Author

admin

Browsing

Nevada Sunrise Metals Corporation (TSXV: NEV,OTC:NVSGF) (OTC Pink: NVSGF) (‘Nevada Sunrise’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce it has completed surface geophysical and geochemical exploration surveys at its Griffon Gold Mine Project (‘Griffon’, or the ‘Project’) in White Pine County, Nevada, USA. Griffon hosts a past-producing gold mine and is located within the Battle Mountain-Eureka Gold Belt, a prolific trend that contains numerous gold mines and deposits.

Highlights of the Fall 2025 Exploration Program

Nevada Sunrise based its Fall 2025 surface exploration program on the results of AI-generated analysis by VRIFY Technology Inc. (‘VRIFY‘) of the extensive historical Griffon geological and geophysical database for the Project (see Nevada Sunrise news release dated September 9, 2025), including:

  • Over 700 soil samples collected by APEX Geoscience USA (‘APEX’) will be analyzed by partial leach geochemical analysis by both Ionic Leach and Soil Gas Hydrocarbon (‘SGH’) methods. Each of these methods are capable of detecting subtle indications of buried mineralization that may not show robust surface expression from conventional soil surveys;
  • APEX carried out a ‘walking mag’ survey consisting of 50-line kilometres that has provided the first ever high-resolution magnetic data at Griffon. Preliminary interpretation of the data has revealed important information about the structural settings of the past-producing Discovery Ridge and Hammer Ridge deposits – knowledge which now can be applied to other untested target areas at the Project;
  • SJ Geophysics Ltd. carried out 3D induced polarization/resistivity (‘3D-IP’) and audiomagnetotellurics (‘AMT’) surveys consisting of 16.8 line kilometres on grids designed to investigate the resistivity and chargeability characteristics of the subsurface at Griffon. These survey types have never been performed at Griffon since the discovery of gold on the property in 1986 (see Figure 1).

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/2799/278476_nevadasunrise_550.jpg

Soil Sampling and Walking Mag surveys in progress at Griffon, November 2025

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/2799/278476_nevadasunrise.jpg

‘Nevada Sunrise is fortunate to have completed this important work during a period of favourable autumn weather in Nevada,’ said Warren Stanyer, President and CEO of Nevada Sunrise. ‘The pending integration of new geochemical and geophysical data with VRIFY’s AI predictive model will be an invaluable addition to the development of Griffon drill targets for 2026.’

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/2799/278476_7d678aef54c8c8d3_004.jpg

Figure 1: Griffon Gold Mine Project 2025-2026 Target areas

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/2799/278476_7d678aef54c8c8d3_004full.jpg

Nevada Sunrise anticipates the receipt of geochemical analyses and geophysical modeling from the ground surveys in January 2026. Re-sampling and multi-element geochemical analysis of reverse circulation drill cuttings collected at Griffon by Fremont Gold Ltd. (now Hayasa Metals Inc.) in 2020, which were historically assayed only for gold, is still in progress. The broader analytical package will include pathfinder elements such as antimony, arsenic, thallium, and mercury that could provide geochemical vectors to enhance drill targeting at the Project.

Griffon Permitting Update

In late September 2025, Nevada Sunrise submitted a Plan of Operations (the ‘Plan‘) for Griffon to the United States Forest Service (the ‘USFS‘) to advise the USFS of the Company’s proposed surface disturbance and 2026 drilling plans at Griffon. Receipt of the Plan was confirmed in October 2025 and the Company awaits comments from the USFS regarding the timing and recommended execution of environmental baseline surveys that are a requisite before the commencement of drilling.

About Griffon

Griffon is located approximately 50 kilometres (33 miles) southwest of Ely, Nevada and consists of 89 unpatented mineral claims totaling approximately 1,780 acres (720 hectares). Griffon is situated within a 60 kilometre (40 mile) section of the Battle Mountain-Eureka Belt, which hosts operating gold mines and significant gold deposits (see Figure 2).

In February 2025, the Company entered into a mining lease to purchase Griffon from an arm’s-length party (see Nevada Sunrise news release dated February 20, 2025). Gold was mined at Griffon in two open pits from 1998 to 1999 and was reported to have produced 62,661 ounces of oxide gold until its premature closure in 1999, a year when the price of gold averaged approximately US$278 per ounce.1

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/2799/278476_7d678aef54c8c8d3_005.jpg

Figure 2: Griffon’s Location in the Battle Mountain-Eureka Gold Belt

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/2799/278476_7d678aef54c8c8d3_005full.jpg

For more information about Griffon, including maps and photos, visit the Company’s website at: www.nevadasunrise.ca

References:

1 Nevada Division of Minerals, ‘Major Mines of Nevada’, published 1998 and 1999.

Qualified Person

The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Robert Allender Jr, CPG, SME and a Qualified Person for Nevada Sunrise as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Mr. Allender has examined information regarding the historical, current and proposed exploration at Griffon, which includes his review of the historical sampling, analytical procedures and results underlying the information and opinions contained herein.

Management cautions that historical results were collected and reported by operators unrelated to Nevada Sunrise and have not been verified nor confirmed by its Qualified Person; however, the historical results create a scientific basis for ongoing work at the Griffon property. Management further cautions that historical results, discoveries and published resource estimates on adjacent or nearby mineral properties, whether in stated current resource estimates or historical resource estimates, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved on the Griffon property.

About Nevada Sunrise

Nevada Sunrise is a junior mineral exploration company with a strong technical team based in Vancouver, BC, Canada, that holds interests in gold, copper and lithium exploration projects located in the State of Nevada, USA.

Nevada Sunrise holds the right to purchase a 100% interest in the Griffon Gold Mine Project, located approximately 50 kilometers (33 miles) southwest of Ely, NV.

Nevada Sunrise holds the right to earn a 100% interest in the Coronado Copper Project, located approximately 48 kilometers (30 miles) southeast of Winnemucca, NV.

Nevada Sunrise owns 100% interests in the Gemini West, Jackson Wash and Badlands lithium projects, all of which are located in the Lida Valley in Esmeralda County, NV.

As a complement to its exploration projects in Esmeralda County, the Company owns Nevada Water Right Permit 86863, also located in the Lida Valley basin, near Lida, NV.

