot Breccia. The current drill program is being conducted from a concession not owned by the Company and a change in Vizsla’s business plan in the drilling area could negatively impact Prismo.

These forward‐looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, notably delays in obtaining or failure to obtain appropriate funding to finance the exploration program at Hot Breccia.

In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Company has applied several material assumptions, including without limitation, that: Vizsla will continue to work with Prismo to allow for drilling at Palos Verdes, the ability to raise capital to fund the drilling campaign at Hot Breccia and the timing of such drilling campaign.

Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements or forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. Readers are cautioned that reliance on such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, forward-looking information or financial outlook that are incorporated by reference herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

SOURCE:Prismo Metals Inc.

View the original press release on accesswire.com

News Provided by ACCESSWIRE via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

As deadline approached, Hezbollah had just launched long range rockets to strike towards Israeli settlements in Judea and Samaria. The Israeli Defense Forces had responded with more than 300 attacks on targets within Lebanon, some within Beirut. The Pentagon announced that our second aircraft carrier, the Harry Truman, was beginning its deployment early to reach the region and join another American carrier task force already deployed there, this one including and around the Abraham Lincoln. 

The Biden/Harris Middle East policy is in flames, as is the region. Given that all Vice President Harris can say about Israel and Hamas—’We must get a deal done!’— what would she say about Israel and Lebanon? What former President Trump has said, consistently, is that Israel needs to win, fast. 

For whom do you suppose Israelis would vote if they could vote in U.S. elections? For whom would the Islamist ruling class of Iran vote? (Iran is not a free country like Israel, so the hypothetical question about voting in our presidential election is restricted to those whom the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei would allow to vote.)

We don’t know, and there’s little to go on. The Jewish People Policy Institute did one survey of Israeli Jews in July, before President Biden withdrew, and found that among Jews in Israel, 51 percent prefer Trump compared to 35 percent who prefer Biden, with 14 percent stating they have no opinion. I have seen no update since then. 

We have seen Iran target the campaign of former President Trump. It is a safe bet that the mullahs prefer a Harris-Waltz victory to one of Trump-Vance because Trump ran the ‘maximum pressure’ campaign against Tehran which had nearly bankrupted the regime there until President Biden ended it and began not only to ease sanctions but unfreeze billions in Iranian assets in order to secure the release of hostages. Khamenei wants no part of Trump 2.0. 

The Israelis? It’s a country deeply divided along political lines but almost wholly united in the need to win the war in Gaza and the one that looms in Lebanon and perhaps beyond (and which may have fully begun overnight). Given that Biden/Harris has played yo-yo with arms shipments to Israel even as it has continually attempted to restrain the Israeli Defense Forces, it’s a safe bet that most Israelis are hoping Donald Trump returns to the White House in January. 

Many American voters could not care less about Israel or Iran. They are worried about the cost of groceries. Those folks are going to vote for Trump as the certain way to bring down the cost of food is to decrease the cost of producing food and the cost of transporting it to supermarkets. The way to do that is to unleash and fully support American domestic energy production. Trump has the majority of the inflation-driven voter locked up just as Harris has the abortion-on-demand voter locked up. 

For those few percent of Americans who vote for national security and ‘peace through strength,’ and especially for those who pray for peace in Jerusalem and the region and for freedom for the Iranian people, the choice is clear: Donald Trump.

Hugh Hewitt is host of ‘The Hugh Hewitt Show,’ heard weekday mornings 6am to 9am ET on the Salem Radio Network, and simulcast on Salem News Channel. Hugh wakes up America on over 400 affiliates nationwide, and on all the streaming platforms where SNC can be seen. He is a frequent guest on the Fox News Channel’s news roundtable hosted by Bret Baier weekdays at 6pm ET. A son of Ohio and a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Michigan Law School, Hewitt has been a Professor of Law at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law since 1996 where he teaches Constitutional Law. Hewitt launched his eponymous radio show from Los Angeles in 1990.  Hewitt has frequently appeared on every major national news television network, hosted television shows for PBS and MSNBC, written for every major American paper, has authored a dozen books and moderated a score of Republican candidate debates, most recently the November 2023 Republican presidential debate in Miami and four Republican presidential debates in the 2015-16 cycle. Hewitt focuses his radio show and his column on the Constitution, national security, American politics and the Cleveland Browns and Guardians. Hewitt has interviewed tens of thousands of guests from Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to Republican Presidents George W. Bush and Donald Trump over his 40 years in broadcast, and this column previews the lead story that will drive his radio/ TV show today.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Quetzal Copper Corp. (TSXV: Q) (‘Quetzal’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to provide an update that it received a permit that allows drilling to commence at the Company’s Princeton Copper Project in British Columbia, Canada. The 11,500-hectare property sits between the Hudbay Minerals and Mitsubishi owned Copper Mountain Mine and the town of Princeton.