For Further Information Contact:
Warren Stanyer, President and Chief Executive Officer
email: warrenstanyer@nevadasunrise.ca Telephone: (604) 428-8028
Website: www.nevadasunrise.ca

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This release may contain forward‐looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words ‘expects’, ‘plans’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘projects’, ‘potential’ and similar expressions, or that events or conditions ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘may’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ occur and include disclosure of anticipated exploration activities. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward‐looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. Forward‐looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date such statements were made. The Company expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward‐looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Such factors include, among others, risks related to: the results of the VRIFY study seeking new target areas at Griffon; the anticipated benefits of integration of new exploration results with the VRIFY results; the ability of the Company to raise funds for exploration activities, permitting and property maintenance costs at Griffon; reliance on technical information provided by third parties on any of our exploration properties; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; current economic conditions; future prices of commodities; possible variations in grade or recovery rates; failure of equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; the failure of contracted parties to perform; labor disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays due to pandemic; delays due to weather events; delays in obtaining governmental approvals, financing or in the completion of exploration, as well as those factors discussed in the section entitled ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis for the Nine Months ending June 30, 2025, which is available under Company’s SEDAR profile at: www.sedarplus.ca

Although Nevada Sunrise has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Nevada Sunrise disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/278476

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Restart of mining operations at San Agustin

  • Mining the reserve will produce 45,000 ounces at an AISC of $1,990/GEO providing a margin of over $2,300/oz at current spot gold prices

  • Oxide targets drilling program underway with 37 holes completed and submitted for analysis

Heliostar Metals Ltd. (TSXV: HSTR,OTC:HSTXF) (OTCQX: HSTXF) (FSE: RGG1) (‘Heliostar’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce that mining, crushing and conveying and stacking of ore onto the leach pad at San Agustin has recommenced.

Heliostar CEO, Charles Funk, commented, ‘Restarting mining at San Agustin is a significant milestone for Heliostar. It delivers on our guidance of a Q4, 2025 restart issued at the beginning of the year and sets the Company up for a large increase in consolidated gold production in 2026. Mining the current reserve will produce 45,000 ounces of gold expected to generate US$40M in cash flow at a US$3,000 gold price. Further, the Company is in the middle of a 10,000-15,000 metre drill program focused on finding potential extensions of the orebody that may support an increase in mine life at San Agustin.’

‘Investing in Heliostar at the beginning of the year required trust that the many undefined opportunities recognized by our team within our portfolio could be progressed. We move toward the end of the year having crystalized many of these opportunities. We have certainty in our production profile at San Agustin and La Colorada going into 2026 and look forward to providing formal guidance in January. We have shown the value of our growth opportunities with studies on our flagship Ana Paula and Cerro del Gallo projects. With more drilling completed in 2025 than the entire previous history of Heliostar, we aim to continue to build on our 8.2M gold and gold-equivalent ounce M&I resource base1,2. We plan to deliver continued production growth, and grow the value of Heliostar on a per share basis. We are only just getting started!’

Restart Update

The Company announced it had received the final approvals from the government to restart mining at San Agustin on July 22, 2025. Since that time, Heliostar has rapidly advanced work to restart mining activities at the operation. This included purchase and transfer of the surface access rights to Heliostar, adjusting the location of a power line tower and establishing surface access roads to the Corner area.

Over the past several months, the Company has relocated the vegetation and topsoil at the Corner area and recommissioned the 30,000 tonne per day crushing circuit while residual heap leach operations have continued uninterrupted. This has allowed Heliostar to restart open pit mining with two ore blasts and two waste blasts completed to date. The mining contractor has successfully mobilized 90% of the mobile equipment fleet to site which will allow the operation to achieve production targets. Crushing activities continue to ramp up to full capacity with stacking of new oxide ore on the leach pad underway.

Restart Photos

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_003.jpg

Figure 1: Production drill rig drilling blast hole patten in Corner Area at San Agustin.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_003full.jpg

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_004.jpg

Figure 2:  First blast of the Corner Area at San Agustin.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_004full.jpg

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_005.jpg

Figure 3: First ore being loaded to be delivered to the crusher at San Agustin.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_005full.jpg

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_006.jpg

Figure 4: First new ore being conveyed and stacked on the San Agustin leach pad.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_006full.jpg

Technical Report Summary

On January 14, 2025, the Company filed an amended and restated technical report titled ‘San Agustin Operations, Durango State, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report’ prepared by Mr. Todd Wakefield, RM SME, Mine Technical Services, Mr. David Thomas, P.Geo., Mine Technical Services, Mr. Jeffrey Choquette, P.E., Hard Rock Consulting, Mr. Carl Defilippi, RM SME, Kappes Cassiday and Associates and Ms. Dawn Garcia, CPG, Stantec with an effective date of November 30, 2024 (the ‘Technical Report’).

The life-of-mine (LOM) plan set out in the Technical Report indicates that a probable mineral reserve of 68,000 ounces of gold can be exploited based on 1.2 years of mine life at a site level all-in sustaining cost (AISC) of US$1,990/oz Au. The initial capital cost in the Technical Report is estimated at US$4.2M.

The Technical Report demonstrates a post-tax NPV5% of US$35.3M, a post-tax IRR of 548% and a payback period of 0.2 years for the upside case at a $3,000/oz gold price.

The mineral reserve estimate included in the Technical Report is based on operation of the existing crusher and conveyor system having a nameplate throughput capacity of about 30,000 tonnes/day and the continued operation of the heap leach and carbon-in-column (CIC) process circuit processing ore from the expanded open pit. The mineral reserve estimate included in the Technical Report is presented below. The expected operating performance and operating cost forecasts were compiled with the benefit of benchmarking historical performance at San Agustin and the input of seasoned professionals knowledgeable of the conventional technologies being used at San Agustin, the expected consumption quantities of key supplies, and commercial pricing for goods and services in Mexico.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_007.jpg

Figure 5: View of Corner Area looking to southeast showing the current reserve model and planned pitshell.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_007full.jpg

Oxide Growth Targets

With mining now started at San Agustin mine, the Company is working to extend the mine life. To date, 37 drill holes totalling 3,300m from the ongoing 10,000-15,000m drill program have been completed with assays pending. This drill program is focused on defining additional gold-bearing oxide gold material at the margins of the current pit and at the edge of the Corner Area that can extend the life of the operation. Drilling at the Corner SW, MKT and Phase 3 SW areas (shown below in Figure 6) has been completed with the drill currently active at the Corner SW area.

Higher-grade oxide results from the priority Corner SW target area drilled by a previous operator include:

  • Hole 14-SAGRC-196 grading 3.52 grams per tonne (g/t) Gold over 18.3 metres from 32.0 metres downhole
  • Hole 14-SAGRC-177 grading 0.34 g/t Gold over 15.24 metres from 27.4 metres downhole

The targets are the extensions of mineralized corridors defined by grade control drilling and through a comprehensive re-logging and multi-element re-assaying program undertaken by Heliostar geologists in H1, 2025. The increase in gold price has also increased the potential of certain lower grade areas that were not previously a priority at San Agustin. The base case economics in the January 2025 Technical Report were shown at a $2,100/oz gold price within resource pit shells calculated at $2,150/oz.