CEO Matt Badiali said, ‘Princeton is the project that originally convinced us to create Quetzal Copper. It checks all the boxes for a potential home run project: next to an operating mine, high-grades in historic samples, and drive-up/drive-home targets. Despite being next to a world-class mine, the key targets remain undrilled and present an exciting opportunity for Quetzal shareholders. Historically, the targets were spread over a series of mining claims, worked independently. We are thrilled to have all the claims united now and are moving rapidly to commence drilling a soon as we can.’

Princeton Copper Project

Figure 1: Location of Princeton Project Claims and Targets

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10393/224344_744f6129a429a89d_001full.jpg

The targets at the Princeton Copper project have only two reported historic drill holes. Quetzal’s technical team compiled historic mapping with new geophysics data and four new targets emerged from that data:

Bud South – standout geology, geochemistry and magnetic anomaly with supporting soil geochemical anomaly and trenching and drilling data.Knob Hill – a strong chargeability anomaly beneath cover, downhill from copper-gold in nearby trenches.Aura and Contact – newly identified geophysical targets under till cover.

Bud South

The drill program will follow up on historic drilling at Bud South. The target has a significant copper in soils footprint over a strong magnetic high, with surface trenches exposing porphyry intrusions and alteration. In 1987 the target was drilled with three holes. The first and second holes were abandoned at shallow depths due to bad ground. The third, DD87-3 on the edge of the magnetic high, returned 10.5 metres of 0.18% copper and 0.34 g/t gold.

Our interpretation, supported by recent 3D inversions of magnetic data, is that DD87-3 did not test the core of the target.

Figure 2: Bud South Target

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10393/224344_744f6129a429a89d_002full.jpg

Knob Hill

The Knob Hill target is a strong chargeability high anomaly 300 to 600m in diameter under thin cover. It occurs downhill of historic trenching which has exposed chalcopyrite bearing quartz-albite veins. Grab samples from trenches ran 0.6% to 1.2% copper and from 0.55 g/t to 0.99 g/t gold. This target has never been drilled.

Figure 3: Knob Hill Target

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/10393/224344_744f6129a429a89d_003full.jpg

Aura and Contact

The Aura and Contact targets are the least explored. They are defined in newly collected geophysical data. Aura appears as an intense apparent magnetic low surrounded by an apparent magnetic-high halo 1.5km in diameter beneath thin till cover. Where covered by the recent IP survey, the halo is a chargeability high. These may be porphyry intrusions with skarn margins which makes them priority copper-magnetite mineralization targets.

First Nations Acknowledgement

Quetzal recognizes that the Princeton Copper Project is located in the traditional unceded territories of the Smelqmix People. We are committed to respect for the land and for the people who reside there.

Cristinas Project Update

Quetzal also reports completion of the phase one exploration and drilling program at the Cristinas project in Chihuahua, Mexico. Quetzal completed three drillholes and a downhole EM (electromagnetic) survey to follow-up on targets generated by surface mapping, sampling, and fixed loop EM surveys. Each hole evaluated prospective conductors defined by the geophysical surveys. Unfortunately, the limited copper mineralization encountered does not justify further exploration at this time.

QP Statement

Dr. Roy Greig, P.Geo., a Qualified Person as defined under National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed, and approved the technical content in this release.

About Quetzal Copper

Quetzal is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties in British Columbia and Mexico. Quetzal currently has a portfolio of three properties located in British Columbia, Canada and one in Mexico. The Company’s principal project, Princeton Copper, is located adjacent to Hudbay’s Copper Mountain mine in southern British Columbia.