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_008.jpg

Figure 6: Plan map of San Agustin showing oxide gold growth targets with drilling and blasthole data shown. Areas highlighted in yellow show drilling progress.

To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/7729/278432_964ab61f64952905_008full.jpg

Statement of Qualified Person

Stewart Harris, P.Geo., a Qualified Person, as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, has reviewed the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this news release and has approved the disclosure herein. Mr. Harris is employed as Exploration Manager of the Company.

Footnotes

  1. La Colorada, San Agustin, Ana Paula and San Antonio are gold-only measured and indicated resource contained ounces.
  2. Cerro del Gallo are measured and indicated resource contained gold-equivalent ounces. The gold equivalent grades were calculated as AuEq = Au Grade + (((Cu Price in US$/lb * 22.0462 * Cu Recovery and Payable) / (Au Price in US$/g * Au Recovery and Payable)) * Cu Grade) + (((Ag Price in US$/g * Ag Recovery and Payable) / (Au Price in US$/g * Au Recovery and Payable)) * Ag Grade). Metal prices used are US$2,500/oz Au, US$30.50/oz Ag, and US$4.60/lb Cu. In addition, a gold recovery of 74%, a silver recovery of 60% and a copper recovery of 17% were used for Oxide material, a gold recovery of 68%, a silver recovery of 73% and a copper recovery of 62% were used for Mixed Oxide material, a gold recovery of 61%, a silver recovery of 58% and a copper recovery of 73% were used for Mixed Sulfide material and a gold recovery of 53%, a silver recovery of 35% and a copper recovery of 59% were used for Sulfide material. The average overall payables from the smelter and refineries were estimated at 98.8% for gold, 90.1% for silver and 88.2% for copper.

About Heliostar Metals Ltd.

Heliostar is a gold mining company with production from operating mines in Mexico. This includes the La Colorada Mine in Sonora and the San Agustin Mine in Durango. The Company also has a strong portfolio of development projects in Mexico and the USA. These include the Ana Paula project in Guerrero, the Cerro del Gallo project in Guanajuato, the San Antonio project in Baja Sur and the Unga project in Alaska, USA.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:

Charles Funk
President and Chief Executive Officer
Heliostar Metals Limited
Email: charles.funk@heliostarmetals.com
Phone: +1 844-753-0045
Rob Grey
Investor Relations Manager
Heliostar Metals Limited
Email: rob.grey@heliostarmetals.com
Phone: +1 844-753-0045

 

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release includes certain ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and ‘forward-looking information’ under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘target’, ‘plan’, ‘forecast’, ‘may’, ‘would’, ‘could’, ‘schedule’ and similar words or expressions, identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information relate to, among other things, show the full extent of the deposit, upgrade and expand the resource base, growing our annual production profile in the near term and bringing additional production online.

Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information relating to the terms and completion of the Facility, any future mineral production, liquidity, and future exploration plans are based on management’s reasonable assumptions, estimates, expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on management’s experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the receipt of necessary approvals, price of metals; no escalation in the severity of public health crises or ongoing military conflicts; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs of development of exploration projects; and the Company’s ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms.

These statements reflect the Company’s respective current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political, and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: precious metals price volatility; risks associated with the conduct of the Company’s mining activities in foreign jurisdictions; regulatory, consent or permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company’s management team and outside contractors; risks regarding exploration and mining activities; the Company’s inability to obtain insurance to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all; currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the environment, health and safety; the ability of the communities in which the Company operates to manage and cope with the implications of public health crises; the economic and financial implications of public health crises, ongoing military conflicts and general economic factors to the Company; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company’s interactions with surrounding communities; the Company’s ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; lack of liquidity for shareholders of the Company; litigation risk; and the factors identified under the caption ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Readers are cautioned against attributing undue certainty to forward-looking statements or forward-looking information. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements or information, other than as required by applicable law.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/278432

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Strengthening the Technical Team as Goldfields Advances Toward Pre-Feasibility

 Fortune Bay Corp. (TSXV: FOR,OTC:FTBYF) (FWB: 5QN) (OTCQB: FTBYF) (‘Fortune Bay’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce the appointment of Ronald (Ron) Halas, P.Eng., as Senior Mining Advisor for its Goldfields Gold Project in Saskatchewan, and to provide an update on recent exploration and development activities at Goldfields.

Fortune Bay Corp. Logo (CNW Group/Fortune Bay Corp.)

Highlights:

  • Senior Mining Advisor AppointmentRon Halas, P.Eng. brings over 35 years of global gold mining experience, including most recently as Chief Operating Officer of Lumina Gold Corp., where he led feasibility-level advancement of the Cangrejos gold-copper project prior to its acquisition by CMOC Group in 2025.
  • Permitting and Environmental Progress – Permitting activities are advancing, with a community engagement tour completed in November 2025. Results from environmental baseline studies are expected in January 2026, supporting planned regulatory engagement in Q1 2026.

Dale Verran, Chief Executive Officer of Fortune Bay, commented ‘At Goldfields, we are advancing toward a Pre-Feasibility Study while progressing permitting and stakeholder engagement activities. Ron’s appointment comes at an important time for the project. He brings deep, hands-on experience across the lifecycle of gold mining projects, from feasibility studies through mine construction and operations. His practical, execution-focused perspective significantly strengthens our technical team as this work continues.’

Ron Halas, Senior Mining Advisor, added ‘Goldfields is an excellent project with strong fundamentals, and I am pleased to be assisting Fortune Bay at a pivotal stage in its advancement. With project development and permitting activities gaining momentum, this is an opportune time to apply my experience in support of Fortune Bay’s disciplined approach to project development. I look forward to working closely with the team to help unlock the project’s potential.’

Appointment of Senior Mining Advisor

Fortune Bay has appointed Ronald (Ron) Halas, P.Eng., as Senior Mining Advisor for the Goldfields Gold Project. Mr. Halas will work with Fortune Bay on a consulting basis, providing direct input into project development planning and permitting activities as the project advances toward a PFS.

Mr. Halas brings more than 35 years of global mining and project development experience, spanning open pit and underground gold mining, feasibility studies, mine construction, permitting, and operations.

Most recently, Mr. Halas served as Chief Operating Officer of Lumina Gold Corp., where he led technical and operational activities supporting the advancement of the Cangrejos gold-copper project in Ecuador through feasibility-level studies. Lumina Gold Corp. was subsequently acquired by CMOC Group in 2025, following the completion of key technical milestones.