Quetzal Copper Limited
Matthew Badiali, CEO
Phone: (888) 227-6821

Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained herein contains ‘forward-looking statements’ within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. ‘Forward-Looking information’ includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the activities, events, or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, planned exploration activities. Generally, but not always, forward-looking information and statements can be identified by the use of words such as ‘plans’, ‘expects’, ‘is expected’, ‘budget’, ‘scheduled’, ‘estimates’, ‘forecasts’, ‘intends’, ‘anticipates’, or ‘believes’ or the negative connotation thereof or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘might’ or ‘will be taken’, ‘occur’ or ‘be achieved’ or the negative connotation thereof. Forward-Looking statements in this news release include, among others, statements relating to exploration and development of the Company’s properties.

Such forward-looking information and statements are based on numerous assumptions, including among others, that the results of planned exploration activities are as anticipated, the anticipated cost of planned exploration activities, that general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner, that financing will be available if and when needed and on reasonable terms, that third party contractors, equipment and supplies and governmental and other approvals required to conduct the Company’s planned exploration activities will be available on reasonable terms and in a timely manner. Although the assumptions made by the Company in providing forward-looking information or making forward-looking statements are considered reasonable by management at the time, there can be no assurance that such assumptions will prove to be accurate.

Forward-Looking information and statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual events or results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future events or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking information or statements, including, among others: negative operating cash flow and dependence on third party financing, uncertainty of additional financing, no known mineral reserves or resources, the limited operating history of the Company, aboriginal title and consultation issues, reliance on key management and other personnel, actual results of exploration activities being different than anticipated, changes in exploration programs based upon results, availability of third party contractors, availability of equipment and supplies, failure of equipment to operate as anticipated, accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry, environmental risks, changes in laws and regulations, community relations and delays in obtaining governmental or other approvals.

Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking information or implied by forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or reissue forward-looking information as a result of new information or events except as required by applicable securities laws.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/224344

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Republican vice presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, has spent the last month reviewing plans, strategics and potential tough questions ahead of the Oct. 1 CBS Vice Presidential Debate against Democrat Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, according to a source familiar with the preparations by former President Trump’s running mate. 

House Majority Whip Rep. Tom Emmer, R-Minn., was selected to play Walz during mock debates to prepare Vance for the Minnesota governor’s ‘folksy’ Midwestern style, the source told Fox News Digital. 

The source revealed that Vance has been doing most of his preparations at his home in Cincinnati or in online sessions with his team. 

Members of Vance’s inner circle – including his wife Usha –  as well as Trump campaign strategist Jason Miller have been involved in prep sessions. The source said those helping Vance are immersing themselves in honing Walz’s debate style by watching videos of his past debates from his previous campaign runs. 

The source also pointed to Vance’s frequent media interviews as helping him prepare for the upcoming debate, set to take place in New York City.

During regular appearances on Sunday shows, Vance has gained experience in engaging in debate often with contentious network hosts and responding to attacks, the source added. 

Meanwhile, Walz’s mock debates will feature U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg acting as JD Vance’s doppelganger, the Associated Press reported, citing people with knowledge of the candidate’s preparations. 

Trump already faced off against President Biden in a June 27 debate hosted by CNN, and Biden’s disastrous performance set into motion his eventual departure from the race and endorsement of Harris. After Trump and Harris took the stage in Philadelphia on Sept. 10 in the second presidential debate of the 2024 election cycle hosted by ABC News, Trump said on TRUTH Social there would be ‘no third debate.’ 

Meanwhile, Harris said in an X post over the weekend she would accept the terms of a debate on Oct. 23 hosted by CNN. During his campaign rally in Wilmington, North Carolina, on Saturday, Trump said Harris has done one debate, while, ‘I’ve done two. It’s too late to do another. I’d love to, in many ways, but it’s too late. The voting is cast.’

Fox News’ Caroline Elliott and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A new poll indicates surging support among America’s youngest voters for Vice President Harris in her 2024 showdown against former President Trump.

Harris tops Trump by 31 points among people aged 18-29 likely to vote in the presidential election, according to a poll released Tuesday morning by Harvard University’s Institute of Politics (IOP) at the Harvard Kennedy School.