Prior to Lumina Gold Corp., Mr. Halas held senior executive and operational leadership roles with Global Atomic Corporation (Chief Operating Officer), Kinross Gold Corporation, IAMGOLD Corporation, Placer Dome, INCO (now Vale), and PT Freeport Indonesia, among others. His experience includes leadership roles at large-scale open pit and underground mining operations and the delivery of multiple feasibility studies across the Americas, Africa, and Asia. He has also served as a board member and technical advisor to several publicly listed mining companies.

Mr. Halas holds a Bachelor of Mining Engineering from McGill University and a Graduate Diploma in Business Administration from Simon Fraser University, and is a registered Professional Engineer (P.Eng.).

Goldfields Project Update

Exploration Drilling

  • Sample batches are being consigned to SRC Geoanalytical Laboratories in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, for gold analysis. First-batch assay results are expected in late-January, with additional results to follow as further batches are processed.
  • Drilling in January will continue exploration step-outs 200 to 350 metres beyond the current mineral resource extents, targeting extensions of higher-grade structural trends at Box.

Goldfields Development & Permitting

  • Metallurgical sample processing for Box is currently underway at SGS Canada – Lakefield, Ontario, focused on refining parameters for gravity-recoverable and flotation-recoverable gold. Results are expected in mid-January and will support decision-making around final project scope for initiation of a PFS.
  • A community tour of Indigenous communities and municipalities was completed in November 2025 to support early engagement regarding the proposed open-pit mine development at Goldfields, in accordance with the Updated PEA mine plan. This tour represents a key step in advancing project development consultation in line with the Company’s commitments to early, transparent, and respectful engagement with Indigenous Nations and local stakeholders.

Qualified Person & Technical Disclosure

The technical and scientific information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Gareth Garlick P.Geo., Vice-President Technical Services of the Company, who is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101. Mr. Garlick is an employee of Fortune Bay and is not independent of the Company under NI 43‑101.

About Fortune Bay

Fortune Bay Corp. (TSXV:FOR,OTC:FTBYF; FWB:5QN; OTCQB:FTBYF) is a Canadian mineral exploration and development company with assets in Canada and Mexico. The Company’s primary focus is advancing the Goldfields Gold Project in Saskatchewan, Canada. Fortune Bay also holds the Poma Rosa Gold-Copper Project in Chiapas, Mexico, as well as an optioned uranium project portfolio in the Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan. Fortune Bay continues to evaluate and advance its portfolio in a disciplined manner while maintaining a strong technical foundation and prudent capital management. For more information, please visit www.fortunebaycorp.com or contact info@fortunebaycorp.com.

On behalf of Fortune Bay Corp.

‘Dale Verran’
Chief Executive Officer
902-334-1919

Cautionary Statement

Information set forth in this news release contains forward-looking statements that are based on assumptions as of the date of this news release. These statements reflect management’s current estimates, beliefs, intentions, and expectations. They are not guarantees of future performance. Words such as ‘expects’, ‘aims’, ‘anticipates’, ‘targets’, ‘goals’, ‘projects’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘believes’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘continues’, ‘may’, variations of such words, and similar expressions and references to future periods, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: the results of the Updated PEA, including future Project opportunities, future operating and capital costs, closure costs, AISC, the projected NPV, IRR, timelines, permit timelines, and the ability to obtain the requisite permits, economics and associated returns of the Project, the technical viability of the Project, the market and future price of and demand for gold, the environmental impact of the Project, and the ongoing ability to work cooperatively with stakeholders, including Indigenous Nations, local Municipalities and local levels of government. Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although these statements are based on information currently available to the Company, the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management’s expectations. Risks, uncertainties and other factors involved with forward- looking information could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Forward looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the Company’s objectives, goals or future plans, statements, exploration results, potential mineralization, the estimation of mineral resources, exploration and mine development plans, timing of the commencement of operations and estimates of market conditions. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited to failure to identify mineral resources, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to reserves, the inability to complete a feasibility study which recommends a production decision, the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, inability to fulfill the duty to accommodate Indigenous Nations and local Municipalities, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry, and those risks set out in the Company’s public documents filed on SEDAR. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law. For more information on Fortune Bay, readers should refer to Fortune Bay’s website at www.fortunebaycorp.com.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

SOURCE Fortune Bay Corp.

Cision View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/December2025/18/c1857.html

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Questcorp Mining Inc. (CSE: QQQ,OTC:QQCMF) (OTCQB: QQCMF) (FSE: D910) (the ‘Company’ or ‘Questcorp’) announces that has closed its non-brokered private placement (the ‘Offering’) of flow-through units (each, an ‘FT Unit’). In connection with closing, the Company has issued 6,023,077 FT Units, at a price of $0.13 per FT Unit, for gross proceeds of up to $783,000. Each FT Unit consists of one common share of the Company, issued as a flow-through share within the meaning of the Income Tax Act (Canada), and one-half-of-one share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a ‘Warrant’). Each Warrant entitles the holder to purchase an additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.20 until December 17, 2027.

The Company anticipates the proceeds from the Offering will be used to conduct exploration of the Company’s North Island Copper Property, located on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

In connection with closing, the Company paid $53,900 and issued 414,615 share purchase warrants (each, a ‘Finders’ Warrant‘) to certain arms-length parties who assisted in introducing subscribers to the Offering. Each Finders’ Warrant is exercisable to acquire a common share of the Company until December 17, 2027, with 134,615 of the Finders’ Warrants exercisable at a price of $0.13 and 280,000 exercisable at a price of $0.20. All securities issued in connection with the Offering are subject to restrictions on resale until April 18, 2026 in accordance with applicable securities laws.

About Questcorp Mining Inc.

Questcorp Mining Inc. is engaged in the business of the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in North America, with the objective of locating and developing economic precious and base metals properties of merit. The Company holds an option to acquire an undivided 100% interest in and to mineral claims totaling 1,168.09 hectares comprising the North Island Copper Property, on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, subject to a royalty obligation. The Company also holds an option to acquire an undivided 100% interest in and to mineral claims totaling 2,520.2 hectares comprising the La Union Project located in Sonora, Mexico, subject to a royalty obligation.

Contact Information

Questcorp Mining Corp.

Saf Dhillon, President & CEO

Email: saf@questcorpmining.ca
Telephone: (604) 484-3031

This news release includes certain ‘forward-looking statements’ under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties, uncertain capital markets; and delay or failure to receive board or regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the geophysical surveys will be completed as contemplated or at all and that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/278391

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The title of Dan Wang’s book Breakneck focuses on the People’s Republic of China (PRC) specifically, but it is really about the self-conscious great-power rivalry between China’s Communist Party leaders and the United States. Along the way, we encounter all the popular points of controversy between the two great nations, covering everything from bullet trains, iPhone factories, and Trump tariffs to zero-COVID lockdowns, rare-earth mineral supply chains, and the demographic long tail of the One Child policy.

This isn’t just another case of two big nations clashing—as big nations tend to do from time to time. For finance analyst and university research fellow Dan Wang, the US and the PRC are uniquely paired in world affairs. In his introduction, he writes, “…no two peoples are more alike than Americans and Chinese,” citing their shared love of consumerism, pragmatic natures, and appreciation for technological progress.

Wang sees the US and PRC economies, in particular, as complements, which explains the rapid growth of trade between the two in the twenty-first century: “It is almost uncanny how much the United States and China have been complementary of each other.”

Yet at the same time, he says that, on a political level, “the two systems are a study in contrasts.” Fair enough, as they’re obviously very different. Yet in other passages, he frames the US and PRC systems as “inversions” of each other. This is seen in each society’s attitudes toward innovation and technology adoption, and to politics in general. It would take a sublime Confucian scholar to disentangle these contradictions. Perhaps the two nations are the phoenix and the dragon of world politics, the cobra and the mongoose, or simply each other’s evil twin.

Focusing on differences, Wang describes a Chinese government run by relentlessly practical but unsentimental engineers, who excel at building impressive infrastructure projects yet often disregard the negative impact on individual citizens. By contrast, America—the home of legal proceduralism and bureaucracy—has, in recent decades, erected a bewildering array of roadblocks to major projects, but does a much better job of recognizing and safeguarding individual rights.

This summary of strengths and weaknesses naturally suggests that each nation could benefit from borrowing elements of the other. The Chinese would be better off in certain ways by becoming more American, and vice versa. The first nation to adopt its counterpart’s advantages, Wang argues, will—like a comic book villain or mythic hero—bring balance to the force of good governance and “win” the twenty-first century.

It’s a reassuring prescription in a way, implying that there are no fundamental conflicts between the two nations that can’t be resolved through better understanding. Yet it contrasts sharply with the rhetoric coming out of both Beijing and Washington, D.C., where policy hawks from each country frame a twenty-first-century showdown that many fear could lead to war in the Taiwan Strait or elsewhere.

It also recalls the attitudes of some Western academics and center-left pundits during the Cold War, who assumed that the US and Soviet systems were similarly paired and would eventually converge in ways beneficial to both societies.

As late as 1988, for example, famed Affluent Society author John Kenneth Galbraith co-published a book with Marxist economist Stanislav Menshikov that imagined a future of increased trade and cooperation between the US and the USSR. They also, as Publisher’s Weekly put it at the time, “…criticize[d] establishment interests on both sides that seek to perpetuate the cold war.”

Galbraith and Menshikov were right that the Cold War would soon end—but not in a way that left the Soviets with a 50 percent stake in the world’s political future. If the collapse of the Soviet system—at a time when some Western economists were still predicting that the Warsaw Pact countries were on track to surpass the West economically—arrived so unexpectedly, one wonders what yet-unseen surprises the Chinese Communist Party has in store for the twenty-first century.

The Party, after all, has delivered plenty of dramatic—and mostly unpleasant—shocks to its own people over the decades. Wang takes deep dives into two of the most infamous: the One Child policy and the zero-COVID containment strategy. The former was certainly more horrific, although the latter’s impacts are far more recent and the responsibility of the current government, giving the pandemic lockdowns more resonance for younger Chinese citizens.

The PRC’s One Child policy was enforced, in successive iterations, from 1980 to 2015, and as a two- and three-child policy until 2021. The statistics, as Wang recounts them, are grim. In 1983, for example, the government sterilized 16 million women and aborted 14 million babies. Women who tried to resist were pressured, harassed, and sometimes even kidnapped by enforcement squads. Official propaganda claimed the procedures were voluntary, but in reality, they were the result of well-organized coercion: “…women [were] hauled before mass rallies and harangued into consenting to an abortion.”

Unsurprisingly, the policy was extremely unpopular among the women and families subjected to it, and the regime did little to blunt the pain it inflicted. “It didn’t help,” Wang dryly notes, “that the abortion posses literally carted off women in hog cages.”

The PRC’s COVID containment strategy was similarly authoritarian. Despite officials praising themselves for initially managing the pandemic well, by early 2022, rising infections were creating growing anxiety among Politburo members in Beijing. The government eventually imposed some of the largest forced quarantines in modern history, confining most of Shanghai’s population, for example, to their homes from March onward.

The lockdown lasted roughly five months—in a metro area of 25 million people, three times the size of New York City. Officials failed to ensure that residents could maintain reliable access to food and clean water. Chaos and panic were widespread, with many forced to adopt digital hunting and gathering as a full-time strategy to supplement the unpredictable and insufficient official provisions.

Wang quotes the unexpectedly poetic—and horrifying—propaganda broadcast throughout the city via drones: “Please comply with COVID restrictions. Control your soul’s desire for freedom,” the floating loudspeakers intoned.

Compared with scenes like that, the 3,000-page environmental impact statements and NIMBYism of US lawyerly society hardly seem so bad. Certainly, if most Americans had to choose between enduring the persistent defects of the United States and living under a system designed by the Chinese Communist Party, they would almost certainly opt for slow trains and the Bill of Rights.

Also, as Wang describes in a chapter on dissatisfied PRC expats, plenty of Chinese nationals with the money and initiative to leave have done so. Some of them, in line with popular narratives, have come to the US to get STEM doctorates and apply for H1B engineering jobs, but plenty have also become beach bums in Thailand or slam poets, democracy activists, and bookshop proprietors in global outposts.

Ultimately, Wang’s equal-but-opposite framework shows the limits of its evenhandedness. While understandably not wanting to depict his family’s home country as evil and vicious, it is difficult to “both sides” the human rights atrocities of something like the One Child policy. Are fast trains and tall bridges as admirable a civilizational achievement as respect for freedom of speech, religion, and the press? Should we pretend that the PRC could have had all of the former if they had brought themselves to embrace the latter?

More prosaically, the “each should be more like the other” framing muddies the question when it comes to issues like housing affordability and supply, which Breakneck repeatedly identifies as a problem in the US today. Wang argues that US institutions of government haven’t built enough.

“American cities have broadly failed to build adequate housing or infrastructure,” he writes. But in a market economy with robust property rights, it is not the government’s job to build housing—that’s what D.R. Horton, Pulte Homes, hundreds of smaller companies, and thousands of work crews are for. The problem is that major American cities have made it nearly impossible for the private sector to actually do its job.