That’s a dramatic switch from Harvard’s survey from this spring, which indicated President Biden topping Trump by just 13 points among likely youth voters.

The numbers in Harvard’s spring survey, as well as similar findings in other polls, raised alarms among Democrats, as younger voters have long been a key part of the party’s base. 

Biden dropped his re-election bid in July in the wake of a disastrous debate performance against Trump, and Harris instantly enjoyed a wave of enthusiasm and momentum as she replaced her boss atop the Democrats’ 2024 ticket.

‘This poll reveals a significant shift in the overall vibe and preferences of young Americans as the campaign heads into the final stretch,’ longtime IOP polling director John Della Volpe said. ‘Vice President Harris has strengthened the Democratic position among young voters, leading Trump on key issues and personal qualities.’

Harris grabs the support of 61% of likely voters aged 18-29, according to the poll, with Trump at 30%. Green Party candidate Jill Stein, Libertarian Party candidate Chase Oliver and independent Cornel West each stand at 1% support, with 6% undecided or refusing to answer.

The vice president’s lead over Trump exceeds the roughly 25-point victory by Biden over Trump among younger voters, according to a Fox News Voter Analysis of the 2020 presidential election.

The latest Fox News national poll, conducted this month, indicated Harris topping Trump by 17 points among voters under age 30.

The poll points to a number of factors fueling Harris’ very large margin over Trump.

Among them, a significant enthusiasm gap of nearly three-quarters of young Democrats saying they will ‘definitely’ vote, compared to 6-in-10 Republicans, and a jump in Harris’ approval rating as vice president, from 32% in the spring to 44% now. Harris’ favorable rating now stands at plus five points, while Trump’s favorables are 30 points underwater.

Also boosting Harris: She outperforms Trump on key issues and personal qualities asked of both major party nominees in the survey.

The poll also points to a boost for Harris from social media, highlighting that just over half of young voters questioned ‘encountering memes about Harris online in the last month, 34% of whom say it positively influenced their opinion. Conversely, 56% have seen memes about Trump, with 26% reporting a negative impact on their perception.’

The survey also spotlights a widening gender gap of 30 points, up from 17 points in the spring.

‘While both men and women are moving toward Harris, the rate of female support eclipses male support,’ the poll’s release notes.

According to the survey, Harris holds a 53%-36% margin among likely male voters aged 18-29, but her lead surges to 70%-23% among likely female voters.

Pointing to his survey’s results, Della Volpe emphasized that ‘Gen Z and young millennials’ heightened enthusiasm signals a potentially decisive role for the youth vote in 2024.’

The survey by the Institute of Politics is Harvard’s 48th Youth Poll. Over the past quarter-century, Harvard University has become a leader in gauging young Americans’ political opinions and voting trends.

The latest edition of the poll was conducted Sept. 4-16 with 2,002 people 18-29 nationwide questioned. The survey’s overall sampling error is plus or minus 2.65 percentage points.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

As deadline approached, Hezbollah had just launched long range rockets to strike towards Israeli settlements in Judea and Samaria. The Israeli Defense Forces had responded with more than 300 attacks on targets within Lebanon, some within Beirut. The Pentagon announced that our second aircraft carrier, the Harry Truman, was beginning its deployment early to reach the region and join another American carrier task force already deployed there, this one including and around the Abraham Lincoln. 

The Biden/Harris Middle East policy is in flames, as is the region. Given that all Vice President Harris can say about Israel and Hamas—’We must get a deal done!’— what would she say about Israel and Lebanon? What former President Trump has said, consistently, is that Israel needs to win, fast. 

For whom do you suppose Israelis would vote if they could vote in U.S. elections? For whom would the Islamist ruling class of Iran vote? (Iran is not a free country like Israel, so the hypothetical question about voting in our presidential election is restricted to those whom the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei would allow to vote.)

We don’t know, and there’s little to go on. The Jewish People Policy Institute did one survey of Israeli Jews in July, before President Biden withdrew, and found that among Jews in Israel, 51 percent prefer Trump compared to 35 percent who prefer Biden, with 14 percent stating they have no opinion. I have seen no update since then. 

We have seen Iran target the campaign of former President Trump. It is a safe bet that the mullahs prefer a Harris-Waltz victory to one of Trump-Vance because Trump ran the ‘maximum pressure’ campaign against Tehran which had nearly bankrupted the regime there until President Biden ended it and began not only to ease sanctions but unfreeze billions in Iranian assets in order to secure the release of hostages. Khamenei wants no part of Trump 2.0. 

The Israelis? It’s a country deeply divided along political lines but almost wholly united in the need to win the war in Gaza and the one that looms in Lebanon and perhaps beyond (and which may have fully begun overnight). Given that Biden/Harris has played yo-yo with arms shipments to Israel even as it has continually attempted to restrain the Israeli Defense Forces, it’s a safe bet that most Israelis are hoping Donald Trump returns to the White House in January. 

Many American voters could not care less about Israel or Iran. They are worried about the cost of groceries. Those folks are going to vote for Trump as the certain way to bring down the cost of food is to decrease the cost of producing food and the cost of transporting it to supermarkets. The way to do that is to unleash and fully support American domestic energy production. Trump has the majority of the inflation-driven voter locked up just as Harris has the abortion-on-demand voter locked up. 

For those few percent of Americans who vote for national security and ‘peace through strength,’ and especially for those who pray for peace in Jerusalem and the region and for freedom for the Iranian people, the choice is clear: Donald Trump.

Hugh Hewitt is host of ‘The Hugh Hewitt Show,’ heard weekday mornings 6am to 9am ET on the Salem Radio Network, and simulcast on Salem News Channel. Hugh wakes up America on over 400 affiliates nationwide, and on all the streaming platforms where SNC can be seen. He is a frequent guest on the Fox News Channel’s news roundtable hosted by Bret Baier weekdays at 6pm ET. A son of Ohio and a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Michigan Law School, Hewitt has been a Professor of Law at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law since 1996 where he teaches Constitutional Law. Hewitt launched his eponymous radio show from Los Angeles in 1990.  Hewitt has frequently appeared on every major national news television network, hosted television shows for PBS and MSNBC, written for every major American paper, has authored a dozen books and moderated a score of Republican candidate debates, most recently the November 2023 Republican presidential debate in Miami and four Republican presidential debates in the 2015-16 cycle. Hewitt focuses his radio show and his column on the Constitution, national security, American politics and the Cleveland Browns and Guardians. Hewitt has interviewed tens of thousands of guests from Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to Republican Presidents George W. Bush and Donald Trump over his 40 years in broadcast, and this column previews the lead story that will drive his radio/ TV show today.


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
A production assembly line for the Volkswagen Beetle factory near Wolfsburg, Germany. 1960.

It’s the end of an era. Volkswagen has just announced that it is planning the closure of two of its German auto manufacturing plants for the first time in its corporate history. In the face of rising competitive pressures from China, its leadership made the seemingly prudent decision to shutter unprofitable operations and concentrate resources elsewhere. The forces of global competition have done what even Allied bombing campaigns could not: close Germany’s more venerable manufacturing plants.

The looming closures, however, are not what spells the end of an era. Rather, it is the response to the planned closures that bodes ill, and not just for Volkswagen but Germany, and free-market economies more broadly. A bloc of interventionists, from labor unions to government ministers, has leapt into the breach, proclaiming their intent to “prohibit” Volkswagen’s intended course. They wish, in short, to force the private company to sustain the unsustainable — intending, by using the power of advocacy, to prevent the kind of creative destruction that makes modern economies flourish. 

Daniela Cavallo, a leading representative of Volkswagen’s General Works Council, for instance, says that Volkswagen’s management decision “is not just a disgrace. It’s a declaration of bankruptcy… Closing factories? Terminations for operational reasons? Cutting wages? Such ideas would only be admissible in one scenario! And that is if the entire business model is dead.” Trade union activists like her are insistent that Volkswagen be prohibited from doing what must be done.

She is, of course, exactly wrong. Closing plants and cutting wages cannot remotely be interpreted as signs that an “entire business model is dead.” In fact, such adjustments are absolutely necessary components in maintaining a vigorous and functioning business model which can freely reallocate resources in the face of a constantly shifting landscape. While the comfortably insulated inhabitants of Wolfsburg may not wish to hear it, the world has shifted in substantial ways and there is no inherent right to business-as-usual.