Our problem is not, as many industrial policy proponents claim, a “lack of state capacity,” but precisely the opposite. We have empowered governmental institutions far beyond their constitutional limits with too much capacity for spending, debt, obstruction, and veto. We are being strangled and impoverished by the state capacity we have now. Making San Francisco and New York more like the land of ghost cities and abandoned theme parks will not be an improvement. Does anyone really believe that the most indebted nation in the history of the world is being chiefly held back because its government agencies aren’t able to borrow even more money and saddle future taxpayers with even more debt?

Granted, Wang generally does an admirable job of holding Americans’ feet to the fire with respect to our own problems around productivity and growth, which are significant. We would, after all, not want to end up like the CCP itself, which is notoriously bad at processing bad news and dealing with dissent, leading to consequences ranging from farcical to nightmarish.

We also wouldn’t want our industrial strength to decline so far that we end up like Europe, which Wang dismisses as a “mausoleum economy.” Americans, both as citizens and policymakers, will need to step up to compete with the machinations of the Communist mandarins in Beijing. We should, however, be careful not to copy their worst policies along the way.

Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, who announced on Wednesday that he will be departing from his role in January, later replied to FBI Director Kash Patel, who gave him a glowing review.

‘Dan is the best partner I could’ve asked for in helping restore this FBI. He brought critical reforms to make the organization more efficient, led the successful Summer Heat op, served as the people’s voice for transparency, and delivered major breakthroughs in long unsolved cases like the pipe bomb investigation. And that’s only a small part of the work he went about every single day delivering for America,’ Patel said in a post on X.

‘He not only completed his mission – he far exceeded it. We will miss him but I’m thankful he accepted the call to serve. Our country is better and safer for it,’ Patel added.

Bongino replied, thanking Patel.

‘Thank you my friend, it’s been the honor of a lifetime to serve beside you,’ he wrote.

Bongino, a former Secret Service agent who stepped aside from his work hosting a popular show as a conservative commentator to join the FBI, will depart the federal law enforcement agency less than a year after his swearing-in ceremony, which occurred in March 2025.

Trump indicates FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino to leave the bureau.

Prior to Bongino’s announcement on Wednesday, President Donald Trump said, ‘Dan did a great job,’ noting that he thinks Bongino wants to return to his show.

Attorney General Pam Bondi shared Bongino’s announcement post, commenting, ‘Americans are safer because of @FBIDDBongino’s service. Thank you, Dan.’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In its manifesto for the 2024 general election, Britain’s Labour party listed “Five Missions to Rebuild Britain,” the first being: “Kickstart economic growth.” 

The party’s second budget since winning that election, delivered on November 26 by Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves, suggests it has already abandoned that mission—and offers a cautionary tale to other governments on what not to do.

Tax, Borrowing, and Spending Hikes 

Before the election, the Financial Times quoted Reeves admitting that, unlike previous incoming chancellors, she would not be able to claim she had “looked inside the books and realized things were even worse than they looked from the outside, giving a flimsy excuse for immediate tax rises or spending cuts.” She promised no increase in national insurance (NI, a payroll tax like Social Security), income tax, or Value Added Tax (VAT, a national sales tax).

Once elected, Reeves claimed she had, after all, looked inside the books—and discovered a £21.9 billion “black hole” in government finances. This supposedly arose from the previous Conservative government’s failure to spend enough, curious given that in 2023–2024, government spending as a share of GDP was higher than in all but seven of the previous 75 years.

Reeves now had her “excuse for immediate tax rises” in the October 2024 budget. Public sector workers were rewarded for supporting Labour with a £9.4 billion pay hike—42.9 percent of the alleged “black hole”—while the perpetually cash-hungry National Health Service received £1.5 billion. To fund this, Reeves raised taxes by £40 billion—the largest increase since 1993—including a two-percentage-point hike in employer NI contributions. She denied breaking her pre-election promise, noting that the employee share was unchanged, but this convinced no one. Overall, taxes were forecast to reach “a historic high” as a share of GDP.

Incredibly, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR, Britain’s version of the Congressional Budget Office) projected that Reeves’ budget would push government spending, taxes, borrowing, inflation, and interest rates up, while driving employment, disposable income, and GDP growth down.     

 The Economy Crashes

This is exactly what happened.

The unemployment rate is up from 4.3 percent in the three months to October 2024 to 5.0 percent in the three months to September 2025 and the number of “payrolled employees…fell by 117,000 (0.4%) between September 2024 and September 2025,” according to the Office for National Statistics. Over 40 percent of organizations reported reducing employee numbers in response to the payroll tax rise, according to last month’s Bank of England Decision Maker Panel survey, and one-third said likewise for a hike in the minimum wage.  

Growth of Total real pay, 2.4 percent in the three months to October 2024, is down to 0.7 percent in the three months to September 2025. Much of this is due to resurgent inflation. Annual growth in the Consumer Price Index is up from 2.3 percent in October 2024 to 3.6 percent in October 2025. “The government has undoubtedly added to, and extended, the inflation problem with its generous public pay settlements and minimum wage increases,” says Paul Dales, chief UK economist at Capital Economics. 

“The underlying fiscal outlook has also deteriorated since October,” the OBR noted in March, but it has continued deteriorating and, in November, it reported that “Borrowing in 2024-25 is £12 billion higher than estimated at the time of the March forecast.” Meanwhile, Martin Wolf notes for the Financial Times, “the yield on UK government bonds is one of the highest among all advanced economies.” Indeed, British government bond yields are now higher than those which brought Liz Truss down when she was said, by Reeves, to have “crashed our economy” in 2022. Kier Starmer’s government finds itself in the difficult position of having levels of borrowing and the cost of that borrowing increasing at the same time. Of course, it is a situation they chose to put the country in.    

More Taxes, Borrowing, and Spending Hikes 

Before the November 26 budget, Reeves—like some fiscal Hubble telescope—had discovered yet another “black hole.”

Closing it required raising “taxes by amounts rising to £26 billion in 2029–30, through freezing personal tax thresholds and a host of smaller measures,” the OBR noted. Freezing the thresholds will push 5.4 million additional people into the higher- and additional-rate tax bands by 2030, in what the Centre for Policy Studies calls the largest tax rise in at least the last 60 years. It breaks another of Reeves’ pre-election pledges—not to raise income taxes—and “brings the tax take to an all-time high of 38 percent of GDP in 2030–31,” the OBR reports.

But again, this wasn’t really about plugging some “black hole”—which Reeves may have lied about anyway—but about financing yet another expansion of government spending, mostly on welfare. “Budget policies increase spending in every year and by £11 billion in 2029–30,” the OBR reports, “primarily to pay for the summer reversals to welfare cuts and lift the two-child limit in universal credit.” Government spending will be higher as a share of GDP in 2030–31 than in 70 of the last 78 years.