Not surprisingly, politicians have weighed in as well. Lower Saxony Governor Stephan Weil has said the company “needs to address its costs but should avoid plant closings.” While that’s easy for him to say, it’s not clear how VW is going to solve the fundamental mismatch between high operating costs and lowered consumer demand. 

And the problem is deeper than merely the market’s softening for German cars. VW has, among other political intrigues, been asked to help meet government mandates by producing more electric cars to meet state emissions targets. Unfortunately for VW, fewer and fewer buyers seem to be open to the electric revolution, especially with the abrupt end in taxpayer-funded electric car subsidies. State tinkering, in other words, is having its predictable effect: laws to artificially boost demand cannot also artificially boost supply in the long term. Something had to give, and now there is hell to pay.

VW’s problems with government go beyond mere market tampering. Since state government holds 20% of the voting rights at the firm, and employee representatives hold half, VW finds itself in something of a pickle. One might say Wolfburg has VW by the ears — the company can neither continue as it has, nor let its political masters go.

And this may the rub: since VW has so heavily relied on state subsidies, much of the talk about factory closures may in fact be industrial-political theater. With threats to close assembly lines causing such raucous dissent (and international headlines), there is some cynical justification for believing this all may be a ploy to scare politicians into re-introducing EV subsidies, thereby juicing VW’s bottom line. It’s an old gambit, to be sure — keep the gravy flowing or we will have to make some uncomfortable scenes…

Whether or not threats to shutter factories are a sham, the overt market manipulations on display represent a serious blow to the efficient allocation of resources. Left unchecked, Germany’s days as an economic engine will be numbered: as its motor sputters and slows under the increasing drag of bureaucratic strictures, it will inevitably backslide into Soviet-style industrialism in which political clout matters more than efficient production. While German labor activists jostle to “save jobs,” and politicians jockey to coddle a titan of industry, they are unwittingly knocking the supports from under a system that led to Germany’s famous prosperity in the first place. Advocates of “protection” cannot defy the basic laws of economics regardless of how loudly they object. The jobs they wish to save will instead be cruelly wiped away in a global floodtide, its comfortably insulated beneficiaries immiserated under the onslaught of the inevitable.

Dismal as this all sounds, it is not a certain death-knell. Bureaucratic sclerosis, after all, displays its own cycles of creative destruction. Sensible people (and Germany has more than a few) may yet call a halt to these kinds of clumsy and counterproductive market interventions. It is entirely conceivable that freed from the fetters of state and union mandates, VW can find a creative way off of its destructive path. But if it does not, it may well mark the end of a free-market era in Germany, with enormous implications for Europe’s largest economy.

 The families of organ donors and recipients gathered in Tehran for the national day of organ donation in Iran, 2018.

Today in America there are about 93,000 people awaiting kidneys for transplant. If you’re one of these individuals you’ll likely wait about four years before getting a kidney, enduring dialysis in the meantime — unless, of course, you’re among the one in twenty people who die each year for want of a kidney.

Thomas Sowell famously says about economic reality that “there are no solutions, only trade-offs.” He’s correct, mostly. Every now and then we encounter a problem that does have a solution. The kidney shortage is one of these problems. And the solution is to allow kidney donors to be paid for their donations.

The case for freeing the market in transplantable kidneys is strong, both economically and ethically. Thousands of lives would be saved every year and thousands more delivered from the misery and indignity of dialysis. The downside is almost nonexistent.

Nevertheless, most people steadfastly refuse even to consider supporting a policy of allowing any living individual to be paid a market price in exchange for one of his or her kidneys. Many of the arguments against a free market in kidneys spring exclusively from people’s aesthetic revulsion at the thought of commerce in kidneys. This revulsion is curious, given that it’s surely more revolting to allow people to die unnecessarily simply in order to protect other people’s aesthetic sensibilities.

While I would immediately lift the prohibition on kidney sales, there are several intermediate measures that would yield much benefit if a complete lifting of this prohibition is off the table. One of the most promising was proposed by the late George Mason University law professor Lloyd Cohen.