Perhaps this could be justified if it were likely to “kickstart economic growth,” as Labour promised—but it won’t. The OBR revised real GDP growth for 2025 up from 1.0 percent to 1.5 percent but revised it downward for every year afterward owing to Reeves’ fiscal measures. Growth now averages 1.5 percent over the forecast, 0.3 percentage points slower than in March. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research estimates that fiscal policy will shave 0.4 percentage points off growth over the next five years. In October, real GDP shrank for the fourth month in a row. 

Lessons for the United States 

The United States shares Britain’s problems of yawning deficits and spiraling debts but, relatively speaking, it does not share its chronic inability to generate economic growth. Since 2008, GDP per capita has increased by 7.3 percent in real terms in Britain compared to 24.2 percent in the US, as Figure 1 shows. 

Figure 1: Real per capita GDP growth, 2008 = 100 (PPP, constant 2021 international $)  

Source: World Bank World Development Indicators   

This Labour government’s economic record illustrates the folly of trying to close budget gaps—driven in part by a vastly expanding welfare state—through payroll tax hikes and minimum wage increases, soon to be joined by higher income taxes. These measures are strangling economic growth in Britain and would do the same in the United States if attempted here. You cannot expand your welfare state by shrinking your economy.

To the extent Labour is still thinking about growth, it diagnoses the problem as one of insufficient demand—much like the Biden administration did with its misnamed Inflation Reduction Act. It isn’t. Britain’s growth problems are supply-side, and so are the remedies. The issue is not a lack of money to spend but a lack of things to spend it on. Perhaps the most important lesson for the United States and any other country facing this familiar cocktail of problems is simple: it’s the supply side, stupid.

In opposition, Labour and affiliated think tanks made noises suggesting they understood this. In office, Kier Starmer and Rachel Reeves have delivered Labour at its most neanderthal, providing policymakers elsewhere with a cautionary example of what not to do.

Uranium prices stayed fairly steady in 2025, but experts agree its long-term outlook is compelling,

Demand picked up from reactor restarts, new nuclear construction projects and growing interest in small modular reactors. Meanwhile, supply constraints continued as miners faced issues ramping up.

1. Trump Admin Pushes for Uranium Stockpile Boost to Secure Nuclear Power Future

Publish date: September 16, 2025

In September, the Trump administration zeroed in on its plan to reduce uranium reliance on Russia.

A report by Bloomberg outlined that Russia still accounts for approximately a quarter of the fuel used in America’s 94 nuclear reactors, which generate roughly 20 percent of the nation’s electricity.

Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said that the Department of Energy was working to reduce that dependence by rebuilding domestic uranium and enrichment supply chains.

The concept of a federal uranium reserve dates back to 2020, when the first Trump administration sought US$150 million to begin direct purchases from US producers, though Congress approved only half the amount.

Supply concerns sharpened after Russia briefly restricted uranium exports to the US in late 2024, underscoring Washington’s exposure to geopolitical risks.

A law signed in May 2024 requires US utilities to phase out Russian uranium by 2028, with future stockpile levels expected to rise in line with new reactor construction, including small modular reactors.

“We’re moving to a place — and we’re not there yet — to no longer use Russian enriched uranium,” Wright said, adding that the US needs significantly more domestic uranium and enrichment capacity.

2. China Achieves World’s First Thorium-to-Uranium Conversion

Publish date: November 6, 2025

China marked a milestone in 2025 by converting thorium into uranium inside a working molten salt reactor.

The experimental thorium molten salt reactor, developed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics in the Gobi Desert, is the first in the world to demonstrate stable thorium-based fission.

The reactor has been operating since reaching first criticality in October 2023 and has now produced data confirming the conversion of thorium-232 into uranium-233, a fissile material capable of sustaining a nuclear chain reaction.

Unlike conventional reactors that use solid uranium fuel rods, the system relies on liquid fuel dissolved in molten fluoride salt, allowing continuous refueling and stable heat generation without shutting down operations.

3. Uranium Energy’s Sweetwater Project Fast Tracked Under Trump Initiative

Publish date: August 6, 2025

In August, Uranium Energy’s (NYSEAMERICAN:UEC) Sweetwater uranium complex in Wyoming was designated for expedited permitting under the Trump administration’s FAST-41 initiative. The initiative is part of a broader strategy to revitalize the US nuclear fuel supply chain and reduce reliance on imports from geopolitical rivals.

The Sweetwater complex, located in Wyoming’s Great Divide Basin, is anchored by a fully licensed conventional uranium mill with a capacity of 3,000 metric tons per day and annual output of 4.1 million pounds.

The site previously included several permitted mines — Sweetwater (Red Desert), Big Eagle and Jackpot (Green Mountain) — and will now be evaluated for in-situ recovery mining, a lower-impact extraction technique.

The new permitting push will allow the company to modify existing approvals to incorporate in-situ recovery capabilities both within and beyond the current mine boundary, including on adjacent federal lands.

Sweetwater is the second uranium project to receive fast-track treatment under the policy, following Anfield Energy’s (TSXV:AEC,NASDAQ:AEC) Velvet-Wood project in Utah, which received the status in May.

4. Denison Mines Moves Closer to Federal Approval for Phoenix ISR Uranium Project

Publish date: February 28, 2025

In February, Denison Mines (TSX:DML,NYSEAMERICAN:DNN) announced that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) had scheduled public hearings for its Wheeler River uranium project in Saskatchewan.

The hearings were scheduled for October 8 and December 8 to 12, and according to the company would represent the final stage in the federal environmental assessment process. Denison holds an effective 95 percent interest in Wheeler River, the largest undeveloped uranium project in the Eastern Athabasca Basin. If approved, the company expects to begin site preparation and construction for its Phoenix in-situ recovery uranium project in early 2026.

In its Q3 report, released on November 6, Denison said the first part of the hearing was complete, and that it was expecting a decision from the CNSC in early 2026 after part two of the hearing.

5. Western Australia Reviews Uranium Mining Ban as Nuclear Energy Investment Grows

Publish date: October 2, 2025

Possibly the biggest uranium news in Australia in 2025 was Western Australia’s move to consider lifting its ban on new uranium licenses. In October, ahead of an energy-focused trade mission to China and Japan, Premier Roger Cook signaled the policy might be under review as part of broader strategic development considerations.

China, Western Australia’s largest trading partner, accounts for more than half of the state’s exports.

While the state’s three existing uranium mines continue to operate under previously approved permits, no new developments have been allowed since the ban was put in place in 2017. Cook emphasized that Western Australia intends to respect legal mining leases, while exploring future opportunities.

He also stressed that any change to the uranium policy would likely depend on a “significant shift” in global markets, while the state continues to monitor existing permit holders and potential future projects.