Cohen recommended that all of our body organs be considered to be parts of our estates in the same way that our homes and jewelry are parts of our estates. When someone dies, his or her heirs would own the deceased person’s body organs just as they own that person’s other properties. These heirs could then sell, give away, or ignore these organs.

The advantages of Cohen’s proposal over the current blanket prohibition on sales are clear. Each year, tens of thousands of healthy transplantable body organs are buried or cremated, needlessly destroyed despite their ability to extend and improve the lives of thousands of people. By treating all transplantable organs as property of each deceased person’s estate, this wholesale destruction of lifesaving body parts would be significantly reduced.

It’s easy to bury a loved one with his or her healthy kidneys or heart if agreeing to have those organs harvested for transplant brings nothing more than a sense of satisfaction from helping a stranger live longer or better. But if the sale of the loved one’s organs will bring thousands of additional dollars to the estate, I’ll bet my pension that the number of kidneys — as well as hearts, lungs, and other body organs — harvested for transplant from newly deceased persons will skyrocket. As a result, thousands of living people will enjoy longer, healthier, and more productive lives.

Of course, as with all properties destined to become part of a person’s estate, that person would, while still alive, have great leeway to determine the disposition of his organs. If someone objects religiously to his organs being harvested, that person must merely specify in his will that no such harvesting is to take place. That man’s family and the courts will be bound to honor this demand.

Or if someone specifies in her will that she wants only her daughter Ann or her nephew Bob to receive her kidney (or heart, or lungs, or liver, or …) for transplant, that provision, too, would be honored.

Cohen’s proposal avoids a major objection to a free market in kidney sales — namely, that too many living persons will impair their health by selling their kidneys to make a quick buck. Cohen’s proposal can be adopted without permitting living persons to sell their organs.

Still, objections are raised, most notably, that potential heirs will skimp on the quality of a sick loved one’s medical care.

No one knows what the prices of transplantable cadaveric organs would be if these were salable on the market. But it’s implausible that adding the value of these organs to our estates will endanger our lives given that our homes, automobiles, and many other assets are already part of our estates. It makes no sense to dismiss Cohen’s proposal on such flimsy speculations.

Another intermediate measure, proposed several years ago by Adam Pritchard and me, is even more modest than the one proposed by Cohen. Pritchard and I propose allowing living people to sell rights to harvest their organs upon their deaths. That is, while I’m still prohibited from selling my kidney when I’m alive, I would be permitted to sell to you — or to a hospital, to a medical insurer, to anyone — the right to harvest my kidneys (and other organs) upon my death.

Today we are all encouraged to become organ donors. But moral encouragement is all we get. How many more of us would sign up to become donors if we received some payment for our agreement while still alive?

Because no one knows what condition my body organs will be in when I die — and because I likely will not die until around 2040 — the prices that I would be able to fetch in 2024 for the rights to harvest my organs upon my death would be modest. My guess is that the right to harvest my kidneys and other organs in the future would fetch a total price today of no more than $250. Still, for $250 I’m more likely to take the necessary steps to agree to become an organ donor than I am when the price I earn from taking such steps is $0.

Is there any good reason to exclude the market value of deceased person’s body organs from being reckoned as part of the deceased’s estate? Is there any good reason for preventing still-living people from selling the rights to harvest their organs in the future, after they die? I can think of no such reason that begins to stand up to the enormous good that such measures would unquestionably produce in the form of more live-improving and life-saving transplant surgeries.

‘You can’t say gold is at a high — you have to look at why, at what brings it to this number and is that still valid. The US they say is creating a trillion dollars of new debt every 100 days,’ he said.

‘I would say gold is not at its high, and looking at it thinking it’s at a high because you value it like a stock or a bond — that would mislead you and prevent you from taking a position that I think you should to preserve your wealth.’

Explaining why it’s important to establish a position in gold sooner than later, Blasi pointed to large entities like central banks, many of which continue to make large purchases of the yellow metal.

‘The central banks see that we are devaluing this currency,’ he said. ‘A lot of people don’t get it, they say we have inflation — well that’s what it is, inflation is the devaluation of the currency. And the move is on for sound money.’

Watch the interview above for more from Blasi on gold. He also discusses the silver, platinum and palladium markets.

Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com