Securities Disclosure: I, Gabrielle de la Cruz, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The House passed a bill on Wednesday that would criminalize gender transition treatment for minors.

The measure, sponsored by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., passed by a 216-211 vote with some bipartisan support.

Reps. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, Vicente Gonzalez, D-Texas, and Don Davis, D-N.C., voted with most Republicans for the bill, while Reps. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., Gabe Evans, R-Colo., and Mike Kennedy, R-Utah, voted with most Democrats against the measure.

‘Children are NOT experiments. No more drugs. No more surgeries. No more permanent harm. We need to let kids grow up without manipulation from adults to make life-altering decisions! Congress must protect America’s children!!!’ Greene wrote on X ahead of the vote.

Greene had reached a deal with House leadership to bring her bill to the floor in exchange for her backing a rule last week to advance the National Defense Authorization Act.

The bill faces a significant hurdle to pass the Senate, as Republicans would need Democrat support to approve the legislation in the Upper Chamber.

The American Civil Liberties Union criticized the House passage, saying the measure ‘would have immediate and devastating effects on the lives and transgender youth and their families across the country.’

‘Politicians should never prohibit parents from doing what is best for their transgender children,’ Mike Zamore, National Director of Policy & Government Affairs at the ACLU, said in a statement. ‘These families often spend years considering how best to support their children, only to have ill-equipped politicians interfere by attempting to criminalize the health care that they, their children, and their doctors believe is necessary to allow their children to thrive.’

‘But this bill also creates an incredibly dangerous precedent far beyond the specific care at issue, criminalizing care based on ideology and placing Washington politicians between families and their doctors,’ he continued. ‘We strongly condemn the passage of this measure and urge members of the Senate to do everything in their power to prevent it from ever becoming law.’

Greene and Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, butted heads over the bill before its passage. The Georgia congresswoman, set to resign next month, had criticized Roy, who sits on the House Rules Committee, for introducing an amendment she argued would ‘gut the commerce clause.’

Roy’s amendment attempted to modify the bill to limit federal criminal liability under certain circumstances ‘by defining when prohibited conduct falls within federal jurisdiction,’ according to the Rules Committee.

But Greene contended that her bill ‘criminalizes ALL pediatric gender affirming care (transgender surgeries, puberty blockers, and hormones) NOT just those receiving federal funds and protects ALL children allowing them to grow up before they make permanent changes to their body that they can never undo!!!’

‘WTF is Chip Roy doing????? And this guy wants to be attorney general of Texas but refuses to protect children??!!!’ she wrote on X.

Roy responded that ‘the constitution matters & we should not bastardize it to use ‘interstate commerce’ to empower federal authorities.’

The Texas Republican, however, said in a statement on Wednesday that he would not offer the amendment ‘to avoid any confusion about how united Republicans are in protecting children from these grotesque procedures.’


This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

IRIS Metals Limited (ASX: IR1, “IRIS” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce it has executed a binding Heads of Agreement (HOA) with Finley Mining Inc for the exclusive right to farm-in to the Finley Basin Tungsten Project (Tungsten Project) located in Granite County, Montana, USA. This strategic farm-in opportunity further expands IRIS’ exposure to critical minerals beyond lithium, positioning the Company in a key tungsten district with historical production potential and untapped high-grade tungsten potential in a jurisdiction primed for revival under U.S. critical minerals policies.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • IRIS Metals has signed a binding Heads of Agreement with Finley Mining Inc and its shareholders, granting IRIS an exclusive right to farm-in to the high-grade Finley Basin Tungsten Project, located in Granite County, Montana, USA, subject to the execution of full form farm-in agreements to be negotiated in good faith on the agreed key terms within 40 business days (unless extended).
  • Due to the transaction materialising during a proposed capital raising program, the Company decided not to raise capital at this point in time, having regard to the strategic merits of the Tungsten acquisition.
  • Limited drilling undertaken by Union Carbide in the late 1970s–early 1980s resulted in a historical, non-JORC compliant tungsten reserve, 850,000 tons at an average grade of 0.68% WO₃1, which is considered high-grade relative to many global tungsten deposits.
  • The farm-in provides IRIS with exposure to tungsten, a critical mineral with strategic importance for defense, energy, and industrial applications, complementing IRIS’ existing critical minerals portfolio.
  • The farm-in structure allows IRIS to earn up to a 100% interest in the project through staged exploration expenditure of up to USD$2,000,000 over 4 years and delivery of a JORC- compliant Inferred Resource.
  • Exploration activities to commence at the Finley Basin Project in early 2026, focusing on resource definition, expansion, and development studies.
  • The transaction aligns with IRIS’ strategy to expand its critical minerals footprint in the USA, leveraging incentives for domestically sourced materials.
IRIS Metals Executive Chairman Peter Marks commented:

‘This binding agreement marks an exciting step for IRIS as we grow and diversify our critical minerals portfolio into tungsten, a vital component for the defense and technology industries. The Finley Basin Project offers significant upside with its prospective geology and location in a mining-friendly jurisdiction. Combined with our existing South Dakota portfolio, this positions IRIS to capitalise on significantly growing demand for US-sourced critical minerals.’

Montana Portfolio Expansion and Development

IRIS is actively evaluating additional critical mineral opportunities to complement its core South Dakota holdings. This farm-in to the Finley Basin Tungsten Project diversifies IRIS’ assets into tungsten, a critical mineral essential for military energetics, alloys, electronics, and renewable energy technologies, with U.S. demand surging amid defense initiatives and clean energy goals, yet vulnerable to geopolitical supply disruptions.

The expansion of IRIS’ mineral portfolio to tungsten was measured in approach with a number of projects reviewed and compared. The Company selected the Finley Basin Project due to its high-grade characteristics when compared other tungsten occurrences in the US2, historical exploration results, favourable jurisdiction, potential for expansion of known mineralisation, local milling capabilities, and reasonable proximity to the Company’s South Dakota operations.

IRIS’ primary focus remains on advancing its South Dakota lithium and rubidium projects toward near- term development under its “Hub & Spoke” strategy, which emphasises centralized processing across multiple sites.

Recent expansions, including the September 2025 acquisition of the Ingersoll Project from Rapid Critical Metals have significantly grown IRIS’ Black Hills footprint and private land holdings. IRIS is rapidly expanding mineral resources and progressing studies to support a multi-mine production model, with economic analysis targeted for 2026.

This strategic diversification importantly aligns with broader U.S. incentives for domestically sourced critical minerals and supports resilient supply chains under frameworks such as the Australia-U.S. Climate, Critical Minerals and Clean Energy Transformation Compact.

Click here for the full ASX Release

This post appeared first on investingnews.com